logo
Despite federal government targeting DEI programs, cultural graduations continue to empower, honor Spokane grads

Despite federal government targeting DEI programs, cultural graduations continue to empower, honor Spokane grads

Yahoo20-05-2025
May 19—Tere Graham attended the African American Graduation Ceremony more than a decade ago after graduating from Eastern Washington University.
Although she previously lived in Spokane and attended Lewis and Clark High School, it was during this ceremony that she first felt connected to the Spokane community.
"I just saw a sea of folks who look like my aunts and uncles, and I said, 'This is pretty cool.' I never experienced that before," said Graham, program manager for the Unity Multicultural Education Center at Gonzaga University and volunteer for the African American Graduation.
For decades, cultural and identity-based groups — including African Americans, Asian Americans, Native Americans, Latinos and the LGBTQ+ community — have hosted graduation celebrations honoring students at all levels, from middle school to college.
Despite ongoing political threats to diversity, equity and inclusion programs organizers of these events in Spokane emphasize that the ceremonies are not about politics; they're about fostering a sense of belonging and worth for young people.
"When I crossed that stage as a college graduate, they were there and they're still here. So, I love to offer that to our generation," Graham said.
Diversity, equity and inclusion
DEI initiatives can be traced back to the Civil Rights Movement and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination in employment. Shortly after, in 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson established an equal opportunity policy, mandating affirmative action for federal contractors.
However, when President Donald Trump returned to office earlier this year, he rescinded DEI-related policies during his first week.
"We have ended the tyranny of so-called diversity, equity and inclusion policies all across the entire federal government, and, indeed, the private sector and our military," Trump said during a joint session of Congress earlier this year. "And our country will be woke no longer."
In February, a letter from the U.S. Department of Education referenced "segregation by race in graduation ceremonies" would warrant withholding federal funds to schools if schools continue to offer them, though a federal court in April prevented the department from acting on the contents in the letter.
Sarah Wixson, an attorney with Stokes Lawrence in Yakima, said one problem with the current wave of attacks on DEI is that the term means different things to different people.
Under Trump's presidency, she said, many began to see it as discriminatory rather than inclusive.
"People view DEI as being discrimination, and I don't think that's a correct way of looking at it, but that's where we are now and where we weren't two years ago," Wixson said.
She said she works with various employers who have since abandoned their DEI programs out of fear of being targeted or defunded. Still, she admires the organizations that continue to hold space for students to celebrate their culture and identity.
"I think everybody else's culture is just as important. It's a huge point of celebration," Wixson said. "Not everybody celebrates the same way."
Frances Mortel, the cultural programs manager for Asians for Collective Liberation Spokane, also said within the past few years that the term "DEI" has become twisted. The Asian American Graduation Ceremony was a reminder to her that DEI isn't a specific brand.
"As part of Asian American Heritage Month, we had guest speaker Viet Thanh Nguyen, a Pulitzer Prize-winning author and really inspiring activist," Mortel said. "It was really inspiring being reminded after both of those talks that our work is actually beyond just what DEI has become."
The fourth annual Asian American Graduation, held in May, was organized by ACL Spokane in partnership with the Empire Health Foundation. She said they had about 40 grads attend the celebration.
Fernanda Mazcot, executive director of Nuestras Raíces Centro Comunitario, said that, with increasing attacks on DEI and the Latino community, they had to rethink safety plans for this year's 30th annual Latino Graduation Ceremony.
Canceling, however, never crossed their minds.
"We know this is a very significant event for young scholars and graduates, especially first-generation college students, to share this event with their families, but we did partner with the Peace and Justice Action League here in Spokane," Mazcot said. "They are just kind of walking around campus, just making sure everything's good, and folks are feeling safe."
For Graham, the main question around the African American graduation wasn't a matter of "if" there would be a ceremony but "when."
"When we see these students walk across this stage, we're one inch closer to not having to talk about diversity, equity and inclusion, not having to talk about who's feeling micro aggressions in their classrooms," Graham said.
During the ceremony, Graham said they gave out an African kente stole, a symbolism of interconnectedness to their heritage and its history that is deeply connected to Africa's rich weaving traditions, which dates as long ago as 3000 B.C.
The more than 30 graduates at the 16th annual Lavender Graduation hosted by Eastern Washington University's Eagle Pride Center were similarly adorned with rainbow stoles to represent their identity or ally-ship with the LGBTQ+ community.
At the intimate ceremony on EWU's campus, many knew each other from their time at the school and in their pride center, where EWU graduate Zoe Swenson worked for about four years as a peer adviser. Even for those outside EWU reveled in the sense of "found family," like North Central High School graduate Anabell Sweet.
