'Who Kissed Whose A**?': Putin Aide Medvedev Trolls Trump For Waging Tariff War On China
PM Modi just dropped another roast—this time aimed at the INDI Alliance—as Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijayan and Shashi Tharoor shared the stage. With a grin and a jab, Modi claimed 'many will lose sleep' seeing this Kerala camaraderie. Is this a power move or just another spicy soundbite from the PM? Watch to see how this unexpected duo got the spotlight... and Congress got the insomnia.#toibharat #Modi #Congress #KeralaPolitics #INDIAlliance #PoliticalRoast #ShashiTharoor #PinarayiVijayan #PMModiSpeech #VizhinjamSeaport #KeralaSeaport
10.2K views | 11 hours ago
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
5 minutes ago
- Hans India
P Chidambaram Responds To Controversy Over 'Evidence' Remarks On Pahalgam Terror Attack
Congress leader and former Union Minister P Chidambaram has addressed the political storm surrounding his recent comments on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor. Chidambaram, in an interview, questioned why the attackers have not been apprehended or their identities revealed, asking, 'Why have you not apprehended them? Why have you not even identified them?' This led to accusations by the BJP, notably Amit Malviya, who claimed that Chidambaram and the Congress were giving a "clean chit" to Pakistan. Responding to the controversy on social media, Chidambaram criticized what he called the 'worst kind of troll'—those who distort interviews by sharing only selective clips. He stated that such actions misrepresent his position and spread misinformation. He also noted the lack of comprehensive official information about the case, highlighting that details have been released only piecemeal by various officials, while there has been silence from top ministers. The National Investigation Agency (NIA), meanwhile, has arrested two local men alleged to have assisted the terrorists and maintains that the attackers were Pakistani nationals, although their names have not yet been released. Chidambaram continues to challenge the narrative, suggesting that the possibility of 'homegrown terrorists' should not be dismissed without clear evidence and transparency from the authorities. Chidambaram is scheduled to participate in the upcoming parliamentary debate on the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor, where these issues are expected to be discussed in detail.
NDTV
21 minutes ago
- NDTV
Shashi Tharoor Snubbed Congress On Op Sindoor Debate: The Inside Story
New Delhi: Shashi Tharoor - at a crossroads in his relationship with the Congress - has refused to toe the party line during the Parliament debate on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor, sources told NDTV Monday morning. Mr Tharoor said he would not contradict himself "for the sake of party messaging". Shashi Tharoor had been asked to lead the Congress' (and the opposition's) attacks on the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party as part of a high-profile, 16-hour debate on the Pahalgam and Op Sindoor, India's military response, as well as the nearly 100-hour armed conflict with Pakistan that followed. Sources said Mr Tharoor had been approached by Rahul Gandhi's office. But the request was turned down. Mr Tharoor and the Congress have been at odds since he led a government delegation to the United States - on Pahalgam and India's anti-terror doctrine - and praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi. That rift was evident again today after Mr Tharoor made it clear he could only speak in support of Op Sindoor and not contradict his own position for the sake of party messaging. The Congress then decided Mr Tharoor would not speak during the debate. Mr Gandhi, who is the Leader of the Opposition, and his deputy, Gaurav Gogoi, as well as Wayanad MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, are among those who will speak for the Congress. Earlier today, Mr Tharoor evaded a question from NDTV on this subject. The Thiruvananthapuram MP walked away. Party colleague Renuka Chowdhury responded on his behalf, and said, "... (he) is constitutionally empowered to speak anywhere..." The debate on Pahalgam and Op Sindoor - scheduled to begin at noon today in the Lok Sabha but adjourned after chaos in the House - had been demanded by an opposition. Under pressure, the government pencilled in this 16-hour debate. The opposition had also demanded Prime Minister Modi address Parliament; Mr Modi is scheduled to speak in the Lok Sabha later today and in the Rajya Sabha tomorrow. Mr Tharoor's reluctance to speak against Op Sindoor underlines the Congress' problem. His relationship with the party - uncertain since 2021, when he joined a group of 'dissenters', i.e., the G-23, and questioned the Gandhis' leadership after a string of election defeats - has taken a sharp downturn over the past few months. The Congress expressed its unease over positive comments about Mr Modi and the BJP, comments amplified after he was handpicked as one of the few opposition MPs chosen to brief 'partner nations' on the Pahalgam attack and India's military response. READ | Tharoor Calls PM "Prime Asset For India" In New Provocation For Congress Mr Tharoor has acknowledged differences between himself and the Congress; he even met Rahul Gandhi, but nothing seemed to come of that meeting. Speaking to NDTV last month, he played down, again, any talk of friction with the party, calling such incidents "differences of opinion... with only some elements of leadership". When NDTV asked him how he would define his relationship with the Congress today, he pointed out he had been loyal to the party and its ideology for the last 16 years. Mr Tharoor has also firmly denied any talk of a switch to the BJP, a move that could re-align and re-shape India's political lanscape. "It is not a sign of my leaping to join the Prime Minister's party... as some people have been implying..." he said after his remarks about Mr Modi's "dynamism".
