Gary officials celebrate progress of Aetna home construction
As he stood outside a newly constructed home on 10th Avenue, Gary Mayor Eddie Melton said the structure represented much more.
'This is proof that Gary's plan and strategy in revitalizing neighborhoods is in the works,' Melton said Friday. 'This is more than just a city initiative — this is a collaborative effort with stakeholders and organizations that are extremely important.'
Melton and other officials allowed the public to see progress on the first single-family home to be built in the Aetna neighborhood in decades. The home, located at 5544 E. 10th Ave., will be complete near the end of July.
The development was spearheaded by Frederick Long and Laneé Nicole, local real estate professionals, and developer David Sutor. The Gary Redevelopment Commission opened a Requests for Proposals process in 2024, with the proposal selected during a June 5, 2024, commission meeting, according to a news release.
'Today is a celebration, not just of building homes, but of people, of partnerships, of promise and progress,' Nicole said. 'This isn't just a house — it's somebody's home. This isn't just a community — it's our community.'
The single-family structure is part of 15 planned homes that will feature ranch-style and two-story options, modern amenities and new construction. All homes will be built on a slab without basements.
Ranch properties will be about 1,400 square feet, starting at about $220,000, and two-story homes will be about 2,000 square feet and start at about $260,000, according to a news release.
The remaining 14 homes are planned to be completed throughout the next couple of years.
Christopher Harris, executive director of redevelopment for the city of Gary, said his goal is to see more than demolition in the city, and seeing the new home Friday gave him hope for the future.
'Think about it: 15 new construction homes in this neighborhood,' Harris said. 'It hasn't happened (in Aetna) in decades. That speaks to the demand, right?'
The construction is part of the city's initiative to remove blighted structures throughout Gary. In March, the city began its second phase of the Aetna demolition, according to Post-Tribune archives.
Blight elimination is one of Melton's focuses as mayor. As state senator, Melton created the Senate Bill 434, which established the blighted property demolition fund and allows the city to receive $6 million from the state of Indiana for blight elimination. The city had to match those funds, with half coming from American Rescue Plan Act funds and $3 million from the Hard Rock casino.
On Friday, Melton said his goal was to start demolishing blighted homes in Aetna before moving to the rest of the city. Last year, Gary demolished about 40 blighted structures in the Aetna neighborhood, Melton said.
'We piloted this targeted approach to make a noticeable, meaningful and impactful difference, so residents can see (the change),' he said. 'Is it complete? Absolutely not. There's still a lot of work left to do.'
Melton believes the Aetna neighborhood offers many opportunities to residents and future homeowners. He highlighted its proximity to the South Shore Line's Miller train station, a Gary Public Transportation Corporation route and major highways, including Interstates 65, 94, 90 and 80.
He also highlighted the proximity to Miller's Lake Street offerings, the beachfront and Indiana Dunes National Park.
Councilman Myles Tolliver, D-at large, spoke at Friday's press conference, saying he's excited about what the development means for Aetna's future.
Tolliver shared Melton's sentiments about why Aetna is a prime location for new development.
