Major changes announced for train travel in one part of Wales
A huge plan to transform train services in north Wales has been announced
Major changes are proposed for north Wales services including Wrexham General
(Image: Google Maps )
The Welsh Government has said it wants to electrify the north Wales mainline in a newly-published grand plan for how it aims to improve rail services in north Wales. The plan includes short-term improvements, like increasing the frequency of services and removing level crossings so services can flow more smoothly, right through to electrifying the north Wales mainline and Metro-style services to all stations.
A plan being announced on Thursday looks at short-, medium-, and long-term plans for the area with some starting in the next six months and others going right through to 2035 and beyond.
In the next six months plans include speaking to people about closing level crossings, renaming the Borderlands Line as Wrexham to Liverpool, and investigating what it can do to improve connectivity between north Wales and London. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here .
The plan is for work to begin immediately to begin discussing major improvements on the north Wales mainline and Marches line. It would mean improvements to stations and lines as well as increased frequency of services.
What are the aims and how long will they take?
Six- to 12-month timescale
Improvements on stations between Wrexham and Liverpool
Double train service frequency between Wrexham and Chester
50% more Transport for Wales (TfW) services on the north Wales mainline
New bus stations to help jobs between Wrexham and Deeside
Pay as you go fares in north east Wales
Metro branding on trains and buses as well as stations
Direct services between Liverpool and Llandudno
One to three years
Upgrading Padeswood station
A "reliable" two trains per hour on Wrexham to Liverpool line
Complete development work on electrification
Improve Buckley station
Article continues below
Five years
New stations including connecting Deeside Industrial Estate
Improved connectivity to Manchester Airport
Consistent rail timetable for the north Wales mainline
New trains
Upgrade Gobowen Signal to increase Marches line capacity
Prepare for electrification of north Wales mainline
By 2035
North Wales mainline electrified with new rolling stock being rolled out and more services
Chester station enhanced
Improved connections between Wrexham General and Central
Four trains per hour between Wrexham and Liverpool
Enhanced connections to Liverpool South Parkway
Redouble the line between Wrexham and Chester
Improve accessibility at stations
Beyond 2035
Metro-style services to all stations south of Wrexham to Gobowen to Crewe
Tram-train connections to "key settlements"
Improve journey times between north and south Wales
New stations north and south of Wrexham including A55 Parkway
Enhanced connectivity to Warrington Bank Quay
Marches Line resignalling and electrification
Northern Line connections
A map of Welsh Government proposals for the North Wales mainline
(Image: Welsh Government )
The operation of the railway in Wales is a Welsh Government responsibility. However infrastructure planning and the funding of Network Rail in Wales remains reserved to the UK Parliament.
Electrifying the north Wales mainline was something suggested by former Conservative Prime Minister Rishi Sunak but his party conference announcement was derided as having no plans behind it. The Welsh Government's then-transport minister said at the time that any discussions between the-then UK and Welsh Governments were looking at a range of projects but this had never been discussed.
On October 4, 2023, Mr Sunak stood on the stage at the Conservative party conference and confirmed he was scrapping the HS2 line to Manchester. Instead he promised transport improvements "in all parts of the country" including to electrify the north Wales mainline.
However the Labour administration in Wales said it had not been informed of the plans.
In the Senedd Lee Waters MS said: "We've had no conversations with the UK Government about this." The cost, it later was estimated, was around £1bn but even that was disputed by Mr Waters who said: "We have no idea of the cost of it" and claimed the £1bn was "a finger in the air figure".
