Iran's supreme leader Khamenei makes first public appearance at mourning ceremony since Iran-Israel war started
New Delhi: Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei made his first public appearance since the 12-day war between Israel and Iran began. Khamenei attended a mourning ceremony on Saturday on the eve of Ashoura. The State TV in Iran showed him waving and nodding to the crowd, which rose to its feet as he entered and sat at a mosque next to his office and residence in the capital, Tehran.
It is important to note that there was no immediate report on any public statement made. Iranian officials such as the Parliament speaker were present. Such events are always held under heavy security.
The 86-year-old Khamenei had spent the war in a bunker as threats to his life escalated. Donald Trump Sent Warning To Khamenei:
US President Donald Trump sent warnings via social media to Khamenei that the US knew where he was but had no plans to kill him, 'at least for now.' This came after the United States inserted itself into the war by bombing three key nuclear sites in Iran. Khamenei's Statement:
Khamenei made his first public statement on June 26, shortly after a ceasefire began, saying in a prerecorded statement that Tehran had delivered a 'slap to America's face' by striking a U.S. air base in Qatar, and warning against further attacks by the U.S. or Israel on Iran.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Harvard students push back as over 200 sign open letter against demands from Trump administration
Over 200 Harvard students have signed an open letter urging the University not to bow to political pressure, as former President Donald Trump claims a 'historic' deal with Harvard is imminent. The letter, circulated by Harvard Students for Freedom —an unrecognized student group—was released on July 4 to emphasize concerns around institutional independence and academic freedom. According to a report by The Harvard Crimson , the letter attracted 197 public signatures and 29 anonymous ones from undergraduate and graduate students alike. It was addressed 'To Harvard from its Students' and expressed unease about potential compromises in ongoing negotiations between the University and the Trump administration. Concerns over academic freedom, student rights The letter outlines several red lines that students believe the University must not cross. These include refraining from altering its curriculum under political pressure, refusing to dismiss faculty members over ideological disagreements, and not disciplining students for exercising peaceful free speech. One of the more pressing concerns involves the possible sharing of disciplinary records of international students, which students believe could open the door to politically motivated deportations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 새로 나온 '실비보험' 최적가 비교가입! "月 보험료 낮추고, 보장은 든든하게"... 굿리치 [등록번호:제2006038313호] 가입하기 Undo The group stressed that any deal with the federal government should not come at the expense of Harvard's core academic principles, nor should it set a precedent that undermines university autonomy nationwide. Independence Day release marks symbolic resistance The timing of the letter's release, on July 4, was a deliberate choice. The group positioned the move as a show of unity and a reaffirmation of values such as freedom of expression and institutional integrity. By publishing the letter on a national holiday, the students aimed to frame their message as a defense of foundational American principles, according to The Harvard Crimson . University response remains guarded While Trump has publicly claimed that Harvard is close to reaching a deal with his administration, the University has not confirmed those claims. It has only stated that its communications with the White House have focused on efforts to combat antisemitism and support viewpoint diversity. This ambiguity has sparked concern among students, faculty, and alumni about the nature of the negotiations and their potential implications. The student letter argues that Harvard must maintain its stance, guided by legal principles and a commitment to truth. The signatories contend that conceding to political pressure would erode the University's credibility and autonomy, not just for Harvard, but across higher education institutions in the U.S. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Israeli airstrikes kill 33 Palestinians in Gaza
