6-0 6-0! Swiatek's historic blitz to win Wimbledon
In blazing sunshine on the Centre Court, Polish great Swiatek made a nonsense of all her previous struggles on grass-courts as she swept to a majestic victory for a sixth grand slam triumph on Saturday in less than an hour.
The 'double-bagel' triumph, which lasted just 57 minutes, had never happened in a Wimbledon final in the Open era.
The last time it occurred at SW19 was 114 years ago in 1911, when Dorothea Lambert Chambers beat Dora Boothby in an all-British final, while the only modern day equivalent was the 1988 French Open final when Steffi Graf routed Natasha Zvereva.
It ensured that at 24, Swiatek becomes the youngest woman since Serena Williams to win majors on all three surfaces after her four French Open titles on clay and her 2022 US Open win.
And it prompted her to have a post-title swipe at her critics who've tried to unpick why she hadn't won a title for over a year.
"For sure, the past months, how the media sometimes describe me - and I've got to say, unfortunately, Polish media - how they treated me and my team, it wasn't really pleasant," said Swiatek, who had served a one-month doping ban at the end of last season after taking contaminated medication.
"I hope they will just leave me alone and let me do my job because obviously you can see that we know what we are doing, and I have the best people around me.
"I have already proved a lot. I know people want more and more - but it's my own process and my own life and my own career."
Presented with the Venus Rosewater Dish by Kate, the Princess of Wales, Swiatek had delivered a right royal performance, exhibiting machine-like quality with her groundstrokes as Anisimova, the American 13th seed, never recovered from getting broken to 15 in the opening service game.
"I think everyone's in a state of shock at what's happened," said three-time Wimbledon champ John McEnroe, echoing everyone's feelings from the commentary box. "Swiatek played someone who absolutely froze. And it was so hard to watch."
Inevitably, the tears came for Animisova, whose comeback had been one of the stories of the championship, with the former teenage prodigy having stepped away from tennis for eight months in 2023 to prioritise her mental health.
Much was expected after the way she'd beaten world No.1 Aryna Sabalenka in the semis, but she was the first to admit her failings after coughing up 28 mistakes in just a dozen games.
"I was a bit frozen there, with my nerves. Maybe the last two weeks I got a bit tired or something," said the 23-year-old, who skipped practice on Friday because of fatigue and felt pain in her right shoulder while warming up before the match.
"I ran out of gas today and I wish I could have put on a better performance for you," she told the crowd after paying a tearful tribute to her mum.
Nothing, though, could be taken away from Swiatek. She's the eighth consecutive first-time Wimbledon champion, but her's is a name that truly belongs in the event's hall of fame after she'd never previously got beyond the quarter-finals.
The first Polish winner at Wimbledon in 148 years had spent 125 weeks as the world No.1 between 2022 and 2024 but had slumped to a No.8 seeding after her win famine. Now she's back where she belongs.
Iga Swiatek has cemented her place as an all-time great of women's tennis with her unprecedented, merciless 6-0 6-0 destruction of Amanda Anisimova in a brutal Wimbledon Centre Court final wipe-out.
In blazing sunshine on the Centre Court, Polish great Swiatek made a nonsense of all her previous struggles on grass-courts as she swept to a majestic victory for a sixth grand slam triumph on Saturday in less than an hour.
The 'double-bagel' triumph, which lasted just 57 minutes, had never happened in a Wimbledon final in the Open era.
The last time it occurred at SW19 was 114 years ago in 1911, when Dorothea Lambert Chambers beat Dora Boothby in an all-British final, while the only modern day equivalent was the 1988 French Open final when Steffi Graf routed Natasha Zvereva.
It ensured that at 24, Swiatek becomes the youngest woman since Serena Williams to win majors on all three surfaces after her four French Open titles on clay and her 2022 US Open win.
And it prompted her to have a post-title swipe at her critics who've tried to unpick why she hadn't won a title for over a year.
"For sure, the past months, how the media sometimes describe me - and I've got to say, unfortunately, Polish media - how they treated me and my team, it wasn't really pleasant," said Swiatek, who had served a one-month doping ban at the end of last season after taking contaminated medication.