"We have people who come into the Pride Center or to even these events, and it's because their families don't support them, so they're looking for kind of a family within the community," Swenson said.
Sweet is bound for Washington State University to study early childhood education. For her, the graduation was just as much a time to feel celebrated as it was to see others who walked in her shoes earn their degrees — those who can relate to being called slurs or not being accepted by parts of their family.
"I'm excited to see and celebrate all these other people who have gone through the same struggles, more struggles than I have," Sweet said. "To just have that space to be like, 'You did it. Despite everything, you did the dang thing.' "
Organizers of the annual Spokane Native American Community Graduation sang a similar tune of its importance. Evanlene Melting Tallow has sat on the graduation's committee for 24 of the 29 years it has existed, working at EWU as a project coordinator and recruiter. Not only is the event significant to honor and adorn graduates with a Pendleton stole, but encourage the young minds watching.
"We definitely need to be able to show you know that these graduates look like them who are in the audience," Melting Tallow said. "These are the people who eventually are going to be doctors, who are going to be engineers or teachers or welders."
It's a real point of pride for her to drape the traditional Pendleton stole over the shoulders of a student she once saw in the audience. Creating a cycle of prosperity for her community is personal to her, the first in her family to graduate college.
"I always said, 'I will not be the last,' " she said, supporting her point by rattling off numerous academically decorated family members, including her two kids who walked in the Spokane Native American Community Graduation.
"When you start a movement, and we are starting a movement, it always has rippling effects," she said.
The ceremony, hosted at Gonzaga, has several cultural elements otherwise absent from traditional school-based affairs, including an Indigenous drum group.
This year, the committee also decided to honor a late teenager who would have walked with her class but died this year in a car accident. Her family received a Pendleton sash and a friend held a photo of her as she walked across the stage to recognize her efforts towards graduating. That personal touch is part of the significance of these ceremonies to supplement whole-school graduations, said Melting Tallow, a citizen of both the Blackfeet Nation of Montana and Blood Tribe of Canada.
"Our people have gone through a lot, but we're resilient. We will continue to have this celebration every year, because we want to show that we have students who are very productive in our communities, from different degrees and graduating from high school," Melting Tallow said. "We are here, we are resilient, and we are going to keep moving forward."
The thought that cultural graduations have been targeted in the Trump administration's efforts against DEI shocked Kitara Johnson Jones, who owns and operates a DEI consulting agency and attended dozens of cultural graduations in her former role as multicultural director for Spokane Community College.
"There's a rite of passage thing to happen, that's a cultural thing that you aren't going to be able to erase ... especially in communities where it doesn't often happen, it takes a whole village to get them there," Jones said.
Jones is confident cultural graduations will persist in some fashion with or without the federal government's approval. The government hasn't historically been the provider of Indigenous powwows or celebrations at Black churches, she said, these came straight from the communities themselves.
"You can't erase people and you can't erase history or heritage or a culture; you just can't," Jones said.
'Proving your worth'
During the Hispanic/Latino Graduation Ceremony organized by Nuestras Raíces Centro Comunitario, Edmundo Aguilar, an assistant teaching professor at the University of Washington, said that graduating and being proud of their culture is important for students to move forward.
"Today, you all are pushing back. You all are fighting back by proving your worth, despite all the barriers that you are facing and all that is happening," Aguilar said.
Hispanic and Latino students from middle school all the way to college were honored with a serape stole, a brightly colored, woven stole used to represent Mexican cultural pride, heritage and identity.
Among them was Angel Maldonado, a recent graduate of Gonzaga University. Maldonado said he majored in elementary education, following in his mom's footsteps to become a teacher.
"My mom is the only one of her siblings to ever go to college. She's also the youngest and she's also a teacher, so I think it's really special for me, to not only to get an education, but to also become a teacher, kind of following in her footsteps," said Maldonado, who's from Brewster, Washington. "It just feels really nice and rewarding."
For him, attending the Latino ceremony was a way to show that he and others aren't backing down, despite attacks on DEI and on the Latino community, especially under Trump's administration.
"I mean, many cultures, but us as Mexican Americans, I think these kinds of fights fall onto our shoulders, and I think just being a part of this ceremony really shows we know what we're really about," Maldonado said. "Just keep looking forward. Follow your dreams."
Elena Perry's work is funded in part by members of the Spokane community via the Community Journalism and Civic Engagement Fund. This story can be republished by other organizations for free under a Creative Commons license. For more information on this, please contact our newspaper's managing editor.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump releases AI 'action plan' that offers a split with Biden
Trump releases AI 'action plan' that offers a split with Biden