Israeli airstrikes killed at least 33 Palestinians in Gaza, hospital officials said on Sunday (July 6, 2025), as Israel's military said it has struck over 100 targets in the embattled enclave in the past day. The strikes came as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was preparing to fly to Washington for talks at the White House aimed at pushing forward ceasefire efforts. Separately, an Israeli official said the Israeli security Cabinet on Saturday (July 5, 2025) night approved sending aid into the northern part of Gaza, where civilians are suffering from acute food shortages. The official declined to offer more details. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the decision with the media. In Yemen, a spokesperson for the Houthi rebel group announced in a prerecorded message that the group had launched ballistic missiles targeting Ben Gurion airport overnight. The Israeli military said these had been intercepted. President Donald Trump has floated a plan for an initial 60-day ceasefire that would include a partial release of hostages held by Hamas in exchange for an increase in humanitarian supplies allowed into Gaza. The proposed truce calls for talks on ending the 21-month war altogether. 20 people were killed and 25 wounded after Israeli strikes hit two houses in Gaza City, according to Mohammed Abu Selmia, the director of Shifa Hospital that services the area. In southern Gaza, 13 Palestinians were killed by strikes in Muwasi, an area on Gaza's Mediterranean where many displaced people live in tents, officials at Nasser Hospital in nearby Khan Younis told The Associated Press. Five of the dead belonged to the same family according to the hospital. The Israeli military had no immediate comment on the individual strikes, but said it struck 130 targets across the Gaza Strip in the last 24 hours. It said the strikes targeted Hamas command and control structures, storage facilities, weapons and launchers, and that they killed a number of militants in northern Gaza. The war began when Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing some 1,200 people and taking 251 others hostage. Israel responded with an offensive that has killed over 57,000 Palestinians, more than half of them women and children, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. The Ministry, which is under Gaza's Hamas government, does not differentiate between civilians and combatants. The UN and other international organisations see its figures as the most reliable statistics on war casualties. The strikes occur as efforts to reach a ceasefire deal appeared to gain momentum. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said his government will send a negotiating team to talks in Qatar on Sunday (July 6, 2025) to conduct indirect talks, adding that Hamas was seeking 'unacceptable' changes to the proposal. The planned talks in Qatar come ahead of Mr. Netanyahu's planned visit on Monday (July 7, 2025) to Washington to meet U.S. President Donald Trump to discuss the deal. It is unclear if a deal will be reached ahead of Mr. Netanyahu's White House meeting. Hamas has sought guarantees that the initial truce would lead to a total end to the war and withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza. Previous negotiations have stalled over Hamas' demands for guarantees that further negotiations would lead to the war's end, while Mr. Netanyahu has insisted Israel would resume fighting to ensure the militant group's destruction.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
US tariffs on European goods likely to disrupt world's largest trade ties
America's largest trade partner, the European Union, is among the entities awaiting word Monday on whether US President Donald Trump will impose punishing tariffs on their goods, a move economists have warned would have repercussions for companies and consumers on both sides of the Atlantic. Trump imposed a 20 per cent import tax on all EU-made products in early April as part of a set of tariffs targeting countries with which the United States has a trade imbalance. Hours after the nation-specific duties took effect, he put them on hold until July 9 at a standard rate of 10 per cent to quiet financial markets and allow time for negotiations. Expressing displeasure the EU's stance in trade talks, however, the president said he would jack up the tariff rate for European exports to 50per cent. A rate that high could make everything from French cheese and Italian leather goods to German electronics and Spanish pharmaceuticals much more expensive in the US. The EU, whose 27 member nations operate as a single economic bloc, said its leaders hoped to strike a deal with the Trump administration. Without one, the EU said it was prepared to retaliate with tariffs on hundreds of American products, ranging from beef and auto parts to beer and Boeing airplanes. Here are important things to know about trade between the United States and the European Union. US-EU trade is enormous A lot of money is at stake in the trade talks. The EU's executive commission describes the trade between the US and the EU as "the most important commercial relationship in the world. The value of EU-US trade in goods and services amounted to 1.7 trillion euros ($2 trillion) in 2024, or an average of 4.6 billion euros a day, according to EU statistics agency Eurostat. The biggest US export to Europe is crude oil, followed by pharmaceuticals, aircraft, automobiles, and medical and diagnostic equipment. Europe's biggest exports to the US are pharmaceuticals, cars, aircraft, chemicals, medical instruments, and wine and spirits. EU sells more to the US than vice versa Trump has complained about the EU's 198 billion-euro ($233 billion) trade surplus in goods, which shows Americans buy more stuff from European businesses than the other way around. However, American companies fill some