Interest in ‘elbows up' merchandise waning ahead of Canada Day, businesses say
When Rachael Coe decided to launch an 'elbows up' merchandise line at her store in Yarmouth, N.S., in March, she said it was an immediate bestseller.
Within a week, Coe said her Timeless Memories shop had already made 400 sales. By the end of the first month, she had sold 2,500 products ranging from T-shirts to hoodies to car decals.
Demand for items bearing Canada's rallying cry against U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs and annexation threats was so high that Coe launched a website to keep up with the surge.
"It was a response from all over Canada," she said. "We reached every single province then we started covering worldwide. Our 'elbows up' merch went everywhere."
Many Canadian businesses hopped on the patriotic trend that also saw Ontario Premier Doug Ford wearing a "Canada is not for sale" ball cap ahead of a January meeting with Canada's premiers and prime minister.
But Coe's sales started slowing down by May. And despite a slight boost ahead of Canada Day, she said the "elbows up" line is now selling at similar rates to the classic red-and-white merchandise she sells every year around this time.
Although business owners say they are selling more Canada-themed products this year leading up to July 1, many have also noted a decline in 'elbows up' merchandise sales.
The rallying cry, initially embraced as a grassroots movement at the height of cross-border trade tensions and Trump's musings about making Canada the 51st state, has shifted to a more generic expression of Canadian pride amid continued tensions, retailers and experts say. Others note that the phrase "elbows up" has increasingly been used in a partisan context, contributing to the marketing shift.
Stephanie Tomlin, Toronto-based owner of the online business Shop Love Collective, said she saw an explosion in 'elbows up' merchandise sales in March, selling as many as 10 or 15 products per day. Similarly, her sales began to stagnate in May.
Leading up to Canada Day, she said she's selling 'quite a bit more' merchandise compared with previous years, but that's due to interest in Canada-themed products across the board.
'I think the climate in Canada is a little bit more settled after the election and that … we feel like we will never be the 51st state,' Tomlin said, adding that Canadian patriotism is becoming less combative as annexation talks have died down.
Howard Ramos, a professor of sociology at Western University, said "elbows up" became "more partisan than it used to be" when Prime Minister Mark Carney embraced the phrase in his election campaign ads in late March.
"It's just added to how the expression is dying down as a pan-Canadian claim," he said. "Now you see on social media, especially from Conservative handles, the use of 'elbows up' in a sarcastic way to criticize Mark Carney or Liberal policies."
Negative online comments about the "elbows up" movement have discouraged Coe from promoting her products on Facebook. But when she's interacting with customers in her Yarmouth shop, she said the phrase isn't as divisive.
'It's not a political term, and it simply means that you're defending your country, and everyone should be defending our country, just like you would defend (against) a goal in hockey,' Coe said.
Danielle McDonagh, owner of Vernon, B.C.-based Rowantree Clothing, said she stopped promoting her 'elbows up' merchandise on a large scale when she noticed the phrase being interpreted as an 'anti-Conservative' and 'boomer' movement.
For McDonagh, increased concern about the political climate in the United States has also chipped away at the lightheartedness of the "elbows up" movement.
'I think some of the levity is gone for me,' she said.
While sales of her 'elbows up' products have dropped by about 90 per cent since hitting 1,000 in the first month, she said she continues to promote the merchandise in small batches at local markets in Vernon.
Business owners say their customers continue to prioritize supporting the Canadian economy, as they are routinely answering questions about where their products are manufactured.
And the push to buy Canadian isn't just coming from this side of the border. Coe said many American tourists arriving by ferry from Maine visit her shop in search of Canadian merchandise.
'(Tourists) want to support us just as much as Canadians want to support us,' Coe said.
McDonagh said her business sees similar interest from Americans.
'I'm shipping a lot of Canada-centric merchandise to the States, which I just love,' McDonagh said. 'People chat with me on my site and say … we're supporting you."
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 25, 2025.
