logo
As Cox advances nuclear agreements, he says the cost to develop technology is nothing so far

As Cox advances nuclear agreements, he says the cost to develop technology is nothing so far

Yahoo11-06-2025
Gov. Spencer Cox answers questions from the media during his monthly PBS news conference in Salt Lake City on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. (Pool photo by Bethany Baker/The Salt Lake Tribune)
When thinking about Utah's nuclear future, Gov. Spencer Cox said he wants people to think less of the giant nuclear plant where Homer Simpson works, and visualize more a picture of dozens of small modular reactors, stacking in the state over time.
While many Utahns are still trying to wrap their heads around the idea Cox is envisioning, he has already signed a couple of memorandums of understanding with companies to help it materialize — and, he said, he wants to go big.
On May 23, Cox joined the founder of Valar Atomics, a California nuclear developer, in announcing their partnership to meet President Donald Trump's goal to have an operational advanced reactor on American soil by July 4, 2026, at the San Rafael Energy Research Center in Emery County.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
On Monday, he signed another agreement with another company for the nuclear efforts, Cox said during his monthly news conference broadcast by PBS Utah.
A plan for Utah nuclear energy industry's foundation is taking shape
'We're going to be working with all of these companies. We want to find the best technology. We're not betting on any one technology or any one company. That doesn't make sense,' Cox said on Tuesday. 'We're betting on the idea that there is going to be a nuclear renaissance.'
While research shows that nuclear developments usually go for a hefty price tag, Cox said that currently the initial plans won't cost anything to the state, since the state already acquired the San Rafael Energy Lab during the 2024 legislative session and that will be one of the state's main contributions in the agreement.
'We're just providing space for these companies to come in and run their new technology there to see if it actually works,' Cox said. 'And so that's not going to cost us anything. The hope is it will save us down the road.'
Lawmakers did agree to fund $10 million for Cox's Operation Gigawatt nuclear initiative; the governor said that money is for siting.
Utah has also sought to ease the regulations to make nuclear energy production a reality. First by suing the federal government in January — then still under the Biden administration — over its strict rules to permit the resource. Then, by passing big legislation to set the foundation for the state's nuclear energy future.
Glowing pains: Developing nuclear power could cost Utah tens of billions
The U.S. is lagging behind countries like China in the development of nuclear plants, Cox said. Now, with a new White House administration prioritizing a quicker licensing process for nuclear reactors and ordering a plan to add 300 gigawatts of nuclear energy capacity in the country by 2050, Cox believes Utah can lead the way.
'The market will decide how big that is,' Cox said, 'government is not going to decide that, but we're going to present opportunities.'
Other agreements happening across the state have centered around the construction of power-hungry data and AI centers. While Cox says he remains 'fairly agnostic' on them, he believes they'll be built in many areas of the country either way, drawing a substantial amount of energy from states' shared grid.
'Even if we didn't have a single data center here, we would still need to significantly increase our power production,' Cox said. 'If we're going to significantly increase our power production, we might as well put them here.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why American Cars May Not Sell Well In Japan Despite Trade Deal
Why American Cars May Not Sell Well In Japan Despite Trade Deal

Forbes

timea few seconds ago

  • Forbes

Why American Cars May Not Sell Well In Japan Despite Trade Deal

The Jeep is the biggest selling American-made car in Japan. (Photo By)"n President Trump is chuffed about his recent trade deal with Japan calling it the greatest in U.S. history. "I just signed the largest trade deal in history, I think maybe the largest deal in history with Japan," Trump boasted at the White House on Tuesday evening. Japan also agreed to invest $550bn in the U.S. economy although no details were forthcoming as to which industries or sectors would benefit. Trump shakes hands with Japan's PM Shigeru Ishiba. (Photo by Jim WATSON / AFP) (Photo by JIM ... More WATSON/AFP via Getty Images) Meanwhile Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba welcomed the announcement of the 15% reciprocal tariffs—down from 25%, stressing that it was "the lowest figure to date among countries with trade surpluses with the US'. Japan's stock market soared at news of 15% trade deal News of the deal was well-received by the Japanese stock market which saw shares soar with Mazda rising 17%, Toyota swelling by 15%, Mitsubishi up 13%, Honda increasing 11% and Nissan jumping 8%. Mazda, a carmaker who builds the majority of its vehicles in Japan, was particularly concerned about the proposed 25% tariffs. A quarter of Japan's US exports are from its critical automotive sector, which accounts for almost 3% of its economy. And it's with the auto sector that Trump really seems to have no idea what's really happening. The truth is two-fold. Firstly, before Trump started threatening Japan with tariffs, American cars entering the Japanese market, including Jeep, Cadillac and Corvette, were charged a zero tariff. Zilch! Japan has not charged tariffs or imports duties on imported cars from the U.S., or Europe for that matter, since the late 1970s. In contrast, America had imposed a 2.5% tariff on Japanese imports. Corvette sells in small numbers in Japan. (Photo By) But that's only part of the issue. Trump has continually complained that Japan does not take American cars. He has repeatedly said that the Asian nation is not open to U.S. vehicles. After this major trade deal announcement with Japan, Trump is bloating that the country will now open up to U.S. cars, trucks, rice and other agricultural products. Hey, buddy, that is not the reality. Japan is, and always has been open and ready to take all the American cars you wish to export. The bottom line is—apart from Jeep, which is the biggest selling American car in Japan, and a smattering of Cadillac and Corvette models, Japanese motorists, for the most part, don't want to buy American cars. Not even Tesla EVs, which do sell in Japan, but are imported from China, so not really seen as American. The fact is that old impressions die hard. From the 1970s through to the early 21st century, a mixture of U.S. cars were offered in Japan—including Ford, GM, Pontiac and Buick, in addition to Chrysler. But even though some brands delivered more stylish designs or more powerful engines than their Japanese counterparts, most American cars were considered too big for Japanese roads and carparks, and not as fuel-efficient or as reliable as Japanese cars, which were, on average, a little cheaper. Other critical factors that led to several brands exiting Japan, like Ford in 2016, were insufficient product lineups, and a poor dealer network. So, with all that in mind Mr Trump, to be honest, it does not matter how many American cars you force on the Japanese market, I cannot see how U.S. brands will sell here, no matter what Trump says. Japanese don't want them. It's like trying to force-feed sushi with wasabi to blue collar American families in the Rust Belt—it is a really tough sell.

