Sentencing for Sean (Diddy) Combs set for October
Combs, who remains jailed after a split verdict last week, spoke briefly to his lawyer Marc Agnifilo during a virtual hearing on the scheduling issue that lasted all of two minutes. At one point he asked the lawyer to turn on his camera so they could see each other's faces.
The hip-hop mogul's lawyers had been urging Judge Arun Subramanian to sentence him as soon as possible after jurors acquitted him last week on racketeering and sex trafficking but convicted him on two prostitution-related charges.
Combs, 55, faces up to a decade in prison for each of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution for flying people around the country, including his girlfriends and male sex workers, for sexual encounters. A conviction on racketeering conspiracy or sex trafficking could have put him in prison for life.
Prior to Tuesday's hearing, Combs' lawyers and prosecutors filed a joint letter proposing a Sept. 22 sentencing date, subject to the consent of the U.S. Probation Office. A short time later, they filed a second letter stating that all parties — including the probation office — were on board with the Oct. 3 date Subramanian originally proposed.
WATCH | Combs denied bail after being convicted of two charges:
Diddy denied bail, avoids life in prison
6 days ago
Duration 2:30
Combs got a standing ovation from fellow inmates when he returned to jail after the verdict last week, Agnifilo said. The Bad Boy Records founder will remain at the federal lockup in Brooklyn where he's been held since his arrest last September after Subramanian last week rejected his request for bail.
The judge, citing a now-infamous video of Combs beating a former girlfriend and photographs showing injuries to another ex-girlfriend, made clear that he plans to hold Combs accountable for the years of violence and bullying behaviour that were exposed at his eight-week trial.
Combs's lawyers want less than the 21 to 27 months in prison that they believe the sentencing guidelines recommend. Prosecutors contend that the guidelines, when properly calculated to include his crimes and violent history, call for at least four to five years in prison.
Combs's punishment is Subramanian's decision alone, and the judge will have wide latitude in determining a sentence. While judges often adhere to the federal judiciary's formulaic guidelines meant to prevent disparity in sentences for the same crimes, they are not mandatory.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Former MLSE boss Tim Leiweke indicted in U.S. arena bid-rigging scheme
Former chief executive officer and president of Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment, Tim Leiweke, has been indicted by the U.S. Department of Justice for allegedly orchestrating a conspiracy to rig the bidding process for an arena at a public university in Austin, Texas. It was announced later Wednesday that Leiweke would step down as CEO of Oak View Group, a sports and real estate company he co-founded. He will transition to vice-chairman of OVG's board of directors and remain a shareholder of the company. 'It has been my great honour to help found and lead OVG as it has grown into the special, customer-oriented company it is today,' Leiweke said in a statement. The board has appointed Chris Granger, president of OVG360, to serve as interim CEO. 'I am honoured to serve in this role and am looking forward to working with our deep roster of leaders and talented team as we deliver on our mission to provide the best possible service and outcome for our customers and partners,' said Granger. Leiweke is charged with a violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, facing a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a US$1-million fine. According to the DOJ, Leiweke told colleagues a rival company was 'bidding against us' and expressed a desire to 'get them to back down' — a goal he later achieved through a 2018 agreement under which the competitor didn't submit a bid and instead received subcontracts, leaving OVG as the lone qualified bidder. None of the allegations have been proven in court. The project became the Moody Center, home to University of Texas basketball, and opened to the public in April 2022. OVG continues to receive significant revenues from the venue. OVG and Legends Hospitality have agreed to pay US$15-million and US$1.5-million in penalties, respectively, related to the conduct outlined in the indictment. In a statement that did not mention Leiweke, OVG said it 'co-operated fully with the Antitrust Division's inquiry' and was 'pleased to have resolved this matter with no charges filed against OVG and no admission of fault or wrongdoing.' Leiweke said he was pleased that OVG resolved its DOJ inquiry without any charges filed or admission of wrongdoing. 'The last thing I want to do is distract from the accomplishments of the team or draw focus away from executing for our partners, so the board and I decided that now is the right time to implement the succession plan that was already underway and transition out of the CEO role,' he said in his written statement. 'In my new role as vice chairman of the board and as an OVG shareholder, I remain as committed as ever to the long-term success of the company, and I know OVG, our valued partners, and our customers are in great hands with Chris and the rest of our stellar leaders.' Leiweke was head of MLSE from 2013 to 2015 before moving on to OVG. The company operates dozens of venues across North America, including Seattle's Climate Pledge Arena, London, Ont.'s Canada Life Place and Hamilton's recently renovated TD Coliseum.
