India launches ‘Operation Sindoor', missiles hit several sites in Pakistan
The Indian strike and counterattack by Pakistan come amid soaring tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbours after a deadly attack last month on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir that New Delhi blamed on Islamabad, which denied any involvement.
India's government said in a statement early on Wednesday that its military had attacked 'terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir from where terrorist attacks against India have been planned and directed'.
'Our actions have been focused, measured and non-escalatory in nature. No Pakistani military facilities have been targeted. India has demonstrated considerable restraint in selection of targets and method of execution,' it said.
Residents examine a building damaged by a suspected Indian missile attack near Muzaffarabad, the capital of Pakistan-administered Kashmir [MD Mughal/AP Photo]
Pakistani officials said at least eight people were killed and more than 35 others injured in India's attacks. The missiles struck locations in Pakistan-administered Kashmir and the country's eastern Punjab province.
Al Jazeera's Kamal Hyder, reporting from Islamabad, said the cities of Muzaffarabad and Kotli, both in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, were among the targets of the Indian strikes.
'Pakistani Defence Minister Khawaja Asif, speaking to a foreign TV network, confirmed that at least five Indian aircraft have been shot down and that a number of Indian soldiers have been taken prisoner,' Hyder said.
'Pakistan said that it would respond to any Indian attack against Pakistan, and Pakistan is now responding to that Indian attack,' he said.
'Heavy shelling has now resumed on the Line of Control that separates Pakistan-administered Kashmir from Indian-administered Kashmir,' he added.
A Pakistani military spokesman had earlier told the broadcaster Geo that at least five locations, including two mosques, had been hit. He had also said that Pakistan's response was under way, without providing details.
In Punjab, missiles hit a mosque in the city of Bahawalpur, killing a child and wounding two civilians, the military said.
Kashmir tensions escalate
Following India's attacks, the armies of the two sides exchanged intense shelling and heavy gunfire across their frontier in disputed Kashmir in at least three places, the Reuters news agency reported, citing police and witnesses.
United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for maximum restraint from both sides.
'The Secretary-General is very concerned about the Indian military operations across the Line of Control and international border. He calls for maximum military restraint from both countries,' the spokesperson said.
'The world cannot afford a military confrontation between India and Pakistan.'
United States President Donald Trump said the clashes were 'a shame'.
'I just hope it ends very quickly,' Trump said at the White House.
The eruption of violence comes amid heightened tensions between the nuclear-armed neighbours in the aftermath of an attack on tourists in Pahalgam in Indian-administered Kashmir last month.
India blamed Pakistan for the violence, in which 26 men were killed, and promised to respond. Pakistan denied that it had anything to do with the killings.
Nitasha Kaul, the director of the Centre for the Study of Democracy, said the strikes are 'very concerning'.
'Once again, the worst affected are going to be the people in the region, the Kashmiris, who are caught between the competing and proprietorial and rival postures and attitudes of India and Pakistan,' Kaul told Al Jazeera.
Still, she said, the escalation is 'not that surprising, because within India… there has been a domestic pressure building up for a more militarist response, given the fact that there is a particularly hyper-nationalist government in power.
'In that sense, sadly, this was a countdown to a greater escalation, and hopefully it won't proceed much further beyond what has already happened with these strikes,' Kaul added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
India's Goyal Sees UK Trade Deal as Win-Win
00:00 Well, I think Indian business is very excited that we've got the free trade agreement in place. We've got the double contribution convention in place. Indian businesses have been very bullish on the UK. And if one looks at the investments flowing in from India to UK, it's a tad more than the other way round. So I think this will also encourage greater investments because of the stable and predictable environment, business environment. It will also open the doors for more robust and resilient supply chains. It will ensure that we can both work as trusted partners, expanding trade in goods and services. I think Prime Minister Narendra modi and Prime Minister Starmer both very clearly recognise and articulated today that this is a milestone and historic achievement which will hold good stead as we double our trade, as we grow our jobs in both countries. It's a win win for both. You can India or any big Indian conglomerate's already planning that expansion? I think we saw, for example, the party group become the single largest investor in British Telecom. Clearly a sign that there is trust between businesses on both sides. In fact, they're also a major part of the one rep. You're aware that many pharma companies, many I.T. companies already have a significant presence in the UK, companies working on pesticides and chemicals. And very many sectors are looking at the UK as a possible centre, both for goods and services. The other talks were, of course ongoing on the bilateral investment treaty. Can I ask what are the sticking points remaining on that? I think negotiations happened in the negotiating room. We don't discuss that in the media, but I do hope we will get that also across the hump soon. And are there any concern, especially for Indian generics makers or in terms of dumping from India that are still there or have those all been resolved? Well, in fact, we were being wrongly classified as a country which had any problems with our patent and our IP regime. We were able to have very, very good discussions with the pharma companies, with all the stakeholders, both in India and in other parts of the world. Concerns that came to our attention, which merited any change have been addressed and it has given a big boost to patent filing faster clearances. In fact, in the last two years we've done nearly 160,000 Britons being issued, so much so that we don't have much of a backlog left anymore. And I think we've been able to create a trusted atmosphere with fast track clearances. And we now have a robust intellectual property rights chapter, both with Switzerland and the UK, two countries which always used to be at the forefront of innovation.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Trump Has a Terrible Idea for American Sports Teams
