logo
More ways to pay? ChatGPT may be exploring weekly and lifetime subscriptions (APK teardown)

More ways to pay? ChatGPT may be exploring weekly and lifetime subscriptions (APK teardown)

Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority
TL;DR Code suggests ChatGPT might be testing weekly and lifetime subscriptions.
This could offer more flexible payment options for users, especially those looking for an annual discount or a lower starting price.
Annual billing for ChatGPT Plus may also be on the horizon.
ChatGPT has become a staple part of several people's routines, to the point that many of us happily pay for the ChatGPT Plus monthly subscription. However, at $20 per month for the digital AI assistant, there is no denying that it is fairly steep, even though it brings a lot of value. There's room for OpenAI to explore more subscription tiers, either with annual billing options that could save users money in the long term or weekly duration options that lower the barrier of entry. OpenAI seems to be doing all that, and then some, as there are clues the company is working on Weekly and Lifetime subscriptions.
Authority Insights story on Android Authority. Discover
You're reading anstory on Android Authority. Discover Authority Insights for more exclusive reports, app teardowns, leaks, and in-depth tech coverage you won't find anywhere else.
An APK teardown helps predict features that may arrive on a service in the future based on work-in-progress code. However, it is possible that such predicted features may not make it to a public release.
X user M1 spotted code in the 'latest ChatGPT build' that suggests the digital AI assistant is exploring more subscription durations, namely Weekly and Lifetime subscriptions, in addition to the usual Monthly and Annual subscriptions.
One of the strings mentions 'Upgrade to Plus,' indicating that these durations could be for ChatGPT Plus. ChatGPT Plus is currently offered in a singular $20 per month subscription, billed monthly. If you need annual billing options, you must jump up to ChatGPT Team or Enterprise offerings. Even the $200 per month ChatGPT Pro is offered only as a monthly billing option.
Independently, we can confirm that the following strings exist within ChatGPT v1.2025.126:
Code Copy Text %1$s annually %1$s billed annually Annual Lifetime Monthly Weekly %1$s / month Choose your plan
Note that strings for monthly and annual prices are mentioned, but not for monthly and lifetime subscriptions. That doesn't necessarily mean these durations are not coming; just that they are still in development and could be added in the future.
A weekly subscription for ChatGPT Plus makes a lot of sense, especially for target audiences like students and young adults who may need the AI digital assistant for shorter durations (though students could get ChatGPT Plus for free recently, too). A weekly plan lowers the price barrier to accessing the Plus subscription since it will hopefully be cheaper than the monthly subscription (unless OpenAI raises prices across the board). Even extending the Plus subscription to annual billing makes plenty of sense for users who are loyal enough to ChatGPT.
However, a lifetime ChatGPT Plus subscription sounds a bit of a stretch. OpenAI will have to factor in future development costs for AI technology and features, potentially pricing the subscription tier to an absurdly high number. Yet, it might just make sense for some hardcore AI loyalists. Given the relatively nascent state of AI, it doesn't make much sense right now to subscribe to any AI digital assistant for such a long time. Who knows what the future holds, what ChatGPT looks like, how competitors catch up or lag behind, and if you'd even need a Plus subscription in the first place!
OpenAI hasn't discussed further billing options for ChatGPT Plus or other tiers. We'll keep you updated when we learn more. Keep in mind that Google has also been spotted working on more Google One AI plans with annual billing, so it could be that OpenAI is getting ready to react as needed.
Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at
Email our staff at news@androidauthority.com . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk Is Compared to a Dictator in Luca Guadagnino's New Movie
Elon Musk Is Compared to a Dictator in Luca Guadagnino's New Movie

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk Is Compared to a Dictator in Luca Guadagnino's New Movie

New details about Luca Guadagnino's Artificial movie, including what role will play in the film, have been revealed. It was announced last month that Guadagnino will direct a movie about OpenAI for Amazon MGM Studios. The film will revolve around the period at the artificial intelligence company in 2023 that saw CEO Sam Altman fired and rehired in a handful of days. The cast of the movie includes Andrew Garfield, Monica Barbaro, and Yura Borisov. According to Puck, Elon Musk's role as an 'early OpenAI investor turned bitter rival' is explored in the film, though it is not yet clear who will play him. 'He's a minor character, especially after he tries to merge OpenAI into Tesla and then pulls his investment when he's rebuffed,' the article notes. 'But Elon, as famous for loving movies as he is for suing people, is probably not gonna like this portrayal — nor, likely, will his Grok chatbot (Unfortunately for Grok, there are no pro-Hitler references in the script). At one point, Murati says of Musk: 'Elon's not so bad, as far as dictators go.'' Puck also reports that Artificial, which was written by Simon Rich, centers more on Ilya Sutskever than it does on Altman. 'The film, which begins rehearsals next week in Italy, with a planned 2026 release, is actually the story of Ilya Sutskever, the idealistic and naive Israeli machine learning engineer (played by Anora breakout Yura Borisov) who co-founded the nonprofit. After several key breakthroughs, as depicted in the script, Sutskever is leveraged, marginalized, and ultimately betrayed by both his power-hungry friend Altman and the larger Silicon Valley community — with potentially disastrous consequences for all of humanity.' It is worth noting that Puck got this information after reading a 'recent draft' of the Artificial script; meaning there could still be edits that are made, given that the movie is not yet in production. The post Elon Musk Is Compared to a Dictator in Luca Guadagnino's New Movie appeared first on - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More.

