logo
Alasdair MacIntyre, Philosopher Who Saw a ‘New Dark Ages,' Dies at 96

Alasdair MacIntyre, Philosopher Who Saw a ‘New Dark Ages,' Dies at 96

New York Times02-06-2025
Alasdair MacIntyre, a philosopher who metamorphosed from a London Marxist into a Midwestern American Catholic during a decades-long quest to prove there was an objective foundation to moral virtue — a lonely project that struck many of his academic peers as anachronistic yet drew a large, varied and growing crowd of admirers — died on May 21. He was 96.
His death was announced by the University of Notre Dame, where Mr. MacIntyre was a professor emeritus of philosophy. The announcement did not say where he died.
Moral beliefs are widely considered matters of private conscience — up for debate, of course, but not resolvable in any sort of final consensus. That is why, for example, people generally think teachers should guide students toward self-realization, rather than proselytize their own beliefs. The same neutrality is expected of lawyers, therapists, government officials and others.
Mr. MacIntyre belonged to a different moral universe.
In his best-known book, 'After Virtue' (1981), he argued that thousands of years ago, the earliest Western philosophers and the Homeric myths generated 'the tradition of the virtues,' which was treated as objective truth. Value neutrality, to Mr. MacIntyre, was the goal of 'barbarians' and a sign of 'the new dark ages which are already upon us.'
Such language might make Mr. MacIntyre seem like a wistful reactionary. In fact, his worldview was far less predictable.
He never entirely disavowed his youthful Marxism, applauding Marx's critique of the individualistic and acquisitive spirit of capitalism. He maintained a certain sort of modesty from his days as a self-appointed champion of the working class — he never earned a Ph.D. and disliked being called 'professor' — and he continued showing the dialectical passion of a Trotskyist, occasionally launching into what one colleague called 'MacIntyrades.'
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel showed that seizing air superiority isn't gone from modern warfare, but Iran isn't China or Russia
Israel showed that seizing air superiority isn't gone from modern warfare, but Iran isn't China or Russia

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Israel showed that seizing air superiority isn't gone from modern warfare, but Iran isn't China or Russia