Hans India
28 minutes ago
- Hans India
Congress MP Employs Cryptic Response Amid Parliamentary Debate Speculation
As Parliament prepares for a critical discussion on the Pahalgam terror incident and the subsequent military response Operation Sindoor, considerable uncertainty surrounds the potential participation of senior Congress parliamentarian Shashi Tharoor in the forthcoming debate. The Thiruvananthapuram representative has become the subject of intense political speculation regarding his role in the opposition's strategy. When approached by media personnel outside Parliament on Monday regarding his possible involvement in the debate, Tharoor delivered an enigmatic two-word response: "Maunvrat, Maunvrat," referencing the concept of observing silence. He declined to provide any elaboration or entertain additional questions from the assembled reporters, leaving his intentions deliberately ambiguous. This cryptic communication has intensified discussions within political circles about whether the veteran parliamentarian will be deployed by the Congress party during the high-stakes debate. Tharoor's recent leadership of a parliamentary delegation to the United States and other nations has positioned him as a potentially significant voice in discussions involving international relations and security matters. The uncertainty surrounding Tharoor's participation stems from his increasingly complex relationship with the Congress party leadership in recent months. His apparent endorsement of the government's rapid response to the Pahalgam attack has reportedly created tension within party ranks, where criticism of governmental actions typically forms the cornerstone of opposition strategy. The Congress party leadership has yet to officially confirm whether Tharoor will be included among the designated speakers for the parliamentary discussion, adding to the intrigue surrounding his potential role. This silence from party officials has fueled further speculation about internal disagreements regarding the appropriate approach to the debate. The Monsoon session experienced significant disruptions during its initial week, with repeated interruptions preventing substantive legislative work. Monday's session, which commenced at 11 AM, witnessed immediate adjournment following disturbances created by opposition party members, highlighting the charged political atmosphere surrounding these discussions. As the Congress party prepares to challenge the BJP-led central government over Operation Sindoor, party leadership has emphasized their insistence that Prime Minister Narendra Modi must be physically present in Parliament when the Pahalgam-Operation Sindoor issues are formally addressed. This demand reflects the opposition's desire to ensure direct governmental accountability for the military operation and its aftermath. The Congress party has persistently advocated for comprehensive debate on these matters since the monsoon session's commencement last week. Jairam Ramesh, the party's general secretary responsible for communications, has been particularly vocal in criticizing the Prime Minister's international travel schedule, arguing that it demonstrates neglect of pressing domestic security concerns. Ramesh recently characterized the Prime Minister as a "Super Premium Frequent Flyer," suggesting that another planned foreign visit would disappoint the people of Manipur and other regions affected by security challenges. This criticism came in the context of Modi's recent four-day diplomatic mission to the United Kingdom and the Maldives, where he successfully concluded a significant free trade agreement with the UK. The Congress communications chief has been particularly critical of what he perceives as the Prime Minister's limited parliamentary presence, noting that Modi typically addresses Parliament only once annually during the Motion of Thanks to the President's Address. Ramesh argued that the gravity of the Pahalgam-Operation Sindoor situation, combined with international implications involving former US President Trump's claims, necessitates the Prime Minister's direct participation in parliamentary discussions. The political dynamics surrounding this debate reflect broader tensions between the ruling party and opposition regarding transparency, accountability, and the appropriate governmental response to security challenges. The Congress party's strategy appears focused on challenging both the operational aspects of the military response and the diplomatic communications surrounding the incident. The timing of these discussions coincides with ongoing questions about intelligence failures, operational effectiveness, and international diplomatic coordination in response to cross-border terrorism. Opposition parties have consistently argued that such matters require thorough parliamentary scrutiny and direct governmental accountability. Tharoor's enigmatic response and uncertain participation status highlight the complex internal dynamics within opposition parties when addressing national security matters. The tension between maintaining party unity and individual conscience becomes particularly pronounced when dealing with military operations and international relations. The parliamentary debate represents a crucial moment for both governmental accountability and opposition strategy, with the potential to influence public perception of the administration's security policies and diplomatic approach to regional challenges.