Article continues below
When Mr Sunak visited Wales the following February we asked him what was happening with the scheme. He told us a meeting happened to be happening that day but three months later his then levelling up minister Michael Gove admitted there was no progress.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Thames Water faces rocketing demand for supplies
Thames Water has warned that plans to build 100 new data centres across London and the South East will pile more pressure on its creaking infrastructure. The utility giant said it had identified 108 'hyper or large' data centres that will drive up demand in its region, with bosses suggesting it will have to manage water supplies carefully to ensure there is no impact on households. Each data centre is equivalent to thousands of homes being added to a water network, meaning the pipeline of new data centres is on par with a new small city being built. In its annual report, Thames Water said that building data centres 'needs to be carefully managed from a demand and UK growth perspective'. The company, which is battling to avoid nationalisation amid pressure from a £17bn debt pile, has previously raised the prospect of rationing water use for data centres or charging more at peak times. Data centres contain giant racks of computer servers that need to be cooled to avoid overheating, often with water piped in. The facilities are crucial to the rise of artificial intelligence and are a key priority for Sir Keir Starmer's growth push. However, the vast number being built has sparked concern among water companies such as Thames Water, which is now engaging with the Government to prevent potential shortages in future. 'The south-east of England is a water-stressed region and data centres can use a vast amount of water, equivalent to the usage of thousands of homes at peak draw,' a Thames Water spokesman said. 'With a large proportion of the proposed data centres earmarked to be built in the Thames Water region, it brings a challenge between safeguarding our finite resources while supporting the UK's growth strategy. 'It is important that we work collaboratively to meet this challenge and to avoid exacerbating water stress and impacting service for customers and the environment.' 'We are engaging with the Government regarding the challenge of water demand related to cooling data centres and how this can be mitigated. We are also working with a number of data centre providers about opportunities to reduce demand through innovation.' A corridor of land between London and Slough, much of which is served by Thames Water, contains Britain's densest collection of data centres. An independent review of the water sector last week cited data centres as one of the factors that are likely to mean water bills rising by 30pc over the next five years. The report, by Sir Jon Cunliffe, a former deputy governor of the Bank of England, said that national infrastructure bodies should be consulted when deciding where to build them. The Government has welcomed investment in new data centres, including designating them as critical national infrastructure. Thames Water last week started a hosepipe ban for more than 1 million people in Gloucestershire, Oxfordshire, Berkshire and Wiltshire. The company is also seeking to agree a rescue deal with creditors, but has warned it may fall into special administration if talks between the lenders and regulator Ofwat fail.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Britain risks following France into a terrifying debt crisis
Last week brought more bad news about the UK's public finances. June's figures for public sector borrowing came in at £20.7bn, well above the OBR's forecast and City expectations. What's more, £16.4bn of this was accounted for by debt interest payments. Yes, that's right: £16.4bn in one month. We are borrowing enormous sums to pay the interest on past borrowings of enormous sums. We are getting dangerously close to what economists call 'the debt trap'. This is when, under the pressure of rising debt interest payments, the debt ratio starts to explode. It goes without saying that it is good to avoid this, if you can. But can we? Be warned, you may need a ready supply of hot towels for this next bit. The key players in the debt drama are: the budget deficit, the debt ratio, the growth rate of the economy in money terms (which is equal to the real growth rate plus the rate of inflation) and the rate at which the Government can borrow. If the rate at which the Government borrows exceeds the growth of the economy (in nominal terms), then debt interest payments and the overall debt will rise as a share of GDP. In order to stop this process from leading to an ever-higher debt ratio, the Government must run a primary budget surplus (meaning a surplus on its budget without interest payments), requiring higher taxes and/or cuts in government spending. And the higher the initial debt ratio, the larger the surplus needs to be to stabilise the debt ratio. The debt dynamics are merciless. When emerging market countries become stuck in the debt trap, the result is usually default or much higher inflation, or both. Remarkably, given our pitifully low to non-existent real growth rate, the nominal growth of GDP (i.e. expressed in money terms), exceeds the average rate at which the Government borrows by a small margin. Phew! But this is somewhat misleading because the average cost of government debt is heavily influenced by past borrowing, some of which was at lower interest rates. When this debt matures, there is a risk that it will be refinanced at higher interest rates. So we are currently just avoiding the debt trap, but with the deficit so large, the debt ratio is still rising. In these circumstances, it is hardly surprising that the gloom is still gathering about the fiscal prospects that the Chancellor faces in the Budget this autumn. It hardly makes our position any better, but we are not alone. Amid all this domestic pessimism, few people have noticed what is happening to our close neighbour across the channel. France is facing a fiscal predicament every bit as serious as ours. For a start, France's ratio of government debt to GDP is higher than ours – 113pc of GDP compared with our 100pc. And its deficit is higher too – 5.8pc last year compared to our 5.1pc. And ours is set to be just under 4pc this year. In both countries, GDP growth has been weak, and prospects are clouded with uncertainty. The one area where France is better positioned is the cost of borrowing, and this really does show the weakness of the UK's position. Whereas 10-year bond yields here are 4.6pc, in France they stand at about 3.5pc, similar to other euro-zone members. In this regard, however, something extraordinary has been happening. French yields have been converging on Italy's. The gap between them is now only 0.18pc, the lowest for almost 20 years. It doesn't seem too fanciful to imagine that French yields will soon surpass Italy's. Admittedly, after a recent period of comparatively strong growth, it looks as though Italian economic growth is set to be slower than growth in France, returning to the long-established norm. That certainly does not make the job of stabilising the public finances any easier. And, at 135pc of GDP, Italy's debt ratio is a good deal higher than in France. But Italy possesses two striking advantages. First, its fiscal deficit is only 3.4pc of GDP, compared to France's 5.8pc. And excluding interest payments (the so-called primary budget), it is in a surplus of 0.5pc, compared to France's deficit of 3.7pc. The result is that to stabilise the debt ratio, Italy needs to tighten the budget deficit (through a mixture of higher taxes and expenditure cuts) by only 0.5pc of GDP. By contrast, to stabilise her debt ratio, France needs to tighten fiscal policy by over 3pc of GDP by 2027. Italy's second advantage is surprising to anyone who has followed Italian politics over the past 80 years. She seems to be more politically stable than France. Giorgia Meloni looks likely to be Italy's first post-war prime minister to complete their term. In France, there have been six prime ministers since 2020, and the current incumbent, Francois Bayrou, who heads a minority government, could be ousted any time soon. He recently announced a plan to tighten French fiscal policy by 1.5pc of GDP. By comparison, Rachel Reeves' Budget last October increased taxes by 1.2pc of GDP, but this was more than offset by increases in public expenditure. There is little chance of the proposed French tightening getting through parliament unscathed. The failure to pass a budget for next year, leading to the fall of the present government, could cause French bond yields to flare up. And then there is the presidential election in 2027. On voting intentions in the first round, Jordan Bardella, the likely candidate of Marine Le Pen's National Rally, is well ahead of the other candidates. Obviously, there's many a slip twixt the cup and the lip. But if the markets were to view a victory for the National Rally as likely, then they would surely send French bond yields much higher, thereby putting France in a dangerous fiscal position. We cannot gloat. There but for the grace of God go all of us.