Military officials and experts warn that air superiority may not be possible in modern warfare. Israel, however, was able to quickly achieve it against Iran. Iran, though capable, isn't bringing the same fight that a foe like Russia or China could. Israel swiftly seized air superiority over parts of Iran during the latest fight, showing that it's still possible in modern, higher-end warfare to heavily dominate an enemy's skies. But there's a risk in taking the wrong lesson from that win. Iran isn't Russia or China, and as the West readies for potential near-peer conflict, it really can't afford to forget that, officials and experts have cautioned. Western military officials and warfare experts have repeatedly warned in recent years that achieving air superiority against those countries would be a daunting task. Russia and China, especially the latter, boast sophisticated, integrated air defense networks with ground-based interceptors well supported by capable air forces, electronic warfare, and reliable space-based and airborne intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. Air superiority in a limited theater is not the same as breaking through a complex anti-access, area-denial setup. Israel's victory in the air war over Iran shows that air superiority is "not impossible" in modern warfare, former Australian Army Maj. Gen. Mick Ryan, a warfare strategist, explained. That said, he continued, a Western conflict with Russia or China would be "very different." A victory in the air for Israel Israel attacked nuclear and military sites in Iran in bombing runs and eliminated dozens of Iranian air defense batteries. Justin Bronk, an airpower expert at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), said it "highlights what you can do with a modern air force against some, on paper, fairly impressive defenses." Iran maintained a capable layered air defense network featuring domestic systems, foreign-supplied defenses, and some modernized older systems. Though only semi-integrated compared to fully networked air defenses, it presented an obstacle. Israel dismantled Iranian defenses over multiple engagements through extensive planning, detailed intelligence, and the employment of combat-proven airpower, specifically fifth-generation F-35 stealth fighters built for penetration and suppression of enemy air defenses and fourth-generation F-15s and F-16s, which can also support that mission. Important to Israel's success in the latest fight with Iran were the engagements last year that substantially weakened Iranian air defense capabilities, as well as Israel's skills in this mission. Failures and aircraft losses in the 1973 Yom Kippur War led it to reevaluate how it approached enemy air defenses, in many ways leading to the emergence of the kind of missions used against Iran. Ed Arnold, a security expert at RUSI, said that Israel reporting no aircraft losses "was significant, and it just showed that, yeah, you can get air supremacy very quickly." The caveat there is that doing so requires the right tactics, weapons, and intelligence, but even then, it is not guaranteed. Retired Air Commodore Andrew Curtis, an airfare expert with a 35-year career in the Royal Air Force, told BI "the situation that everybody's been used to over the last 30 years is air supremacy," but when it comes to high-intensity war against a near-peer adverary, realistically, "those days are long gone." Russia and China Iran had air defenses, but not airpower. It's air force is largely made up of obsolete Western, Soviet, and Chinese aircraft. The ground-based surface-to-air missile batteries are more capable, but that's only one part of the defensive picture. Curtis explained that Iran has "very little in the way of air defense aircraft, whereas of course Russia, and especially China, has stacks of them." Both Russia and China field fourth-generation-plus aircraft, as well as fifth-generation fighters. China, in particular, has multiple fifth-gen fighters in various stages of development, and there are indications it's working on sixth-generation prototypes. By comparison, Iran's air force looks a lot like a plane museum. But they also boast more advanced and more effective air defenses. Bronk said Russia's defenses are "better networked, more capable, more numerous, and more densely layered than Iran's." He said that if the West rolled back the SAM threat, it would likely be able to overcome Russia's air force, but China is a different story. China has a complex integrated air defense network supported by ground-based air defenses, naval air defenses, and what Bronk characterized as "an increasingly very capable modern air force," among other capabilities. And China also has a "far greater and more sophisticated missile arsenal for striking bases" to hamstring an enemy's airpower. Additionally, it holds a strong economic position with an industrial base that is turning out high-end weapons. China has also been tremendously increasing its number of interceptors without really expending any, unlike the US, which has been burning through interceptors in Middle Eastern conflicts. Not all of China has the same protections, but breaking through defenses would likely represent a substantial challenge in a conflict, especially in something like a Taiwan contingency. A conflict between the West and China could look like "a more traditional air war" — something not seen in a long time, Curtis said, explaining that air-to-air combat could make a comeback, with pilots again shooting down enemy planes. "In a peer-on-peer conflict, certainly with China, you would see a lot of that, because China has got a lot of air assets." Future air battles Achieving air superiority, as Israel did recently and as the US did in the Gulf War in the 1990s and in the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan in the 2000s, has been crucial to the Western way of war, often serving as a tool to enable ground maneuvers. Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which failed to knock out Ukraine's air defenses, now far more robust than at the start of the war, has shown what a conflict looks like when it isn't achieved. Aircraft are shot out of the sky, and ground forces are locked in grinding slogs. Devastating long-range attacks are still possible, but quick victory is generally not. It has resulted in some stark warnings for future warfare. Speaking on air superiority, Gen. James Hecker, the commander of NATO's air command, warned last year that "it's not a given." He added that "if we can't get air superiority, we're going to be doing the fight that's going on in Russia and Ukraine right now." Other military leaders have said that air superiority may only be achieved in short bursts. War is full of surprises, but evidence indicates that's a real possibility. Achieving Curtis said air planners now have to focus on specific priorities, like protecting air bases, and figuring out how to achieve a "localized time-bound air superiority or air supremacy in support of a short-term mission or operation." "It's a different mindset," he said. The key in future wars will be to seize control of as much of the aerial battlespace as possible to do what's necessary in the moment, all while holding firm defensively, as Israel did against Iran's retaliatory ballistic missile strikes, experts said. That means maintaining a strong air force and strong air defenses. "Nothing in Ukraine or Israel has shown that air superiority isn't needed in the future," Ryan shared. "I think they've both shown that having air superiority is an extraordinarily important part of warfare and remains so.

'Dangerous' US Halt to Ukraine Aid Could See Russian Battlefield Gains
'Dangerous' US Halt to Ukraine Aid Could See Russian Battlefield Gains