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump releases AI 'action plan' that offers a split with Biden

President Trump released an AI "action plan" on Wednesday that outlines the administration's vision for achieving global dominance in artificial intelligence. The report marks a split from Biden administration policies, which favored restrictions against exports of AI chips and steps to ensure AI was not used to spread misinformation. However, the new rules do come with limitations for AI developers that build "ideological biases" into their systems, which have yet to be defined by the administration. 'There is a global competition now to lead in artificial intelligence, and we want the United States to win that race," said David Sacks, chair of the president's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, during a briefing on the report. Sacks said the report builds on President Trump's executive order on AI issued during the first week of his second term in office by taking away "unnecessary barriers" to AI adoption put in place by the Biden administration. Keys to the action plan include removing federal regulations that the administration believes hinders AI, promoting the build out of AI data centers, and exporting American-made AI around the world. More details of the plan are expected to come in an executive order or orders issued by the president on Wednesday afternoon. And Trump is also expected to discuss the plan during a speech at a Wednesday event titled "Winning the AI Race," organized by White House AI and crypto czar David Sacks and his co-hosts on the "All-In" podcast. Those executive orders, according to Axios and the Wall Street Journal, would promote the exports of chips and AI technology to countries considered friendly to the US. There may also be an order that targets "woke AI," according to The Wall Street Journal. It would target AI developers that the administration believes create liberally biased algorithms and block them from serving as federal contractors. The White House didn't respond to a request for comment. Asked who decides if an AI system is biased, a senior White House official said during a briefing that "what we're recommending here is that federal procurement guidelines be updated to ensure that government only, the federal government only contracts with LLM developers who ensure that their systems are objective and and free from top-down ideological bias. And you know, DEI is really the main one." Two constitutional law scholars who talked with Yahoo Finance said it is doubtful the "woke AI" measure will withstand legal scrutiny. "If you sanction software that is liberal, but not software that is conservative, the challenge will be that the executive order is content-based discrimination," said UC San Francisco School of Law professor Rory Little. "I don't even know how you tell if software is liberal or conservative," Little said, adding that the First Amendment protects intellectual property as forms of speech that the government may not single out for punishment. But the order's constitutional viability may not matter in the short term for companies like Amazon (AMZN), Anthropic ( Google (GOOG), OpenAI ( Microsoft (MSFT), and Perplexity ( all of which are vying to supply AI systems to the government. Even if the order is met with legal challenges, AI developers might not have time to wait out a court solution. "A lot of people are trying to make deals with the Trump administration, so they view these executive orders not as law, but as the opening bid in a negotiation," Little said. "If you're an AI company, like Google, you're probably going to do your best to negotiate something that permits whatever you want to do to go forward," he added. "And you could care less what atmospheric politics might look like, so long as you're making money on your software." OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said Tuesday at a Federal Reserve banking conference in Washington, D.C., that his company now has lots of government work. "We are increasingly working with the government to roll out our services to lots of government employees," Altman said. If such an AI order is issued and then challenged, a court fight is likely to resemble those in multiple ongoing lawsuits against two other DEI-focused executive orders issued by Trump during his first days back in office. Those earlier orders directed all federal contractors to certify that they do not operate DEI programs in violation of anti-discrimination laws. They also shuttered government offices and employment positions focused on DEI. David Coale, a partner with the law firm Lynn Pinker Hurst & Schwegmann, said the executive orders get into an area called the "unconstitutional conditions" doctrine, which prohibits the government from conditioning a grant on the exercise of constitutional rights. "This [type of] proposal goes too far," Coale said, explaining that tying the eligibility to an AI's liberal bias presents "serious First Amendment issues." Alexis Keenan is a legal reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow Alexis on X @alexiskweed.

