AARP: Why Majority of Retirees and Seniors Are Missing Out on SNAP Food Benefits
Learn More:
Read Next:
Rising food prices and the end of emergency SNAP allotments have made it even harder for older adults to keep nutritious food on the table. Food insecurity among Americans aged 50 and up jumped from 7.9% in 2021 to 9.8% in 2022, per AARP report. With so many missing out, understanding the reasons behind low enrollment and how to access these benefits is more urgent than ever.
AARP research found that the majority of eligible older adults are not receiving SNAP benefits, despite being entitled to them. Several barriers keep retirees from enrolling, including a lack of awareness about eligibility, stigma around government assistance and the complexity of the application process.
Erica R. Williams, MBA, Executive Director of A Red Circle and national expert on food equity, explained that the biggest barrier is a lack of information and the stigma attached to government programs. 'Many seniors simply don't know they're eligible, or are too proud or ashamed to ask for help,' Williams said.
The SNAP application process can be daunting, especially for those with mobility issues or limited internet access. To make things easier, Williams suggested retirees use online screening tools like the National Council on Aging's BenefitsCheckUp, which can quickly determine eligibility.
Local social services offices and community organizations can also help seniors understand the guidelines and assist with applications. Williams added that integrating SNAP eligibility checks into routine healthcare visits would ensure older adults do not miss out simply because they are unaware of their options.
Be Aware:
Retirees and seniors who do not enroll in SNAP miss out on several important benefits that can improve their lives. A report by the National Council on Aging explained three benefits retirees and seniors are miss out on:
They lose access to an average of $158 per month in food assistance, which can make it much easier to afford healthier groceries and stretch a fixed income.
They forgo the chance to use the excess medical expense deduction. This deduction allows seniors with more than $35 in monthly out-of-pocket medical costs to increase their SNAP benefit — but only 16% of eligible older adults currently use it.
SNAP participation is linked to better health outcomes, including a 23% lower chance of entering a nursing home and a 4% lower chance of hospitalization, as well as reduced overall healthcare costs.
Several misconceptions keep retirees from applying for SNAP. Many believe receiving Social Security or having a modest pension will disqualify them. However, most states have flexible rules that allow for higher income limits and exclude certain assets from consideration.
Another myth is that accepting SNAP takes benefits away from others. However, the program is designed to help everyone who qualifies. The stigma around accepting government assistance also remains a powerful deterrent, even though SNAP is a program funded by taxpayers for exactly this purpose.
Many seniors believe that having Social Security income or a small savings account will automatically disqualify them, but that is often not true. In fact, a report by Propel found that for 2025, seniors can qualify for SNAP if their annual income is below $15,060 for one person, or $20,440 for two people. Also, assets like a primary home and retirement savings are not counted against them.
The misconception that SNAP is only for families with children or that accepting help means taking it away from others also discourages many from applying.
Applying for SNAP does not have to be overwhelming. Williams suggested breaking the process into manageable steps and seeking assistance from SNAP outreach volunteers, community nonprofits or Area Agencies on Aging. Many states now allow seniors to apply online or over the phone, making the process more accessible. Gathering necessary documents such as identification, proof of income and medical expense records ahead of time can also speed things up.
Once approved, maintaining enrollment is crucial. Many states now offer longer certification periods for seniors, reducing the need for frequent renewals. Local agencies and nonprofits can help remind seniors when it's time to renew and assist with paperwork. Having a support partner, like a family member or friend, can also make a big difference in keeping benefits active.