Natasha Baldin, The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
8 minutes ago
- Forbes
Helen Antoniou: Values, Legacy, And Quiet Leadership
Helen Antoniou, executive coach and Chair of the Board of Governors at Concordia University. Stephanie Ricci contributed to this story. In an era that prizes boldness and constant visibility, Helen Antoniou offers a different view of leadership – one grounded in purpose, humility and long-term impact. As Chair of the Board of Governors at Concordia University and daughter-in-law of brewing icon Eric Molson, Antoniou has witnessed the kind of leadership that has guided one of North America's oldest family businesses through seven generations. Her perspective challenges conventional wisdom about what makes leaders effective, and her own professional journey – from corporate law to executive coaching – underscores how purpose often outweighs prestige in shaping a meaningful career. The Pivot Point Antoniou's wake-up call came early in what looked like a promising legal career. After graduating from McGill Law School at just 21, she was rising through the ranks of a prestigious law firm, when reality hit. "I found myself, at 25, pressing the button to the 54th floor of the CIBC tower downtown, thinking, 'Oh my God, this is it. I've arrived. All that's left is to become a partner in a few years.' … I wasn't inspired." That moment of disillusionment led her to Harvard's Master of Public Health program, then to senior roles at Capgemini, Bombardier Aerospace, and the McGill University Health Centre. In each new role, she applied the same methodical, values-based approach: "I'd start by defining the problem, gathering the facts, testing assumptions and seeking different points of view. Ultimately, what I was after was designing a fair and balanced solution — one that aligned both with the stakeholders' interests and long-term goals of the enterprise without compromising on core values." This analytical mindset, combined with her passion for human development, ultimately led Antoniou to her true calling: executive coaching. 'I found deep purpose in creating space for reflection and growth – helping leaders move towards who they want to become, lead with clarity, and leave a legacy that lasts." The Introvert's Advantage In writing Back to Beer … and Hockey: The Story of Eric Molson, Antoniou gained rare insight into the kind of leadership that endures. Eric Molson, Chairman of what was then known as The Molson Companies from 1988 to 2010, guided the company back to its brewing roots after a period of diversification. He exemplifies what Jim Collins defines as a 'Level 5 leader' — a blend of deep humility and unwavering resolve. "Level 5 leaders aren't loud or flamboyant,' Antoniou says. 'They don't need to dominate a room. What sets them apart is quiet strength –humility and unshakable determination. That's what characterizes Jim Collins' highest tier of leadership — and to me, it's exactly what Eric embodies." In a culture that often equates leadership with visibility, Antoniou points to the power of observation. "One thing that's often overlooked about introverts is how sharp their powers of observation can be. Introverts don't rush to speak. They notice – I mean, they really notice what's going on. Eric had that gift— he didn't just hear the words, he read the room. And when he did speak, people listened. Because he only spoke when it truly mattered." The Courage to Course-Correct Perhaps the most defining moment of Eric Molson's leadership was his decision to refocus the company on brewing after years of diversification. It was a move that required both conviction and courage. "Eric eventually doubled down on what he believed in and steered the company in a direction that was aligned with his vision," Antoniou explains. "That kind of course correction takes courage – especially when the stakes are high." This ability to challenge established direction in service of deeper values is, to Antoniou, the mark of authentic leadership: 'It's not about serving yourself. It's about contributing to something larger and building something that lasts." Stewardship as Strategy The Molson family's longevity—seven generations and counting — is rooted not just in strategic decision-making, but in what Antoniou calls stewardship thinking. "When you see your role as contributing to something bigger than yourself, it frees you. You're no longer driven by ego or fear – you're driven by purpose." This mindset, she emphasizes, isn't taught in boardrooms – it's passed down through example. "For Eric, stewardship isn't just a concept — it's a way of being. That's what he passed on to his sons — not through lectures, but through the way he lives, the choices he makes, and the conversations we have around the dinner table." Lessons for the Next Generation For today's rising leaders, Antoniou encourages pausing amidst the noise – to choose intention over reaction. "Young people today are bombarded — by options, opinions, , expectations. It's easy to get swept up and react to everything. But sometimes the most powerful thing you can do is pause. That moment of stillness before you respond often gives you clarity and agency." She also challenges the pressure to have everything figured out early. "I don't believe you're meant to have it all figured out by your 20s — or even by your mid-30s, for that matter. Discovering what matters to you, what energizes you, is part of the fun. If you treat each step as a learning experience, then every move you make becomes part of who you're becoming.' In a business world increasingly driven by purpose and sustainability, Antoniou's observations about values-based leadership are strikingly relevant. Her own career – trading legal prestige for personal meaning – mirrors what many executives and professionals are now seeking. As companies wrestle with questions of culture, retention and engagement, the Molson family's enduring model offers an alternative: leadership rooted not in charisma or volume, but in conviction, humility and long-term vision. The most powerful leadership, it turns out, might just be the kind that listens more than it speaks.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Where Will Brookfield Asset Management Be in 10 Years?