Android's new design is bouncy and I'm all for it
Android's new design is bouncy and I'm all for it

Android Authority

timean hour ago

  • Android Authority

Android's new design is bouncy and I'm all for it

Joe Maring / Android Authority From blobs to bounce to bright colors, your phone is about to look and feel a lot different, with Google bringing more of an opinionated approach to its design than we've ever seen before. In the world of software design, many are used to looking to Apple for inspiration, but Google's Material Design bucks that trend with its boldest and most daring design strategy yet. Is Google's more playful approach going to be a hit and entice an entirely new type of consumer to give Android a try? Or is it just going to alienate longtime Android users? In my time with the latest Android 16 beta, I've encountered some of these new design elements, while some are not yet implemented. Let's dive into a few of my favorite interactions. Bringing Android to life with a bounce There's a new bounce throughout Android as a whole. That's the best word I can think of to describe how it looks and feels, and it makes the OS feel more functional, playful, and interactive, bringing it to life in a way that previous versions did not. The changes are subtle but important, adding up to an overall design that feels fluid and fun. The most obvious example of this is the new notification panel. Swiping to dismiss an alert now feels like you're peeling the notification away from the stack, in the best possible way. Swipe slowly to really see all the different aspects of this seemingly simple interaction all come together. The corners morph from slightly squared off to more round, the surrounding notifications move ever-so-slightly in the same direction as your swipe, and just at the right moment — about 10% of the way into your swipe — haptic feedback signals the point at which your chosen notification detaches from the stack, all while the remaining notifications bounce gently back into place. All of that comes together to create a really satisfying swipe gesture. Before this change, a notification dismissal felt independent of the surrounding notifications. You'd swipe, the box would fly off the screen, and the stack would collapse together to fill the space. While it worked fine then, the whole experience just feels more cohesive and intentional now. And again, that snap — or haptic feedback, rather — when the notification detaches from the rest of the stack is super satisfying. There's a new bounce throughout Android as a it makes the OS feel more functional, playful, and interactive in a way that previous versions did not. Another example of Google's move toward motion is the increase in shape shifting with Material components. Google's updated design documentation now contains a ton of new tools and guidelines to create a more animated UI, like button groups, where the selected button morphs into a more oval-like shape, while the unselected buttons remain more squared off. You can already see this shape shifting in the new Quick Settings panel. When you turn on the flashlight, for example, the button goes from a rounded oval to a rounded square. This is a nice way to quickly visualize which buttons are activated and which aren't. And of course, there's that bounce again. The surrounding buttons animate with a bounce with each tap of the flashlight button, again leading to a more cohesive experience. Since we're still in beta, there are still a lot of new design elements on the way. You can check out the full list of Material 3 Expressive components in Google's documentation. It only matters if Google cares enough Google is making it clear: it wants Android and apps on the platform to come alive. And it means it, too, so much so that it includes an entirely new motion physics system in M3 Expressive, designed to allow developers to customize the physics of their apps more easily than previously possible. This is something I'm particularly excited about, and I really hope Google and third party developers alike implement this in tasteful ways, leading to apps that feel right at home in this new evolution of Android. That's a really important point, though. All of this sounds great — and so far, from what I've seen, looks great — but will developers buy into this new design language? Will Google itself implement it into their own apps, thus taking the lead and setting the example for what M3 Expressive is all about? There are already traces pointing to some of Google's main apps implementing the new design language, but only time will tell if other developers will follow suit. Based on what you've seen, do you like the added animations in Android 16? 1 votes Yes, but I hope Google doesn't overdo it. 0 % Yes, and I hope they continue to add more throughout the OS. 100 % No, Android is already animated enough. 0 % I don't use Pixel launcher, so I'll probably never see this anyway. 0 % I've used Android for a long time now. Pixel 2 XL was my first Android device, though, so I know many of you have used Android a lot longer than me. This has me wondering what more tenured Android enthusiasts think of this design direction. Historically, Android didn't use nearly as much motion, which may be preferred by some longtime users. With the new direction, it appears Google is going for a more mass market appeal, and I'd argue this is the right move, positioning Google to appeal to a generation of users who are used to, say, the fluidity of iOS, but maybe they're looking at trying Android thanks to Google's promising AI features. Google is making a huge bet here with Material 3 Expressive. The motion adds a fluidity that was lacking in previous versions of Android, a cohesiveness that now feels obvious, and a whole new way for developers to make their apps more beautiful and more functional. The goal is seemingly in the name itself — Material Design — and all these new animations definitely make your device seem more like a material you can feel.