of the gap by outselling the EU when it comes to services such as cloud computing, travel bookings, and legal and financial services. The US services surplus took the nation's trade deficit with the EU down to 50 billion euros ($59 billion), which represents less than 3per cent of overall US-EU trade. What are the issues dividing the two sides? Before Trump returned to office, the U.S. and the EU maintained a generally cooperative trade relationship and low tariff levels on both sides. The U.S. rate averaged 1.47 per cent for European goods, while the EU's averaged 1.35 per cent for American products. But the White House has taken a much less friendly posture toward the longstanding US ally since February. Along with the fluctuating tariff rate on European goods Trump has floated, the EU has been subject to his administration's 50 per cent tariff on steel and aluminum and a 25per cent tax on imported automobiles and parts. Trump administration officials have raised a slew of issues they want to see addressed, including agricultural barriers such as EU health regulations that include bans on chlorine-washed chicken and hormone-treated beef. Trump has also criticized Europe's value-added taxes, which EU countries levy at the point of sale this year at rates of 17 per cent to 27 per cent. But many economists see VAT as trade-neutral since they apply to domestic goods and services as well as imported ones. Because national governments set the taxes through legislation, the EU has said they aren't on the table during trade negotiations. On the thorny issues of regulations, consumer standards and taxes, the EU and its member states cannot give much ground, Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Germany's Berenberg bank, said. They cannot change the way they run the EU's vast internal market according to U.S. demands, which are often rooted in a faulty understanding of how the EU works. What are potential impacts of higher tariffs? Economists and companies say higher tariffs will mean higher prices for US consumers on imported goods. Importers must decide how much of the extra tax costs to absorb through lower profits and how much to pass on to customers. Mercedes-Benz dealers in the US. have said they are holding the line on 2025 model year prices until further notice. The German automaker has a partial tariff shield because it makes 35 per cent of the Mercedes-Benz vehicles sold in the U.S. in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, but the company said it expects prices to undergo significant increases in coming years. Simon Hunt, CEO of Italian wine and spirits producer Campari Group, told investment analysts that prices could increase for some products or stay the same depending what rival companies do. If competitors raise prices, the company might decide to hold its prices on Skyy vodka or Aperol aperitif to gain market share, Hunt said. Trump has argued that making it more difficult for foreign companies to sell in the US is a way to stimulate a revival of American manufacturing. Many companies have dismissed the idea or said it would take years to yield positive economic benefits. However, some corporations have proved willing to shift some production stateside. France-based luxury group LVMH, whose brands include Tiffany &Co, Luis Vuitton, Christian Dior and Moet & Chandon, could move some production to the United States, billionaire CEO Bernaud Arnault said at the company's annual meeting in April. Arnault, who attended Trump's inauguration, has urged Europe to reach a deal based on reciprocal concessions. If we end up with high tariffs, ... we will be forced to increase our US-based production to avoid tariffs, Arnault said. And if Europe fails to negotiate intelligently, that will be the consequence for many companies. ... It will be the fault of Brussels, if it comes to that. Many expect Trump to drop his most drastic demands Some forecasts indicate the US economy would be more at risk if the negotiations fail. Without a deal, the EU would lose 0.3per cent of its gross domestic product and US GDP would fall 0.7per cent, if Trump slaps imported goods from Europe with tariffs of 10per cent to 25per cent, according to a research review by Bruegel, a think tank in Brussels. Given the complexity of some of the issues, the two sides may arrive only at a framework deal before Wednesday's deadline. That would likely leave a 10per cent base tariff, as well as the auto, steel and aluminum tariffs in place until details of a formal trade agreement are ironed out. The most likely outcome of the trade talks is that the US will agree to deals in which it takes back its worst threats of retaliatory' tariffs well beyond 10per cent, Schmieding said. However, the road to get there could be rocky. The US offering exemptions for some goods might smooth the path to a deal. The EU could offer to ease some regulations that the White House views as trade barriers. While Trump might be able to sell such an outcome as a win' for him, the ultimate victims of his protectionism would, of course, be mostly the US consumers, Schmieding said. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
