
AR foils ambush near India-Myanmar border, 1 insurgent dead
The encounter took place during a routine patrol between Khogla and Lyangche villages, when troops from the Wakka Company Operating Base, under the Khonsa Battalion, came under sudden and heavy fire from insurgents hiding in dense jungle terrain.
The paramilitary unit's swift response neutralised the threat, averting what could have been a deadly attack. A subsequent search of the area revealed a makeshift hideout and a significant stockpile of war-like stores.
The recovered items included five IEDs weighing 15kg, 34 detonators, three pistols (.22 and .32 calibre), 74 live rounds, one Chinese grenade, two walkie-talkies, Indian and Burmese currency, extortion notes, combat clothing, two SIM cards each from India and Myanmar, and other incriminating materials.
"The patrol came under sudden and heavy fire from a pre-set ambush deep in jungle terrain. Our troops launched an immediate and effective counter-assault, forcing the insurgents to flee and abandon their position.
The scale of the recovery shows a clear intent to carry out hostile activity," said a senior Assam Rifles official.
NSCN-KYA, a faction of the National Socialist Council of Nagaland, has long operated along the porous India-Myanmar border and remains a persistent security concern in the region. Longding, in southeastern Arunachal Pradesh, has seen several such encounters in recent years. Its dense forest cover and remote geography make it a favoured transit corridor for insurgent movement between the two countries.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Sebi's Jane Street interim order made India's stock market sit up for good reason
The stock market has been forced to sit up by an interim order passed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) against New York-based securities firm Jane Street. The order has fired the imagination of sundry arbitrageurs and mollified traders who were alarmed by rising levels of risk in India's capital markets. Sebi has been alerting the public about rising risk in the equity futures and options (F&O) segment and taking prudential steps. Last week, after a long probe, it barred Jane Street's four trading arms from transacting in the Indian securities markets till it completes its 'detailed' investigation. The capital market regulator has also sought to disgorge ₹4,844 crore from the securities firm. Sebi's order alleges that Jane Street's associate arms indulged in market manipulation—specifically of Bank Nifty index derivatives and this index's constituent shares in the cash segment. Also Read: Mint Explainer: How Sebi sniffed out Jane Street's market manipulations Jane Street allegedly ignored a February advisory from the first-level regulator, National Stock Exchange (NSE), leading Sebi to comment in its order that it is not 'a good faith actor that can be, or deserves to be, trusted." The whole affair not only raises many questions, but points to some macro issues as well. The first question arises from the way in which Sebi chanced upon Jane Street's alleged misconduct. Media reports in April 2024 detailed how Jane Street had sued two former employees in a Manhattan court for allegedly using the firm's 'proprietary trading strategy' in their new firm. The lawyers of the accused revealed in court that the strategy was being deployed in India. This reportage alerted Sebi, which then began its initial probe into Jane Street's trades in the Indian market's cash and derivative segments, which included directing NSE to keep a close watch on the firm's trading patterns. While Sebi must be lauded for its alacrity and the time it took to marshal and establish the facts of this case—from April 2024 to July 2025—a question could be raised about its source of information. To be fair, Sebi can always respond to alerts of any viable origin. However, Jane Street's trading strategy was at work for more than a year before April 2024, having flown below Sebi's vigilance and surveillance radars. Thereby hangs a lesson. Also Read: Street theatre: Sebi pins down Jane Street for manipulation Another issue that should be debated is whether Jane Street's trading strategy was illegal—or 'manipulation" as per the Indian regulator's interim order. Many F&O traders have adopted similar strategies in the past and escaped scrutiny. Jane Street's large volumes in a shallow market made the difference; but then, can the securities firm be blamed for structural deficiencies in our derivatives market? What's more important, though, is the fact that Jane Street allegedly profited on the back of uninformed derivatives trading by retail investors. Sebi's September 2024 report had stated that over 90% of retail investors in the F&O market had incurred losses between 2021-22 and 2023-24. This then calls for a larger investigation into whether retail investors were led up the garden path and if the entities that operated as pied pipers were acting on behalf of Jane Street. Also Read: F&O action: Can new Sebi rules tame wild bulls of the derivatives market? Sebi's F&O risk mitigation strategy, which has included raising the bar for futures and options trading, may need some course correction. The regulator must ensure that the bar is raised sufficiently to deter non-institutional investors from treating the derivatives segment of the market like a casino without a cover charge.