Trump admin will soon propose to kill EPA's ability to make rules about climate pollution, sources say
Trump admin will soon propose to kill EPA's ability to make rules about climate pollution, sources say

CNN

time2 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump admin will soon propose to kill EPA's ability to make rules about climate pollution, sources say

The Environmental Protection Agency has drafted a proposal to reverse a landmark scientific finding that planet-warming pollution from fossil fuels endangers human health, and could release that proposal as soon as this week, according to three people familiar with the plan. Known as the 'endangerment finding,' the 2009 declaration has served as the basis for federal rules limiting greenhouse gas pollution from power plants, cars and trucks, and the oil and gas industry. The repeal, if successful, would take away the federal government's main way to fight climate change. EPA administrator Lee Zeldin announced in March the agency would reconsider the rule as part of a suite of proposals to overturn pollution rules the Trump administration considers to be burdensome to the fossil fuel and transportation industries. A proposal to 'update' the finding was first touted by Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation blueprint to overhaul the federal government and repeal many keystone regulations that have come to define life in modern America. An EPA spokesperson did not comment on when the proposed rule would be released. 'The proposal will be published for public notice and comment once it has completed interagency review and been signed by the Administrator,' the EPA spokesperson said in a statement. Environmental groups who have attended public meetings about the EPA's proposal have been alarmed at the lack of EPA staff in those meetings. Only one White House Office of Management and Budget staffer has attended the public meetings with stakeholders, a highly unusual move, said David Doniger, a senior federal strategist at the Natural Resources Defense Council, and Shaun Goho, the legal director for the Clean Air Task Force. 'There was only one participant on the government side, and there was nobody from EPA,' Goho told CNN. 'In my many years of experience doing these meetings, that is unprecedented. It raises questions about the role of EPA staff in this rulemaking. It raises questions about who is actually doing the work.' The EPA spokesperson did not answer CNN's questions about which agency is leading the rulemaking process. The draft, titled 'Reconsideration of 2009 Endangerment Finding and Greenhouse Gas Vehicle Standards,' was sent to the White House Office of Management and Budget on June 30, the EPA spokesperson said. It is widely expected the proposal will also seek to repeal rules that regulate greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles, since they stem from the finding, sources told CNN. The Biden EPA sought to tighten those standards to prod the auto industry to make more fuel-efficient hybrids and electric vehicles. CNN's sources said the EPA proposal is still in draft form, and could still change before its release. 'We're expecting that they will repeal all of the climate related vehicles standards, saying the predicate finding of danger wasn't made right or doesn't exist,' Doniger told CNN. The EPA appears to be making a legal argument in the draft that the agency went beyond its legal authority to use the Clean Air Act to regulate pollutants that contribute to climate change, rather than trying to make a scientific argument that climate change itself isn't harming humans, sources told CNN. The EPA plans to argue the Biden vehicle rule presented harm to public health by increasing vehicle prices, decreasing consumer choice, and slowing the replacement of older vehicles, according to one person with knowledge of the draft. 'Legally, it's misguided and creates enormous harms to the American people,' said Richard Revesz, a former Biden White House official and New York University environmental law school professor. Doniger said the effort inside the administration has been helmed by political staff including Jeff Clark, who heads the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, the White House office that reviews regulations. Clark is the former Justice Department official who was investigated for aiding President Donald Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Clark served as assistant attorney general for DOJ's Environment and Natural Resources Division in the first Trump administration and served in the same office during the first George W. Bush administration. 'He's been on a crusade to block EPA regulation of greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act since then,' Doniger said. Doniger said the agency's proposed rule ignores the current reality of climate change, which is supercharging rainfall and leading to record global temperatures. 'For the administration to stand up and say in effect climate change isn't happening or there's nothing significant going on, so there's no need for government standards, this is mindbogglingly out of touch with reality,' Doniger said.

Democrats can rebuild government by learning from how Trump has destroyed it
Democrats can rebuild government by learning from how Trump has destroyed it

The Hill

time4 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Democrats can rebuild government by learning from how Trump has destroyed it

