University where students and staff were exposed to antisemitism promises action
Goldsmiths accepted the inquiry's findings in full (Ian Nicholson/PA)
A significant increase in antisemitic incidents on UK university campuses has been reported in recent years.
The Community Security Trust, a charity that monitors antisemitism, recorded 145 antisemitic incidents linked to students and universities across the UK in 2024.
The Council and Executive Board of Goldsmiths fully endorsed the inquiry's findings, but said its strategy would still protect legitimate political protest at the university.
The university said it would begin a two-year antisemitism action plan, building a 'culture of belonging for all Jewish students and staff'.
Professor Frances Corner, vice-chancellor of the university said: 'Antisemitism has no place at Goldsmiths.
'As with all forms of racism, antisemitism prevents people from entering, enjoying and contributing fully to our university.
'The inquiry sets out a disturbing picture and I am sorry that our community and culture fell short of the behaviours we expect.
'The report rightly states that we owe it to former, current and future Jewish students and staff to learn from our mistakes.
'Today we commit to lasting cultural change with respect to Jewish students and staff, and for all religions and beliefs, drawing on our intellectual heritage and our longstanding belief in social justice.'
The inquiry was commissioned in 2023 by Goldsmiths' Council, the university's governing body, to determine whether Jewish students or staff had experienced antisemitism.
It accepted its findings in full.
Tom Sleigh, chairman of Goldsmiths' Council, said: 'With antisemitism sadly shown to have risen across the university sector, reflecting a broader increase across society, the report was commissioned to have a clear picture of the situation at Goldsmiths.
'Thank you to all who contributed evidence to the inquiry and participated in any way.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
12 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
ADL survey: Majority of Americans reject antisemitism
The survey assessed more than 1,000 Americans across the nation and various demographics including age, political parties and views on Israel. Respondents were asked about deadly attacks in Washington D.C. and Boulder, Colorado as well as an arson attack at Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro's residence on April 13. Last month, a 45-year-old man allegedly used a Molotov cocktail to attack members of the Jewish community during a march in Colorado, killing an 82-year-old woman and injuring 14 others. On May 21, a 31-year-old man fatally shot two staff members at the Israeli embassy in Washington, D.C. Around 22% of respondents said those attacks were not antisemitic, and 14% did not consider them hate crimes, according to the ADL. Around 13% called the attacks "justified" and 15% agreed that the violence was "necessary." The survey also found that the majority of Americans consider the recent attacks on Jewish people "morally wrong." "As the Jewish community is still reeling from recent antisemitic attacks that killed three people, it's unacceptable that one-quarter of Americans find this unspeakable violence understandable or justified -- an alarming sign of how antisemitic narratives are accepted by the mainstream," ADL CEO and National Director Jonathan Greenblatt said in a news release. 34% say Jewish Americans are more loyal to Israel than US Greenblatt said antisemitic hate has continued to increase since the Oct. 7, 2023 attack on Israel when Hamas militants killed 1,200 people and took 251 others hostage in Gaza. Since then, more than 57,000 Palestinians have been killed in Israeli attacks in Gaza, according to Reuters, and millions are suffering from acute malnutrition, starvation and illness. "The torrent of antisemitic hate has continuously increased since Oct. 7, 2023, with Jews being harassed and targeted, blamed and attacked, wounded and killed. The bipartisan majority of the American public must act," Greenblatt said. The ADL also shared more findings on perspectives toward the Jewish community, including that 34% of survey respondents said they believe Jewish Americans are more loyal to Israel than to the United States. Around 30% of Americans believe Jewish people have too much influence in politics and media, the report states. Meanwhile, the report says one in four Democrats and 23% of Republicans have expressed concerns about antisemitism within their own political ranks. The survey revealed that 27% of recipients said they believe Jewish Americans bear responsibility for the actions of Israel. ADL survey: Other key findings The ADL survey also revealed several other key findings, including that 29% of Americans are favorable toward anti-Israel protesters. However, that favorability decreased with age, from 59% in favor for Gen Z, 29% for millennials and 16% for baby boomers. Other findings include: 58% said protesters use the term "Zionist" to refer to Jewish people in general 68% said violence toward Jewish people rose with slogans like "Globalize the Intifada" or "From the River to the Sea." 34% said they aren't sure what "anti-Zionism" means 82% said they support removing online hate speech that celebrates violence 77% want government officials to do more to combat antisemitism Islamophobia also spiked since the Oct. 7 attacks Reports of discrimination or violence toward Muslims and Palestinians have peaked to new highs following Oct. 7, 2023, according to the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). In March, CAIR reported that Islamophobia in the U.S. continues to be at an all-time high with many discrimination cases going toward "those speaking out against genocide and apartheid." "Speaking out against Israel's policies of apartheid, occupation and genocide came with a price," CAIR Research and Advocacy Director Corey Saylor said in the report. "For the first time in our report's nearly 30-year history, complaints reported to us were often the result of viewpoint discrimination rather than religious identity." During the two months after the Oct. 7 attacks, reported incidents of Islamophobia rose by 300% in the U.S., according to Vision of Humanity. The platform also reported a 270% rise in antisemitic incidents in the U.S. between September 2023 and November 2023, as well as a 200% increase in 2024.