New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
The Jane Street Saga: What it means to you
The 105-page interim order in the matter of index manipulation of Jane Street Group, a global proprietary trading firm, rocked the stock market last week. The Securities and Exchange Board of India, the stock market regulator, barred a group of four entities from trading in Indian markets and ordered the impounding of their profits. Sebi has accused the group of manipulating the prices of securities for profit. Derivatives, such as futures and options, derive their value from underlying securities, like stock indices or individual shares. Traders around the world buy in markets where prices are low and sell when prices are high. They do that within the cash or derivative market or across markets. The purpose of trading in derivatives is to make short-term profits. With the help of technology, high-frequency traders can buy in one market and sell in another in microseconds. Now, you can do that between two different counter parties. The accusation in the case of Jane's Group concerns the use of the same entities belonging to the group, but registered in different geographic locations, for carrying out high-frequency trades. At the same time, shares in the cash market, such as those held by large banks with a high weight in the Bank Nifty, were bought and sold closer to the market close on multiple days. The allegation is that it was done to move the final settlement price in favour of Jane Group companies. While the reaction in the cash market was subdued, it was evident in a sharp decline in trading volume in the index and stock options segments on the National Stock Exchange last Friday. Those who are into day trading are likely to exercise caution. There are multiple opinions already on the issue. Some reports suggest that the Jane Group is not the only foreign trading firm in the Indian equity options market that comprises index-based options (such as Nifty and Bank Nifty) or stock options. There are other firms as well, and they may be hesitant to enter the Indian market. Brokers offering their opinions are cautious in their response to the Sebi order. Brokers generate a significant remuneration out of the day trading activity through brokerages and fees from you. They are unlikely to be happy about any decline in the trading volume in the Indian stock market. Some independent experts said on social media that the Jane Group is a resourceful organisation and will pursue appeals against the Sebi order. The outcome of the case will determine the future role of foreign portfolio investors in the Indian derivatives segment. The long-term investors among them will not be bothered. However, those who rely on day trading may want to tread with caution. What it means If you are an active day trader, you must use this situation to learn. This column has always maintained the importance of knowledge. The Sebi order is excellent reading material for someone trying to generate income from stock market trading. It explains the situation of the case but also touches upon the basics of options trading. You can understand the dos and don'ts of stock market trading and the associated risks. You will also learn that as an individual, it will be increasingly challenging to compete with technology. While machines execute transactions in microseconds, it takes far more time for you to execute trading strategies on your own. The significant individual interest in options trading is encouraged as firms that use technology make money at their expense. Derivative trading in futures and options is not a new concept. It is a formidable tool that allows traders to bet on the future price trend of underlying securities, creating liquidity. At the same time, it also helps you hedge the risk against your long-term equity holding.


Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
Delhi: Over 1,200 rolls of Chinese manjha seized, 3 arrested
Ahead of Independence Day and Raksha Bandhan, the Delhi Police has seized over 1,200 rolls of banned Chinese manjha in the past week and has arrested three men from different places in Delhi. The raids were part of an operation to curb the sale of the illegal thread, police said on Sunday. Chinese manjha uses nylon threads which are sometimes coated with powdered glass. DCP (Crime) Sanjeev Kumar Yadav, said that this is a part of a preventive drive before Independence Day. He said Chinese manjha is dangerous to people, birds, and animals. In the past month, two people have died in three separate incidents related to injuries caused by manjha have been reported. The first seizure was conducted at Kamla Market on June 26; the second operation happened in Uttam Nagar on June 27. The third operation took place in Wazirabad on July 5. In total, 1,226 rolls of Chinese manjha were seized. Police have registered three FIRs against the people involved. In the first case, police arrested Raju Chaurasia, 51, from Uttam Nagar. He was running a godown-cum-shop and had 922 rolls of Chinese manjha. 'He previously operated a shop from the ground floor of his residence. He started selling banned Chinese manjha both offline and online due to high profit margins,' DCP Yadav said. In the second case, police arrested Areeb Khan, 22, from Daryaganj. He had 248 rolls of banned string and was caught near Kamla Market. Earlier, Areeb worked at a clothing store but moved to kite-string selling for more profit, the police said. In the third case, Danish Khan, 28, from Babanpuri, Uttar Pradesh, was arrested. Police caught him in Sangam Vihar, Wazirabad, with 56 rolls of manjha. He used to make kites but started selling manjha to earn more money. All three men were booked under the Environment Protection Act and sections of the BNS. Police said that they are trying to find out the larger supply network behind this illegal trade.