More From GOBankingRates
5 Types of Vehicles Retirees Should Stay Away From Buying
How Far $750K Plus Social Security Goes in Retirement in Every US Region
4 Things You Should Do if You Want To Retire Early
12 SUVs With the Most Reliable Engines
Sources
AARP, '16 Million Eligible Adults Ages 50 and Older Are Not Enrolled in SNAP'
AARP, 'Food Insecurity Increased to 1 in 10 Adults Ages 50 and Older in 2022'
Erica R. Williams, A Red Circle
National Council on Aging, '7 Facts About Older Adults and SNAP'
Propel, 'SNAP for seniors: navigating benefits, income limits, and eligibility'
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: AARP: Why Majority of Retirees and Seniors Are Missing Out on SNAP Food Benefits
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
17 minutes ago
- New York Post
I went blind after doing cartwheels — here's what I learned after losing my vision
A woman who lost her ability to see after a joyful romp on the beach is opening up about the frightening ordeal. Deborah Cobb was 19 years old when she broke out in a series of cartwheels — only to come up without her vision. Now 42, Cobb has said that she has the ocular health of an 80-year-old and anticipates she will soon return to blindness due to early-onset macular degeneration. Advertisement 4 Seemingly harmless horseplay caused temporary blindness and chronic illness for one 19-year-old woman. Mikhail Ulyannikov – In a new interview with Newsweek, Cobb said she was with her friends when she decided to challenge herself to do as many cartwheels in a row as she could 'just for fun.' 'I started doing them and got to 13 and fell over super dizzy. My eyes were kind of spinning, so it took a moment to realize that my eyes weren't focusing,' she recalled. Advertisement 'Looking at her face, it was a giant orange blur,' Cobb continued, referring to a friend who witnessed the shocking moments. 'My eyes wouldn't fully focus. There was no pain, and my peripheral vision was fine, but everything I looked directly at was blocked by an orange blur.' Cobb's harrowing story went viral in a recent post on Instagram, where she detailed the mysterious medical phenomenon that doctors first thought was a sign of leukemia and even AIDS. 'I had neither. Just weak blood vessels in my eyes that is apparently a genetic trait as I later learned,' she wrote of her condition, called macular degeneration. 4 Deborah Cobb, now 42, shared details of her macular degeneration diagnosis on Instagram. deborahcobb_ihp/Instagram Advertisement Cobb explained in the viral video post that her gymnastic stunts had caused internal hemorrhages in a part of her eye called the macula, an area at the center of the retina that is responsible for sharp, focused vision. Macular degeneration is the leading cause of vision loss, affecting more than 200,000 Americans every year, usually brought on by old age and other factors, including genetics and cardiovascular disease. The condition causes blurred and distorted vision, dark spots changes in color perception. She was deemed 'legally blind' for three months after the initial incident, and did not regain full vision for another three months thereafter. 4 Macular degeneration, usually only seen in the elderly, affects the eye's ability to bring sight into sharp focus. mihai – Advertisement Cobb's life came to a halt during that time. As a result of the injury, she was forced to quit massage school. She couldn't drive, watch TV or even look at herself in the mirror. Though she was eventually able to return to school and later earned her license in massage therapy, she still lives in fear of losing her vision again. 'I can't do anything upside down or anything that causes too much blood to rush to my head. It happened once from doing push-ups, so I have to limit myself physically,' Cobb wrote. 4 Due to her eye condition, Cobb can no longer engage in physically exhaustive activities without risk of losing her vision again. deborahcobb_ihp/Instagram The experience inspired Cobb to dedicate her career to integrative medicine, and she now works with clients who suffer from anxiety and nervous system dysregulation. Cobb has also said that losing her vision gave her a positive new outlook on life, saying she's so thankful for the lessons in empathy and 'to not take the simple things for granted.' 'I could live in fear because of it, or I could be filled with gratitude because of it,' Cobb concluded in the thoughtful post. 'I choose gratitude, because who wants to live in fear?!'
Bloomberg
4 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Healthy Living Helps the Aging Brain
A new study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association makes a compelling case that a healthy lifestyle does an aging brain good. That might sound obvious. Eat well, exercise, challenge yourself mentally, have an active social life and you'll be better off for it. Yet researchers are just starting to offer concrete data to support the theory that making conscientious lifestyle changes can lower the risk of dementia, which is estimated to affect some 6 million Americans.
San Francisco Chronicle
5 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
In the age of Ozempic, is there still a role for weight-loss surgery?