CBC
5 hours ago
- CBC
Charges for man accused of sexually assaulting teen followed flawed investigation: Manitoba judge
Social Sharing An attempt to put a group home worker's name on Manitoba's child abuse registry was based on charges stemming from a "seriously flawed investigation," a Manitoba judge says. Court of King's Bench Justice Kaye Dunlop said in a June ruling it's "overwhelmingly clear" the man could not have abused a girl at the group home he worked at in 2015. The man, who was in his 50s at the time and is identified in the ruling only as "M.G.," was arrested in October 2017 and charged with sexual assault and sexual interference, after the girl told investigators she'd been touched at the group home when she was 13. The man maintained his innocence. A trial was held at Court of King's Bench in February 2020, and during the direct examination of the girl, the Crown stayed the charges against the man, Dunlop's decision said. However, the Child and Family All Nations Coordinated Response Network — a non-profit agency that provides intake and emergency child and family services in Winnipeg and surrounding areas — still moved to have the man's name put on the child abuse registry. He was given notice in August 2021 that the agency intended to have his name added to the registry. He challenged the ANCR's move, with Dunlop ruling in his favour. The judge said in her reasoning the agency acknowledged the investigation into the allegation was lacking. She said the burden of proof rested entirely on the organization, which didn't prove the man abused the child. "This case is an example of the great responsibility held by players tasked not only with protecting children but also protecting society from unfounded claims," Dunlop wrote in her decision. "This case is also an example of the profound effect that improper, incomplete and single focused investigations can have on an individual's life." As much as the investigators owed a duty to the child, they did so just as much to M. - Justice Kaye Dunlop The man was fired from his position at the group home after he was criminally charged. He had spent more than 20 years working with Child and Family Services at various homes before that, and had also worked with the Headingley Correctional Service. The girl, who was from northern Manitoba, tried to harm herself in July 2015, when she was 13 years old, and was flown to Winnipeg. She eventually ended up in the group home where the man worked. In the following years, she was placed in several other group homes around Winnipeg, and when she was 15, told her favourite worker at the Marymound group home she had been sexually assaulted. The worker reported the incident to the girl's social worker, after which the ANCR agency got involved. She was interviewed by a provincial investigator in February 2017. The decision said the girl told the investigator she had been sexually touched by a group home worker, whom she identified as a white, bald man who rode a bike to work, and referred to him using a shortened version of M.G.'s first name. Investigators failed in 'very basics' A forensic investigator from Snowflake Place, now known as Toba Centre — a non-profit that works with children affected by abuse — also interviewed the child. A Winnipeg police officer was present, and gave her a photo lineup. At one point, the officer took two photos out of the lineup and showed them to the girl side by side, which is against best practices, according to Dunlop's decision. The girl "said that the one photo looked like the staff [member], but gestured that he had facial hair," the decision said. But the man had provided court with two photos of himself around the time of the alleged assault that showed he did not have facial hair then. "Even if I accept the flawed procedure used for the lineup, the photographs of M. that he tendered as exhibits explicitly show him a few days before the date of the alleged offence with no facial hair," Dunlop's decision said. The judge pointed to other inconsistencies in the girl's testimony that she said investigators should have looked into, but didn't, displaying "a single-minded focus from the very beginning by essentially accepting at face value the allegations." She said among other things, investigators could have seen the room at the group home where the alleged assault occurred was "wide open for all to see," with large windows and video cameras placed all around the area, and that the girl's description of the room did not match it. The police officer who was ANCR's witness in the proceedings "believed that the assault took place in the management office," Dunlop said. "In fairness to her, no other investigator knew or seemed to care where the alleged assault could have occurred because they did not go to the group home, or they simply did not ask the question." The judge said investigators also failed to establish when the assault could have occurred, failing to do "very basics" like review the group home's logbooks. The investigators admitted they failed to follow best practices, Dunlop's decision said. She said she believed the child may have been sexually assaulted before the allegations and doesn't believe she fabricated the evidence, but that it was clear the child "had been influenced about what to say." The judge said the girl's description of events may have also been affected by a mental health crisis she was going through at the time. "As much as the investigators owed a duty to the child, they did so just as much to M. As a result of their failures, the consequences on M.'s life were significant," she said.
