Canada rescinds digital services tax to advance stalled US trade talks
OTTAWA: Canada scrapped its digital services tax targeting U.S. technology firms late on Sunday, just hours before it was due to take effect, in a bid to advance stalled trade negotiations with the United States.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump will resume trade negotiations in order to agree on a deal by July 21, Canada's finance ministry said in a statement.
Trump abruptly called off trade talks on Friday over the tax targeting U.S. technology firms, saying that it was a 'blatant attack.'
He reiterated his comments on Sunday, pledging to set a new tariff rate on Canadian goods within the next week, which threatened to push U.S.-Canada relations back into chaos after a period of relative calm.
The breakdown in trade talks comes after the two leaders met at the G7 in mid-June and Carney said they had agreed to wrap up a new economic agreement within 30 days.
Canada's planned digital tax was 3% of the digital services revenue a firm takes in from Canadian users above $20 million in a calendar year, and payments were to be retroactive to 2022.
It would have impacted U.S. technology firms, including Amazon, Meta, Alphabet's Google and Apple, among others.
Monday collection will be halted, the Canada's finance ministry statement said, and Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne will bring forward legislation to rescind the Digital Services Tax Act.
'The DST was announced in 2020 to address the fact that many large technology companies operating in Canada may not otherwise pay tax on revenues generated from Canadians,' the statement said. 'Canada's preference has always been a multilateral agreement related to digital services taxation.'
Stocks index futures rose after the news the digital tax will be rescinded and the bullish sentiment spilled over into Asian markets.
Canada is the second-largest U.S. trading partner after Mexico, and the largest buyer of U.S exports. It bought $349.4 billion of U.S. goods last year and exported $412.7 billion to the U.S., according to U.S. Census Bureau data.
The Biden administration had requested trade dispute settlement consultations over the tax in 2024, saying it was inconsistent with Canada's North American trade deal obligations.
Canada had escaped Trump's broad tariffs imposed in April but faces 50% duties on steel and aluminum.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
33 minutes ago
- The Star
How do you teach computer science in the AI era?
Carnegie Mellon University has a well-earned reputation as one of the nation's top schools for computer science. Its graduates go on to work at big tech companies, startups and research labs worldwide. Still, for all its past success, the department's faculty is planning a retreat this summer to rethink what the school should be teaching to adapt to the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence. The technology has 'really shaken computer science education', said Thomas Cortina, a professor and an associate dean of the university's undergraduate programs. Computer science, more than any other field of study, is being challenged by generative AI. The AI technology behind chatbots such as ChatGPT, which can write essays and answer questions with humanlike fluency, is making inroads across academia. But AI is coming fastest and most forcefully to computer science, which emphasises writing code, the language of computers. Big tech companies and startups have introduced AI assistants that can generate code and are rapidly becoming more capable. And in January, Mark Zuckerberg, Meta's CEO, predicted that AI technology would effectively match the performance of a midlevel software engineer sometime this year. Computer science programs at universities across the country are now scrambling to understand the implications of the technological transformation, grappling with what to keep teaching in the AI era. Ideas range from less emphasis on mastering programming languages to focusing on hybrid courses designed to inject computing into every profession, as educators ponder what the tech jobs of the future will look like in an AI economy. 'We're seeing the tip of the AI tsunami,' said Jeannette Wing, a computer science professor and executive vice president of research at Columbia University. Heightening the sense of urgency is a tech job market that has tightened in recent years. Computer science graduates are finding that job offers, once plentiful, are often scarce. Tech companies are relying more on AI for some aspects of coding, eliminating some entry-level work. Some educators now believe the discipline could broaden to become more like a liberal arts degree, with a greater emphasis on critical thinking and communication skills. The National Science Foundation is funding a program, Level Up AI, to bring together university and community college educators and researchers to move toward a shared vision of the essentials of AI education. The 18-month project, run by the Computing Research Association, a research and education nonprofit, in partnership with New Mexico State University, is organising conferences and roundtables and producing white papers to share resources and best practices. The NSF-backed initiative was created because of 'a sense of urgency that we need a lot more computing students – and more people – who know about AI in the workforce,' said Mary Lou Maher, a computer scientist and a director of the Computing Research Association. The future of computer science education, Maher said, is likely to focus less on coding and more on computational thinking and AI literacy. Computational thinking involves breaking down problems into smaller tasks, developing step-by-step solutions and using data to reach evidence-based conclusions. AI literacy is an understanding – at varying depths for students at different levels – of how AI works, how to use it responsibly and how it is affecting society. Nurturing informed skepticism, she said, should be a goal. At Carnegie Mellon, as faculty members prepare for their gathering, Cortina said his view was that the coursework should include instruction in the traditional basics of computing and AI principles, followed by plenty of hands-on experience designing software using the new tools. 