IDF should be proscribed as terror group, says SNP MSP James Dornan
Palestine Action lost a late-night Court of Appeal challenge on Friday evening, which sought to stop it being banned, less than two hours before the move came into force at midnight.
The designation as a terror group means that membership of or support for Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
READ MORE: 29 people arrested at protest in support of Palestine Action
It comes after SNP MP Brendan O'Hara set out why the SNP abstained on the vote to proscribe the group in the House of Commons.
Dornan's motion was described as 'antisemitic' by the Board of Deputies.
In his motion, Dornan set out that Palestine Action are now proscribed alongside international terror organisations including Al Qaeda, Boko Haram, and the Irish Republican Army, among others.
The motion adds that 'all of these groups have, unlike Palestine Action, at some stage taken part in violent action'.
The move to ban Palestine Action was announced after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, which police said caused around £7 million of damage.
Dornan's motion adds that the decision is 'an overreaction' from the UK Government that appears to have been 'embarrassed by the actions of Palestine Action and terrified to show anything but utter compliance and subservience to the Israeli government in what it sees as its ongoing ethnic cleansing of Gaza'.
(Image: Getty) The motion says that this also applies to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, despite the warrant for his arrest for war crimes by the International Criminal Court.
It continues: 'Urges the Home Secretary to let the justice system deal with any ongoing criminal offences potentially committed by Palestine Action during reported events at RAF Brize Norton, and to proscribe only those organisations that, it considers, really do, or did, cause a threat to life, such as the Israel Defense Forces.'
The motion was backed by former SNP housing minister Paul McLennan and former international development minister Ben Macpherson. Other SNP MSPs Evelyn Tweed, Stephanie Callaghan and Stuart McMillan were joined by four Scottish Green MSPs, outgoing co-leader Patrick Harvie, Maggie Chapman, Ross Greer and Mark Ruskell.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes was 'disgraceful' and that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'.
MPs in the Commons voted 385 to 26, majority 359, in favour of proscribing the group on Wednesday, before the House of Lords backed the move without a vote on Thursday.
READ MORE: Proscription of organisation won't end the debate around terror laws
The SNP abstained on the vote - with Argyll and Bute MP O'Hara stating that they would have opposed the ban had the UK Government not included two neo-Nazi organisations - Maniacs Murder Cult and the Russian Imperial Movement.
Speaking in The Sunday Times Michael Wegier, chief executive of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, said Dornan's motion was 'ludicrous' and that the IDF was defending Israel.
'If the IDF did not exist, Israel would cease to exist,' Wegier said. 'Had the IDF not existed since Israel was created in 1948, there would be no Israel.
'So the only implication of this motion is that it is calling for the dissolution of the state of Israel, which is clearly antisemitic.'
He added that there is a 'distinction' between criticising the Israeli government and 'calling for Israel's dissolution', which Wegier argued proscribing the IDF would do.
Asked whether the SNP backed Dornan's motion and to set out its position on the proscription of Palestine Action, a spokesperson said: 'Since the beginning of this conflict, the SNP has been consistent in calling for an immediate ceasefire by all parties, the unconditional release of hostages, an end to UK arms sales to Israel and the recognition of Palestine as a sovereign state as part of a two-state solution to secure a lasting peace.
'The focus of the international community must be in ensuring that peace is delivered, that humanitarian aid is delivered unimpeded to those who need it and that the international rule of law is enforced.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
John Swinney branded an 'analogue politician' by UK Labour minister in 'second-rate' NHS app row
UK ministers have hit out at Scotland's 'second-rate' NHS app as it promises a 'supercharged' version south of the border. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... First Minister John Swinney has been branded an 'analogue politician in a digital age' over a row about Scotland's 'second-rate' NHS app. UK Health Secretary Wes Streeting said the SNP Government needed to act quickly as patients in Scotland were 'missing out'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The verbal swipe comes as Mr Streeting launches a plan to give patients in England a 'doctor in your pocket' to make healthcare technology part of everyday life. UK Health Secretary Wes Streeting | Lucy North/Press Association There has been an NHS England app for six years, but a similar version in Scotland will only go on a limited trial at the end of this year. A full rollout is not expected until 2030. Mr Streeting said: 'The UK Labour government is embracing technology to deliver a better NHS for patients and their families, giving them more control and transparency over their treatment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'In John Swinney, the SNP have an analogue politician in a digital age, and patients in Scotland are missing out. The SNP have record funding and complete control of the NHS in Scotland. 'There's no excuses for this and it just shows why Scotland can't afford a third decade of the SNP. 'It needs a new direction with Anas Sarwar as first minister.' The English app has 35 million users and UK ministers say they will improve their version by 2028, allowing patients to book and check hospital appointments, interact with specialists, and visit 'AI doctors' for advice. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad First Minister John Swinney | Jane Barlow/Press Association A Scottish app was first announced in 2021, but will not be launched until December this year. The app's functionality will initially be restricted to dermatology patients only at NHS Lanarkshire, and limited to only notifying them of appointments. If the trial is successful, it will be rolled out in other health boards and then be fully introduced in five years' time. A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'The NHS England app was developed to support England's NHS trusts and is configured specifically to their IT infrastructure. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We have, however, already engaged extensively with NHS England and with other health systems to explore how we can take learning from other approaches in developing our service.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Tony Blair's staff took part in 'Gaza Riviera' project
