Hong Kong GDP expands 3.1%, faster than forecast
That compares with an average forecast of 2.7% from 13 economists polled by Reuters and with growth of 3.0% in the first quarter of 2025. GDP had expanded 2.5% in the fourth quarter of 2024.
"Looking ahead, steady economic growth in Asia, particularly in the (Chinese) mainland, combined with the government's various measures to bolster consumption sentiment, attract investment, diversify markets, and promote economic growth, will continue to provide steadfast support for various segments of the Hong Kong economy," a government spokesman said.
Overall investment expenditure increased alongside the economic expansion, while private consumption expenditure resumed growth, supported by stabilisation of consumption in the domestic market, the government said.
Total exports of goods saw accelerated growth, with the temporary easing of U.S. tariff measures leading to some "rush shipments", while exports of services, growth in inbound tourism, and expansion in cross-boundary traffic also boosted growth.
However, the spokesman also warned that renewed U.S. tariff hikes would exert pressure on economic activity, adding that an uncertain pace of U.S. interest rate cuts will affect investment sentiment and the "rush shipment" effect is also expected to fade later this year.
On a seasonally adjusted quarterly basis, the economy expanded 0.4% in April-June, the data showed. That compared with a revised 1.8% in January-March and 0.9% in October-December 2024.
Private consumption expenditure increased by 1.9% in the latest quarter, compared with a decline of 1.2% in the first quarter, and a fall of 0.2% in the fourth quarter of 2024.
Goods exports rose 11.5%, compared with an 8.4% jump in the first quarter, and a 1.3% increase in the fourth quarter 2024.
Imports of goods increased 12.7%, as compared with a 7.2% surge in the first quarter and 0.4% growth in the fourth quarter 2024. - Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
3 minutes ago
- The Star
What are China's most dynamic cities? New report gives surprising answer
China's most dynamic local economies are no longer metropolises like Beijing and Shanghai, but lesser-known cities including Hangzhou and Hefei, according to a new report by the Economist Intelligence Unit. The findings reflect a growing shift in China's economic landscape, as smaller cities emerge as a main engine of growth due to their strength in advanced manufacturing, clean energy and other emerging sectors. The annual report by the EIU ranks Chinese cities in terms of their growth potential, with the eastern city of Hangzhou – home to e-commerce giant Alibaba, artificial intelligence start-up DeepSeek, and several other major technology companies – topping the list for the fifth consecutive year. It was followed in the ranking by Hefei – an eastern city known for being a hub for semiconductor and electric car companies – and the southwestern industrial powerhouse of Chengdu. Shenzhen, often dubbed China's Silicon Valley, placed fifth, while Beijing, Guangzhou and Shanghai all failed to make the top 10. The results 'capture the rise of manufacturing and the decline of the service sector' in China, economists Xu Tianzeng and Su Yue wrote in the report, as a prolonged property downturn drags down consumer spending and the economy continues to rely on strong production. Most of the top-ranked cities have benefited from China's advanced manufacturing boom, recording strong economic growth and attracting significant population inflows over the past two years. According to the report, Hangzhou has made a strong recovery from Beijing's regulatory crackdowns on the tech sector launched in 2021. 'The city has since reasserted its leadership in China's artificial intelligence race, driven by major players like DeepSeek, while also leveraging its strengths in advanced manufacturing,' the authors wrote, noting that Hangzhou has one of the most robust fiscal positions of cities nationwide. Hangzhou is home to China's 'six little dragons' – a group of high-profile tech start-ups including DeepSeek, humanoid robot maker Unitree Robotics and Neuralink rival BrainCo. Local authorities in Zhejiang, the eastern province where Hangzhou is located, have put a strong emphasis on supporting hi-tech companies. Last week, the province released a draft action plan for boosting local innovation, which set a target that over 80 per cent of its new listed companies should come from the tech sector by 2027. Meanwhile, Hefei and Chengdu have both 'made bold, strategic investments in foundational technologies' to drive their development, the report said. Hefei has invested heavily in CXMT, a major producer of dynamic random access memory (DRAM) chips, which is now preparing for an initial public offering. The company is widely regarded as China's best hope of competing with South Korea and the United States in the global memory chip market. Chengdu has also invested in the semiconductor company Hygon, a joint venture with US chipmaker AMD. 'These ventures have not only generated substantial returns for the two cities, but have laid the groundwork for broader industrial ecosystems with surrounding cities,' the report's authors said. They noted that the broader metropolitan area covering the core cities of Chengdu, Deyang, Meishan and Ziyang logged an average growth rate of more than 7 per cent in the first quarter of 2025 – making it one of the country's fastest-growing regions. Similarly, China's clean energy push is powering significant growth in smaller cities with established manufacturing bases for renewable energy technologies, according to the report. Xinyu and Yichun in the eastern Jiangxi province, for instance, have seen their growth boosted by rising demand for lithium-rich ores from the electric vehicle and energy storage sectors. Meanwhile, Jinchang in the northwestern Gansu province recorded an impressive average annual growth rate of 12.9 per cent between 2022 and 2024, as demand for renewable energy infrastructure boosted the city's non-ferrous metals industry. But smaller cities that are riding high thanks to the green transition also face 'vulnerabilities', the report noted. 'These include exposure to commodity price cycles, external trade shocks and spillover effects from overcapacity rectification in downstream industries,' it said. - South China Morning Post
