logo
Top of the flops: just what does the games industry deem ‘success' any more?

Top of the flops: just what does the games industry deem ‘success' any more?

The Guardian12-02-2025

Back in 2013, having bought the series from Eidos, Square Enix released a reboot of the hit 1990s action game Tomb Raider starring a significantly less objectified Lara Croft. I loved that game, despite a quasi-assault scene near the beginning that I would later come to view as a bit icky, and I wasn't the only one – it was extremely well received, selling 3.4m copies in its first month alone. Then Square Enix came out and called it a disappointment.
Sales did not meet the publisher's expectations, apparently, which raises the question: what were the expectations? Was it supposed to sell 5m in one month? If a book sells 10,000 copies in a week it's considered a bestseller. Even at the height of its popularity in the 90s, no Tomb Raider game ever sold more than a few million. Square Enix's expectations were clearly unrealistic. It wouldn't be the last time; in a 2016 interview with Hajime Tabata, Final Fantasy XV's director, he told me that game needed to sell 10m to succeed.
Last week in an earnings call, EA's executives had to explain a shortfall in profits. It was driven mostly by EA FC, the ubiquitous football series whose revenue was down on the previous year, but CEO Andrew Wilson also singled out the long-awaited RPG Dragon Age: The Veilguard, which came out last October. 'Dragon Age had a high-quality launch and was well reviewed by critics and those who played. However, it did not resonate with a broad enough audience in this highly competitive market,' he said.
Dragon Age has 'reached 1.5 million players' in the months since launch, which presumably includes people paying via subscription services as well as direct sales. If 3.4m was a disappointment for Square Enix in 2013, you can only imagine that 1.5m was a disaster for EA in 2024, when games cost multiples more to make.
However, as Polygon's Maddy Myers points out in a detailed analysis of comparable games, 1.5m is more than Metaphor: ReFantazio (1m), and not much less than the second part of the Final Fantasy VII remake (2m) over comparable time periods. Dragon's Dogma, the genre's breakout hit last year, sold 3.3m over six months.
In those terms, Dragon Age was certainly not a flop. I can only come to the same conclusion as Myers: EA's expectations were unrealistic. The company was expecting an instant mega-hit from a game in a series that had sat dormant for 10 years. The Veilguard had been rebooted and reworked several times over a tortuous development period, during which time BioWare struggled enormously. Having previously made standard-setting role-playing games in Mass Effect, Dragon Age and Star Wars: The Old Republic, its only releases since 2014 were Mass Effect: Andromeda (disappointing) and mech shooter Anthem (broken). Meanwhile, a different developer had an enormous hit with a series that BioWare itself established: Baldur's Gate, which sold 15m.
The developers at BioWare have suffered the fallout from this. The studio is now down to a relatively bare bones staff of 100, and it seems EA will not be giving it the chance to build on what it achieved with The Veilguard. It's a miracle that game exists at all.
I've written a lot in this newsletter about the ridiculously high stakes of modern video game development; it's clear that a more sustainable path needs to be forged. But in 2025 as in 2013, short-termism and unrealistic expectations on a corporate level stand in the way. That Tomb Raider reboot ended up selling more than 14m over time, more than any other game in the series. First-quarter sales cannot be used as the first and final measure of a game's success. Nintendo's principle of selling the same games for literally decades has meant that plenty of mid-selling titles have become million-sellers over time.
There was also a point in EA's history – indeed in most publishers' history – where the portfolio was more important than each individual game's profitability. The likes of EA FC and Call of Duty were the bankable successes that could fund the rest of the slate, allowing those publishers to make room for the next surprise success. Not every game released in a year by a given company was expected to be a mega-hit. As long as the overall slate was profitable, there was space for the critically acclaimed or fan-pleasing games that didn't break out of their niche.
The space for those games now appears to be confined to independent developers and the smaller publishers that overtly support them. Mike Laidlaw, the director of the first three Dragon Age games, left BioWare in 2017 and formed a new studio in 2020; its first game, Eternal Strands, came out last month and is picking up great word-of-mouth buzz. By all accounts it's a banger – and its team haven't had to labour under the expectation of instant success.
While Waiting came out a few days ago, an unusual game that feels like a playable version of those slice-of-life newspaper cartoons. You play through the life of an incredibly regular guy, from birth through waiting for exam results through all the banal moments of his existence at the doctor's surgery, crossing the road, waiting for new software updates to finally finish their endless install cycles. You can do absolutely nothing, or mess around in each scene to amuse yourself. It's an interactive version of the adage that life is what happens when you're busy making other plans, a small celebration of embracing the mundane.
Available on: PC, Nintendo Switch
Estimated playtime: 5 hours
Sign up to Pushing Buttons
Keza MacDonald's weekly look at the world of gaming
after newsletter promotion
PlayStation Network went down for almost a whole day at the weekend, prompting an tsunami of complaints from disappointed gamers looking forward to their weekend multiplayer sessions. Sony called it an 'operational issue' and apologised by giving PlayStation Plus subscribers five extra days of play.
A Bloomberg report (£) digs into the absolute state of things at Warner Bros' game division, whose CEO recently departed after a string of underperforming titles, culminating in last year's Suicide Squad. Even ongoing sales of mega-hit Hogwarts Legacy couldn't save it from a $300m loss last year.
Two pieces of consumer-rights-related news: Steam has quietly added warning labels to early access games that have been 'abandoned' by their developers (ie, they've had no updates for many months); and the UK government has responded to a petition urging it to prohibit game developers from shutting down their live games, thus rendering them unplayable.
Wait! The Sims is a lot bleaker than I remember
Football Manager 25 video game cancelled after series of delays
Loads of you recommended your favourite video game stories for last week's questioner, Natalie. There are so many banger recommendations that I've been shouting 'YES!' at my inbox all week. Thanks to Lawal, Emma, Jude, Toby and Phill for these picks:
The Forgotten City (branching narrative indie mystery game), Mass Effect 2 (perilous science-fiction), 80 Days (globetrotting illustrated text adventure), Her Story (wonderfully clever detective game), Kathy Rain: A Detective is Born (well acted 90s-style point-and-click adventure), We Happy Few (dodgy gameplay but characters that really stay in your head), Warhammer 40K: Rogue Trader (nails its worldbuilding), Xenogears (a weird and iconic classic), Breath of Fire III (poignant retro RPG), Red Dead Redemption II (long-winded but peerless western), Eliza (sparsely written and well acted), The Witcher trilogy (grimy dark fantasy, 3 is my fave), Half-Life and its sequel (the ultimate first-person story), What Remains of Edith Finch (anthology style magical realist tragedy), and Everybody's Gone to the Rapture (uneasy pastoral English supernatural mystery).
I'll tackle a fresh question next week. If you've one to send in – or anything else to say about the newsletter – hit reply or email us on pushingbuttons@theguardian.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Square Enix should hire the Expedition 33 team for Final Fantasy 17
Square Enix should hire the Expedition 33 team for Final Fantasy 17