"I hope they will just leave me alone and let me do my job because obviously you can see that we know what we are doing, and I have the best people around me.
"I have already proved a lot. I know people want more and more - but it's my own process and my own life and my own career."
Presented with the Venus Rosewater Dish by Kate, the Princess of Wales, Swiatek had delivered a right royal performance, exhibiting machine-like quality with her groundstrokes as Anisimova, the American 13th seed, never recovered from getting broken to 15 in the opening service game.
"I think everyone's in a state of shock at what's happened," said three-time Wimbledon champ John McEnroe, echoing everyone's feelings from the commentary box. "Swiatek played someone who absolutely froze. And it was so hard to watch."
Inevitably, the tears came for Animisova, whose comeback had been one of the stories of the championship, with the former teenage prodigy having stepped away from tennis for eight months in 2023 to prioritise her mental health.
Much was expected after the way she'd beaten world No.1 Aryna Sabalenka in the semis, but she was the first to admit her failings after coughing up 28 mistakes in just a dozen games.
"I was a bit frozen there, with my nerves. Maybe the last two weeks I got a bit tired or something," said the 23-year-old, who skipped practice on Friday because of fatigue and felt pain in her right shoulder while warming up before the match.
"I ran out of gas today and I wish I could have put on a better performance for you," she told the crowd after paying a tearful tribute to her mum.
Nothing, though, could be taken away from Swiatek. She's the eighth consecutive first-time Wimbledon champion, but her's is a name that truly belongs in the event's hall of fame after she'd never previously got beyond the quarter-finals.
The first Polish winner at Wimbledon in 148 years had spent 125 weeks as the world No.1 between 2022 and 2024 but had slumped to a No.8 seeding after her win famine. Now she's back where she belongs.
Iga Swiatek has cemented her place as an all-time great of women's tennis with her unprecedented, merciless 6-0 6-0 destruction of Amanda Anisimova in a brutal Wimbledon Centre Court final wipe-out.
In blazing sunshine on the Centre Court, Polish great Swiatek made a nonsense of all her previous struggles on grass-courts as she swept to a majestic victory for a sixth grand slam triumph on Saturday in less than an hour.
The 'double-bagel' triumph, which lasted just 57 minutes, had never happened in a Wimbledon final in the Open era.
The last time it occurred at SW19 was 114 years ago in 1911, when Dorothea Lambert Chambers beat Dora Boothby in an all-British final, while the only modern day equivalent was the 1988 French Open final when Steffi Graf routed Natasha Zvereva.
It ensured that at 24, Swiatek becomes the youngest woman since Serena Williams to win majors on all three surfaces after her four French Open titles on clay and her 2022 US Open win.
And it prompted her to have a post-title swipe at her critics who've tried to unpick why she hadn't won a title for over a year.
"For sure, the past months, how the media sometimes describe me - and I've got to say, unfortunately, Polish media - how they treated me and my team, it wasn't really pleasant," said Swiatek, who had served a one-month doping ban at the end of last season after taking contaminated medication.
"I hope they will just leave me alone and let me do my job because obviously you can see that we know what we are doing, and I have the best people around me.
"I have already proved a lot. I know people want more and more - but it's my own process and my own life and my own career."
Presented with the Venus Rosewater Dish by Kate, the Princess of Wales, Swiatek had delivered a right royal performance, exhibiting machine-like quality with her groundstrokes as Anisimova, the American 13th seed, never recovered from getting broken to 15 in the opening service game.
"I think everyone's in a state of shock at what's happened," said three-time Wimbledon champ John McEnroe, echoing everyone's feelings from the commentary box. "Swiatek played someone who absolutely froze. And it was so hard to watch."
Inevitably, the tears came for Animisova, whose comeback had been one of the stories of the championship, with the former teenage prodigy having stepped away from tennis for eight months in 2023 to prioritise her mental health.
Much was expected after the way she'd beaten world No.1 Aryna Sabalenka in the semis, but she was the first to admit her failings after coughing up 28 mistakes in just a dozen games.
"I was a bit frozen there, with my nerves. Maybe the last two weeks I got a bit tired or something," said the 23-year-old, who skipped practice on Friday because of fatigue and felt pain in her right shoulder while warming up before the match.