Plans outlined in a slide deck, titled the 'Great Trust', were shared with the US president proposed paying half a million Palestinians to leave the area and replacing them with private investors to develop Gaza. According to the Financial Times, the Tony Blair Institute (TBI) did not author or endorse the final slide deck, but two members of its staff were involved in message groups and calls as the project developed. READ MORE: How the UK media are covering up British spy flights for Israel One 'lengthy' document on postwar Gaza, written by a TBI staff member, was reportedly shared within the group for consideration, according to people familiar with the work. The document included a proposal of a 'Gaza Riviera' with artificial islands off the coast, blockchain-based trade initiatives, a deep-water port to tie Gaza into the India-Middle East-Europe economic corridor, and low-tax 'special economic zones'. The TBI document reportedly claimed that Israel's devastating assault on Gaza had 'created a once-in-a-century opportunity to rebuild Gaza from first principles . . . as a secure, modern prosperous society'. Although the Israeli businessmen's slide deck, which is more than 30 pages long, differed from the paper written by TBI's staff, there was some similarity the Finacial Times reported. The institute's document did not refer to the relocation of Palestinians. When first approached by the Financial Times regarding TBI's role in the project, a spokesperson said: 'Your story is categorically wrong . . . TBI was not involved in the preparation of the deck, which was a BCG deck, and had no input whatever into its contents.' TBI were then provided details of a 12-person message group used for the project — including two TBI staff, BCG consultants and the Israeli businessmen — and an unpublished TBI document shared within the group titled 'Gaza Economic Blueprint'. A TBI spokesperson then said: 'We have never said TBI knew nothing about what this group was working on or that they weren't on calls in which the group discussed their plans.' TBI said that when meeting groups to discuss postwar plans, it is 'essentially in listening mode'. The 'internal TBI document' looked at proposals 'being made by various parties . . . [and] is one of many such internal documents'. 'TBI emphatically did not provide its own internal document for the purposes of the BCG work,' it added. TBI staff 'saw' the slide deck but 'didn't create it', the spokesperson said. 'It would be wrong to suggest that we were working with this group to produce their Gaza plan.' TBI said Blair had sought a 'better Gaza for Gazans' for the past two decades: 'It has never been about relocating Gazans, which is a proposal TBI has never authored, developed or endorsed.'
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Palestine Action is malign, but terror status goes too far
At midnight on Saturday, Palestine Action became officially proscribed under the Terrorism Act. In that ignoble status, it joins al-Qaeda, Hamas and Isis. Voicing support for, or being a member of, Palestine Action is now punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Predictably enough, a number of adherents of the anti-Israeli direct action group do not seem to have been chastened. Following a failed last-minute High Court effort to block the group's proscription, dozens of protestors were arrested over the weekend on suspicion of supporting the organisation. They included an 83-year-old priest, as well as others thought to be 'wearing clothing or displaying articles' indicating membership of a terrorist organisation. That Palestine Action is a malign force is beyond doubt. Its members include sinister ideologues, deeply confused in their geopolitical outlooks and their assessment of the best way to secure their objectives. The group's 'disruptive tactics' involve calculated acts of criminal damage, illegal occupation of premises, and intimidating acts of vandalism. Since its founding in 2020, the group has had a hand in around 500 distinct instances of 'direct action', often targeting firms and property suspected of having links to Israel. The most serious act for which the group claimed credit was when four people were arrested on suspicion of causing £7 million of damage to two military transporter aircraft at RAF Brize Norton. It was this that prompted Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, to judge that the group had 'crossed the threshold established in the Terrorism Act'. • Police defend arrest of 83-year-old Palestine Action activist Yet, however wanton its criminality, it remains a stretch to brand Palestine Action a terror group. Its members are qualitatively different from those of al-Qaeda, and pose a substantially different kind of threat to public order and national security. Their tactics more closely resemble those of extremist environmentalist groups like Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion than those of Islamist terrorists. In recent months, a combination of public ill will, effective prosecution and proportionate sentencing have made it unviable for climate activists to persist with their criminal antics. In March this year, Just Stop Oil announced an end to its practices of criminal vandalism, claiming implausibly to have achieved its objectives. In reality, they were prosecuted into submission by legitimate use of the criminal law. The heavy-handed branding of Palestine Action as terrorists risks seeming absurd when bona fide hostile military groupings like the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps remain unproscribed. The destruction of property that Palestine Action has made its calling card can already be prosecuted. There are legitimate concerns that such measures risk suppressing dissent on the part of those politically opposed to the government's support of Israeli defence policy. Palestine Action's members may be misguided, but Britain must remain a country in which the right to express unpopular and dissenting political views is not subject to outright prohibition. The emergence in recent years of activist groups that make criminal forms of destruction and public nuisance their modus operandi does raise challenges for law enforcement. Lord Walney, the government's former independent adviser on extremism, has recently mooted an amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill which would give police greater power to curb the illegal antics of extremist groups that fall shy of terrorist organisations. These might include powers to block their ability to fundraise, organise on social media, or live-stream acts of criminality. These lighter-touch measures would be an obviously apt response to the level of threat posed. Palestine Action are an antisocial menace to public order; but politicians should not do them the service of taking them as seriously as they take themselves.