As weight-loss medications like Ozempic exploded across the U.S. over the past four years, bariatric surgeons faced a bit of an existential crisis: Were their jobs about to become obsolete? For the first time, health care providers have a combination of highly effective therapies to offer patients with obesity, a condition that has long been one of the most difficult to treat. The outlook is especially exciting for patients who are severely overweight — including those who are considered too heavy for surgery. Indeed, there may exist a future where drugs and other interventions prevent people from ever becoming obese and needing weight-loss surgery. But that future is far off, say surgeons and other weight-loss experts. In fact, even as millions of Americans are now taking drugs that dramatically improve weight loss, surgeons say their tool may be more powerful than ever. 'A massive amount of people have tried these medications, so the question becomes: 'How well do they work and is there a role for bariatric surgery in the era of these drugs?'' said Dr. Jonathan Carter, a UCSF surgeon who specializes in minimally invasive procedures. Bariatric surgery has for decades been the most effective and durable weight-loss tool available. The specific procedures vary, but the most common operation now is the gastric sleeve surgery, in which a large portion of the stomach is removed. Roughly a quarter of a million Americans undergo a bariatric procedure each year. The surgeries are highly effective for weight loss — patients can lose about a third of their body weight within two years, and they generally keep off most of those pounds long-term. The side effects with the sleeve procedure are minimal and may include gas, bloating and nutritional deficiencies that can be alleviated with diet. Meanwhile, more than 1 in 10 Americans have now taken the newest weight-loss medications. On these drugs, patients can lose about 15% of their weight, but they must remain on the drugs for life — those who stop gain all of the weight back. Side effects are similar to the surgery. The drugs and the surgery work somewhat similarly by essentially quashing people's hunger and cravings. And though the surgery is more expensive at the outset — about $12,000 to $15,000 — it's cheaper in the long-term compared to drugs that cost about $1,000 a month. Both treatments are often, but not always, covered by insurance. With the surgery, 'You take someone who is 100 pounds overweight and their knees hurt and they have sleep apnea,' said Carter, 'and you do a one-hour intervention and a year later they've lost 100 pounds and their knees don't hurt and the sleep apnea is gone. It's like a butterfly coming out of a cocoon.' But bariatric surgery has never been a popular weight-loss option for those who need it most. Of all Americans who are eligible for surgery, only about 1% undergo the procedure. Surgeons and weight-loss experts say that's largely been due to misconceptions about the procedure and stigma around obesity. 'If you've been treating patients with obesity for decades, you always felt like, 'Yes, I have a great treatment, I can do these surgeries and do them safely, I believe in them whole-heartedly,'' said Dr. Dan Azagury, a Stanford University bariatric surgeon. 'But you were still limited in your capacity to treat patients.' Azagury took over Stanford's Lifestyle and Weight Management Center in February 2020, about a year before Ozempic, the first blockbuster weight-loss drug, blew up. Over the next 18 months, the number of patients on weight-loss medications jumped from 50 to 2,000. He said friends would often ask him if he would be out of a job soon. The drugs, though, have in some ways validated the surgical interventions, Azagury said. Weight loss has notoriously been a fraught topic in doctors offices, with patients feeling judged and doctors feeling frustrated by their lack of treatment options. 'A lot of times doctors would just say that you should eat less,' Azagury said. 'And I think patients intrinsically didn't see obesity as a medical condition,' he said. The success of recent weight-loss drugs, though, has made that conversation more palatable both to patients and providers, Azagury said. And he believes that is making some patients more amenable to a surgical option. There are, broadly, now three buckets for treating weight loss: diet and exercise, medication and surgery. The first option is likely best for people who don't have a lot of weight to lose and who are not facing any immediate complications related to their weight. They can manage their own treatment, or get a referral to a community or private weight-loss program. From there, patients with more serious obesity can decide if medication or surgery — or both — is the best option for them. Some people may be resistant to the idea of any surgical procedure and opt for medication. Others may decide that they would rather not deal with weekly injections for the rest of their life and prefer a one-time operation. Many patients, though, will end up with multiple interventions over their lifetime. They may start with medication and eventually decide they want a more permanent solution. Or they may get bariatric surgery and a few years later decide to start a medication if their weight is creeping back up. Mandy Hinz, 47, fought with her weight all her life, and it's only in the past two years that she finally felt like she had options. She had inquired about bariatric surgery about 20 years ago but was told she would need to lose 100 pounds before doctors would consider it safe. After that, she was up and down, peaking at about 415 pounds on her 5-foot, 3-inch frame. She started Ozempic in early 2023, and though the drug made her feel 'super sick,' she stuck with it and lost about 30 pounds. Around that time, Hinz, a Sacramento resident, was referred to the bariatric program at UCSF, and in October 2023, she finally got a gastric sleeve. She got down to about 200 pounds from the surgery, then started a different weight-loss drug and lost another 20 pounds. Though she's still obese for her height, Hinz said she's not interested in losing much more weight. 'I'm 180 and completely happy,' Hinz said. 'My journey has been absolutely amazing.' She noted that even with all of the tools at her disposal, losing the weight was never easy. And she has friends for whom even the newest therapies aren't solving all of their weight issues. But for Hinz, the weight-loss drugs finally unlocked a path that had never felt accessible to her. 'Being big my whole life, I missed out on a lot of stuff,' she said. Walking up and down stairs had become difficult, or spending a day on her feet at an amusement park. 'Now I can run up and down the stairs, I can walk around the amusement park the whole day. I went on my first hike a year and a half ago. It's like, let's go, let's do this.' Azagury said he's most thrilled for the patients — and their doctors — who have the most weight to lose, and especially those for whom a combination of medical and surgical therapies could be life-saving. 'The worst thing for a bariatric surgeon is when you get a patient in your clinic and it's too late — their condition is so bad that surgery is unsafe,' Azagury said. 'The conversation is, 'You have a condition I can treat, but I can't treat you.' It's the worst conversation. And I never have to have it anymore. Now I can tell them: 'I can't do surgery, but I have a good alternative for you.''