"I ran out of gas today and I wish I could have put on a better performance for you," she told the crowd after paying a tearful tribute to her mum.
Nothing, though, could be taken away from Swiatek. She's the eighth consecutive first-time Wimbledon champion, but her's is a name that truly belongs in the event's hall of fame after she'd never previously got beyond the quarter-finals.
The first Polish winner at Wimbledon in 148 years had spent 125 weeks as the world No.1 between 2022 and 2024 but had slumped to a No.8 seeding after her win famine. Now she's back where she belongs.
Iga Swiatek has cemented her place as an all-time great of women's tennis with her unprecedented, merciless 6-0 6-0 destruction of Amanda Anisimova in a brutal Wimbledon Centre Court final wipe-out.
In blazing sunshine on the Centre Court, Polish great Swiatek made a nonsense of all her previous struggles on grass-courts as she swept to a majestic victory for a sixth grand slam triumph on Saturday in less than an hour.
The 'double-bagel' triumph, which lasted just 57 minutes, had never happened in a Wimbledon final in the Open era.
The last time it occurred at SW19 was 114 years ago in 1911, when Dorothea Lambert Chambers beat Dora Boothby in an all-British final, while the only modern day equivalent was the 1988 French Open final when Steffi Graf routed Natasha Zvereva.
It ensured that at 24, Swiatek becomes the youngest woman since Serena Williams to win majors on all three surfaces after her four French Open titles on clay and her 2022 US Open win.
And it prompted her to have a post-title swipe at her critics who've tried to unpick why she hadn't won a title for over a year.
"For sure, the past months, how the media sometimes describe me - and I've got to say, unfortunately, Polish media - how they treated me and my team, it wasn't really pleasant," said Swiatek, who had served a one-month doping ban at the end of last season after taking contaminated medication.
"I hope they will just leave me alone and let me do my job because obviously you can see that we know what we are doing, and I have the best people around me.
"I have already proved a lot. I know people want more and more - but it's my own process and my own life and my own career."
Presented with the Venus Rosewater Dish by Kate, the Princess of Wales, Swiatek had delivered a right royal performance, exhibiting machine-like quality with her groundstrokes as Anisimova, the American 13th seed, never recovered from getting broken to 15 in the opening service game.
"I think everyone's in a state of shock at what's happened," said three-time Wimbledon champ John McEnroe, echoing everyone's feelings from the commentary box. "Swiatek played someone who absolutely froze. And it was so hard to watch."
Inevitably, the tears came for Animisova, whose comeback had been one of the stories of the championship, with the former teenage prodigy having stepped away from tennis for eight months in 2023 to prioritise her mental health.
Much was expected after the way she'd beaten world No.1 Aryna Sabalenka in the semis, but she was the first to admit her failings after coughing up 28 mistakes in just a dozen games.
"I was a bit frozen there, with my nerves. Maybe the last two weeks I got a bit tired or something," said the 23-year-old, who skipped practice on Friday because of fatigue and felt pain in her right shoulder while warming up before the match.
"I ran out of gas today and I wish I could have put on a better performance for you," she told the crowd after paying a tearful tribute to her mum.
Nothing, though, could be taken away from Swiatek. She's the eighth consecutive first-time Wimbledon champion, but her's is a name that truly belongs in the event's hall of fame after she'd never previously got beyond the quarter-finals.