'We think that's where it's going,' he said. 'But do we need a more profound change in the curriculum?' Currently, individual computer science professors choose whether to allow students to use AI. Last year, Carnegie Mellon endorsed using AI for introductory courses. Initially, Cortina said, many students regarded AI as a 'magic bullet' to quickly complete homework assignments that involved writing programs. 'But they didn't understand half of what the code was,' he said, leading many to realize the value of knowing how to write and debug code themselves. 'The students are resetting.' That's true for many computer science students embracing the new AI tools, with some reservations. They say they use AI for building initial prototype programs, for checking for errors in code and as a digital tutor to answer questions. But they are reluctant to rely on it too much, fearing it dulls their computing acumen. Many students say they send out 100 to 200 applications for summer internships and first jobs. Connor Drake, who will be a senior next fall at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, counts himself lucky, having scored an interview after submitting only 30 applications. He was offered a job as a cybersecurity intern this summer for Duke Energy, a large utility company, in Charlotte. 'A computer science degree used to be a golden ticket to the promised land of jobs,' Drake, 22, said. 'That's no longer the case.' Drake's personal AI-defense strategy is to expand his skill set. In addition to his computer science major, he has minored in political science with a specialty in security and intelligence studies – a field where his expertise in cybersecurity could well be applied. He is president of a university cybersecurity club and has served in student government. Drake, like other computer science students, has been forced to adjust to an increasingly tough tech job market. Several factors, labor experts say, are at work. Big tech companies, in particular, have curbed their hiring for the past few years, a sharp pullback from the pandemic-era boom years. The exception is the hectic recruiting of a relatively small number of the most coveted AI experts, who are being offered lucrative pay packages. But most technology workers do not work for tech companies. Overall employment for workers in tech occupations had generally held up until recently – down 6% since February, according to government statistics. Employers have sent a sharper signal with a significant pullback in tech job listings. In the past three years, there has been a 65% drop from companies seeking workers with two years of experience or less, according to an analysis by CompTIA, a technology research and education organization. The decline in listings for tech workers with all levels of experience is down 58%. 'We're mainly seeing a postpandemic unwinding of hiring and the impact of the current economic uncertainty,' said Tim Herbert, chief research officer at CompTIA. 'We don't really have a clear AI effect yet.' While the road ahead for computer science education may be uncertain, the market for AI-assisted software is poised for growth, experts say. AI is a productivity tool, and every new wave of computing – the personal computer, the internet, the smartphone – has increased the demand for software and for programmers. This time, they say, the result may be a burst of technology democratization as chatbot-style tools are used by people in fields from medicine to marketing to create their own programs, tailored for their industry, fed by industry-specific data sets. 'The growth in software engineering jobs may decline, but the total number of people involved in programming will increase,' said Alex Aiken, a professor of computer science at Stanford University. – ©2025 The New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
The Star
42 minutes ago
- The Star
Japan says it won't sacrifice farm sector after Trump complains about rice
This photo taken on June 4, 2025 shows a farmer preparing a transplanter vehicle before planting rice seedlings at a farm in the town of Sanjo, Niigata prefecture in northern Japan. Japan has been grappling with a doubling in rice prices due partly to a weather-driven poor-quality harvest in 2023 that caused a shortage last year. - AFP TOKYO: Japan will not sacrifice the agricultural sector as part of its tariff negotiations with the United States, its top government spokesperson said on Tuesday (July 1), after President Donald Trump complained that its ally was not importing American rice. Trump wrote in a social media post that Japan's reluctance to import American-grown rice was a sign that countries have become "spoiled with respect to the United States of America." "I have great respect for Japan, they won't take our RICE, and yet they have a massive rice shortage," he wrote on Truth Social. Japan has been grappling with a doubling in rice prices due partly to a weather-driven poor-quality harvest in 2023 that caused a shortage last year. The government has released almost its entire stock of emergency rice since March in an effort to bring prices down. "We are not thinking about doing anything that would sacrifice the farm sector," Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi told a press conference. He, as well as farm minister Shinjiro Koizumi, declined to comment directly on Trump's post. Koizumi told a separate press conference that his ministry would continue to work with various ministries towards maximising Japan's national interests. Under a "minimum access" agreement within the World Trade Organisation, Japan has an 770,000-tonne tariff-free import quota for rice, of which up to 100,000 tonnes is for staple rice. Beyond this, rice imports are subject to a levy of 341 yen (US$2.37) per kilogramme. To continue in its efforts to lower domestic prices, the government had brought forward a tender for the first 30,000 tonnes of tariff-free staple rice imports earmarked for this year earlier than the usual auction in September. Results of that tender, held on June 27, showed applications for 81,853 tonnes, or nearly three times as much as was auctioned. Of the total tendered, 25,541 tonnes was from the US, followed by 1,500 tonnes from Australia and 708 tonnes from Thailand. - Reuters
