Tories demand Reeves ‘urgently rule out' investment tax hikes
The party is seeking to pile pressure on ministers after a memo sent by Angela Rayner to Ms Reeves, in which the Deputy Prime Minister suggested a series of tax hikes, was leaked to the press.
In the document, Ms Rayner proposed removing the dividend allowance to raise around £325 million a year in revenue, as well as axing inheritance tax relief for AIM shares and increasing dividend tax rates, the Telegraph reported.
Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'The Government need to urgently rule out these tax hikes on savers and investors before speculation causes further economic harm.
'Labour don't understand how business works and how to create growth. More taxes on investment, entrepreneurship and saving are the last thing our economy needs right now.'
The Government's U-turns over welfare reform and winter fuel payments have left the Chancellor with a multibillion-pound black hole to fill, fuelling speculation that she will seek to raise revenue through tax hikes.
The Tories claimed axing the dividend allowance would drag 'an estimated 5.22 million more people into paying dividend tax'.
This figure appears to be based on an assumption that at least 8.82 million people in the UK hold shares that pay dividends.
Some 3.6 million are already subject to dividend tax, according to data obtained by investment platform AJ Bell through a Freedom of Information request.
The Chancellor last year said she would not be 'coming back with more borrowing or more taxes' after her first budget but has since refused to rule out raising specific levies, saying it would be 'irresponsible' to do so.
A Labour Party spokesperson said: 'The Conservatives have some brass neck. They've still not apologised for the damage caused by the Liz Truss mini-Budget, nor the £22 billion black hole they left – which hammered firms and families across the country.
'Labour is doing more to support business than the Tories ever could.
'We've already delivered three historic trade deals and four interest rate cuts – to reduce costs and put money back in people's pockets.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Thousands more Britons will be dragged into paying tax on their hard-earned savings
Millions of Britons will be forced to pay tax on their savings this year as soaring numbers of workers are pulled into higher bands for the first time. Rachel Reeves 's decision to keep tax thresholds frozen means many workers receiving wage rises to help combat the cost-of-living crisis will be dragged into paying more tax. In a double blow for many, higher interest rates will also mean around 3.4million people are expected to receive a bill for interest made on their savings in the current tax year, up from 3.1million five years ago. Critics have urged the Chancellor to address the effects of the tax-threshold freeze – known as 'fiscal drag' – as bills go up without income increasing in real terms. She is also facing mounting pressure to maintain the tax-free amount that savers are allowed to put into cash Isas. The Chancellor is understood to have considered lowering the limit to encourage more people to invest in stocks and shares. Harriet Guevara, chief savings officer at Nottingham Building Society (NBS), which studied the latest HMRC figures, said the data showed a 'hidden tax burden for ordinary savers'. She added: 'At a time when families are trying to build financial resilience amid frozen thresholds and rising living costs, the Government should be doing more to reward and protect savers.' Government rules allow people to earn some interest on their savings without paying tax. A person earning less than £17,570 a year can receive up to £6,000 in savings interest tax-free. Basic-rate taxpayers earning between £17,571 and £50,270 have a savings allowance of £1,000. For higher-rate taxpayers, earning up to £125,140, this falls to £500, while additional rate taxpayers over this level receive no tax-free allowance. The allowances have been frozen for nine years, meaning many more people have been dragged into paying tax on savings interest as their incomes have risen in line with inflation. The system is also considered incredibly complicated, which has resulted in many storing their money in Isas, which have a tax-free allowance of £20,000. Ms Reeves reportedly considered cutting the tax-free allowance on cash Isas to encourage more people to invest in shares and boost the economy. But an announcement on the limit was delayed last month following a backlash from building societies and savers. The NBS assessment came as HMRC data compiled by the online investment platform AJ Bell showed that one in every 25 basic-rate taxpayer will receive a bill for interest on their savings this year compared to less than one in 100 four years ago. While rising interest rates have boosted returns for savers, AJ Bell warns that this has now turned into a 'bounty for the taxman' as HMRC is expected to pocket more than £6billion from savers this year.
