
Taiwan to attend Nagasaki peace ceremony for the first time
NAGASAKI--Taiwan for the first time will attend Nagasaki's annual Peace Memorial Ceremony on Aug. 9 to mark the 80th anniversary of the city's atomic bombing.
Mayor Shiro Suzuki told reporters on July 5 that Taiwan had expressed interest in taking part and that the city had responded affirmatively.
Historically, Nagasaki has not invited Taiwan to the ceremony due to Japan's lack of formal diplomatic relations with the island.
This year's anniversary of the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki stands as a powerful symbol of the horrors of nuclear warfare.
Officials here explained that formal invitations to the ceremony are typically based on the Foreign Ministry's list of diplomatic missions in Japan.
But starting this year, even if a country does not have an embassy in Japan, the city will still send a less formal notification of the event. This applies if the country has representation at the United Nations, as is the case with North Korea, for example.
Because Taiwan falls outside these categories, Nagasaki officials did not initially plan to invite the self-ruled island.
However, the city reconsidered its policy after Taipei expressed disappointment.
The decision reflects a broader trend this year of extending invitations to countries that had been excluded in recent years. This includes Russia, Belarus and Israel, which were previously left off the guest list due to the wars in Ukraine and Gaza.
Hiroshima, which hosts its own peace ceremony on Aug. 6, similarly confirmed Taiwan's interest and sent an invitation back in May.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Japan Today
2 hours ago
- Japan Today
Cambodia calls for ceasefire with Thailand after deadly clashes
Ongoing border clashes between Thailand and Cambodia left more than a dozen dead and damaged structures, including this pagoda in Cambodia By Gregory WALTON, with AFP bureaus in Thailand and Cambodia Cambodia wants an "immediate ceasefire" with Thailand, the country's envoy to the United Nations said Friday, after the neighbors traded deadly strikes for a second day, with Bangkok also signaling an openness to talks. A long-running border dispute erupted into intense fighting with jets, artillery, tanks and ground troops on Thursday, prompting the UN Security Council to hold an emergency meeting on the crisis Friday. "Cambodia asked for an immediate ceasefire -- unconditionally -- and we also call for the peaceful solution of the dispute," said Phnom Penh's UN ambassador Chhea Keo following a closed meeting of the Council attended by Cambodia and Thailand. A steady thump of artillery strikes could be heard from the Cambodian side of the border Friday, where the province of Oddar Meanchey reported one civilian -- a 70-year-old man -- had been killed and five more wounded. More than 138,000 people have been evacuated from Thailand's border regions, its health ministry said, reporting 15 fatalities -- 14 civilians and a soldier -- with a further 46 wounded, including 15 troops. Fighting resumed in three areas around 4 am on Friday (2100 GMT Thursday), the Thai army said, with Cambodian forces firing heavy weapons, field artillery, and BM-21 rocket systems, and Thai troops responding "with appropriate supporting fire." Thai Foreign Ministry Spokesman Nikorndej Balankura told AFP that fighting had begun to ease off by Friday afternoon, however, adding that Bangkok was open to talks, possibly aided by Malaysia. "We are ready, if Cambodia would like to settle this matter via diplomatic channels, bilaterally, or even through Malaysia, we are ready to do that. But so far we have not had any response," Nikorndej told AFP, speaking before the UN meeting had been held. Malaysia currently holds the chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) regional bloc, of which Thailand and Cambodia are both members. Earlier, acting Thai Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai had warned that if the situation escalated, "it could develop into war." "For now, it remains limited to clashes," he told reporters in Bangkok. Ongoing dispute Both sides blamed each other for firing first, while Thailand accused Cambodia of targeting civilian infrastructure, including a hospital hit by shells and a petrol station hit by at least one rocket. At the UN, Cambodia's envoy questioned Thailand's assertion that his country, which is smaller and less militarily developed than its neighbor, had initiated the conflict. "(The Security Council) called for both parties to (show) maximum restraint and resort to a diplomatic solution. That is what we are calling for as well," said Chhea Keo. None of the other attendees of the UNSC meeting spoke to reporters. The fighting marks a dramatic escalation in a long-running dispute between the neighbors -- both popular destinations for millions of foreign tourists -- over their shared 800-kilometer (500-mile) border. Dozens of kilometers in several areas are contested and fighting broke out between 2008 and 2011, leaving at least 28 people dead and tens of thousands displaced. A UN court ruling in 2013 settled the matter for over a decade, but the current crisis erupted in May when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a new clash. 'We are scared' Fighting on Thursday was focused on six locations, according to the Thai army, including around two ancient temples. Ground troops backed up by tanks battled for control of territory, while Cambodia fired rockets and shells into Thailand and the Thais scrambled F-16 jets to hit military targets across the border. In the Cambodian town of Samraong, 20 kilometers (12 miles) from the border, AFP journalists saw families speeding away in vehicles with their children and belongings as gunfire erupted. "I live very close to the border. We are scared," Pro Bak, 41, told AFP. He was taking his wife and children to a Buddhist temple to seek refuge. © 2025 AFP


The Diplomat
3 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Why Is Taiwan Supporting an Illegal Israeli Settlement in the Occupied West Bank?
