West Virginia scrambles to strip artificial dyes from school meals before classes start
Gone will be red Jell-O fruit cups, yogurt topped with brightly hued sprinkles and Cool Ranch Doritos — all foods made with
synthetic dyes
.
In their place will be foods that contain
colors made only from natural sources
— such as vegetables, spices and seeds — after West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey signed
a sweeping new law
in March banning seven artificial dyes from school meals.
Other states have enacted similar laws that would strip artificial dyes from school meals, but West Virginia's action is the first to take effect, starting Aug. 1. It triggered a four-month sprint that that left state and local nutrition directors reeling.
'I think the initial reaction was like, 'Wow, what are we going to do?'' said Tony Crago, director of child nutrition for the West Virginia Department of Education. 'Where do we start?'
Across the state, managers of school food programs scoured district grocery lists for dozens of products that contained any trace of petroleum-based synthetic dyes including
Red 3
, Red 40, Yellow 5, Yellow 6, Blue 1, Blue 2 and Green 3.
'When it went into law, it was shocking,' said Diane Miller, who leads child nutrition and food services for Kanawha County Schools in the state's central region. 'We began to realize that these dyes were in much more than just your cereals.'
West Virginia's ban on synthetic dyes was cheered by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has successfully pressured food makers to agree to remove artificial colors from their products. The law focuses first on dyes in school foods, followed by a second action that will ban the colors plus two preservatives from all foods sold in the state starting in 2028.
The move is aimed at halting potential health effects from the dyes, which have been linked to neurobehavioral problems, such as hyperactivity and attention problems, in some children. It's part of a larger focus on limiting artificial ingredients in food, Morrisey said in March.
'By eliminating harmful chemicals from our food, we're taking steps toward improving the health of our residents and protecting our children from significant long-term health and learning challenges,' he said.
Health advocates have long called for the removal of the dyes, citing mixed evidence of potential harm. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has said the color additives are safe when 'used properly,' in the amounts and products approved by the agency. Most children have no problems when consuming the dyes, the agency adds, 'but some evidence suggests that certain children may be sensitive to them.'
More recently, however, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary has joined Kennedy in the push to get artificial dyes out of food, despite limited proof of health effects.
'When you get rid of petroleum-based dyes, kids aren't gonna all suddenly be healthy,' Makary said on a recent podcast. 'We're not going to address the fact that
30% of our nation's kids
have prediabetes by simply removing petroleum-based food dyes. But these are steps in the right direction.'
Nutrition experts agree that removing artificial colors from foods doesn't address the main drivers of America's chronic health problems. Those stem largely from ingredients such as added sugars, sodium and saturated fat.
But dyes are 'hallmarks of ultraprocessed food,' said Jerold Mande, a Harvard University nutrition expert and former federal food policy adviser. Targeting them could be a way of letting companies know 'that the way they're making food is unacceptable,' he said.
Some suppliers had already removed artificial dyes from some school foods, swapping them for products colored with beet juice or turmeric, said Hollie Best, food service director for Wood County Schools in Parkersburg, which has 11,000 children in 27 schools. Overall, Best said she removed just five foods from her menus.
General Mills said 98% of its products for schools were already made without the banned colors. The company 'will be compliant' with West Virginia's law immediately and plans to remove the dyes from school foods nationwide by next summer, said Mollie Wulff, a company spokesperson.
In Miller's district, with 23,000 students in 67 schools, the new law affects about 10% of the foods served, she estimated. She expected some foods to contain artificial colors, like strawberry milk and Pop-Tarts. Others were surprising, such as pickles, salad dressing and certain snack chips.
'People were like, 'Oh my gosh, no more Doritos?'' Miller said. The popular Cool Ranch flavor contains dyes Red 40, Blue 1 and Yellow 5.
The challenge is finding substitutes that will still appeal to children, Miller said.
'Because the last thing we need them to do is to choose not to participate in our school lunch program,' she said, adding that schools provide many students their healthiest meals of the day.
Parents of children with sensitivities or allergies to artificial dyes had already raised concerns, according to school food directors. But for others, the presence of synthetic colors in school meals hasn't been an issue. Chris DeRico, nutrition director of Barbour County Schools, with 2,000 students, said few parents seemed worried about dyes.
'They'd be in the minority, I believe,' he said. 'In rural West Virginia, I don't think it's really on radar screens.'
