A U.S. Attack on Iran Would Show the Limits of China's Power
But as President Trump openly ponders deploying American forces to join Israel in attacking Iran, the limits of China's clout in the region are coming into focus.
China has much to lose from a runaway conflict. Half of the country's oil imports move in tankers through the Strait of Hormuz on Iran's southern coast. And Beijing has long counted on Tehran, its closest partner in the region, to push back against American influence.
But despite those strategic interests, China, which has little sway over the Trump administration, is unlikely to come to Iran's defense militarily, especially if the United States gets involved.
'The reality is they don't actually have the capability to insert Chinese forces to defend Iran's installations,' said Zack Cooper, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington. 'What they would prefer to do is very quietly provide some material support, some rhetorical support and maybe some humanitarian aid.'
Though China favors stability in the Middle East, it could also gain if the United States gets roped into a prolonged war there, which might divert American troops, ships and other military resources away from Asia.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fmr. Commerce Sec. Wilbur Ross explains Trump's BLS suspicions
Tariffs on countries like Japan and Switzerland remain in place as Trump pushes to improve the US trade balance. Wilbur Ross, former US Commerce Secretary, joins Opening Bid to discuss trade policy and prospects for a China deal. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Opening Bid. So what's next on the trade deal front? Want to welcome back onto Opening Bid, longtime investor Wilbur Ross. Mr. Ross served as the U.S. Commerce Secretary in President Trump's first term and has had a close relationship with the president for decades. Mr. Secretary, always nice to get some time with you. Appreciate you coming on here. Um, before we get into the topic of trade, I'm sure you've seen what's been going on, uh, with the president, uh, dismissing or firing the BLS commissioner. You know, you're a longtime investor. Do you still believe that the economic data coming out of the government? Well, I think what is a little bit suspicious about the most recent BLS data is it came out shortly after the Fed FOMC meeting where Trump was hoping to get rates reduced. And clearly, if the two big revisions had come out before the meeting, it would have been more likely that the FOMC would cut rates. And that's the second time that that sort of suspicious behavior occurred. Remember, just before the presidential election, they also had two months of very good, uh, labor results, and then a day or two after the election, they made a massive correction in both months. Again, had that been out before the election, it would have been helpful to Trump. So, I can understand why he would be suspicious at least of the timing as to whether the underlying data themselves are correct. I I would really have no way to know. But it is a little spooky that there were two recent events, big numbers, big changes, uh, that could have helped Trump, had they been more timely. Do you believe, uh, Mr. Secretary, uh, before we get into the trade, I, like the president, noted on Friday after the numbers were hit, that this data is rigged, not only the jobs data, but perhaps other data that the government provides? Well, I think that's just speculation. Um, I certainly never tried to influence the data that came out of the Bureau of Economic Analysis, which is part of Department of Commerce. We never had any problems like that during my term. But we also never had the kinds of events that I just described to you that naturally make one a little suspicious. Mr. Secretary, on the on the trade front, um, since we last talked, tariffs have stayed in place for many countries. I mentioned Japan at 15%, Switzerland now at 39%. Are tariffs the new normal for the duration of the president's, uh, second term here in your view? Or is there an opportunity to take these 15% tariff rates that that Japan is now paying and negotiate them down further? Well, I think the president has made clear that if there are further reductions by other countries, that he would take that into account. So, his target is really improving our balance of trade. That's one of his major objectives. And that can either be done by holding back the trade of foreign countries through tariffs or by everybody cutting it together. So, I think trade policy will continue to be a centerpiece of his administration, but that doesn't mean everything will be increasing. What gets, uh, a deal with China over the finish line? Well, China, as you know, is going to be having their big party Congress very, very shortly. And, as you may know, I've felt for some time that it was unlikely that they would make a radical change in policy before the Party Congress. They don't normally do that. And, uh, I think that Congress is either this week or next week. So, we should know pretty soon if anything different will come out of that. But certainly, the news that was out today about the critical materials, uh, being still restricted, that was not very encouraging. Uh, Mr. Secretary, the fact that China has not solidified a deal with the U.S. on trade, is it likely then that its tariff rate will be higher than what we saw, uh, from the likes of Japan and, of course, the European Union? Well, it's up pretty high right now. And it's, um, I I don't know whether he would make it even higher, but, you know, once you get to about 30 or so percent on the tariffs, it doesn't make too much difference if you go beyond because 30 odd percent is very, very hard for a country to absorb. And as a result, 30 or so percent is the demarcation between are you going to be doing trade with them or not. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Benchmark Keeps Buy Rating on Alibaba (BABA) Despite Challenges
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE:BABA) is one of the 12 Best Performing AI Stocks So Far in 2025. On July 21, Benchmark reiterated its Buy rating on Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE:BABA) with a price target of $176. Benchmark noted that the company could face near-term margin pressure because of investments in Food Delivery and Instant Retail services. This led the firm to reduce its Q1 fiscal 2026 and fiscal year 2026 earnings estimates. Christopher Penler / Benchmark sees this increase in investment by Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE:BABA) as defensive, to respond to Inc. (JD) entering the market and making some early market share gains in these segments. Despite the near-term pressure, the firm pointed out strategic benefits for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE:BABA) as it can improve and reposition its core e-commerce strategy with a more integrated retail ecosystem approach, which could help the company grow in the long run. Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE:BABA) is a Chinese multinational technology company focused on e-commerce, retail, AI, digital media and entertainment, cloud, and technology. While we acknowledge the potential of BABA as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 12 Best Performing Stocks in the Last 6 Months and 12 Most Owned Stocks by Hedge Funds So Far in 2025. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kaynes Tech unit to invest $570 million in India's Tamil Nadu state
(Reuters) -Kaynes Technology India said on Monday its unit will invest roughly 49.95 billion rupees ($570.40 million) over the next six years in the southern state of Tamil Nadu. Kaynes Circuits India Pvt Ltd's investment will fund capacity additions and also set-up new projects in the state, the company said. ($1 = 87.5700 Indian rupees) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