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

'Dangerous' US Halt to Ukraine Aid Could See Russian Battlefield Gains

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Ukrainian aid group told Newsweek the White House's recent move to pause weapons deliveries to Kyiv was "dangerous and irresponsible." On Tuesday, the U.S. confirmed it had paused the delivery of some of Ukraine's most in-demand equipment and supplies. White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said the decision was made "to put America's interests first" following a review of U.S. military support to other countries. But it has prompted bipartisan criticism in the U.S. and Yuriy Boyechko, CEO and founder of Hope for Ukraine, predicted it would mean an increase in Ukrainian civilian casualties. The D.C.-based think tank Institute for the Study of War said the U.S. halt of weaponry on air defense interceptors, artillery shells, missiles and rockets would lead to Russian gains as previous American aid suspensions have in the past. Newsweek has contacted the White House for comment. This image from March 6, 2025 shows a Patriot air defense system installed at the military hub for Ukraine at the Rzeszow-Jasionka airport in Jasionka, southeast Poland. This image from March 6, 2025 shows a Patriot air defense system installed at the military hub for Ukraine at the Rzeszow-Jasionka airport in Jasionka, southeast It Matters The U.S. has provided about $67 billion in military aid to Ukraine over the full-scale invasion. Since President Donald Trump returned to the White House, there have been concerns from Kyiv and its allies about the U.S.'s continuing commitment to this aid. Critics of the U.S. aid suspension say the move is likely to help Russia's military operations against Ukraine only weeks after Moscow launched a summer offensive across multiple parts of the front line. The U.S. move is feared to degrade Ukraine's ability to defend against long-range missile and drone strike capabilities that kill civilians. What To Know Politico first reported that a review of U.S. munitions stockpiles had raised concerns over a dip in the Department of Defense's stockpiles, and that an initial decision to hold back some military aid pledged during the previous administration was made almost a month ago. Aid halted had come through the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI) and donations pulled from U.S. military stocks, which have dwindled due to heavy involvement in the Middle East. The ISW, citing Western media reports, said the U.S. pause on weapons will affect PAC-3 interceptors for Patriot air defense systems, Stinger man-portable air defense systems, 155mm high explosive howitzer munitions and Hellfire air-to-ground missiles. Also impacted will be the supply of Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS) rockets, grenade launchers and AIM air-to-air missiles. Like previous U.S. aid suspensions to Kyiv, Russia is likely to exploit the halt to push for battlefield gains, the ISW said. This has happened near Avdiivka, in the Donetsk region in mid-January 2024 and in the Kursk region following the suspension of U.S. intelligence-sharing in early March 2025. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov welcomed the U.S. move Wednesday saying the fewer weapons Ukraine receives, the sooner the war ends. The ISW said the suspension will consolidate Vladimir Putin's theory he can win a war of attrition with slow advances by outlasting Western support for Ukraine. Boyechko, from Hope for Ukraine, a group helping communities near the front line, told Newsweek Ukrainian civilians will bear the brunt of the U.S. aid freeze. Ukraine needed air defense weapons more than ever as Moscow steps up its daily attacks on civilian targets, he added. Representative Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA), the co-chair of the Congressional Ukraine Caucus, posting on X, he will be "demanding accountability" for the move and sent a letter to the White House. Representative Michael McCaul (R-TX) said the freeze comes "at the wrong time" and will look into whether it breaches 2024 legislation on aid to Ukraine, Politico reported. And Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, called the decision, "fallacious and maybe even disingenuous." What People Are Saying White House spokesperson Anna Kelly: "This decision was made to put America's interests first following a review of our nation's military support and assistance to other countries across the globe." Yuriy Boyechko, CEO and founder of Hope for Ukraine: "The decision by the White House to freeze shipments of air defense and precision-guided weapons to Ukraine is dangerous and irresponsible." "These are defensive weapons that the Ukrainian military uses to protect civilians from daily attacks by Russian missiles and drones." Representative Brian Fitzpatrick wrote on X: "Ukraine's courage must continue to be met with action, and the United States must continue to lead with clarity and purpose." What Happens Next Fitzpatrick has called on the White House and the Department of Defense to hold an emergency briefing but as of Wednesday, it was unclear when the pause would start after Ukraine's Defense Ministry said it has not received formal notification of delays or cancellations.

Is Trump's America Living up to Its Founding Ideals? Newsweek Contributors Debate
Is Trump's America Living up to Its Founding Ideals? Newsweek Contributors Debate

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Is Trump's America Living up to Its Founding Ideals? Newsweek Contributors Debate