On Sunday, President Trump, still on the ropes because of the controversy over the government's Jeffrey Epstein files, ventured a distraction. With all the usual exclamation points and eccentric capitalization, he sounded the alarm on an issue a reader might have mistaken for a national crisis: the names of professional sports franchises. In particular those franchises that had cast off names that no longer felt culturally appropriate: the Washington Commanders, formerly the Redskins, and the Cleveland Guardians, formerly the Indians. 'The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team. There is a big clamoring for this. Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams,' — by the way, it wasn't — 'with a storied past. Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen. Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them.' With typical subtlety, Trump concluded, 'OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!' The controversy dates back more than a half-century. It was formalized in 1968, when the National Congress of American Indians embarked on a campaign to fight negative stereotypes of native people in American culture. For a while, however, the evidence on the word 'redskin' seemed equivocal. Polls by the Annenberg Public Policy Center, in 2004, and again by The Washington Post, in 2016, reported that a vast majority of actual Native Americans had no problem with the term. Was the whole thing just a politically correct tempest in a teapot, an effort to fix something that wasn't actually a problem? In 2020, a new poll was conducted. This one asked respondents for more finely grained responses and gave them more opportunity to consider their answers. The outcome was very different: Almost half of 1,000 Native Americans surveyed indeed found the term 'Redskin' to be offensive. Organized college athletics had long since forsworn team mascots that were based on caricatures of Indians. Amid the national climate of racial reckoning that George Floyd's death and the Black Lives Matter movement brought on, the Washington football franchise announced it would be changing its name. When Trump claims that 'our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen,' there is no reason to wonder if he commissioned his own secret polling. But you don't need a poll to understand why he's wrong. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
India Commerce Minister on Trade Talks, Economy, Visas
CC-Transcript 00:00Let me start by asking you about Indian businesses. You've managed doing some really key concessions, especially on the National Insurance payments front. Are you hearing from companies that they want to increase investments in the UK as a result? And if so, where? Well, I think immune business is very excited that we have got the free trade agreement in place. We've got the double contribution convention in place. Indian businesses have been very bullish on the UK and if one looks at the investments flowing in from India to UK, it's tied more than the other way round. So I think this will also encourage greater investments because of the stable and predictable environment, business environment. It will also open the doors for more robust and resilient supply chains. It will ensure that we can both work as trusted partners, expanding trade in goods and services. I think Prime Minister Narendra modi and Prime Minister Starmer both very clearly recognise and articulated today that this is a milestone and historic achievement which will hold good stead as redouble our trade as we grow our jobs in both countries. It's a win win for both. You can India or any big Indian conglomerates already planning that expansion? I think we saw, for example, the party group become the single largest investor in British Telecom. Yeah, clearly a sign that there is trust between businesses on both sides. In fact, they're also a major part of the one that you're aware that many pharma companies, many I.T. companies already have a significant presence in the UK, companies working on pesticides and chemicals. And very many sectors are looking at the UK as a possible centre, both for goods and services. The other talks were, of course ongoing on the bilateral investment treaty. Can I ask what are the sticking points remaining on that? Sessions happened in the negotiating room. We don't discuss that in the media, but I do hope we will get that also across the Council. And are there any concern, especially for Indian generics makers or in terms of dumping from India that are still there or have those all been resolved? Well, in fact, we were being wrongly. Classified as a country which had any problems with our patent and our IP regime. Yes, we were able to have very, very good discussions with the pharma companies, with all the stakeholders, both in India and in other parts of the world. Concerns that came to our attention, which merited any change, have been addressed, and it has given a big boost to patent filing faster clearances. In fact, in the last two years, we've done nearly 160,000 patents being issued, so much so that we don't have much of a backlog left anymore. And I think we've been able to create a trusted atmosphere with fast track clearances, and we now have a robust intellectual property rights chapter, both with Switzerland and the UK, two countries which always used to be at the forefront of innovation and had earlier expressed concerns. So you would appreciate that. Now we have a good Segway on IPR also with the advanced and developed economies, and we do believe that we will see a lot of innovation happening in India in the years to come. And do you see this deal as a template for the deals that you're looking to in with the US, for