Metro

timean hour ago

  • Metro

Square Enix should hire the Expedition 33 team for Final Fantasy 17

A reader imagines what would happen if Sandfall Interactive made the next mainline Final Fantasy game and created a more old school experience. It's always sad when you feel yourself losing touch with something you used to love. Whether it's a film series or a hobby, sometimes you grow out of the thing or sometimes it evolves in a way that no longer interests you. That's where I am with Final Fantasy at the moment, at least in terms of the mainline games. If I'm honest with myself, I haven't truly enjoyed any of them since Final Fantasy 12 and it's only the surprisingly good Final Fantasy 7 Remake trilogy that hasn't made me completely cynical about the whole series. The final straw, so to speak, for me was Final Fantasy 16, which was the first one I actively hated and never finished. I do not want my Final Fantasy games to be some weird attempt to copy Games Of Thrones. These are Japanese games, and I'd like them to reflect that. If I wanted to play The Witcher 3 I'd go ahead and do so, not put up with a bad copy. It's not even a question of whether 16 is a good game or not, it's just not a Final Fantasy game, in my opinion. And what's worse is that they've stripped so much out of what makes the series unique that I worry they're going to go even further with the next one, so that it's totally unrecognisable as being part of the franchise. That's why I'd like to see Sandfall Interactive, the people behind Clair Obscur: Expedition 33, make the next Final Fantasy. I realise they're not Japanese, but I feel we'd get a more authentic experience if we let them make Final Fantasy 17 then if we had Square Enix do it. You'd get a game that had a strong Western influence, probably lots of new and original ideas, but also a team that appreciate the older Final Fantasy games. One of the reasons I love Expedition 33 is that it has an old school overworld map and turn-based battles. Square Enix would never do that and yet Expedition 33 will probably end up outselling Final Fantasy 16 in the end. Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning. That alone is crazy to me and all the reason Square Enix needs to talk to them. After all, if they don't they could end up becoming close competition. I think it's probably unlikely to happen though, because Sandfall (kind of a boring name, don't you think?) will want to make their own games now. I imagine they'll want to have a career like Larian Studios but remember that their biggest hit was Baldur's Gate 3, a licensed game, so maybe Sandfall would be interested in making a Final Fantasy at least once, just to get some money rolling in. Of course, Square Enix could just do it themselves, take Expedition 33 as proof that an older school approach can work and make it internally, but I'm just not sure they have the nerve. Final Fantasy 16 was their big experiment and as much as I'm enjoying the Final Fantasy 7 remakes they're not turn-based at all really. More Trending But I do think that the answer for most of these big franchises, that are getting too expensive to make nowadays, is to go back to what they used to be, just with modernised graphics and features. Not only would it give fans what they want but they'd be cheaper to make and more profitable. After the failure of Final Fantasy 16, what have they go to lose? By reader Lusk The reader's features do not necessarily represent the views of GameCentral or Metro. You can submit your own 500 to 600-word reader feature at any time, which if used will be published in the next appropriate weekend slot. Just contact us at gamecentral@ or use our Submit Stuff page and you won't need to send an email. MORE: I bought GTA 5 for the third time and it's still one of the best games ever - Reader's Feature MORE: We have to accept the Nintendo Switch 2 is not for hardcore gamers - Reader's Feature MORE: The 90s and 2000s were the best time for video game creativity – Reader's Feature

EA FC 26 cover star leaked – who will be on the front of the new game?
EA FC 26 cover star leaked – who will be on the front of the new game?