Malay Mail
4 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Trump pressures, Delhi holds firm, but state oil refiners quietly pull back after Russian discount dips
Indian officials deny policy change on Russian oil imports Foreign ministry emphasises independent energy decisions Trump has threatened tariffs on Russian oil buyers Russia remains India's top oil supplier NEW DELHI, Aug 3 — India will keep purchasing oil from Russia despite US President Donald Trump's threats of penalties, two Indian government sources told Reuters on Saturday, not wishing to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. On top of a new 25 per cent tariff on India's exports to the US, Trump indicated in a Truth Social post last month that India would face additional penalties for purchases of Russian arms and oil. On Friday, Trump told reporters he had heard that India would no longer be buying oil from Russia. But the sources said there would be no immediate changes. 'These are long-term oil contracts,' one of the sources said. 'It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight.' Justifying India's oil purchases from Russia, a second source said India's imports of Russian grades had helped avoid a global surge in oil prices, which have remained subdued despite Western curbs on the Russian oil sector. Unlike Iranian and Venezuelan oil, Russian crude is not subject to direct sanctions, and India is buying it below the current price cap fixed by the European Union, the source said. The New York Times also quoted two unnamed senior Indian officials on Saturday as saying there had been no change in Indian government policy. Indian government authorities did not respond to Reuters' request for official comment on its oil purchasing intentions. However, during a regular press briefing on Friday, foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said India has a 'steady and time-tested partnership' with Russia. 'On our energy sourcing requirements ... we look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation or circumstances,' he said. The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. India's top supplier Trump, who has made ending Russia's war in Ukraine a priority of his administration since returning to office this year, has expressed growing impatience with Russian President Vladimir Putin in recent weeks. He has threatened 100 per cent tariffs on US imports from countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine. Russia is the leading supplier to India, the world's third-largest oil importer and consumer, accounting for about 35 per cent of its overall supplies. India imported about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil from January to June this year, up 1 per cent from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by sources. But while the Indian government may not be deterred by Trump's threats, sources told Reuters this week that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian oil after July discounts narrowed to their lowest since 2022 – when sanctions were first imposed on Moscow – due to lower Russian exports and steady demand. Indian Oil Corp, Hindustan Petroleum Corp , Bharat Petroleum Corp and Mangalore Refinery Petrochemical Ltd have not sought Russian crude in the past week or so, four sources told Reuters. Nayara Energy – a refinery majority-owned by Russian entities, including oil major Rosneft, and major buyer of Russian oil – was recently sanctioned by the EU. Nayara's chief executive resigned following the sanctions, and three vessels laden with oil products from Nayara Energy have yet to discharge their cargoes, hindered by the new EU sanctions, Reuters reported last week. — Reuters
New Straits Times
7 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Risks remain for exporters even with tariff cut
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia's successful negotiation to reduce the reciprocal tariff imposed by the United States (US) on its exports to 19 per cent from 25 per cent is seen as a strategic step forward, placing the country on equal footing with major Asean peers while preserving key domestic policy priorities. While the new tariff rate did not eliminate trade hurdles, it marked a meaningful improvement compared to the earlier 25 per cent proposal and underscored Malaysia's ability to defend its sovereign economic direction in the face of international pressure. Still, economists cautioned that the relief is temporary and layered with risk. With the US being Malaysia's largest export market, accounting for RM198.65 billion in 2024, economic strain, particularly on manufacturers and small and medium enterprises, might intensify if broader reforms stall. "The tariff may shave off growth, primarily through reduced exports. However, resilient domestic demand such as consumer spending, infrastructure projects and pre-emptive rate cuts by Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) provide buffers," Centre for Market Education chief executive Alvin Desfiandi told Bernama in an interview. Alvin said BNM's pre-emptive recent rate cut, which was the first in five years, supported Malaysia's economic growth but risked currency depreciation if US rates stay high. He noted that further easing might be necessary if growth fell below 4.0 per cent, but any spike in inflation above 3.0 per cent could limit that flexibility. "Thus, BNM should maintain flexibility for further rate cuts if growth falters, but anchor inflation at 2.0-3.0 per cent," he added. Meanwhile, Alvin believed Malaysia is entering the period of recalibration from a position of relative strength. "Malaysia's economy is navigating tariffs from a position of strength, with BNM's gross domestic product (GDP) forecast for 2025 already pricing in