The first Polish winner at Wimbledon in 148 years had spent 125 weeks as the world No.1 between 2022 and 2024 but had slumped to a No.8 seeding after her win famine. Now she's back where she belongs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
15 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Tennis world slams sight of controversial figure in Wimbledon Royal Box
The sight of a former tennis player with a very chequered past sitting in the Royal Box for the Wimbledon men's final has raised more than a few eyebrows. There wasn't a spare seat at centre court as a mix of royalty, celebrities and tennis legends turned out to watch Jannik Sinner defeat Carlos Alcaraz 4-6 6-4 6-4 6-4. A steely Sinner refused to give Alcaraz an opening, clinching his fourth grand slam title and exacting revenge after his gut-wrenching five-set loss to the Spaniard in the French Open final. Prince William and Princess Kate were there with Prince George and Princess Charlotte in the front row of the Royal Box, along with a host of celebrities including Anna Wintour and actors Keira Knightley, Nicole Kidman, Matthew McConaughey, John Lithgow and Paul Mescal. A row of tennis legends and former Wimbledon champions featured Andre Agassi, Stefan Edberg, Chris Evert, Lleyton Hewitt and his wife Bec. But sitting next to Agassi was former tennis player Justin Gimelstob, who won the 1997 Hopman Cup, and Australian Open and French Open mixed doubles titles with Venus Williams in 1998. He reached a career high singles ranking of No. 63 in 1999 but is best known for a series of controversies in the 2000s. The American became a highly controversial figure in retirement after he made sexist comments regarding several female players in the 2000s. Gimelstob gave an infamous interview to radio program The Junkies, making inflammatory comments about Anna Kournikova ahead of an exhibition doubles match against the former No. 8. 'She is a b*tch,' Gimelstob said at the time. 'Hate's a very strong word. I despise her to the maximum level just below hate … I wouldn't mind having my younger brother, who's a kind of a stud, nail her and then reap the benefits.' He added of his plans for the match: 'I'm going to serve it right at the body about 128 (mph), right into the midriff. If she's not crying by the time she comes off court I did not do my job.' Asked if he would have an affair with Kournikova, Gimelstob said: 'Definitely not. I have no attraction to her. She has a great body but her face is a five. 'I really have no interest in her … I wouldn't mind having my younger brother, who's a kind of a stud, nail her and then reap the benefits of that,' he said. He also described French players Tatiana Golovin and Alize Cornet as 'sexpots', and called Czech player Nicole Vaidisova 'a well-developed young lady'. In 2018, Gimelstob was charged with the alleged violent assault of a former friend Randall Kaplan on Halloween. He denied the accusations later changed his plea to 'no contest' to a felony battery charge, and was sentenced to three years' probation and 60 days of community labour. Despite his past, Gimelstob appeared to be a guest of Agassi at Sunday's final — he works with Agassi and his wife, tennis legend Steffi Graff. Gimelstob and Agassi attended Wimbledon together last year too. The 48-year-old was animated at stages during the final, holding his head in his hands after one thrilling rally between Alcaraz and Sinner. The sight of Gimelstob sitting in the prestigious Royal Box didn't go down well with many viewers. Leading tennis reporter Ben Rothenberg wrote on X: 'There have certainly been better moments in Wimbledon Royal Box optics than sitting Justin Gimelstob directly behind Princess Kate …' One observer wrote: 'The one on the right is Justin Gimelstob? I haven't seen him in a long time.' A second said: 'Eww Justin Gimelstob, how'd he scam his way into the box?' A third commented: 'Why tf is Justin Gimelstob sitting on a row with Edberg and Hewitt?!?! Another said: 'Agassi's 'plus one' is … Justin Gimelstob. That's quite the comeback.' Gimelstob served on the ATP board for a decade, resigning from the player council in 2018 and quitting his commentary role on the Tennis Channel. It remains to be seen of Gimelstob intends on making a return to tennis administration in the future. Sports Illustrated tennis insider Jon Wertheim wrote in his Wimbledon wrap: 'For a thriving sport, there are still a striking number of big jobs in need of filling: WTA Chairman (Chairperson?), ATP CEO and, maybe above all, the head of the USTA, a highly fraught, highly-compensated position. 'A search firm has been retained (and several candidates showed up in London to angle for the job), but there will be no announcement until after the U.S. Open.'