Taiwan's decision to donate to a medical facility located in the illegal Israeli settlement of Sha'ar Binyamin in the occupied West Bank earlier this month sparked a firestorm of controversy. It marked the first time since late 2023 that a foreign state has made such a public display of providing direct financial support for a project inside an illegal Israeli settlement in the occupied West Bank. At first glance, Taiwan's aid may appear purely humanitarian. In March and May 2024, Taiwan's representative office in Israel donated NT$15.9 million (approximately US$500,000) to support medical patrols in Israeli cities and to provide basic humanitarian assistance – such as food, water, and shelter – through an NGO operating in Gaza. However, more recently, Taiwan became the first foreign government to provide funding for a medical center located within an illegal Israeli settlement in the occupied West Bank. A ceremonial event marking the donation took place in July 2025, attended by senior Israeli officials and Taiwan's representative in Israel who, by her very visit to an illegal settlement in the occupied West Bank, effectively recognized Israel's unlawful occupation. At a press conference on July 22, a spokesperson for Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that 'discussions about the donation were still ongoing and centered solely on humanitarian and medical cooperation.' The West Bank, where the settlement regional council of Binyamin is located, is an occupied territory under international law. The establishment and expansion of Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) are illegal under the Fourth Geneva Convention, which among other provisions protects civilian populations in occupied territory. These settlements thus constitute a war crime. The illegality of Israeli settlements has been reiterated by the United Nations, the European Union, and numerous international NGOs, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. Most notably, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which in 2004 already found that Israeli settlements are contrary to the Fourth Geneva Convention, affirmed the illegality of Israel's occupation of the OPT in its July 2024 advisory opinion. The ICJ concluded that: [A]ll States are under an obligation not to recognize as legal the situation arising from the unlawful presence of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. They are also under an obligation not to render aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by Israel's illegal presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Support or aid to any infrastructure projects in the settlements, even under the guise of medical donations, contributes to the maintenance and entrenchment of unlawful Israeli occupation. Any support provided to Israeli settlements, including medical care, should also be seen in the context of Israel's decades-long systematic and institutionalized discrimination against Palestinians, including in access to healthcare, which has resulted in stark health inequalities between Palestinians and Israelis. Compounding this inequality are Israel's arbitrary restrictions on Palestinian freedom of movement, ability to access clinics and adequate healthcare. Just in recent months, Israeli authorities have repeatedly obstructed West Bank Palestinians' access to life-saving healthcare, at times with lethal consequences. When Taiwan chooses to fund projects that exclusively serve Israeli settlers – Palestinians are barred from living in Israeli settlements – it contributes to legitimizing and maintaining Israel's system of apartheid. This is not only a violation of international law, but also undermines Taiwan's own image as a democracy rooted in human rights and equality. The grim reality on the ground sharply contrasts with the statements of Taiwan's representative in Israel, Abby Ya-Ping Lee. At the event celebrating the medical center in the settlement, Lee said: 'We are pleased to expand this cooperation to the regional level, through initial work with a regional council to save lives and to ensure the right to health regardless of ethnicity, age, or gender.' The very settlement enterprise that this donation supports and empowers is rooted in national, racial and ethnic domination over Palestinians. Israeli authorities continue to systematically and deliberately destroy or damage the healthcare sector in Gaza and deny or obstruct the entry of essential medical provisions. Israel also adopts unlawful measures that result in the erosion of the Palestinian healthcare system in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem. Taiwan must take a principled and rights-based approach – which would look like supporting Gaza's decimated healthcare system and Palestinian healthcare facilities facing severe challenges in the West Bank, rather than investing in infrastructure serving illegal settlements. Donations, even in the guise of humanitarian aid, to illegal Israeli settlements in the OPT only serve to make them sustainable, thus entrenching a violation of international law. Taiwan has long sought greater international recognition and has positioned itself as a defender of liberal values, democratic governance, and global solidarity. These aspirations should extend to its foreign aid strategy. If Taiwan is to be seen as a responsible and genuine global actor, it must ensure that its humanitarian assistance – especially in conflict zones – is neutral, impartial, transparent, and consistent with international legal norms. In conflict zones where aid is often politicized, humanitarian neutrality is not a luxury – it is a mandatory and an international obligation. Taiwan's well-intentioned support can have meaningful impact, but only if it is grounded in impartiality and a commitment to upholding international law. This is not just about diplomacy; it is about ensuring that Taiwan's actions abroad reflect the values it upholds at home and ensuring that it does not engage in actions that could risk Taiwan being complicit in Israel's violations of international law.