Daily Mirror

timea day ago

  • Daily Mirror

EA FC 26 cover star leaked – who will be on the front of the new game?

Leakers have revealed almost all there is to know about EA FC 26 before EA Sports has had the chance to announce anything itself It looks like we now know who is set to star on the front of EA FC 26, with the EA FC 25 cover star leaked on social media. We're still a few months away from the release of EA FC 26, and with EA Sports yet to reveal anything about the new game, you'd expect hype surrounding the next EA Sports FC instalment to be low. Well, this isn't quite the case, with a host of EA FC 26 leaks being made across social media over the last few weeks. ‌ Without anything being revealed by EA, it now seems that players know nearly everything there is to know about EA FC 26. Details such as the games release date, new Icons and new card designs have all been leaked over the last few weeks, but now, the EA FC 26 cover star has been leaked, likely spoiling any big reveal or surprise that EA had planned. ‌ EA FC 26 cover star leaked In EA FC 24, Erling Haaland was on the front of the game. EA FC 25 saw Jude Bellingham make his debut as the frontman. And now, according to leaker @FutSheriff, Bellingham will be the EA FC 26 cover star, with EA sticking with the Real Madrid and England international for another year. In all honestly, this was sort of expected from most people. It's likely that Bellingham agreed to a multi-year deal with EA when he became the cover star for EA FC 25, so at least one more year of the Englishman seems appropiate. There were other players rumoured to be on the cover of EA FC 26, but there were some players we could rule out instantly. Could it have been Cristiano Ronaldo? Lionel Messi? Lamine Yamal? Well, we already knew for a fact it couldn't have been any of these. Yamal was revealed as an ambassador for eFootball, previously known as Pro Evolution Soccer (PES), earlier this year, meaning the Spaniard cannot be on the cover of EA FC 26. Messi has also been an embassador for eFootball for a few years now, while Ronaldo is an investor and ambassador for free-to-play football game UFL. It is a shame that the cover star has been leaked so far in advance, as it does take away any sort of surprise factor when EA makes its official announcement. For EA FC 24, there were no leaks about Haaland being the cover star, so when it was officially revealed, it was a surprise for everyone. But, it seems that leaks are more prominent than ever ahead of EA FC 26. Let's hope that EA can find a way to limit these when the game's eventually released.

EA FC 26 card designs leaked – every FUT card we know including new Icon design
EA FC 26 card designs leaked – every FUT card we know including new Icon design

Daily Mirror

time3 days ago

  • Daily Mirror

EA FC 26 card designs leaked – every FUT card we know including new Icon design

Leakers are revealing lots of details about EA FC 26, with a host of card designs being leaked on social media ahead of any official announcements. The EA FC 26 card designs have been leaked on social media, revealing a number of new designs coming to Ultimate Team in EA FC 26. EA FC 26 leaks have been prominent on social media over the last few weeks, and at this rate, there will be nothing left for EA Sports to reveal once an official EA FC 26 announcement is made in July. The next instalment of the EA Sports FC game series is set to be released in September, but we already seem to know nearly everything new about the game. ‌ From EA FC 26 pre-order bonuses to new Icons coming to Ultimate Team, leakers have left little for EA to exclusively reveal, and now, a handful of different Ultimate Team card designs have been leaked, including a brand-new type of Icon. ‌ EA FC 26 card designs leaked There are several different sources for all of the EA FC 26 card design leaks, so we've rounded them all up in one place for you. Leaker @Fut_Scoreboard has been the source for the majority of the leaked designs, with the leaker revealing in a tweet the new rare gold card design. Featuring a new pattern, the rare gold design is the exact same as rare gold and rare bronze, with the obvious difference being the colours of the cards. The leaker revealed the new TOTW design in another tweet, and with its famous black and gold colourway, it's exactly what we've come to expect from a TOTW card. @Fut_Scoreboard has revealed that the Hero design is getting a major revamp in EA FC 26, with the card drastically changing; the orange, pink and purple colourway from EA FC 25 has been scrapped, with the Hero card in EA FC 26 now fully purple. Leaker @FutSheriff revealed the new Icon design, which is similar to past years, but the new background design adds a new dimension to the card. But, a new Icon design is being added in EA FC 26, with @exofifa_ tweeting a picture of the new pre-order Icon card designs. If you pre-order EA FC 26 Ultimate Edition, you will receive a free Icon card, with the item upgrading after launch and also receiving a slightly different card design. @LeanDesign_ tweeted the new card designs for the Showdown promo, including the Showdown Plus card design, and to round things up, @Fut_Scoreboard tweeted the new Flashback card design, which is one of the most ambitious designs of the lot. Now remember, these are all leaks, and none of these have been confirmed by EA, but these leakers have proven track records, so likely, they are all correct. More card designs are expected to be revealed in the coming weeks, so keep an eye out for those.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store