The Star
42 minutes ago
- The Star
Trump floats Japan tariff, Hassett says deals after July 4
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump threatened to impose a fresh tariff level on Japan, while his top economic adviser said the White House aims to finalise deals with partners after the July 4 holiday. Trump's latest round of brinkmanship with Tokyo on Monday (June 30) comes just over a week before a July 9 deadline for higher tariffs to restart for dozens of trading partners, including Japan. He cited what he said was the country's unwillingness to accept US rice exports. "They won't take our RICE, and yet they have a massive rice shortage,' Trump posted on social media. "In other words, we'll just be sending them a letter, and we love having them as a Trading Partner for many years to come.' Trump for weeks has sought to exert leverage with negotiating partners ahead of the deadline, vowing to cut short talks with those he sees as being difficult and instead send them letters setting tariff rates. The president paused his country-by-country tariffs in April to allow time for negotiations. Since then, he and his team have repeatedly pledged that a slate of deals was weeks away. But to date, the only two agreements announced have been broad frameworks with China and the UK. Meanwhile, White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett signaled Monday that agreements with several governments would be announced after US Independence Day. He said the administration's focus has been on passing Trump's massive tax and spending bill through Congress before the holiday. "It might be that people take an hour or two off on the Fourth to watch the fireworks and then we'll get back, and we're going to start to announce the frameworks,' Hassett said Monday on Fox Business. "We're expecting to meet with the president and explain the frameworks that have been negotiated and see if he approves or not.' Talks between the US and Japan are expected to continue despite Trump's latest threat, according to Hassett. "Nothing is over. I know what he just posted, but there'll still be discussions right up to the end,' he told reporters. Stocks in Tokyo fell shortly after the market opened Tuesday morning, with the Topix benchmark down as much as 0.7 per cent as traders digested the latest Trump comments. The rice supply shortage that the US president cited has frustrated Japanese consumers already unhappy about an ongoing cost-of-living crunch. Rice prices have doubled in the last year, prompting Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's government to release emergency reserves into the market and sideline conventional distribution channels. While that move may stop voter anger boiling over, it has upset the farming industry, which is a long-time voting bloc for the ruling party. Expanding imports of American rice might help ease the imbalance in the market, but that move would increase angst in the domestic farming sector, especially if their interests are seen to be sacrificed to secure a lowering of tariffs for the car industry. Ishiba may want to hold off making any concessions that affect that segment of the population ahead of an upper house election on July 20. This is not the first time the Trump administration has singled out Japan's protection of its rice industry as unfair. In March, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt accused Japan of setting tariffs on rice at 700 per cent, a claim the Japanese government has said is inaccurate. Trump's threats to cut off talks with nations have sometimes seen trading partners retreat on policies that drew his ire, leading to resumed negotiations. The president said Friday he was ending all trade talks with Canada in retaliation for its digital-services tax. But after Ottawa withdrew that tax, Hassett told reporters Monday there had been "lots of progress in our discussions with Canada.' Japan is one of the most significant US trading partners, putting it in a category of economies that Trump administration officials has said are in line for deals - rather than imposed rates. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said last week that the administration would finalise a slate of trade deals with roughly ten of the "top' US partners, while others would receive letters setting duty levels. US and Japanese officials have yet to resolve thorny issues surrounding tariff levels and trade barriers in talks that have stretched on for months. Japan has pressed for relief from Trump's 25 per cent auto tariffs, saying they are crippling a crucial industry. But the US president has balked at the request, saying Japan does not import a significant number of American-made vehicles. Japan is facing a separate 24 per cent levy on all exports to the US, which was lowered to ten per cent during the negotiating period. Earlier Monday, Leavitt said the US was nearing deals with India and other nations ahead of the deadline reimposing higher tariffs that were paused for 90 days in April in order to conduct talks. "He is going to set the rate for many of these countries if they don't come to the table to negotiate in good faith, and he is meeting with his trade team this week to do that,' Leavitt said. A frenzy of meetings and calls between foreign governments, industries and the administration has marked the weeks leading up to the deadline, with officials and executives lobbying for carve-outs from Trump's import taxes. When asked if there should be tariff exemptions for products that typically can't be grown in the US, such as cocoa and coffee, US Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said in an interview that "everything's on the table right now.' For "certain products that we can't produce here,' Rollins continued, "it's important to have a full understanding and a robust strategy' that keeps grocery prices down and promotes American agriculture. - Bloomberg
