What happens to men who have caused harm to women?
None of this is any surprise. Donald Trump has been found guilty in a civil court of sexual misconduct, and was subsequently returned to the White House by voters. The longstanding myth that being accused of (or even found to have committed) sexual harassment ruins your career and life forever is being publicly and repeatedly debunked. This is a reminder that the people who subject others to sexual harassment or perpetrate sexual assault are often normal people embedded in and atop the fabric of our society, not outcast from it.
So, what do we actually want from men who have been found to have caused harm? Is it punishment, rehabilitation, or both? How do we measure what level of social ostracism it would take for them to not harm again? Should victim satisfaction or future behaviour be the focal point of these reflections?
Power and entitlement are the bedrock of all forms of sexual harassment and assault. Powerful people have access to subordinates and have seen institutions or circles they are part of routinely protect their own kind, while silencing victims. This creates a sense of legal and reputational immunity (one that is often proven correct), and contributes to levels of entitlement that manifest as their prerogative to the bodies of others.
One of the criminal justice system's greatest failings in addressing sexual harm is its all-or-nothing approach – unable to reckon with the complexity of human experience and interpersonal harm. The criminal system was designed by men, for men, when sexual harm was an act of 'damaging' another man's 'property'. We still lack a socially acceptable form of accountability outside the criminal system, a system many victims avoid, not just because of its traumatising process or the slim chance of a conviction, but because many do not want their perpetrators jailed, especially when they are friends, mentors or colleagues.
The problem here is that each victim will have their own threshold for what constitutes justice.
Loading
Some perpetrators face social consequences for their actions – terminated or forced resignations from positions, exclusion from parties, or reputational damage – but when you're close to the harm, it feels irrelevant compared with the gravity of consequences for the victim.
Both things can be true: accountability can exist in public form (generally, men fear this), and yet this can feel painfully insufficient to those who bore the impact (generally, women resent this). However, it must not be forgotten that the question of accountability is only being explored at all because Heydon was found by a High Court inquiry to have committed the actions he was accused of. I wonder whether, had the standard of proof in this inquiry been 'beyond reasonable doubt', the women who spoke up would be branded as 'attention-seeking liars'. The reality was the same, regardless, but the finding is what has shaped the public narrative.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese lands in China's medical capital Chengdu, Port Darwin stance hangs in the air
Anthony Albanese will top his China charm offensive on Thursday with panda diplomacy and spruiking Australia's prowess in the Medical Technology sector after landing in the Sichuan capital Chengdu. Mr Albanese will tour a Cochlear manufacturing and research facility to showcase 'Australian ingenuity, inventiveness and know-how' as he enters the final leg of a six-day tour to turbocharge Australia's economic ties with its largest trading partner. China is one of Cochlear's top five markets, having helped treat 50,000 Chinese patients with hearing loss, and the Sydney-based company launched its Chengdu production facility and international hearing research, innovation and service centre in 2021. Australia is the world's second largest producer of Medtech patents, and the third largest medical device market in the Indo-Pacific, with more than 850 firms and a total market value exceeding $10.5 billion. 'Australian and Chinese researchers, hospitals and universities are driving remarkable progress in every field of medical technology,' Mr Albanese will tell a lunch reception of top healthcare and biomedical tech leaders, including Nobel Laureate Prof Barry Marshall, whose research has revolutionised the treatment of stomach ulcers. Mr Albanese is the first Prime Minister to visit Chengdu since Bob Hawke in 1986, in a three-city tour that has been warmly received by a Chinese government pushing for closer trade ties with Australia as a buffer against the disruption of US trade tariffs. However, clouds remain on the horizon. Earlier on Wednesday, the Prime Minister was forced to dismiss suggestions Australian business could be iced out of the Chinese market over the Government's decision to put the strategic port of Darwin back into Australia's hands. Chinese objections to Labor's election promise to overturn the awarding of a 99-year lease of the port to the Beijing-owned Landbridge group have loomed over Mr Albanese's red carpet reception this week, with state media repeatedly highlighting the controversy. Mr Albanese on Wednesday confirmed that the sale of the port had not been raised directly with him in talks with Premier Li Qiang or Chinese President Xi Jinping, who offered a rare lunch invitation to the Prime Minister and fiancee Jodie Haydon. Mr Li was effusive about the potential for stronger trade ties at a roundtable of Chinese and Australian business leaders in the imposing Great Hall of the People on Tuesday but alluded to the point of contention by urging Australia to create a 'non-discriminatory business environment.' 