Brookfield Asset Management just upped its dividend by 15%. The Canadian asset manager believes it can continue to grow the dividend by 15% through 2030. What happens if that dividend growth rate is cut in half between 2030 and 2035? 10 stocks we like better than Brookfield Asset Management › Brookfield Asset Management (NYSE: BAM) is an attractive dividend growth stock. You could also look at it as a desirable growth and income stock. The two stats backing that up are the above-market 3.1% yield and the huge 15% annual dividend growth rate that management is projecting out to the end of of the decade. What does that mean for investors? And what happens after 2030? Before looking at the dividend growth opportunity with Brookfield Asset Management, it is important to understand what the company does. It is a large Canadian asset manager with a historical focus on infrastructure. It has long invested on a global scale, as well, so it has a very broad investment universe. In recent years it has expanded the universe, too, adding a bond specialist to the mix and broadening its efforts in private equity. Brookfield Asset Management operates across five different platforms: renewable power, infrastructure, real estate, credit, and private equity. It believes it is positioned to benefit in all of these business lines from key long-term trends, including the shift toward clean energy, the world becoming increasingly digital, and de-globalization. The goal is to increase the fee-bearing assets it manages from $550 billion to $1.1 trillion by the end of the decade. As an asset manager, Brookfield Asset Management charges fees for managing other people's money. So growing fee-bearing assets will lead to higher revenues and earnings. If it hits its current targets, the company believes it can grow the dividend 15% a year through the end of 2030. Assuming Brookfield Asset Management can live up to its dividend growth goal, which is not unreasonable, the dividend will grow from about $0.44 per share per quarter to $0.88. If the stock price remains the same in 2030 as it is today, the dividend yield would increase from 3.1% to 6.3%. If, as is more likely, the stock price increases as the dividend grows, the stock will rise from around $56 per share to $112 if the yield remains at the 3.1% level. But, in the price increase example, the yield on purchase price for an investor buying today would still be 6.3%! That's great and should interest dividend growth as well as growth and income investors. But what happens over the five years after that? If the company can keep growing the dividend by 15%, which would be a very tall order, the dividend in 2035 would be $1.77 per share per quarter. That would suggest a yield on purchase price of 12.6% and a stock price of $224 per share if the market continued to afford the stock a 3.1% yield. Wow! However, 15% dividend growth for a decade is a pretty aggressive expectation. What if the dividend growth is just half that rate after the first five years, slowing to 7.5% a year between 2031 and 2035? In that case the dividend will grow to $1.26 per share per quarter and the yield on purchase price would fall to "only" 9%. If the stock is still yielding 3.1% in 2035, the stock price based on the higher dividend would be around $160 per share. So it is still a very attractive outcome even if Brookfield Asset Management's growth slows materially in the back half of this 10-year outlook. These are just estimates played out using a spreadsheet. Real life is always more complicated. Brookfield Asset Management's future is highly dependent on its ability to execute and, frankly, the ups and downs of Wall Street. However, if Brookfield Asset Management can live up to its lofty goals over the next five years, it is a very attractive dividend growth/growth and income stock today. And if it can do half as well over the five years after 2030 it will still be an attractive investment over that 10-year horizon. Before you buy stock in Brookfield Asset Management, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Brookfield Asset Management wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Reuben Gregg Brewer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Brookfield Asset Management. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Where Will Brookfield Asset Management Be in 10 Years? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Canada's stubby beer bottle finds new meaning in an age of American bluster
Forty years after its retirement as the industry standard bottle for beer in Canada, the stubby is being reinterpreted in an age marred by tariffs and American grievance — not as a cultural icon, but as a discreet way of protecting a national industry. In a research paper published this spring, Heather Thompson, a recent graduate of the public history program at Carleton University in Ottawa, argues that the stubby — squat, refillable and therefore largely unappealing to foreign brewers — functioned as a quiet and distinctly Canadian form of protectionism. "At the time, the Big Three, [Canadian Breweries Limited], Molson and Labatt's, they see the Americans coming and they knew they were very interested in the lucrative Canadian market. They needed something," she told CBC News. "The stubby is not a tariff, it's not government-imposed. It's as much an economic product as it is a cultural product." In today's