Head of FEMA Search and Rescue resigns over agency's response to Texas floods: Sources

timea few seconds ago

Head of FEMA Search and Rescue resigns over agency's response to Texas floods: Sources

The head of FEMA's Urban Search and Rescue branch, Ken Pagurek, resigned on Monday, multiple sources confirmed to ABC News. Pagurek told colleagues he was frustrated by the Department of Homeland Security's efforts to dismantle FEMA and by new hurdles that slowed the agency's response to the catastrophic flooding in Central Texas earlier this month, according to sources familiar with the matter. Sources said he pointed to a new DHS policy requiring all spending over $100,000 to be personally approved by Secretary Kristi Noem as a key factor behind the delays and, ultimately, his decision to step down. CNN. Pagurek had worked with FEMA's search and rescue operations for more than a decade and had served as its chief for the past year. Pagurek did not respond to a request for comment by ABC News. DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin told ABC News, "The attempt to spin a personal career decision into some big scandal is RIDICULOUS. It is laughable that a career public employee, who claims to serve the American people, would choose to resign over our refusal to hastily approve a six-figure deployment contract without basic financial oversight." "We're being responsible with taxpayer dollars, that's our job," McLaughlin said. "FEMA experienced no delays in deployment of assets, and Texas officials have unequivocally and vocally applauded the federal government and FEMA's response. If anyone is upset by the end of unchecked, blank-check spending under President Trump's administration, that says more about them than it does about us."

What's in Trump's trade agreement with Japan?

timea few seconds ago

What's in Trump's trade agreement with Japan?

President Donald Trump announced a trade agreement with Japan on Tuesday, making it the largest U.S. trade partner to broker an accord as the White House threatens to impose tariffs on dozens of countries within days. Before the deal, Japan faced the prospect of a 25% tariff rate set to take effect Aug. 1. Instead, products from the fifth-largest U.S. trade partner will be slapped with a 15% tariff, in exchange for a willingness on the part of Japan to import some goods, among other concessions. In a post on social media late Tuesday, Trump touted the agreement as a 'massive deal.' The White House has yet to release full details of the agreement. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba also celebrated the accord. 'With the national interests of both countries in mind, we were able to reach an agreement at this time,' Ishiba said. Japan's Nikkei index surged 3.5% on Wednesday, while major U.S. indexes nudged slightly higher in early trading. Here's what to know about what's in the trade agreement and what comes next: What's in the U.S. trade agreement with Japan? The trade agreement lowers the tariff rate on Japanese products to 15%, putting it below the threatened rate of 25% but higher than a universal rate of 10% faced by nearly all imports. Even more, the U.S. agreed to set a 15% tariff on Japanese cars, putting it below the 25% tariff rate placed on imported vehicles from other nations. Japan purchased nearly $80 billion worth of U.S. products in 2024, while the U.S. bought about $148 billion worth of Japanese goods, according to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, a government agency. Cars and auto parts accounted for about $52 billion worth of imported Japanese products, making up more than one-third of products purchased by the U.S., government data shows. Shares of Japan-based Toyota soared more than 13% on Wednesday, while Honda jumped about 12%. In exchange for the softening of U.S. tariffs, Japan agreed to open its economy to imports of trucks, rice and other agricultural goods, Trump said. Japan also agreed to invest $550 billion in the U.S. economy, Trump added, but the president did not specify how the funds would be spent. How many trade agreements has the White House achieved so far? When Trump delayed the onset of so-called 'reciprocal tariffs' in April, the White House vowed to strike 90 trade agreements in 90 days. Before that deadline elapsed, Trump proposed a flurry of similar country-specific tariffs with a new effect date of Aug. 1. So far, Trump has brokered agreements with the United Kingdom, Indonesia, Vietnam, the Philippines and Japan. The White House also reached a preliminary accord with China that lowered tit-for-tat tariffs previously imposed by the world's two largest economies. For his part, the president has insisted that the on-again, off-again levies make up a key part of his negotiation strategy. "The president and his trade team want to cut the best deals for the American people and the American worker," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said last month when she announced the Aug. 1 deadline. Price hikes could hit coffee, shoes, appliances and a range of other products if additional tariffs take effect on Aug. 1, analysts previously told ABC News.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store