Spectator
13 hours ago
- Spectator
France doesn't need Boomers dreaming of political comebacks
If France didn't have enough to worry about right now with its soaring rates of debt, crime and immigration, now comes news of a political comeback. Dominique de Villepin, prime minister between 2005 and 2007, earlier this month launched his political party called Humanist France. 'I decided to create a movement of ideas, of citizens, through the creation of a political party,' he explained. 'This movement is for everyone. We need to unite all French people to defend social justice and the republican order,' he said. Given some of his recent statements about Israel, de Villepin will have his work cut out to unite the country. In October, the Jewish philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy accused de Villepin of anti-Semitism and last week three prominent members of France's Jewish community refused to shake his hand at a ceremony. De Villepin has strongly denied Lévy's accusations. He also angered conservatives when he said recently he has no problem with little girls wearing the hijab. 'I'm not a fashion designer,' he declared. Boomers have nothing to bequeath to France The 71-year-old de Villepin, who reportedly has his eye on the presidential election in 2027, is best known outside France for his eloquent speech to the United Nations in February 2003. At the time, he was the foreign minister in the government of Jacques Chirac when France refused to join George W Bush's coalition of the willing against Iraq. France, de Villepin told the UN, 'has never ceased to stand upright in the face of history and before mankind' but it could not back military action against Iraq because 'there is an alternative to war, disarming Iraq through inspections'. It was a dignified address from a man known for his elegance as much as his eloquence. But Villepin hasn't always been as principled since leaving political office in 2007. A year later, a French business paper remarked that de Villepin was prospering financially in his new life as a consultant and international lawyer, and 'has only to open his address book to make an appointment with [Vladimir] Putin'. In 2014 the Daily Telegraph broke an embarrassing story about whether de Villepin had repaid a €100,000 bonus awarded to him by a governmental 'administrative error'. His spokesperson said he had repaid it as soon as he realised the mistake. The next year a French current affairs weekly ran a feature headlined 'The Secret Lives of Dominique de Villepin' in which it said his business was booming: from China to Russia to Saudi Arabia and particularly Qatar, thanks to his warm relationship with the ruling Al Thani family. In an angry television interview last year, de Villepin refused to elaborate on how he earned his money and from whom. Nor did he adequately explain why his company last published its accounts in 2008. 'By definition, when you have consulting activities, you don't give the names of the people,' he explained, adding that 'I would be totally prepared to do so on a confidential basis'. He assured his interviewer that 'there is no foreign power behind it'. The interview was a grimly fascinating reminder of the arrogance of De Villepin's caste. They are the Bourgeois Boomer generation, which evolved from the protests of May 1968 convinced they were born to rule. They include Nicolas Sarkozy, Alain Juppe, Francois Hollande, Michel Barnier and Christiane Taubira. The latter was the Minister of Justice in Hollande's Socialist government a decade ago. She attempted a comeback for the 2022 presidential election but was forced to withdraw when she could muster only 181 of the 500 sponsors of elected officials required to run. Hollande is also said to be considering running for the 2027 election, forgetting that he was the most despised president in the history of the Fifth Republic. At least he was until Emmanuel Macron arrived on the scene. This generation of Boomers with their barely distinguishable centrist ideology – De Villepin claims to be from the centre-right but he is more popular these days with the left – are blamed for the terrible decline of France this century. Economically, culturally, socially, academically and morally, France is in a desperate state. Last week it was revealed that public debt hit a record €3,346 billion (£2,887 billion) at the start of 2025, €40 billion (£34.5 billion) more than at the end of 2024. Doubtless, de Villepin (who was never elected to public office during his political career) looks at some of the leading politicians in France today – such as Jordan Bardella, Gabriel Attal, Marion Marechal, Francois Xavier-Bellamy, Marine Tondelier and Mathilde Panot – and sees thirty-something whippersnappers in need of schooling. That was how Michel Barnier treated Gabriel Attal when he replaced him as prime minister last September. Three months later Barnier was out on his ear, brought down by his own incompetence. Boomers have nothing to bequeath to France. Their day has passed and they should go quietly into the night. Whether Xers and Millennials will be able to clean up their mess is uncertain. The damage caused by the 68ers to the Fifth Republic may be irreparable.