climate of rising tariffs, "buy Canadian" policies and deepening trade tensions, the story of the stubby might feel less like historic footnote and more like a blueprint — for how Canada can still navigate life beside an economically dominant and often unpredictable neighbour. The stubby was introduced in 1961, at a time when Americans, who favoured non-recyclable aluminum cans, made their products in large centralized facilities and shipped their beer across the U.S. and to the world. The stubby, by contrast, was glass, but it was also cheap, durable and lightweight, making it easy to transport. It was also able to be reused up to 100 times. It was the keystone in a closed-loop Canadian bottling system that kept costs down for domestic brewers while it kept foreign brewers out by raising the cost of market entry. The bottle also fit neatly within Canada's fragmented domestic economy. Thanks to interprovincial trade barriers, brewers looking to sell in a given province often had to produce their beer there or face tariffs and restrictions when crossing provincial lines. By 1962, the year after the stubby was introduced, Canada's Big Three brewers controlled about 95 per cent of the Canadian beer market. They owned nearly all of the country's 61 breweries, which gave them a physical presence in every region of Canada. The Big Three also held a majority stake in Ontario's Beer Store, known then as the Brewing Warehousing Company Limited. When the stubby was made a packaging requirement for all beer sold at its stores in Ontario, Thompson argues, the Big Three effectively locked all foreign brewers out by creating an extra hurdle for entry into the market. "To bottle in the stubby, [American brewers] are going to have to make their own line at their plant to bottle specifically for Ontario," she said, noting any cost savings for American brewers through the reusable stubby would be eaten up in transportation costs by first shipping the beer to Canada then shipping it back the U.S. for a refill. Since almost all of Canada's breweries were owned by only three companies when the stubby was introduced in Ontario, the rest of the country followed suit in adopting the stubby because the bottle could be filled and reused in any bottling plant in any province by any Big Three brewer. On par with bagged milk, says history podcaster That kind of market consolidation meant for a generation of Canadian beer drinkers, from 1961 to 1984, the stubby was just about everywhere: on bar counters, fridges or sweating on the dock from St. John's to Victoria. It was also immortalized as a symbol of Canadian identity by the beer-swilling, tuque-wearing McKenzie brothers, who were a parody of Canadian working class culture in the early 1980s, near the end of the bottle's industry dominance. "When we think of the stubby, at least for me, I think of Bob and Doug McKenzie," said Craig Baird, host of the Canadian History Ehx! podcast, a show that looks back on the country's history. Baird said the only thing that comes close to what the stubby did, in terms of uniquely Canadian design and function, is bagged milk. Like the stubby, it's efficient, cost-effective and largely incomprehensible to outsiders, making it both a practical solution and marker of national identity. "If you look online, people say Canadians use bagged milk even though only Ontario and some other localized areas use bagged milk." Canadian brewers dropped the stubby in 1984, switching to taller long necks as American brands like Budweiser and Coors entered the market thanks, first, to licensing agreements with American brewers and then free trade with the U.S. The new bottles held the same 341 millilitres but offered more branding appeal. WATCH | Saying goodbye to the stubby: The stubby began to be phased out in 1985 and now largely exists only in antique stores and our collective memory. Reviving the spirit, if not the bottle In a global market shaped by trade battles and foreign ownership, Thompson sees the stubby as more than nostalgia. It's a reminder of what Canadian brewers once did to protect their market — and what they might do again. "We're seeing more interest in buying Canadian," she said. "It's a great opportunity for craft brewers to revive the stubby and its cultural power." While few brewers have returned to the squat bottle, its spirit lives on in projects such as Glorious and Free, a patriotic IPA first brewed by Dominion City Brewing in Ottawa. The recipe is shared with 40 breweries across Canada that have used hometown ingredients to create their own versions. "The idea for the campaign really came from a walk in the snow," Dominion City co-founder Josh McJannett said with an obvious nod to former prime minister Pierre Trudeau, a politician whose retirement followed "a walk in the snow" in 1984, the same year the stubby was put out to pasture. "The thought of stubby beer bottles around again is certainly appealing to the nostalgia in me," McJannett said, noting Glorious and Free is available in tallboy cans only. He said the recipe was crafted as a direct response to some of the frustration he was feeling over U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs and talk of annexation. "This was a way to harness that feeling and take some kind of an action," McJannett said. Firm, but polite. A beer that, like the stubby, refuses to be poured into anyone else's mould.