On Friday, the United States celebrates the 249th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Is America living up to its founding ideals? Is the U.S. a force for good in the world today? And how should Americans express their patriotism this Fourth of July? Newsweek contributors Steve Cortes and Faisal Kutty debate: Steve Cortes: Since our founding, America has battled tirelessly to live up to the lofty ideals of our revolution and formation. Despite facing setbacks and blemishes, just like any other human institution, the country's inexorable trajectory has been a march upward toward justice, sovereignty, prosperity, and equality under law. America stands as the pinnacle and leader of Western civilization. President Donald Trump makes this position clear through foreign policy that is restrained, but fierce when required. Previously reticent European allies now lavishly praise Trump and, at his prompting, are stepping up materially to defend the NATO alliance. Faisal Kutty: The founding of America—rooted in liberty, justice, and equality—remains one of history's most inspiring achievements. At its best, America upheld those ideals, using diplomacy and humanitarian aid to save lives, build institutions, and improve the world. Its flaws were tempered by its promise. Today, that legacy is faltering. The U.S. shields regimes that violate human rights and abuses immigration law to silence dissent. From Gaza to university campuses, its power protects the powerful, not the principled. To truly be a force for good again and maintain global respect, America must reclaim its founding values—for everyone, not just its allies. Cortes: America quite literally saved the world three times in the 20th century: in two world wars, and then in the Cold War. We asked for nothing in return and then generously funded the very peace we achieved. Now, we rightly turn our focus toward addressing threats at home, such as a border left open for decades and Marxists dominating our institutions, from higher education to taxpayer-funded NGOs. Kutty: Yes, America played a vital role in shaping the 20th century—but claiming it "saved the world" alone erases allies' sacrifices and overlooks its strategic self-interest. U.S. aid came with conditions, as it often should. As for America's domestic issues, talk of "Marxists" and "open borders" only distorts reality and stokes fear. Patriotism shouldn't rest on fear or historical amnesia. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva Cortes: America's ongoing rebirth rebuffs the globalist detractors and lawless nihilists who tear down statues, riot, and promote uncontrolled migration. True patriotism exalts citizenship—it creates a deep, abiding love of our countrymen, culture, shared ideals, glorious history, and our blessed sovereign land. Kutty: On the contrary, true patriotism confronts hard truths—it doesn't hide behind myths. America was built by lawful dissenters fighting for liberty and justice. An American rebirth demands reckoning, not whitewash. Loving your country means defending the Constitution, not scapegoating. Citizenship is duty, not blind loyalty. Cultural strength lies in its ability to withstand critique, not suppress it. Cortes: I agree wholeheartedly! Proud citizens of America must live in reality and speak the truth—for example, the truth that men and women are two distinct sexes. Or that America's founding principles are honorable and created a superpower that leads the world. Or that trespassers into our land are not "newcomers" or "undocumented," they are here illegally and must be expelled. We are reclaiming our legacy—and our greatness, just as America enters its 250th year as the greatest nation ever to exist. Kutty: I agree there are two major genders—but let's be honest: this isn't about biology, which isn't binary. It's a dog whistle to exclude. America's founding ideals were powerful, but they coexisted with slavery, genocide, and exclusion. True patriotism strives to fulfill those ideals, not mythologize them. People crossing borders aren't "trespassers"—they're human beings, often fleeing crises fueled by U.S. foreign policy or economic dominance. Due process applies to everyone, including them. Greatness comes not from erasing history, but from confronting it—courageously and inclusively. Cortes: The United States is a unique country in world history, founded upon ideals and values explained so eloquently by our nation's Founding Fathers. But we are more than just an idea. We are a people with a culture and a land, both of which need to be protected, whatever the costs. Indeed, we are the inheritors of greatness forged by strong patriots who tamed a continent, built an economic juggernaut, and saved the world from the tyrannies of fascism and communism. The rise of globalism and talk of "universality" sends segments of the nation into an identity crisis, but we thankfully are finding renewal in a patriotic, populist nationalism that lights a path forward to even more greatness for this republic, into a fantastic 250th year. Kutty: America's founding ideals—liberty, equality, justice—remain among the most powerful ever articulated. The U.S. has done immense good through diplomacy, aid, and global leadership. But when dissent is punished, migrants dehumanized, and international law selectively applied, it projects not principled leadership but selective power. Patriotism should inspire honest reckoning, not denial. True greatness lies in applying justice universally—not just to citizens or allies. The world is watching. Preaching ideals while violating them reveals not moral leadership, but hypocrisy—and it breeds resentment. If America hopes to lead not just militarily, but morally, it must reclaim the values that once made it a beacon to others. Power impresses, but principle inspires. Steve Cortes was former senior advisor to President Trump and JD Vance, former commentator for Fox News and CNN, and president of the League of American Workers, a populist right pro-laborer advocacy group. Faisal Kutty is a Toronto-based lawyer, law professor, and frequent contributor to The Toronto Star. The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store