We know the tragic effects of President Trump's dismantling of the federal government. Social Security service delivery are in crisis. Calls to the Federal Emergency Management Agency in the wake of disaster go unanswered. Rural hospitals brace for a loss of federal support. And now congressional Republicans are surrendering the power of the purse to further hobble core government services by choking off funding. But the truth is, Trump alone didn't break the federal government. He is putting the devastating capstone on a decades-long conservative project of undermining its capacity to function: underfunding agencies, outsourcing expertise, layering on procedural hurdles, stacking courts with partisan allies, and eroding public trust. Long before Trump took office, the result was a government that couldn't move quickly, deliver boldly or meet the needs of the people it was supposed to serve. And when the government is unable to visibly respond to people's discontent and aspirations within the timeframe of an electoral mandate, the legitimacy of democracy itself erodes. If Democrats truly believe in the power of government to improve people's lives, they should be cautious about reverting to pre-Trump institutions. Our time in the Biden-Harris administration taught us that the federal government wasn't meeting the needs of middle- or working-class people long before the 2024 election. What was left of it has now been intentionally sabotaged. If we want to implement a bold policy agenda in the future — one that truly creates agency, power and opportunity for people who don't have it — we have to start planning now to build the basic infrastructure for a government that's much more responsive to and resonant with ordinary Americans, not the monied few. For too long, Democrats have been stuck in a vicious cycle of playing catch-up in a game with existential stakes. Phase one: Republicans dismantle government programs and services and trigger economic crises through their laissez-faire approach to governance. Phase two: Democrats retake power, and then scramble to steer a hobbled system back to the status quo. Phase three: Democrats fail to deliver the visible change the electorate craves, Republicans retake power, and the cycle repeats. What has to change? We need to confront a hard truth: Despite good intentions and tireless efforts from appointees and civil servants alike, the old tools and norms have not worked. Administrative rulemaking has been too slow, fragile, and captured by well-resourced industries to meaningfully serve the public interest. Major policies passed with fanfare took four or more years to show results — long after voters were asked to judge them. Meanwhile, activist courts stacked by the right delayed or dismantled even modest reforms. Agencies were afraid to antagonize the powerful industries they were supposed to oversee, or to take an investment risk and face public failure. Enforcement against corporate lawbreaking was underfunded and slow. Outsourcing of core government functions made private contractors rich even when their performance was shoddy. And far too often, the government was a distant, impenetrable behemoth that piled paperwork on Americans, instead of proactively listening to them to understand their needs and deliver frictionless services in response. We can't win back faith in government with policies that are invisible, delayed or drowned in process. We need a new playbook — one that matches the urgency of the moment and the acuteness of people's needs. One that learns, paradoxically, from the relentlessness of Trump and his allies. What they've demonstrated is that the rules and norms constraining government action aren't fixed laws of nature. They're conventions — and they can be changed. If there's no political cost for ignoring them in the service of corporate power and oligarchic corruption, there should be even less fear about changing them to make government work better for ordinary people. Democrats should take the lesson: Flip the risk profile. Go big or go home. That means reorganizing policymaking around speed, visibility and political resonance. It means building teams around outcome-driven missions — not statutes, institutional bias or risk-averse compliance. It means treating economic, legal, outreach and communications strategy as one integrated campaign, and working much more collaboratively with our state and local government partners and community-based organizations. It means starting work long before Day One with the understanding that we will need to simultaneously build and deliver: pre-drafting policies, mapping authorities, recruiting top-flight talent and identifying the signature priorities for each agency that will show up in people's lives within a single term. These are unified campaign-style operations, not bureaucratic ones. And it means breaking free from the norms that keep the government mired in caution. Abolish or radically retool obsolete veto gates, such as the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. Limit judicial meddling in economic policy choices made by political leaders accountable to the people, and refocus courts on protecting individual liberties. Make the government great to work for again, and repopulate it with technologists, statisticians, product managers, service designers, community organizers and movement lawyers. Clean out the procedural clutter that saps time and bandwidth. We've seen what gets in the way. Now it's time to start clearing it. Importantly, when we act, we must act boldly. During the last administration, the types of policies that resonated were the big, simple, universal ones: a cap on insulin prices, a ban on junk fees, an end to noncompetes, a free, easy way to file your taxes. These were policies designed to be tangible, memorable and swift — and they addressed economic frustrations that transcend partisan lines. That's not just good economics. It's good politics. It's good democracy. Policies must provide proof that the government can still work for ordinary people, not just large corporations or insiders. For too long, Democrats have tried to govern within a framework designed to thwart them and to protect entrenched interests. Trump simply ignored it. If we want to change that trajectory for government, we need to be just as fearless and bold in building a new framework as Republicans have been in destroying the old one. If Democrats want to lead, the party must demonstrate that the government can — and will — continue to change lives for the better. Let's stop trying to tinker with a broken machine. Let's start building one that actually works.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store