The Sun
5 hours ago
- The Sun
Full list of benefits that WILL qualify for £300 energy bill support
MILLIONS of pensioners are set to receive energy bill help worth up to £300. The Winter Fuel Payment will be issued to nine million people this winter to cover the cost of gas and electric over the colder months. 1 The payment is worth up to £300 and most receive it automatically. Eligibility for the Winter Fuel Payment was means-tested in 2024/25 meaning only those on certain benefits received it. However, the government has since u-turned and it will now be paid to individuals with a yearly income of £35,000 or less. Those on certain benefits will also qualify this year when they didn't in 2024/25. This is the full list of benefits that qualifies you, and means you will receive the payment automatically: State Pension Pension Credit Universal Credit Attendance Allowance Personal Independence Payment (PIP) Carer's Allowance Disability Living Allowance (DLA) Income Support income-related Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) income-based Jobseeker's Allowance (JSA) awards from the War Pensions Scheme Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit Incapacity Benefit Industrial Death Benefit If you do not get any of these, you will need to claim your Winter Fuel Payment if either you've not had one before, or you've deferred your State Pension since your last Winter Fuel Payment. Who exactly is eligible and how much will I get? You can get a Winter Fuel Payment if you were born before September 22, 1959, and live in England and Wales. The amount you will receive is based on when you were born and your circumstances, including what benefits you are on, between September 15 and September 21 this year. This is known as the "qualifying week". If you live alone or no one you live with is eligible for the Winter Fuel Payment you will get either: £200, if you were born between 22 September 1945 and 21 September 1959 £300, if you were born before 22 September 1945 If you live with someone else who's eligible for the Winter Fuel Payment and are not on benefits you will get a payment of: £100, if you and the person you live with were both born between 22 September 1945 and 21 September 1959 £100, if you were born between 22 September 1945 and 21 September 1959 but the person you live with was born before 22 September 1945 £200, if you were born before 22 September 1945 but the person you live with was born between 22 September 1945 and 21 September 1959 £150, if you and the person you live with were born before 22 September 1945 If you and your partner jointly claim one of the following benefits, you will receive a different amount: Pension Credit, Universal Credit, income-based Jobseeker's Allowance (JSA), income-related Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) and Income Support. If you are on one of these benefits, one of you will get a payment of either: £200 if both of you were born between 22 September 1945 and 21 September 1959 £300 if one or both of you were born before 22 September 1945 The payment will be made into the bank account your benefits are usually paid into. If you get any of the same above benefits, but not as part of a joint claim, you'll get a payment of either: £200 if you were born between 22 September 1945 and 21 September 1959 £300 if you were born before 22 September 1945 However, in all the above cases, if your taxable income is more than £35,000, your Winter Fuel Payment will be taken back either through PAYE or through Self Assessment. If you are living in a care home will get either: £100, if you were born between 22 September 1945 and 21 September 1959 £150, if you were born before 22 September 1945 How to claim Anyone who has to claim the Winter Fuel Payment and is doing it by post can do so from September 15. Anyone claiming by phone can call up from October 13. The ultimate deadline to claim for this winter is March 31, 2026. More details on how to claim can be found via Most Winter Fuel Payments are made in November or December. If you are eligible, you should receive a letter in October or November telling you how much you're in line to get. If you don't receive one by January 28, 2026, contact the Winter Fuel Payment Centre on 0800 731 0160.