The Age
26 minutes ago
- The Age
I've seen the future of tennis. It's Sinner v Alcaraz
Back in 1961, the famous New York Times writer Robert Sheldon saw a warm-up act at Gerde's Folk City in Greenwich Valley, and wrote a review about an unknown singer called – checks notes – 'Bob Dylan'. Citing his 'searing intensity,' and his stunning 'originality and inspiration, all the more noteworthy for his youth,' Sheldon famously observed it 'it matters less where he has been than where he is going, and that would seem to be straight up'. It is often cited as the most prescient reviews of all time, the one that picked early that Dylan would dominate the music scene for a generation. Watching this Wimbledon men's singles final, however, one needed no such prescience, no such expert insight, to offer up the bleeding obvious. Italy's Jannik Sinner and Spain's Carlos Alcaraz – meeting in the final of a major for just the second time, after their epic, record-breaking battle at Roland Garros just last month, and won by Alcaraz – will, individually and often as a duo, dominate tennis majors for years to come. And those who thought we'd never see ever again the likes of the rivalry between the retired Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal, let alone the fading Novak Djokovic, must think again. What a match! What an atmosphere! What a sheer, epic contest between two young titans in a suddenly elevated titanic tennis age. So brilliant were they, the fascination was not just who would win, but just how wonderfully their skills countered each other, to make so many points epic contests in themselves. For it was not just the extraordinary array of classic tennis skills they brought to this marvellous green stage. It is the other talents that sheer take the breath away. With both players regularly hitting forehands and blistering backhands of over 160km/h, and serves so fast they could be booked for speeding on open freeways, they both had the punch that would have done Muhammad Ali proud. Could Usain Bolt move as fast around the court as these two with tennis racquet in hand, the way they do? I doubt it. Time and again, Alcaraz unleashed a curious kind of chip shot lob, with backspin and just over Sinner's reach, that Tiger Woods would be proud to call his own. Sinner, particularly, showed a capacity to – from behind the baseline – hit drop shots that landed just over the net, and landed with little more bounce than a dry meat pie on a cafeteria floor. If Alcaraz didn't possess the speed of the aforesaid Bolt, and the escape skills of Harry Houdini, he never would have got close to them, let alone hit many of them back for winners. You get the drift. For every punch, a counter-punch. For every thrust, a parry. For every parry, came something we had rarely seen before. And then there is the different way they interacted with the people that matter to them.
Sydney Morning Herald
26 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
I've seen the future of tennis. It's Sinner v Alcaraz
Back in 1961, the famous New York Times writer Robert Sheldon saw a warm-up act at Gerde's Folk City in Greenwich Valley, and wrote a review about an unknown singer called – checks notes – 'Bob Dylan'. Citing his 'searing intensity,' and his stunning 'originality and inspiration, all the more noteworthy for his youth,' Sheldon famously observed it 'it matters less where he has been than where he is going, and that would seem to be straight up'. It is often cited as the most prescient reviews of all time, the one that picked early that Dylan would dominate the music scene for a generation. Watching this Wimbledon men's singles final, however, one needed no such prescience, no such expert insight, to offer up the bleeding obvious. Italy's Jannik Sinner and Spain's Carlos Alcaraz – meeting in the final of a major for just the second time, after their epic, record-breaking battle at Roland Garros just last month, and won by Alcaraz – will, individually and often as a duo, dominate tennis majors for years to come. And those who thought we'd never see ever again the likes of the rivalry between the retired Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal, let alone the fading Novak Djokovic, must think again. What a match! What an atmosphere! What a sheer, epic contest between two young titans in a suddenly elevated titanic tennis age. So brilliant were they, the fascination was not just who would win, but just how wonderfully their skills countered each other, to make so many points epic contests in themselves. For it was not just the extraordinary array of classic tennis skills they brought to this marvellous green stage. It is the other talents that sheer take the breath away. With both players regularly hitting forehands and blistering backhands of over 160km/h, and serves so fast they could be booked for speeding on open freeways, they both had the punch that would have done Muhammad Ali proud. Could Usain Bolt move as fast around the court as these two with tennis racquet in hand, the way they do? I doubt it. Time and again, Alcaraz unleashed a curious kind of chip shot lob, with backspin and just over Sinner's reach, that Tiger Woods would be proud to call his own. Sinner, particularly, showed a capacity to – from behind the baseline – hit drop shots that landed just over the net, and landed with little more bounce than a dry meat pie on a cafeteria floor. If Alcaraz didn't possess the speed of the aforesaid Bolt, and the escape skills of Harry Houdini, he never would have got close to them, let alone hit many of them back for winners. You get the drift. For every punch, a counter-punch. For every thrust, a parry. For every parry, came something we had rarely seen before. And then there is the different way they interacted with the people that matter to them.
