Denial of timely, unfettered access to medical records violates right to life, says consumer panel
The Commission said that access to one's medical records — whether physical or digital — was indispensable not only for seeking second opinions and ensuring continuity of care, but also for facilitating effective grievance redressal. It also recommended that doctors prescribe generic medicines in a clear and legible manner.
The Commission, comprising president D.B. Binu and members V. Ramachandran and Sreevidhia T.N., made the observation while dismissing a petition filed by the husband of Saiju Mujeeb, 38, of North Paravur, alleging gross negligence, failure to diagnose, and improper post-operative care.
'Hospitals and healthcare providers are therefore reminded of their ethical and legal obligation to ensure that patients are provided with their medical records in a timely and accessible manner. Both modern medical ethics and advancements in health information technology support a patient-centric system in which medical records are made readily accessible through secure digital means,' said the Commission.
The Commission, drawing on its broader mandate to promote consumer welfare and transparency in healthcare, recommended that regulatory bodies ensure the secure digital delivery of medical records in compliance with applicable data protection laws, fulfil requests for records preferably within 72 hours, and implement interoperable electronic health record (EHR) systems to promote seamless access and continuity of care.
It also called for disclosure to patients at the time of admission or discharge regarding their right to receive medical records in physical or digital format, along with information on encryption, password protection, and consent protocols for all digital transmissions of sensitive medical data. The Commission further recommended public education initiatives to raise awareness about patients' rights to medical records and the confidentiality safeguards.
It also dismissed the petition alleging post-surgery complications on the grounds that no deficiency in service could be established. The complainant had failed to prove that the treatment deviated from accepted professional standards or that the subsequent complications were directly caused by any act or omission on the part of the opposite parties, the Commission observed, while citing the Supreme Court's dictum that 'to hold a medical practitioner liable for negligence, a higher threshold of proof is required to be met by the complainant.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump administration asks US Supreme Court to allow NIH diversity-related cuts
New York: Donald Trump's administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday to allow the government to proceed with sweeping cuts to National Institutes of Health grants as part of the Republican president's crackdown on diversity initiatives. The Justice Department asked the justices to lift Boston-based U.S. District Judge William Young's June ruling that halted the plan as a violation of federal law and required the government to reinstate access to the grant funds. The judge acted in a legal challenge by researchers and 16 U.S. states, led by Democratic-governed Massachusetts. The NIH is the world's largest funder of biomedical research. The cuts are part of Trump's wide-ranging actions to reshape the U.S. government, slash federal spending and end government support for diversity, equity and inclusion programs and transgender healthcare. The administration repeatedly has sought the Supreme Court's intervention to allow implementation of Trump policies impeded by lower courts. The Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has sided with the administration in almost every case that it has been called upon to review since Trump returned to the presidency in January. In June, dozens of scientists, researchers and other NIH employees signed an open letter criticizing the agency's actions and spending cuts under Trump that they said politicize research and "harm the health of Americans and people across the globe." Young's ruling came in two lawsuits challenging the cuts. One was filed by the American Public Health Association, individual researchers and other plaintiffs who called the cuts an "ongoing ideological purge" of projects with a purported connection to gender identity, DEI "or other vague, now-forbidden language." The other was filed by the states, most of them Democratic-led. Young, an appointee of Republican former President Ronald Reagan, invalidated the grant terminations in June. The judge wrote that every new administration is entitled to make policy changes but that these must be reasonable and reasonably explained. Instead, according to the judge, the steps taken by Trump administration officials were "breathtakingly arbitrary and capricious," violating a federal law governing the actions of agencies. Young criticized administration officials for not offering any definition of DEI while disparaging studies they deemed low-value and unscientific that the officials claimed were used to unlawfully discriminate on the basis of race and other protected characteristics. "There is not a shred of evidence supporting any of these statements in the record," Young wrote. Many U.S. conservatives contend that DEI policies discriminate against white people. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on July 18 denied the administration's request to put Young's decision on hold. The administration has argued that the litigation should have been brought in a different judicial body, the Washington-based Court of Federal Claims, which specializes in money damages claims against the U.S. government. That reasoning was also the basis for the Supreme Court's decision in April that let Trump's administration proceed with millions of dollars of cuts to teacher training grants also targeted under the DEI crackdown.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Rehabilitation of homeless with psychosocial disabilities sensitive issue: SC