This is the best cross-platform 2FA app I've used — and you should try it too
This is the best cross-platform 2FA app I've used — and you should try it too

Android Authority

time2 hours ago

  • Android Authority

This is the best cross-platform 2FA app I've used — and you should try it too

Karandeep Singh / Android Authority When a sizeable chunk of online attacks involves weak passwords and unauthorized account access, second-factor authentication (2FA) is one of those magic bullets that can save your digital life from getting compromised. But they're only usable if they don't become an inconvenience themselves. Inconvenient — that's exactly what a lot of 2FA apps have been for me. Some wanted to lock me down to their app, some had themselves been compromised, while others weren't available on all the platforms I use. So, I was just jumping from one app to another whenever one started to trouble me enough. My hunt has finally come to a rest, thanks to this 2FA app, Ente Auth, which I think is (almost) perfect. One that my inner tech support guy is going to recommend to my family without thinking twice. And I figured I'd bring it up with you guys too — not to sound cheesy, but you're family too. Which authenticator app do you use for 2FA? 0 votes Google Authenticator NaN % Authy NaN % Your password manager NaN % Something else (comment below) NaN % Google Authenticator to Aegis to Ente Auth Joe Hindy / Android Authority I've never been a fan of the one-time password (TOTP) feature being built into password managers (like 1Password or Apple Passwords). That defeats the very purpose of 'second' factor authentication by putting everything in the same app for the sake of convenience. While the password managers I've used — Enpass and Bitwarden — do have the option to link TOTPs to each of my saved credentials, I consciously decided to use a separate 2FA app. Like every single person who's felt the need for extra digital protection, I started off with Google Authenticator. As with several things Google, Authenticator is basic but still a solid place to start. It's better than not using two-factor authentication at all. However, back in the day, it worked offline, so moving between devices became particularly difficult, especially for someone like me who needs to do that often. And it felt deprived of features compared to what the competition offered. I went on a spree to de-Google my everyday apps a few years ago, and that's when I found Aegis — a solid, open-source alternative to Google Authenticator. It had a clean interface and gave me the peace of mind of being completely local. But it still felt cumbersome when it came to cross-platform use. I had to manually move backups, and when I tried to switch to the iPhone 16 Pro Max last year, I learned that Aegis doesn't offer an iOS app. Joe Hindy / Android Authority It was time to find another app. My search ended with Ente Auth — the 2FA app from the same folks behind Ente Photos, a privacy-first Google Photos alternative without the big tech tracking that my colleague Rob loved. When I came across it, I immediately started looking for a catch, because how can an app be such an all-rounder and still fly under the radar? And I instantly regretted not discovering it earlier. Ente is the best of both worlds It's only now that I realize how actively involved I was in making Aegis work, especially with the lack of a proper sync feature. Meanwhile, Authy was out of the question due to its data breach last year, and Google Authenticator is, well, still Google Authenticator. Ente Auth truly offered me the best of both worlds. It was super easy to import my codes from Aegis — I was actually worried about needing to manually set up 2FA on all my hundred accounts if the transfer didn't work as expected. But thankfully, the process couldn't have been smoother. I got started within minutes! But more importantly, Ente Auth is a breeze to use. I don't have to worry about taking a backup every few weeks and manually uploading the latest to the cloud just so that everything stays up to date. The app takes care of it with real-time sync — something that works as smoothly as Google Drive syncing your files everywhere. And if you're wondering, these backups are entirely end-to-end encrypted. More importantly, Ente Auth is open source, with independent audits proving its security — a critical brownie point for an app handling such critical data. Ente backups are entirely end-to-end encrypted. Furthermore, Ente Auth is open source with independent audits proving its security. What I still haven't gotten used to is that I can access my codes anywhere. With 2FA apps, I'm conditioned to picking up my phone to copy the code or manually type it on my desktop. But every time I'm on my Mac and need to open Ente, I'm reminded that I can use the desktop app too. It's that much easier when you need to punch in those ephemeral codes 10 times a day. The anti-Ente argument Karandeep Singh / Android Authority Ente Auth is overall a well-regarded app, and I can vouch for that general sentiment with my own experience. However, it still frustrates me at times. For instance, despite using it for close to a year now, I have no clue what the quick gesture to directly copy the TOTP is. Is it a single tap, a double tap like Aegis, or a long press? I know all of these do something, but I don't know what does what. So, on most days, I end up trying all three and hoping it's picked up the code. While that's on me (only partially, okay?), I feel Ente needs to up its own security — especially since it relies on an email-password combo to sync your data. A solid way to do that would be letting users secure their account with a physical YubiKey for an ironclad vault. But maybe that's something for another day. It's still worth your attention Megan Ellis / Android Authority If you want to start using two-factor authentication (yay, welcome to the safer side of the internet!) or are looking for an alternative to your current setup, Ente Auth would be my top recommendation. It doesn't have any more of a learning curve than Google Authenticator and syncs your codes in perhaps the most secure way known to the internet, at least on the consumer side. For a solid strategy to keep your accounts safe from prying eyes, just use a reliable password manager to generate strong and lengthy passwords, pair it with Ente Auth (or whatever 2FA strikes your fancy), and you'll be good to go. That's pretty much all most of us need — because digital safety shouldn't feel like a chore.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store