'We hope that the Australian side will treat Chinese enterprises visiting Australia fairly and properly solve the problems encountered by enterprises in market access, investment review, and other aspects,' Mr Li said. The Global Times, a state-run media outlet, was more direct. 'At present, there are specific issues between China and Australia that need to be discussed, such as the lease of Darwin Port and the expansion of the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement,' it said. 'There are also practical obstacles, especially the tendencies toward 'pan-politicisation' and 'pan-securitisation,' as well as interference from third parties,' it continued in an otherwise glowing account of Mr Albanese's trip so far. Asked during a press conference on the Great Wall of China on Wednesday if he was prepared for Australia to be put back into the deep freeze on the issue, Mr Albanese responded with a straight, 'the answer is no'. The Prime Minister's trip has been centred on repairing business and trade ties after a diplomatic spat under the Morrison government triggered a series of damaging import bans on key commodities, which have since been lifted. Labor has stressed, however, that it will not budge over the cancelling of the Landbridge lease for national security reasons. Mr Albanese told reporters that this was a longheld position 'shouldn't come as any surprise.' However, Chinese officials have protested against changes made to the Foreign Investment Review Board under the previous Government after the port lease was awarded to a Chinese-state owned operator by the Northern Territory authorities. The Government has rejected Beijing's suggestions that Chinese companies are unfairly targeted by rules requiring greater scrutiny in sensitive investment areas. Ahead of Mr Albanese's trip, the Government indicated it would not be prepared to ease restrictions or to accede to Chinese requests for greater cooperation on artificial intelligence capabilities. 'We have a case by case issue when it comes to foreign investment,' said Mr Albanese. 'It is viewed not on the basis of any one country, but on the basis of an objective assessment of our national interest.' He added, 'One of the things that I emphasise - I say the same thing in Beijing as I say in Bankstown - which is that the Australian Government supports free and fair trade. It's in the interests of the world to have free and fair trade, and we'll continue to engage that way.' The Prime Minister also revealed Communist Party Chairman Zhao Leji had agreed to an invitation to lead a National People's Congress delegation to Australia. 'It is very clear that it is in our national interest for us to have a positive relationship with China, where there are differences, to talk about them, but not be defined by them,' he said. Later on Wednesday afternnon, the Prime Minister donned his Akubra hat and to battle stifling humidity at the Sichuan International Tennis Centre, where he oversaw an announcement that the city will host the Asia-Pacific Wild Card Playoffs for the 2026 Australian Open. There was 'no better way' to improve people to people and cultural links between Australia and China than the iconic Australian Open, Mr Albanese told an audience including Australian Open Champion John Fitzgerald, Tennis Australia's Vicki Reid, Governor Shi Xiaolin and rows of young tennis players.
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Crazy leftists abuse gay rights activist for protecting minors from gender surgery
Conservative gay activist Arielle Scarcella reacts to her video, where she attends a Pride event, discussing a Supreme Court decision to end gender affirming surgery on minors. 'I'm a lesbian, I should be allowed to be there,' Ms Scarcella told Sky News host Rita Panahi. 'We need to show people that we are not like these crazy people, we are different, we are just normal gays.'
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
China is regarded as a ‘developing country' and has ‘no obligation' to cut CO2 emissions
Australian Associate Editor Graham Lloyd says China's emissions profile is so large that anything Australia can implement is 'immediately swallowed up.' 'The very core of those meetings is this ethic that there must be different treatment for developing and developed countries,' Mr Lloyd told Sky News host Danica De Giorgio. 'China is still regarded as a developing country, and therefore it has no obligation to cut its carbon dioxide emissions. 'The size of their economy and emissions profile is so great that anything that's done in Australia is immediately swallowed up.'