In Best's district, dyes were already out of the food dished up during the summer session in July. That didn't make much difference to Lilith Wilson, 9, who said her meal of a meatball sub sandwich, sweet potato fries and ice cream was 'really good.'
Asked whether she likes school lunches in general, the incoming fourth-grader echoed the sentiments of picky kids everywhere: 'Sometimes I don't, sometimes I do. It just depends on what it is.'
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
2 days ago
- CBS News
West Virginia scrambles to strip artificial dyes from school meals before classes start
When school starts in West Virginia next month, 240,000 students in districts large and small will notice something missing from their cafeteria trays. Gone will be red Jell-O fruit cups, yogurt topped with brightly hued sprinkles and older versions of Cool Ranch Doritos — all foods made with synthetic dyes. In their place will be foods that contain colors made only from natural sources — such as vegetables, spices and seeds — after West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey signed a sweeping new law in March banning seven artificial dyes from school meals. Other states have enacted similar laws that would strip artificial dyes from school meals, but West Virginia's action is the first to take effect, starting Aug. 1. It triggered a four-month sprint that left state and local nutrition directors reeling. "I think the initial reaction was like, 'Wow, what are we going to do?'" said Tony Crago, director of child nutrition for the West Virginia Department of Education. "Where do we start?" Across the state, managers of school food programs scoured district grocery lists for dozens of products that contained any trace of petroleum-based synthetic dyes, including Red 3, Red 40, Yellow 5, Yellow 6, Blue 1, Blue 2 and Green 3. "When it went into law, it was shocking," said Diane Miller, who leads child nutrition and food services for Kanawha County Schools in the state's central region. "We began to realize that these dyes were in much more than just your cereals." West Virginia's ban on synthetic dyes was cheered by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has successfully pressured food makers to agree to remove artificial colors from their products. The law focuses first on dyes in school foods, followed by a second action that will ban the colors plus two preservatives from all foods sold in the state starting in 2028. The move is aimed at halting potential health effects from the dyes, which have been linked to neurobehavioral problems, such as hyperactivity and attention problems, in some children. It's part of a larger focus on limiting artificial ingredients in food, Morrisey said in March. "By eliminating harmful chemicals from our food, we're taking steps toward improving the health of our residents and protecting our children from significant long-term health and learning challenges," he said. Health advocates have long called for the removal of the dyes, citing mixed evidence of potential harm. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has said the color additives are safe when "used properly," in the amounts and products approved by the agency. Most children have no problems when consuming the dyes, the agency adds, "but some evidence suggests that certain children may be sensitive to them." More recently, however, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary has joined Kennedy in the push to get artificial dyes out of food, despite limited proof of health effects. "When you get rid of petroleum-based dyes, kids aren't gonna all suddenly be healthy," Makary said on a recent podcast. "We're not going to address the fact that 30% of our nation's kids have prediabetes by simply removing petroleum-based food dyes. But these are steps in the right direction." Nutrition experts agree that removing artificial colors from foods doesn't address the main drivers of America's chronic health problems. Those stem largely from ingredients such as added sugars, sodium and saturated fat. But dyes are "hallmarks of ultraprocessed food," said Jerold Mande, a Harvard University nutrition expert and former federal food policy adviser. Targeting them could be a way of letting companies know "that the way they're making food is unacceptable," he said. Some suppliers had already removed artificial dyes from some school foods, swapping them for products colored with beet juice or turmeric, said Hollie Best, food service director for Wood County Schools in Parkersburg, which has 11,000 children in 27 schools. Overall, Best said she removed just five foods from her menus. General Mills said 98% of its products for schools were already made without the banned colors. The company "will be compliant" with West Virginia's law immediately and plans to remove the dyes from school foods nationwide by next summer, said Mollie Wulff, a company spokesperson. In Miller's district, with 23,000 students in 67 schools, the new law affects about 10% of the foods served, she estimated. She expected some foods to contain artificial colors, like strawberry milk and Pop-Tarts. Others were surprising, such as pickles, salad dressing and certain snack chips. "People were like, 'Oh my gosh, no more Doritos?'" Miller said. The popular Cool Ranch flavor previously contained dyes Red 40, Blue 1 and Yellow 5. PepsiCo, which runs the Frito-Lay division that makes the chips, has pledged to remove the synthetic colors starting with this school year, according to spokesperson Genevieve Ascencio. The challenge is finding substitutes that will still appeal to children, Miller said. "Because the last thing we need them to do is to choose not to participate in our school lunch program," she