Reuters
23 minutes ago
- Reuters
White House to target banks as Trump claims discrimination
WASHINGTON/NEW YORK, Aug 5 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he believes that banks, including JPMorgan (JPM.N), opens new tab and Bank of America (BAC.N), opens new tab, discriminate against him and his supporters, as he prepares to act against banks for allegedly dropping customers for political reasons. Trump also said the country's top two lenders had previously rejected his deposits, ramping up his attack on the industry. "They totally discriminate against, I think, me maybe even more, but they discriminate against many conservatives," he told CNBC in an interview. Trump made the comments when asked about a report by the Wall Street Journal that said he planned to punish banks that discriminated against conservatives, but did not address the order specifically. The executive order instructs regulators to review banks for "politicized or unlawful debanking" practices, according to a draft reviewed by Reuters. It is likely to be announced on Wednesday, an industry source said. "They did discriminate," Trump said of actions taken by JPMorgan after his first term in office. "I had hundreds of millions, I had many, many accounts loaded up with cash ... and they told me, 'I'm sorry sir, we can't have you. You have 20 days to get out.'" Trump's latest criticism adds pressure on America's largest lenders. The order would likely require banks to conduct sweeping reviews of their businesses to comply with regulations. Trump said, without providing evidence, that the banks' refusal to take his deposits indicated that the administration of former President Joe Biden had encouraged regulators to "destroy Trump." Trump said he subsequently tried to deposit funds with BofA and was also refused, and eventually split the cash. "I ended up going to small banks all over the place," he said. "I was putting $10 million here, $10 million there, did $5 million, $10 million, $12 million," he said, without naming the lenders. "I have them all over the place, the craziest thing, and it's lucky I even had them. They were doing me a favour, and that's because the banks discriminated against me very badly, and I was very good to the banks." In a statement, JPMorgan did not address the president's specific claims about his account. "We don't close accounts for political reasons, and we agree with President Trump that regulatory change is desperately needed," JPMorgan said. "We commend the White House for addressing this issue and look forward to working with them to get this right.' BofA also did not address Trump's specific claims. During Biden's administration, regulators were able to scrutinize banks' decisions on the basis of reputational risks, a second source familiar with the matter said. Lenders were under intense scrutiny and pressure to weigh reputational risks when dealing with Trump because of his legal woes, a third source said. JPMorgan continues to have a banking relationship with members of the Trump family that dates back years, and it also banks a number of campaign accounts linked to Trump, the third source said. After Trump took power, the Federal Reserve announced in June it was directing its supervisors to no longer consider reputational risk when examining banks, a metric that had been a focus of industry complaints. The Wall Street Journal reported late Monday that the expected executive order would instruct regulators to investigate whether any financial institutions breach the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, antitrust laws or consumer financial protection laws by dropping customers for political reasons. The order could authorize monetary penalties, consent decrees or other disciplinary measures against violators, according to the draft. The White House had no immediate comment on the reported order. "What the White House is doing is telling the banks not to hide behind regulations to deny loans or banking relationships," said Wells Fargo bank analyst Mike Mayo. "Banks can use their normal underwriting standards and deny services, but not blame regulators or use reputational risk as a justification." BofA said it welcomed the administration's efforts to clarify the policies. "We've provided detailed proposals and will continue to work with the administration and Congress to improve the regulatory framework," the bank said. Trump in January admonished the CEOs of JPMorgan and BofA for denying services to conservatives. At the time, the two banks denied making banking decisions based on politics. Banks have consistently argued that any complaints about "debanking" should be aimed at regulators, as they argue onerous rules and overzealous bank supervisors can discourage them from engaging in certain activities. "The heart of the problem is regulatory overreach and supervisory discretion," the Bank Policy Institute, an industry group, said in a statement. Lenders have held discussions around debanking and weighed scenarios around a potential order, the first source said. Banks are also hopeful the administration may change anti-money laundering laws that they say are outdated and burdensome, the source added.
Glasgow Times
29 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
PM unveils £88m for youth services in bid to tackle online challenges
The funding is aimed at delivering services like new climbing walls and music lessons in a bid to buck the 'worrying' trend of young people 'detached from the real world,' Downing Street said. Groups like the Scouts and Guides will receive £7.5 million to help offer more places in local communities while £30.5 million will go to improving youth club infrastructure in areas with the highest levels of child poverty. Some £22.5 million over three years will be used to fund access in 400 schools across the country to extra-curricular activities such as sport, art and music, outdoor activities, debating or volunteering. The expansion is part of wider efforts to 'reconnect young people with the world around them' amid concerns children are increasing amounts of time online or in their bedrooms, Number 10 said. Announcing the package, the Prime Minister said: 'Growing up today is hard for young people. As they navigate their way through the online world, too often they find themselves isolated at home and disconnected from their communities. 'As a Government, we have a duty to act on this worrying trend. Today's investment is about offering a better alternative: transformative, real-world opportunities that will have an impact in communities across the country, so young people can discover something new, find their spark and develop the confidence and life skills that no algorithm can teach.' Downing Street said 'young people today are spending more and more of their time detached from the real world, either stuck in their bedrooms or behind a screen, throwing up huge challenges for them and their loved ones to overcome'. Sir Keir said the plans were part of wider efforts aimed at opening up opportunities to ensure 'no child falls through the cracks' ahead of the publication of the Government's national youth strategy this autumn. Young people have been encouraged to contribute to development of the strategy in recent months through focus groups and surveys. Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said local youth services were the 'bedrock of thriving communities' and that 'today's announcement is just the beginning' ahead of its launch in the autumn. She said the Government was 'putting young people at the heart of our mission-led government ensuring they have the support and opportunities they deserve so that no one is left behind.' The Duke of Edinburgh's Award charity welcomed the funding package but urged ministers to go further in guaranteeing 'enrichment opportunities' for every young person. Chief operating officer at the charity, John Egan, said: 'This multimillion-pound investment is about so much more than creating new opportunities for art, music and outdoor activities – it's an investment in the resilience, confidence and future of young people. 'As a leading youth charity, we now urge the Government to go further and commit to a youth guarantee, to ensure that every young person has access to the enrichment opportunities that they need to thrive which can't always be found in the classroom.' Shadow culture secretary Nigel Huddleston said: 'After scrapping the National Citizen Service which gave over a million young people valuable opportunities, any investment in youth services is welcome. 'However, young people need more than just skills – they need a growing economy that can offer jobs and opportunities in the future. 'Because of Labour's economic mismanagement and tax rises businesses are closing, there are no jobs, and the economy is shrinking while inflation has doubled. 'Under Labour, the future of the next generation looks bleak.'