New Delhi, The Supreme Court on Friday said the rehabilitation of homeless persons suffering from psychosocial disabilities was a sensitive issue and directed the Centre to take it up "very seriously". Rehabilitation of homeless with psychosocial disabilities sensitive issue: SC The Centre informed a bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta that authorities were already deliberating the matter with meetings being underway. The government counsel sought eight weeks' time to update the court on the progress achieved. "You need to take it very seriously and as less time as possible," the bench said. The apex court was hearing a plea filed by advocate Gaurav Kumar Bansal for directions to formulate and implement a policy for the homeless suffering from psychosocial disabilities. The top court had in April sought responses from the Centre and others on the plea. Psychosocial disabilities refers to the challenges people with mental health issues face due to discrimination, lack of support, among others. On Friday, Bansal said the Centre had filed a counter affidavit in the matter. The bench noted a brief reply was on record. "We are already deliberating. Meetings are going on. I am praying for eight weeks time to place on record the progress so far," the Centre's counsel said. Bansal said the homeless were "literally becoming football" and the police ought to do something for their rehabilitation under the law. He said women were among several homeless persons and there was negativity from the police side in such cases, especially due to the lack of a proper rehabilitation programme. "We are expecting response of the government on all these issues. Let them come back and then we will monitor it. We will try and take it to a logical end," the bench said. When the Centre's counsel referred to the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, the bench observed, "Acts are there. Where is the execution, where is the compliance". The top court posted the matter on September 22. The plea has sought directions to frame and implement the standard operating procedures for key stakeholders, including departments of law enforcement and medical health, to ensure the humane and effective handling of homeless persons with psychosocial disabilities. The plea highlighted the issue faced by homeless persons with psychosocial disability who instead of being provided with appropriate care are often subjected to neglect, social isolation, and physical and sexual abuses. "Despite existing legal and policy frameworks, including the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 and National Mental Health Policy, 2014, respondents have failed to operationalise the provisions intended to protect and assist homeless individuals suffering from mental illness," it added. The petitioner said the lack of a structured national policy on homelessness and mental illness has resulted in a "complete breakdown of the system, leaving thousands of individuals to fend for themselves" without access to medical care, shelter, or social entitlements. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
Rehabilitation of homeless with psychosocial disabilities sensitive issue: SC
The government counsel sought eight weeks' time to update the court on the progress achieved. The Centre informed a bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta that authorities were already deliberating the matter with meetings being underway. New Delhi, Jul 25 (PTI) The Supreme Court on Friday said the rehabilitation of homeless persons suffering from psychosocial disabilities was a sensitive issue and directed the Centre to take it up 'very seriously'. 'You need to take it very seriously and as less time as possible,' the bench said. The apex court was hearing a plea filed by advocate Gaurav Kumar Bansal for directions to formulate and implement a policy for the homeless suffering from psychosocial disabilities. The top court had in April sought responses from the Centre and others on the plea. Psychosocial disabilities refers to the challenges people with mental health issues face due to discrimination, lack of support, among others. On Friday, Bansal said the Centre had filed a counter affidavit in the matter. The bench noted a brief reply was on record. 'We are already deliberating. Meetings are going on. I am praying for eight weeks time to place on record the progress so far,' the Centre's counsel said. Bansal said the homeless were 'literally becoming football' and the police ought to do something for their rehabilitation under the law. He said women were among several homeless persons and there was negativity from the police side in such cases, especially due to the lack of a proper rehabilitation programme. 'We are expecting response of the government on all these issues. Let them come back and then we will monitor it. We will try and take it to a logical end,' the bench said. When the Centre's counsel referred to the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, the bench observed, 'Acts are there. Where is the execution, where is the compliance'. The top court posted the matter on September 22. The plea has sought directions to frame and implement the standard operating procedures for key stakeholders, including departments of law enforcement (police department) and medical health, to ensure the humane and effective handling of homeless persons with psychosocial disabilities. The plea highlighted the issue faced by homeless persons with psychosocial disability who instead of being provided with appropriate care are often subjected to neglect, social isolation, and physical and sexual abuses. 'Despite existing legal and policy frameworks, including the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 and National Mental Health Policy, 2014, respondents have failed to operationalise the provisions intended to protect and assist homeless individuals suffering from mental illness,' it added. The petitioner said the lack of a structured national policy on homelessness and mental illness has resulted in a 'complete breakdown of the system, leaving thousands of individuals to fend for themselves' without access to medical care, shelter, or social entitlements. PTI ABA ABA AMK AMK This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