Nikkei Asia
21 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
France will recognize Palestinian state in September, Macron says
PARIS/WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- France intends to recognize a Palestinian state in September at the United Nations General Assembly, President Emmanuel Macron said on Thursday in hopes of bringing peace to the region, drawing angry rebukes from Israel and the United States. Macron, who unveiled the decision on X, published a letter sent to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas confirming France's intention to press ahead with Palestinian recognition and work to convince other partners to follow suit. "True to its historic commitment to a just and lasting peace in the Middle East, I have decided that France will recognize the state of Palestine," Macron said. "I will make this solemn announcement at the United Nations General Assembly next September." Home to Europe's largest Jewish and Muslim communities, France will become the first major Western country to recognize a Palestinian state, potentially fueling a movement so far dominated by smaller nations generally more critical of Israel. The news sparked anger in Israel and Washington. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned the decision by one of Israel's closest allies and a G7 member, saying such a move "rewards terror and risks creating another Iranian proxy." In a post on X, he added, "A Palestinian state in these conditions would be a launch pad to annihilate Israel -- not to live in peace beside it. "Let's be clear: the Palestinians do not seek a state alongside Israel; they seek a state instead of Israel." Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz described the move as "a disgrace and a surrender to terrorism," adding that Israel would not allow the establishment of a "Palestinian entity that would harm our security, endanger our existence." In response, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the United States "strongly rejects (Macron's) plan to recognize a Palestinian state at the UN general assembly." In a post on X, he said, "This reckless decision only serves Hamas propaganda and sets back peace. It is a slap in the face to the victims of October 7th." Earlier, Canada also pressed Israel to seek peace, with Prime Minister Mark Carney condemning its "failure to prevent the rapidly deteriorating humanitarian disaster in Gaza" and reiterating support for a two-state solution. Carney also accused Israel of violating international law over the blocking of Canadian-funded aid to civilians in the war-torn Palestinian enclave. "Canada calls on all sides to negotiate an immediate ceasefire in good faith," he added. "We reiterate our calls for Hamas to immediately release all the hostages, and for the Israeli government to respect the territorial integrity of the West Bank and Gaza." In a diplomatic cable in June, the United States said it opposed steps to unilaterally recognize a Palestinian state, even saying it could go against U.S. foreign policy interests and draw consequences. Also in June, Washington's ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, said he did not think an independent Palestinian state remained a U.S. foreign policy goal. President Donald Trump has himself expressed doubts about a two-state solution, proposing a U.S. takeover of Gaza in February that was condemned by rights groups, Arab states, Palestinians and the U.N. as a proposal of "ethnic cleansing." Macron had been leaning toward recognizing a Palestinian state for months as part of a bid to keep the idea of a two-state solution alive, despite the pressure not to do so. French officials initially weighed up the move ahead of a United Nations conference, which France and Saudi Arabia had planned to co-host in June to lay out parameters for a roadmap to a Palestinian state, while ensuring Israel's security. The conference was postponed under U.S. pressure and after the 12-day Israel-Iran air war began, during which the closure of regional airspace made it hard for representatives of some Arab states to attend. It was rescheduled and downgraded to a ministerial event set for July 28 and July 29, with a second event taking place with heads of state and government on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly in September. The decision to make the announcement ahead of next week's conference aimed to give the French team at the United Nations a framework to work with other countries that are also considering recognizing a Palestinian state or have misgivings in doing so. Diplomats say Macron has faced resistance from allies such as Britain and Canada over his push for the recognition of a Palestinian state. About 40 foreign ministers will be in New York next week. Israeli officials have spent months lobbying to prevent what some have called "a nuclear bomb" for bilateral ties. Sources familiar with the matter say Israel's warnings to France have ranged from scaling back intelligence sharing to complicating Paris' regional initiatives -- even hinting at possible annexation of parts of the West Bank. Israel has been waging a devastating war in Gaza since the Palestinian militant group Hamas' deadly attack on Israel in October 2023. It says recognizing a Palestinian state now would be equivalent to rewarding Hamas. Thanking France, Palestinian Authority Vice President Hussein Al Sheikh said on X that Macron's decision reflected "France's commitment to international law and its support for the Palestinian people's rights to self-determination and the establishment of our independent state."