Election Commission of India says 80% of electors in Bihar have submitted voter enumeration forms
Editorial | Careful curation: On Bihar's Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls
The Commission stated that 100% of the forms had been printed and that distribution was nearly complete for all electors found at their respective addresses. As of 6:00 p.m. on Saturday (July 12, 2025), a total of 6,32,59,497 Enumeration Forms — or 80.11% of electors — had been collected.
The ECI had earlier, on July 6, issued front-page advertisements in Patna-based newspapers urging voters to submit their filled forms even if they did not yet possess the requisite documents. The advertisement clarified that Electoral Registration Officers could process such forms based on local inquiries or alternative documentary evidence.
Soon after, the Commission further clarified that while documents could be submitted until July 25, voters would also have another opportunity to provide them during the claims and objections period.
On July 10, while hearing a group of petitions challenging the SIR process in Bihar, the Supreme Court urged the ECI to consider Aadhaar, EPIC cards, and ration cards as valid forms of identification. The next hearing is scheduled for July 28, just ahead of the planned publication of the draft electoral rolls on August 1, 2025.
Editorial | Widen the net: On Supreme Court and Bihar's revision of electoral rolls
In its statement, the Commission said 77,895 Booth Level Officers (BLOs), supported by an additional 20,603 newly appointed BLOs, are actively engaged in completing the enumeration exercise ahead of the July 25 deadline. Field-level supervision is being conducted by 38 District Election Officers (DEOs), 243 Electoral Registration Officers (EROs), and 963 Assistant EROs across the State, under the oversight of the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO), the Commission added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
TG Cricket Assn files complaint over alleged fund misuse
Hyderabad: The Telangana Cricket Association (TCA) district committees have lodged police complaints against the Hyderabad Cricket Association (HCA) across various districts, alleging the misuse of funds earmarked for cricket development over the past two decades. District committees from Khammam, Warangal, Adilabad, and Mahbubnagar have approached their respective Superintendents of Police. Dharam Guruva Reddy, General Secretary of the TCA, stated that the HCA has consistently claimed in its annual accounts to have allocated Rs 20 lakh annually for cricket development. However, a forensic audit conducted by E&Y reportedly found no evidence of these funds being spent in the districts. Guruva Reddy highlighted that both the High Court-appointed committee and two Supreme Court-appointed committees had previously recommended investigating and punishing those responsible for the alleged fund misuse. Despite these recommendations, he claims that successive elected bodies governing the HCA have ignored and bypassed these directives. Consequently, four TCA district units have submitted criminal complaints against HCA-related clubs in their respective districts. The TCA plans to submit similar complaints against other district-named clubs on Tuesday. The association is demanding appropriate criminal action against all clubs involved in siphoning off what it describes as 'publicly accountable funds' intended for the upliftment of underprivileged and rural cricketers in Telangana State.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Can legislative committees interfere in Revenue deptt work?
Representative imageRepresentative image SC to examine their power to interfere in quasi-judicial functions New Delhi: Can parliamentary and legislative committees interfere in the quasi-judicial work of the revenue department? The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to examine this question arising from the directions issued by a parliamentary committee in the UP Assembly in a land dispute case. Appearing for a petitioner, senior advocate Amit Anand Tiwari told a bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi that multiple directions have been issued by the Uttar Pradesh govt, on the instructions of legislative committees, to revenue officers asking them to take 'necessary action' and submit report on the land dispute. 'Such directions directly and substantially impinge on free and independent adjudication by the revenue authorities in pending proceedings,' Tiwari said, which prompted the bench to entertain the petition and say that the question of law arising in this case is – 'Whether legislative committees can interfere in quasi-judicial functions of revenue authorities?' The issue pertained to demarcation and determination of possession of a plot, which according to the petitioner could be gone into by the competent authority, in this case the sub-divisional magistrate, under the UP Revenue Code. Tiwari said a proper and effective adjudication by the revenue authorities is not possible if there is regular and constant interference from the legislative Committees. He said the Allahabad HC erred by failing to issue appropriate directions to prevent interference by political authorities in the adjudicatory process before Revenue Authorities. The petitioner informed SC that he had filed a complaint before the Assistant Collector, Meja, Prayagraj under section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 against one R P Shukla, who using his influence, had encroached upon the public lands causing great hardships and obstruction to people in pursuing their agricultural activities. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo 'While the petitioner was diligently pursuing the remedies available to him under the law, questions were being raised in the Vidhan Sabha and directions were being issued by the Secretariat to Revenue Officers asking them to take necessary action and to submit report regarding the land dispute concerning RP Shukla,' he alleged.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Yogendra Yadav writes: Bihar's SIR exercise is a threat to right to vote — across India