moderate disruption. The focus now shifts to industrial upgrades and market diversification to sustain growth beyond 2025," he added. However, Alvin opined that short-term fallout is difficult to avoid as the 19 per cent tariff would directly impact Malaysia's competitiveness in the US market, especially in key sectors like electronics and semiconductors. "The 19 per cent tariff will raise costs for US buyers, potentially reducing export volumes. This may create a domino effect that will negatively affect investment sentiment and currency movements," he said. Alvin said that tariff exposure would be highest in the electronics and semiconductor sectors, squeezing already-tight profit margins for local manufacturers. He said that Malaysia's reliance on Chinese components further complicated its position under Washington's stricter rules of origin. "Tariffs will highly expose the electronics and semiconductors industry, squeezing margins for manufacturers," he said. The risk of tariff stacking, where goods containing Chinese components are penalised under multiple jurisdictions, adds to exporters' cost pressures, potentially eroding Malaysia's competitiveness even without direct involvement in transhipment. "Since Malaysia's National Semiconductor Strategy (NSS) aims to offset losses by moving into high-value chips and attracting US foreign direct investment (FDI), the government may provide emergency grants for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to explore new markets," the economist added. Beyond immediate mitigation, Alvin urged Malaysia to convert tariff pressure into opportunity and highlighted the importance of adopting a "tech-for-market access" strategy, trading supply chain transparency for stable US tariffs on semiconductor inputs. The economist said that the need to build green industrial alliances with the US in electric vehicle battery and renewable energy sectors is equally important, with Malaysia serving as a strategic Asean gateway. Moreover, he said Malaysia should also aim to lead on digital rulemaking by co-developing Asean standards in financial technology (fintech) and digital trade with the US. "The country should trade supply chain transparency for stable US market access in semiconductors, form joint green industrial alliances in electric vehicles and renewables, and take the lead in digital rulemaking through US-Malaysia fintech partnerships," he said. Alvin noted that this approach may transform tariffs into a catalyst for high-value FDI diversification, with the October Asean Summit offering a critical platform to lock in sectoral bargains. By conceding tactically on processes such as certifications and monitoring while holding firm on policy sovereignty, he said Malaysia might retain negotiating credibility for future bilateral agreements. Alvin also cited Malaysia Aviation Group's US$19 billion (US$1 = RM4.27) Boeing aircraft procurement as a symbolic but limited tool for rebalancing trade ties with Washington. "The Boeing procurement offers moderate deficit relief and symbolic leverage in tariff talks but cannot single-handedly rebalance trade or guarantee future concessions," he added. Its real value, Alvin said, was in demonstrating diplomatic pragmatism, aligned industrial strategy, and readiness to engage the US without surrendering sovereignty. Meanwhile, economist Dr Geoffrey Williams welcomed the tariff reduction but warned that it still presented significant risks for Malaysia's trade-dependent economy. "A potential 10 per cent drop in exports to the US could cost RM20 billion annually. This underlines the urgency for structural reforms and export diversification," he added. Williams said Malaysia must avoid over-relying on short-term measures or blanket support policies. "Redirecting fiscal savings to indiscriminate bailouts would be politically and economically unwise," he said, adding that businesses should double down on automation, supply chain resilience, and long-term competitiveness. Williams added that the current outcome reinforced the need for Malaysia to fully implement its reform blueprints under the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP). "It's a reminder that domestic competitiveness must be earned," he said, adding that further negotiations with Washington would be necessary to secure improved tariff terms over time. Alvin concurred that Malaysia's dual-track strategy, namely balancing critical interdependence with the US while engaging its Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and BRICS partners, would define its long-term trajectory. He added that the 19 per cent tariffs would consolidate ASEAN unity in the short term, with Malaysia's October summit testing whether economic diplomacy could extract US compromises such as semiconductor exemptions. "However, the longer-term trend is clear: ASEAN will reduce US dependence through RCEP integration and non-Western partnerships. If Trump offers no concessions in October, expect accelerated ASEAN+BRICS cooperation, a tacit admission that the US market is no longer worth sovereignty trade-offs," he said. Alvin pointed out that, ultimately, the shift to a 19 per cent tariff level marked the end of Malaysia's low-cost FDI model but opened a new window for high-value investment if reforms hold. "The tariff parity ends Malaysia's low-cost FDI model but accelerates its transition to high-value niches," he added. With approved investments reaching RM378.5 billion in 2024, both economists agreed that Malaysia has shown resilience and policy clarity. The challenge now is to lock in long-term investor confidence through the execution of New Industrial Master Plan 2030 (NIMP 2030), supply chain repositioning, and bloc-wide diplomacy. Since April, Malaysia has been negotiating with Washington to reduce the previous 24 per cent tariff rate. The Malaysia-US tariff negotiations officially began on May 6 and concluded on July 31, 2025, resulting in a recalibrated 19 per cent tariff rate that now positions Malaysia in alignment with key ASEAN peers such as Thailand and Indonesia. - Bernama