said, adding that schools provide many students their healthiest meals of the day. Parents of children with sensitivities or allergies to artificial dyes had already raised concerns, according to school food directors. But for others, the presence of synthetic colors in school meals hasn't been an issue. Chris Derico, nutrition director of Barbour County Schools, with 2,000 students, said few parents seemed worried about dyes. "They'd be in the minority, I believe," he said. "In rural West Virginia, I don't think it's really on radar screens." In Best's district, dyes were already out of the food dished up during the summer session in July. That didn't make much difference to Lilith Wilson, 9, who said her meal of a meatball sub sandwich, sweet potato fries and ice cream was "really good." Asked whether she likes school lunches in general, the incoming fourth-grader echoed the sentiments of picky kids everywhere: "Sometimes I don't, sometimes I do. It just depends on what it is." ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
USA Today
2 days ago
- USA Today
FDA recalls more than 64,000 pounds of butter over undeclared milk
More than 64,000 pounds of butter have been recalled due to potential undeclared milk allergens, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Food ingredient company Bunge North America recalled 1,800 cases of its NH European Style Butter Blend that were distributed at 12 centers located across the United States and one in Dominican Republic, a July 14 FDA alert reported. The FDA classified the recall under its second-highest risk warning on July 31 warning that consumption could pose temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences. USA TODAY has reached out to Bunge North America for comment. Based in Chesterfield, Missouri, Bunge North America is an agribusiness that produces and markets multiple food ingredients including corn, wheat, rice, soybeans and feed peas. Which butter products are recalled? The FDA has issued a recall for 64,800 pounds of Bunge North America's NH European Style Butter Blend with: The product was packaged in white paperboard cases each containing 36 blocks.
Newsweek
3 days ago
- Newsweek
Freeze Dried Fruit Recall Sparks Warning to Customers Across the US
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Doehler Dry Ingredient Solutions, LLC is recalling the Member's Mark brand of freeze-dried fruit variety packs due to fears the product is contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes. Newsweek attempted to reach the company via phone on Friday for comment but could not leave a voicemail. Why It Matters Numerous recalls have been initiated this year due to the potential for damaged products, foodborne illness, contamination and undeclared food allergens. Millions of Americans experience food sensitivities or allergies every year. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the nine "major" food allergens in the U.S. are eggs, milk, fish, wheat, soybeans, Crustacean shellfish, sesame, tree nuts and peanuts. Listeria monocytogenes is a bacterium that poses significant health risks, particularly to pregnant women, newborns, older adults, and individuals with weakened immune systems, according to the FDA. What To Know In the alert, the FDA notes that the products were distributed from July 1, 2025, until July 25, 2025, at Sam's Club retail locations. The states and territories impacted by this recall are: Alabama Arizona California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Iowa Indiana Illinois Idaho Kansas Louisiana Maryland Maine Mississippi Minnesota Missouri Michigan Montana North Carolina North Dakota Nebraska New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico Nevada New York Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Virginia Wisconsin West Virginia Wyoming Puerto Rico The Member's Mark Freeze Dried Fruit Variety Pack's being recalled are in 15 count boxes with a UPC number of 1 93968 50900 2, the FDA said. The agency added that no illnesses have been reported as of Thursday. The alert has a chart listing the recalled products with corresponding lot code numbers and use by dates for consumers to cross reference. The problem was discovered via "internal testing," the FDA says. A 15-count package of freeze dried fruit variety packs can be seen in connection to a recall on July 31, 2025. (Photo by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration) A 15-count package of freeze dried fruit variety packs can be seen in connection to a recall on July 31, 2025. (Photo by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration) What People Are Saying The FDA on its website in part about the incubation period for Listeria infection: "There can be a substantial delay between the time of ingestion of contaminated food and the onset of serious symptoms. The average time from exposure to illness is approximately 30 days, but symptoms can appear as long as 90 days after exposure. It is important for consumers to know that the infection can occur as much as 90 days later, so that they can seek appropriate treatment if they have symptoms of Listeria infection." What Happens Next? Consumers are advised to contact Doehler Dry Ingredient Solutions, LLC's Customer Service via phone at (770) 387-0451 on weekdays from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET with any additional questions, the FDA says. Health authorities continue to emphasize the importance of proper food storage and handling, particularly for ready-to-eat items. The FDA advises consumers to refrigerate perishable foods at and under 40°F, discard recalled products and properly sanitize surfaces that may have contacted suspected contaminated items to prevent the risk of cross-contamination.
