Trump must not TACO his way out of helping Ukraine
To this point, Putin has calculated that time is his ally; he could wait out the West's patience with a grinding, expensive war of attrition. Trump is trying to change Putin's assumptions, forcing substantive negotiations on a deadline by brandishing an economic weapon — secondary sanctions — the United States has hesitated to use. Yet Moscow might see Trump's latest move as the opening bid in a negotiation or otherwise discount the likelihood that the United States will follow through. 'In another six months or so, the pendulum could swing back the other way,' Sergey Poletaev, an analyst at the Russian analytical platform Vatfor, told NPR.
For the sake of Ukraine specifically and American credibility generally, Trump cannot back down.
Trump is clearly frustrated with Putin. On Monday, he described having 'pleasant' and 'lovely' telephone conversations with the Russian president, only to find out soon after that Russian missiles and drones were pulverizing yet another Ukrainian city. Whether that frustration manifests in strong, sustained U.S. support for Ukraine, in weapons shipments and other measures, will determine how this conflict finally ends.
Trump was typically vague in describing which actual weapons systems would be shipped to Ukraine, other than confirming that Patriot batteries and missiles, key air defense systems, would be among the hardware. This is crucial, as Russia in recent weeks has stepped up its devastating aerial bombardment as part of its much-telegraphed summer offensive, even as ground operations seem mired in a bloody stalemate.
Ukraine also needs more offensive weapons to hit targets behind the front line. This is where the previous Biden administration moved too timidly, and too late, always fearing that more direct Ukrainian attacks on Russia might ignite a broader regional conflict against a nuclear power. (They didn't.) The Trump administration should continue to follow the Biden team's belated policy to let the Ukrainians use the Army Tactical Missile System, or ATACMS, to fire long-range ballistic missiles to strike targets deep inside Russia.
Meanwhile, sanctioning Russia's ongoing trading partners would be a powerful tool to help bring Putin to the negotiating table. This is the path being pursued by a bipartisan group in Congress, which is proposing even higher sanctions of up to 500 percent on goods from countries that continue to buy Russian oil, gas, uranium and other exports. These sanctions would particularly hit China and India, which buy the bulk of Russia's oil.
But what if Putin refuses to make peace and sticks with his maximalist demands for a dismembered Ukraine under Russia's thumb? Is Trump ready to ramp up the pressure? Will he sustain the arms shipments once the stockpiles run dry? Will he seize billions of dollars in frozen Russian assets? Will he try to crack down on the shadow tanker fleet that moves Russian oil? And will he follow through on his secondary sanctions threat, with its potentially vast implications for trade with countries such as China and India?
The war against Ukraine has already persisted for far too long, with horrific casualty tolls on both sides. It will only end when Putin realizes he has nothing more to gain, and much more to lose, the longer it goes on. The arms shipments to Ukraine might bring that realization closer. More pressure can bring that day closer still. Now that Trump has issued his ultimatum, he needs to make clear to Putin he means what he says.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
16 minutes ago
- Washington Post
UN council authorizes continuing vigilance of attacks by Yemen's Houthi rebels on Red Sea shipping
UNITED NATIONS — The U.N. Security Council on Tuesday authorized continued reporting on attacks on ships in the Red Sea by Yemen's Houthi rebels , who have defied its previous demands to immediately halt all such attacks. The vote in the 15-member council was 12-0 with Russia, China and Algeria abstaining because of attacks against Yemen in violation of its sovereignty, a clear reference to U.S. airstrikes against the Houthis who control most of northern Yemen. The Trump administration has carried out the strikes because of the group's attacks on shipping in the Red Sea, a crucial global trade route, and on close ally Israel.


Bloomberg
20 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
President Trump Touts US, Indonesia Trade Deal
President Donald Trump says he reached a deal with Indonesia that will tariff its goods at 19%. Trump also says that Indonesia agreed to erase all duties on US imports and the Southeast Asian nation will buy more than $19 billion of American products. Bloomberg's Claire Jiao reports from Jakarta on the latest. (Source: Bloomberg)


Digital Trends
20 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
WeTransfer backlash highlights need for smarter AI practices
A recent update to WeTransfer's terms of service caused consternation after some of its customers feared that it meant content from files uploaded to the popular file-sharing service would automatically be used to train AI models. But the Netherlands-based company insisted on Tuesday that this is not the case, saying in a statement that it 'does not sell user content to third parties,' and nor does it 'use AI in connection with customer content.' Recommended Videos The updated terms of service that prompted the criticism was sent to its customers earlier this month and marked as going into effect on August 8, 2025. The text stated that WeTransfer could use content shared on its service for purposes 'including to improve performance of machine learning models that enhance our content moderation process.' The new wording was widely interpreted as granting WeTransfer the right to use customer-uploaded files to train AI models. Many users reacting strongly, accusing WeTransfer of giving itself the right to share or sell customer content to AI companies hungry for fresh data to train their AI technologies. On Tuesday, WeTransfer tried to reassure its users by saying in a statement that 'your content is always your content,' and that 'we don't use machine learning or any form of AI to process content shared via WeTransfer.' It continued: 'The passage that caught most people's eye was initially updated to include the possibility of using AI to improve content moderation and further enhance our measures to prevent the distribution of illegal or harmful content on the WeTransfer platform. Such a feature hasn't been built or used in practice, but it was under consideration for the future.' It said that it had removed the mention of machine learning from its terms, 'as it's not something WeTransfer uses in connection with customer content and may have caused some apprehension.' The revised section now states: 'You hereby grant us a royalty-free license to use your Content for the purposes of operating, developing, and improving the Service, all in accordance with our Privacy & Cookie Policy.' The controversial episode highlights the growing sensitivity among people toward having their content used for AI model training. Artists, musicians, and writers, for example, have been protesting strongly against AI companies using their work to train AI models without asking for permission or offering compensation. The troubling episode is also a lesson for other online companies to be clearer about how they're handling user data, as misunderstandings over AI can, as we've seen, quickly escalate into a major backlash.