The Independent
13 hours ago
- The Independent
100 years of Mein Kampf: Why Hitler believed England to be his truest European ally
For 80 years, Germany has done everything it can to stamp out all vestiges of Nazism. It has told itself and the world that it, and only it, could have meted out such horror. The notion of Sonderweg, the special path, is deeply embedded. According to this reading of history, Germans followed a straight line from Bismarck to Hitler. We Brits love to hear this kind of thing: those pernicious Huns. We, by contrast, would never have succumbed. But having had the dubious honour of spending the last few months immersing myself in Mein Kampf, which was published a century ago next week, I am more convinced than ever that we are deluding ourselves. The same blithe over-confidence applies to Americans (indeed pretty much anyone). We are all prone to the most dangerous propaganda, extremism and hate, no matter where we come from. Before embarking on this assignment for a BBC radio documentary, I had never read Mein Kampf. No sensible person, apart from a history scholar, would have done. For me, it was a particularly unpleasant prospect given that my Jewish father fled Czechoslovakia shortly after Hitler had marched in and several members of his extended family were killed in the concentration camps. In Germany, the book has been taboo, subject not just to legal copyright restrictions (new versions could not be printed), but also to social shame. However, from India to Turkey and beyond, it has done a healthy trade around the world. It took me nerves of steel to plough through the more than 700 pages of this grubby work, 30 pages a night, with its endless distorted references to biology and race theory, with its warnings about miscegenation and the poisoning of good German blood. Much of it is predictable: a badly written mix of narcissistic autobiography and job application to lead Europe's nascent fascist movement. But, the main conclusion I drew from my research was that, just as Hitler's odious book was based around a cut and paste (not that typewriters of the 1920s were capable of such things) of late 19th- and early-20th-century race-based ideology, much of what is appearing online today in the 2020s follows the same path. It is part of a continuum. With the help of Dr Simon Strich, an academic from the University of Potsdam, I traced a direct line between many of the ideas contained in Mein Kampf to videos on current YouTube, popular podcasts and social media posts, many of them with millions of hits and clicks. From that, you can move to speeches from the likes of Hungary's Viktor Orban, Italy's Giorgia Meloni and (you guessed it), Donald Trump. Consider this: 'They're destroying the blood of our country, that's what they're doing. They're destroying our country. They don't like it when I said that. And I never read Mein Kampf. They said, 'Oh, Hitler said that, in a much different way'.' That was Trump during an election campaign rally in December 2023. There are a number of other examples that I could have cited. Then run alongside it the following: 'The poisonings of the blood which have befallen our people … have led not only to a decomposition of our blood, but also of our soul.' Mein Kampf, chapter two of volume two. Again, there were plenty of contemporary examples to choose from. Or this, from Orban, telling an audience in July 2022 that it is acceptable for Europeans to mix with each other – but not with those arriving from outside. 'We are not mixed race,' he says, 'We do not want to become peoples of mixed-race.' Then stand it alongside this sentence in chapter 11 of Mein Kampf, entitled People and Race: 'Blood mixture and the resultant drop in the racial level is the sole cause of the dying out of old cultures.' And what of Elon Musk? While he was Trump's right-hand man, he was conducting an interview with Alice Weidel, leader of Germany's far-right AfD, in which the only criticism they could find for Hitler was that he was a 'Communist'. History is clearly not their forte. Now, even as Musk is cast into the Trumpian wilderness, the X's AI chatbot showers praise on the Fuhrer. All it was doing was reproducing much of the bile that appears on his very own social media platform. 'Mein Kampf is not special,' Strich tells me as we dart from one grisly website to the next. 'There are a million different versions of the same material, the same ideology out there.' The most intriguing aspect for me was Hitler's loathing of the French and his respect for the English, even when expressed through suspicion. When musing about Lebensraum, about the need for Germans to find new lands in the East, he believed there was only one like-minded country with whom he could strike a deal: 'For such a policy, there was but one ally in Europe: England.' In another section, he states: 'No sacrifice should have been too great for winning England's willingness. We should have renounced colonies and sea power, and spared English industry our competition.' We know what happened in the end. Once Churchill was at the helm, Britain played a heroic role in resisting Hitler. But history has a habit of simplifying, of drawing straight lines that do not necessarily exist. It wouldn't have taken much for the British or another country to embrace something hideous in the 1930s. And it wouldn't take much now.