CBC
6 hours ago
- CBC
Family, supporters of 3 killed in 2022 Point Douglas attacks face teen killer in court
WARNING: This story contains graphic details. The sister of a woman beaten to death at random nearly three years ago faced one of her sibling's killers in a Winnipeg courtroom Wednesday, where a judge is hearing arguments on whether to sentence the now 18-year-old as an adult. Danielle Dawn Ballantyne, 36, was one of three people killed in a series of early morning attacks on Aug. 22, 2022. Two men — Marvin William Felix, a 54-year-old amputee who used a wheelchair, and Troy Baguley, 51 — were critically injured that morning and later died in hospital. Two teens, both 15 at the time of the killings, pleaded guilty to second-degree murder in the deaths of Ballantyne and Felix. Both were also charged with manslaughter in Baguley's death, but that charge was stayed in January for one of the teens. Manitoba Court of King's Bench Justice Gerald Chartier is now hearing arguments on whether the other person convicted, now 18, should be sentenced as an adult, in sentencing hearings that began on Monday. Kristy Ballantyne, Danielle's sister, said the 18-year-old didn't just take her sister's life — he also tore apart their family. "What you took from us can never be replaced," she said in a victim impact statement she read aloud in court Wednesday. "You stole a piece of every single person who loved her." The grief of her sister's violent death led her to suffer a heart attack, Kristy said. "My body couldn't carry the weight of what you did." While her sister is gone, Kristy said the teen can never take away her family's love for Danielle. She broke down in tears at points while reading her impact statement, and at other times turned to face the teen, who sat in the prisoner's box with his head held down for the most part, looking up briefly to glance at Kristy a few times. "I think he needed to see the severity of my emotions, and how it impacted my life, and I wanted to speak to him, knowing that I am now the voice for my sister," she told CBC News outside the courthouse. Prosecutors have recommended both teens receive adult sentences, which would mean automatic life sentences on the second-degree murder charges. The maximum youth sentence for second-degree murder is seven years — up to four years in custody, with up to another three years of probation. Kristy said she wants to see the teen receive an adult sentence. "I think it's important for … the public, because it's a heinous crime, and he has a continuous record of crime," she said. In court, she asked the judge to remember that "behind this case are real families living with the consequences of someone else's choices." "Please honour my sister, and the other victims' families, by delivering a sentence that reflects the deep and lasting harm caused by their passing." 'Who would do this to him?' Victim impact statements written by Felix's two sisters remembered him as a caring and peaceful person who liked to teach people how to bake, and who enjoyed making bannock to share with others, including at homeless shelters near where he was killed. "Marvin only had one leg. Who would do this to him?" Marva George wrote in her victim impact statement. Victim impact statements from staff members of Winnipeg's Turning Leaf Support Services — a non-profit that works with vulnerable people — were also read aloud to remember Baguley. He struggled with mental health challenges but desperately craved independence, and Turning Leaf staff helped him move to Winnipeg from Saskatchewan and live on his own in 2021, according to Meaghan Turko, Baguley's clinical case manager. Staff acted as Baguley's chosen family in Winnipeg, and he was beginning to reconnect with his Indigenous heritage, she said. But Baguley "never got to meet the goals he set for himself," said Turko, adding staff were devastated by his death. "I do take a small comfort in knowing that ... for a year and a half, he did get to live life on his terms and make his own choices," she said. Turko also said Baguley was once a "hurt young man who lashed out and caused pain to others," but found healing and reclaimed his life. "I wish the offenders the same journey. It is not an easy journey that they will have to take, but healing is possible," she said. The victim impact statements were presented as the Crown wrapped up its sentencing arguments. Prosecutor Jodi Koffman told the court that the Crown must prove the teen was morally responsible for the killings, and that a seven-year youth sentence is not enough to hold him accountable or to protect society. The teen has been a consistent physical threat to others, in and out of custody, she said, with offences that began before he turned 12 years old and continued to shortly before his 18th birthday. There was a change in his behaviour at that point that Koffman called "suspicious" and suggested may be manipulative. Actions 'cry out' for adult sentence: Crown While an adult sentenced for second-degree murder is ineligible for parole for 10 years, someone who receives an adult sentence for an offence committed when they were 14 or 15 years old is eligible for parole in five to seven years. The Crown is seeking seven years of parole ineligibility for the teen, with Koffman saying his actions are not normal for someone his age and "cry out" for an adult sentence. "This is someone who knows right from wrong," she said. "He will need lifelong support and resources, and only an adult sentence can achieve this." Laura Robinson, the lawyer defending the 18-year-old, said he accepted responsibility for the killings by pleading guilty. She argued the Crown has failed to prove her client demonstrated the moral capacity of an adult in the killings. Court heard Tuesday that the 18-year-old was diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, fetal alcohol spectrum disorder and mild intellectual disability. Robinson also said the seriousness of the teen's offences, and the moral outrage surrounding them, should not "outweigh the analysis that needs to be done in this case." She is expected to wrap up her arguments in court on Thursday. Victims' families face teen who admitted to killings in Point Douglas 13 minutes ago Duration 2:09 Family members of three people — Danielle Dawn Ballantyne, Marvin William Felix and Troy Baguley — who were assaulted and killed in Winnipeg's Point Douglas neighbourhood in 2022, were in court Wednesday to deliver victim impact statements and face the now-18-year-old boy who has admitted to killing them.
