India shared concerns with US over Russia energy sanctions
Jaishankar, who was in Washington for a foreign ministers meeting of the Quad (a grouping of India, Japan, the US and Australia), said that India, a major buyer of Russian oil, was aware of the potential implications of the proposed bill.
'Regarding Senator Lindsey Graham's bill, any development which is happening in the US Congress is of interest to us if it impacts our interest or could impact our interest,' the Indian foreign minister said at a press briefing. 'I think our concerns and our interests in energy security have been made conversant to him. So, we will then have to cross that bridge when we come to it, if we come to it.'
The bill is part of a broader effort to pressure Russia, amid ongoing tensions related to the Ukraine conflict. Graham has said that it 'will be a tool in (US President Donald Trump's) toolbox to bring Russian President Vladimir Putin to the table.'
Indian diplomats and officials are in touch with the Republican senator who sponsored the bill, which has Trump's backing, according to the news outlet India Today. Since 2022, India and China have significantly increased their oil purchases from Russia. In May, New Delhi emerged as the second-largest buyer of Russian fossil fuels, with estimated purchases totaling $4.9 billion, of which crude constituted about 72% of the total value, according to the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air.
India has purchased 80% of Russia's seaborne Urals crude exports this year, with two private refineries increasingly buying more of this variety. The US and India are engaged in negotiations for a trade agreement and are racing to meet a July 9 deadline set by Trump, in order to avoid reciprocal tariffs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Dmitry Trenin: This is a long war, and it's not just about Ukraine
The trademark style of the current US president, Donald Trump, is verbal spectacle. His statements – brash, contradictory, sometimes theatrical – should be monitored, but not overestimated. They are not inherently favorable or hostile to Russia. And we must remember: Trump is not the 'king' of America. The 'Trump revolution' that many anticipated at the beginning of the year appears to have given way to Trump's own evolution – a drift toward accommodation with the American establishment. In that light, it's time to assess the interim results of our 'special diplomatic operation'. There have now been six presidential phone calls, several rounds of talks between foreign ministers and national security aides, and sustained contact at other levels. The most obvious positive outcome is the restoration of dialogue between Russia and the United States – a process that had been severed under the Biden administration. Crucially, this revived dialogue extends beyond Ukraine. A range of potential areas for cooperation have been mapped out, from geopolitical stability to transportation and sport. These may not carry immediate strategic weight, but they lay the groundwork for future engagement. Under Trump, the dialogue is unlikely to break off again – though its tone and pace may shift. One visible result of this diplomacy was the resumption of talks with the Ukrainian side in Istanbul. While these negotiations currently hold little political substance – and the recent prisoner exchanges occurred independently of them – they nonetheless reaffirm a core tenet of Russian diplomacy: we are ready for a political resolution to the conflict. Still, these are technical and tactical achievements. The strategic reality remains unchanged. It was never realistic to expect Trump to offer Russia a deal on Ukraine that met our security requirements. Nor for that matter would Russia accept one that compromised its long-term security interests. Likewise, any notion that Trump would 'deliver' Ukraine to the Kremlin, join Moscow in undermining the EU, or push for a new Yalta agreement with Russia and China was always fantasy. So the page has turned. What comes next? Trump will almost certainly sign the new US sanctions bill into law – but he'll try to preserve discretion in how those measures are applied. The sanctions will add friction to global trade, but they will not derail Russian policy. On the military front, Trump will deliver the remaining aid packages approved under Biden, and perhaps supplement them with modest contributions of his own. But going forward, it will be Western Europe – especially Germany – that supplies Ukraine, often by buying US-made systems and re-exporting them. Meanwhile, the United States will continue to furnish Kiev with battlefield intelligence – particularly for deep strikes inside Russian territory. None of this suggests the conflict will end in 2025. Nor will it end when hostilities in Ukraine eventually wind down. That's because the fight is not fundamentally about Ukraine. What we are witnessing is an indirect war between the West and Russia – part of a much broader global confrontation. The West is fighting to preserve its dominance. And Russia, in defending itself, is asserting its sovereign right to exist on its own terms. This war will be long. And the United States – with Trump or without him – will remain our adversary. The outcome will shape not just the fate of Ukraine, but the future of Russia itself. This article was first published in Kommersant, and was translated and edited by the RT team.
Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Child dies from wounds received in Ukrainian drone attack
A five-year-old boy has died from wounds he suffered in a Ukrainian drone strike on a public beach in the city of Kursk, interim regional governor Aleksandr Khinshtein said. The boy died while being transferred to Moscow for treatment, Khinstein reported in a Telegram post on Wednesday. The governor expressed his condolences to the family of the deceased child and promised to provide them with all necessary support. 'Medics did everything they could to save him, but the injuries were too severe: the child had burns on more than 30% of his body – this is extremely, extremely high for a small person,' Khinstein wrote. The fatality brings the death toll from the beach attack to four. At least nine civilians received shrapnel wounds and burns in the strike. A Ukrainian drone struck the public beach on Tuesday as people gathered to celebrate the Day of Family, Love, and Fidelity, a holiday celebrated on July 8, according to the governor. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova condemned the strike, while criticizing the countries that provide military aid to Ukraine. 'Those supplying weapons to the Kiev regime should understand that they are being used to kill children,' she stated. Kursk Region has become one of the prime targets for Ukrainian drone, artillery, and missile strikes amid the ongoing conflict between Moscow and Kiev. The region also endured a major invasion that was launched last August, when dozens of villages and the border town of Sudzha were seized by Ukrainian troops. After finally fully liberating the region in April, Russian authorities found evidence of widespread atrocities committed against the local population.
Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Multinationals sue India over e-waste recycling rules
Multinational companies, including South Korea's LG and Samsung and US-based air conditioning giant Carrier have taken the Indian government to court over its new electronic waste management policy. The Delhi High Court heard pleas on Tuesday against new e-waste disposal rules, which have led to a hike in fees that manufacturers must pay recyclers. The Indian government has requested that these petitions be dismissed, according to the Economic Times. The new rules mandate a minimum payment of 22 Indian rupees ($0.26) per kg to recycle consumer electronics. Companies say this will triple their costs, as the new prices are 5-15 times higher than the current rates. In a 380-page court filing, Carrier argued that the Indian government's new electronic waste rules are unfair and arbitrary, Reuters reported. The American company claimed that recyclers were willing to continue working at the previous prices and that the government should not intervene in private agreements between companies and recyclers, the report added. 'The burden of the benefit being given to the recyclers has been put on the producers, which is unfair and arbitrary,' Carrier was cited by Reuters as saying in its court submission. Other major appliance manufacturers, including Japan's Daikin and Voltas, owned by the Tata Group, have expressed concerns over the e-waste rules. Japanese company Hitachi and Indian multinational Havells had previously filed lawsuits against the Indian government between November 2023 and March 2024, seeking to quash the pricing rules. During the hearing on Tuesday, India's environment ministry told the Delhi court that the companies have not produced any evidence of arbitrariness in the government's decision-making process, and that the manufacturers have been party to stakeholder discussions on the issue since 2021, according to the Economic Times. The hearing of the petitions has been postponed to August 1. India's e-waste volumes soared by about 2.5x in six years, from 708,445 metric tons in 2017-18 to over 1.7 million metric tons in 2023-24, with an annual increase of 169,283 metric tons, according to a report in The Hindu.