instance, starting with, you know, one of the questions, if I may ask, is on visa access, because that is something that came up a lot in the trade agreement. I don't think so. That's completely wrong propaganda that's been discussed in the United Kingdom. I have often said on the record that free trade agreements are not about immigration. Now, of course, business visas to further providing goods to do business or to provide some service in the short term is a different matter. And unfortunately, the debate in the UK went into the wrong direction. I'm glad that now more and more clarity is coming to everybody. This was never about immigration. It was about free trade, both in goods and services. It does open up a plethora of opportunities for businesses on both sides and will be great. It will be a win win for the UK, as much for India. And you know, President Trump is in the UK this weekend. How were the negotiations with the US going? Do you see those happening by August 1st? Will be a very robust negotiations going on with several countries, with the United States, with the European Union and with New Zealand, with the Peru, Chile and USA. Slightly more significant. There are significant and of course I've had some wonderful engagement with my friend and colleague from the US, the Commerce Secretary, Mr. Howard. The United States Trade Representative, Ambassador Jamison Greer, are both very dear friends and I'm sure they are looking at the great business with the United States in the years to come. And you know, this thing President Trump has said of an extra 10% tariffs on BRIC nations, tariffs on countries that are importing oil from Russia. Are those sticking points at all? I don't think there is any sticking point in our relationship or negotiation with the United States, and it's making good progress. And you're confident in terms of given the clock is ticking there as well? Well, I'm always confident. I'm curious also. You know, one of the things has been it seems like there's a thaw in trade relations between India and China, two of the big global economies. How do you see that? And, you know, what's your outlook for there? Well, I think China is a large economy and they have trading relations across the world. There have also been in dialogue with the United States. They're doing significant work with your country in the UK and the European Union. And India has always stood for fair play. And that is what we are looking to achieve with all our trading partners. I think whoever plays by the trade rules or for open trade gives equal access to Indian goods and services, helps us develop our economy to become a developed economy by 2047, which is Prime Minister Narendra modi's vision for the country. Will be willing to work with all such countries. And what do you see next after this really successful one? You know, you spoke about the US. Is the EU next? What can we be expecting? Well, I think all the trade negotiations are important and they are all moving along very fast, very well. I'm in continuous dialogue. I was just exchanging messages with the EU Agriculture Commissioner a few minutes back. So it's a continuous process, particularly given the time zones are different all over the country. I think it's a round the clock effort also. What do you in the UK coming back to? It was the biggest concession. You know, these trade negotiations have gone on for more than three years, successive governments. What was the biggest concession that you think really swung it? I don't think there's anything big or small. A trade deal is always a comprehensive package. And you always balance different elements of a deal. In this particular transaction also, and it's one of the most comprehensive trade deals ever. It does. Then it took the chapters more than we've had in any other trade deal. So I think it's a holistic, comprehensive agreement. And very often you balance instead of one against the other. You don't literally pick up one as the most important of the other is less import. Absolutely. How are you feeling now with the middle of the year? You know, this new government has done something. This deal was the first in a decade that India has done at this scale. You know, what is India's outlook when you're looking at the global economies and its new position in the world? After Prime Minister Modi came into government, the first stop, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, which was an agreement with the effectively with the non-market economies. So, you know, we already had a free trade deal with the ASEAN region and with Japan and Korea, Australia and New Zealand. We could have bilaterally and we've already now completed it with Australia. We're in dialogue with New Zealand. So if I didn't, it would have been a free trade deal with China. So I think it was important to stop that because that would have hurt India's manufacturing prowess. Having said that, Prime Minister Modi is focused on free trade deals with advanced and developed economies. We've concluded one with Australia, with the United Arab Emirates and Mauritius, with the full bloc after countries Switzerland, Norway. Let's then stay in and I said the amount that the United Kingdom, in active dialogue with you, with the U.S., with Peru, Chile, we've concluded discussions with Oman. So India has now changed track and is engaging with the larger and the more consequential partnerships which will help India in its journey to becoming a developed nation. And sorry, just one clarification on the US, because you mentioned look, Nick in Korea is I'm just wondering, is Scott Bessant not involved in those negotiations as negotiations are with the Commerce Secretary and the USGA? Okay. And you said visas for Indian workers, which has been a big issue. I mean, in the US, that is not part of the talks. H1-B visas for Indian workers. I think most current H-1B visas is not an Indian issue at all. A lot of people realize that you can do great amount of work from home, so you can do a great amount of work from third countries. So frankly, in the last four years, nobody has come to me with the problem about it to be visas. So that's no longer an issue, no more an issue. And it's not even we've not discussed that even once in our dialogues. Okay. Well, Minister, thank you so much for taking the time. Thank you.