While the relief signalled by the Supreme Court in its hearing on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar can only be welcomed, it carries a serious risk of distracting us from the real issue. Our focus may be diverted to the inclusion of Aadhaar, on revising the impossible timelines of this exercise and on the ground reality in Bihar. All these are real and pressing issues. But exclusive attention to them can cloud the fundamental issue, of significance for the entire country, and indeed for the future of the Indian republic. Unless they are vigilant, opponents of the SIR (including this author) run the risk of winning a battle only to lose the war. Let us not forget what is at stake here. The SIR is not limited to Bihar. Bihar is just a pilot. As this paper has reported ('After Bihar, EC writes to remaining states to prepare for intensive roll revision, qualifying date set', July 13), the ECI has directed that preparations for the exercise begin in the rest of the country, even as the Supreme Court is examining its legality. This is not a revision of the voters' list — it is a de novo compilation of the list. It is, in fact, a rewriting of the rules, procedures and protocols of how the voter list is to be created. At stake here is the foundational principle of universal adult franchise. No matter what relief we obtain in Bihar, unless the entire exercise is annulled, we stand to lose the universality of the franchise. Universal adult franchise was among the core principles of our freedom struggle, formulated in the Motilal Nehru Committee Report of 1928 and reiterated in the declaration of Purna Swaraj in 1929 and thereafter. The Constitution of India incorporated the principle of 'adult suffrage' in Article 326 by stipulating that 'every person who is a citizen of India and who is not less than twenty-one years of age … shall be entitled to be registered as a voter'. Article 5 specifies that Indian citizenship shall be based on birth and residence (not on descent or ethnicity etc). Article 10 protects a citizen against loss of citizenship status by providing for presumption of continuity: 'Every person who is or is deemed to be a citizen of India' continues to be so. In the first 75 years, the Republic of India followed the 'logic of encompassment' in realising this constitutional promise. As Anupama Roy argues in her book Mapping Citizenship in India, the logic of encompassment involved a move towards true universalisation and recognition of all differences so as to extend citizenship status to everyone. There was also, no doubt, the contrary 'logic of closure' at work — of denial, suspicion and exclusion — especially against migrant workers, who continued to be 'residual citizens'. But that logic was never extended to the denial of voting rights. Hence the now-accepted argument in the book Why India Votes? by anthropologist Mukulika Banerjee: The secular ritual of voting has acquired something of a sacrosanct status in India. This did not happen by accident. The logic of encompassment was embodied in laws, rules and institutional practices, all aimed at ensuring that no voter was left behind. First, unlike the US and other countries that require every eligible person to apply to register as a voter, the Indian system placed the responsibility of enrolling each eligible voter on the state. The result: only 74 per cent of adults made it to the voters' list in the US, while it was 96 per cent in India. While individuals can apply for inclusion in the electoral roll, the principal responsibility lies with election officials (now the BLO and the ERO) to contact every adult resident and make sure that no eligible voter is left behind. Second, there is a presumption of citizenship: Every person who appears to be an adult and resides in the locality is presumed to be a citizen and put on the electoral roll unless there are good grounds to suspect otherwise or there is a complaint. Once on the voters' list, a name cannot be removed without the proper process. Finally, as Ornit Shani's celebrated history How India Became Democratic shows, the making of universal franchise required the ECI to take unusual steps. Over the years, the ECI has gone out of its way to evolve protocols for the inclusion of 'liminal' citizens who may have been left out in any routine, bureaucratic exercise: Nomadic communities, homeless persons, sex workers, transgender persons, orphans, undocumented citizens and non-resident Indians. The SIR seeks to reverse the logic of encompassment. It seeks to formalise the logic of closure that would result in graded inequality of citizenship. For the first 75 years, the Indian state failed to convert the promise of 'free and equal membership of a political community' — to recall the favourite words of T H Marshall — from the formal political sphere to a substantive social sphere. As Niraja Gopal Jayal has argued so perceptively in Citizenship Imperilled: India's Fragile Democracy, we are witnessing 'major reconfigurations of citizenship' that would result in 'not the realisation of substantive citizenship but in fact a substantive erosion of even formal citizenship'. The current exercise completes this reversal through multiple, simultaneous moves under the innocuous neologism of 'Special Intensive Revision' of electoral rolls. While it pretends to implement Article 326 of the Constitution, it twists the constitutional intent by disregarding the presumption of continuing citizenship. It is another subtle step in what Jayal identifies as the transition from the jus soli principle of citizenship based on birth and residence to the jus sanguinis principle of citizenship based on descent, ethnicity or religion. The SIR reverses the practices that have ensured the operationalisation of universal adult franchise in India. First, the onus of being on the voters' list has been shifted to the eligible voters. For the first time, all potential voters, with no exception, have been asked to fill out an enumeration form. Otherwise, they don't even figure on the draft electoral rolls. Their being on the voters' list so far is of no consequence, unless they figured on the electoral rolls of 2003. (There is nothing to justify 2003 as a cut-off point, as that exercise did not involve any physical or documentary verification of citizenship status). Second, the presumption of citizenship has been overturned. Now you need to prove that you are not an illegal resident. For the first time, everyone carries the burden of offering documents (either a copy of the 2003 voters' list or proof of birth and residence) that have never been provided to them, and that a majority has no reason to possess. Finally, it seeks to legalise arbitrariness through the absurd provision of an 'indicative (though not exhaustive)' list of documents, which can be changed at the discretion of any local official. In the past few days, the media has finally taken note of the chaos, the tragedy and the farce that the SIR is unfolding in Bihar. Powerful and relevant as these stories are, they must not distract us from the basic design underlying the exercise. The real problem is not just inefficiency and unfairness in operationalising the SIR. The very scheme is malevolent, anti-constitutional and anti-democratic. It must be scraped. The writer is member, Swaraj India, and national convenor of Bharat Jodo Abhiyaan. He has filed a petition in the Supreme Court challenging the SIR