'Here is the greatest city in Northwest Indiana,' Tolliver said. 'It's time for us to show it. We do that by building infrastructure and what will be homes.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
29 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate wraps up 16-hour reading of Trump bill, moves to debate
The Senate clerks completed the full reading of the Senate GOP's massive tax and spending bill on Sunday afternoon, allowing the chamber to start the countdown clock toward a final vote on the package sometime on Monday. Democrats, in an attempt to delay passage of the bill, forced the clerks to read aloud all 940 pages of the package, an endeavor that clocked in at 15 hours and 55 minutes and ended shortly after 3 p.m. 'I objected to stop Republicans moving forward on their Big, Ugly Bill until they read every single word of it to the American people,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) wrote on X on Saturday night. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) thanked the clerks. 'I would like to start by just taking a moment to thank the clerks, who stayed up all night reading the amendment and getting us to this point. I know it was a long night and that we're not finished yet, but I want them to know the Senate appreciates their dedication, their stamina and their service,' he said. The chamber will now begin up to 20 hours of debate, equally divided between the two sides before an unlimited series of amendment votes known as a 'vote-a-rama' is set to begin. Republicans are expected to yield back much of their time, expediting the timeline for passage. That would mean the vote-a-rama would likely kick off in the wee hours of Monday morning, setting up passage for sometime later in the day. Members are able to offer as many amendments as possible as long as they are related to the tax package. All amendments must be voted on and dispensed with before GOP leaders are able to vote on final passage. Republicans were able to scrounge together the votes needed to advance the bill on Saturday — after a long day of negotiations that continued as the vote was held open for more than three hours — but they still have work to do. Two Republicans who voted against advancing the measure — Sens. Thom Tillis (N.C.) and Rand Paul (Ky.) — are also expected to vote against the bill itself over Medicaid provisions and the inclusion of a $5 trillion debt ceiling hike, respectively. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), one of the conference's foremost centrists, voted to advance the bill on Saturday but has not yet declared whether she will vote for final passage. 'That's going to depend on whether the bill is substantially changed,' she said on Saturday. 'There are some very good changes that have been made in the latest version but I want to see further changes and I will be filing a number of amendments.' Senate Republicans ran into trouble on Saturday as the vote was held open for nearly four hours after a foursome of conservatives — Sens. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Rick Scott (R-Fla.), Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) — held out their support over what they view as too generous of Medicaid provisions in the package. According to the conservatives, Thune and Trump committed to back Scott's proposal to lower the 90 percent federal matching share for new Medicaid enrollees in expansion states. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), a top moderate, also held out her support for multiple hours over the proposed Medicaid the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) cuts in the blueprint.
Fox News
29 minutes ago
- Fox News
Mike Lee preemptively drops 'big beautiful bill' provision to sell federal lands that riled GOP colleagues
Utah Republican Sen. Mike Lee preemptively withdrew a provision in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act on Saturday evening that would have allowed for the sale of federal lands for development after widespread outrage among his conservative colleagues. "Over the past several weeks, I've spent a lot of time listening to members of the community, local leaders, and stakeholders across the country. While there has been a tremendous amount of misinformation – and in some cases, outright lies – about my bill, many people brought forward sincere concerns," Lee said in a message posted to his X account on Saturday evening. Lee, who chairs the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, said he pulled the provision after he failed to secure "safeguards to guarantee that these lands would be sold only to American families," and not to China or corporations. The Senate parliamentarian ruled on Monday that the provision's original language did not comply with strict rules related to what could be included in reconciliation legislation, with Lee's office resubmitting the provision with new language before pulling it altogether on Saturday evening. Lee said he maintains his long-held position that the U.S. government owns too much land that is often mismanaged and leaves Americans, most notably in Western states, with higher tax burdens. "I continue to believe the federal government owns far too much land – land it is mismanaging and in many cases ruining for the next generation," Lee wrote in his post. "Under Democratic presidents, massive swaths of the West are being locked away from the people who live there, with no meaningful recourse." Lee had included a mandate for sales of millions of acres of federal lands in a draft provision of the tax cut package earlier this month. He preemptively pulled the provision on Saturday ahead of a procedural vote, as a handful of Republican lawmakers in both chambers publicly denounced the provision and said they would vote against the bill if it was included. "We've got the votes to strike it," Montana Sen. Steve Daines said Thursday of Lee's provision. "We're ready." "I agree with my colleagues that the federal government has mismanaged federal lands for decades. But I don't agree with their solution. The solution is not to sell public lands. The solution is better management. Let's send legislation to POTUS desk to improve management and access. I remain a no on the senate reconciliation bill," Montana Rep. Ryan Zinke posted to X last week ahead of Lee pulling the provision. Zinke served as President Donald Trump's secretary of the Department of the Interior during his first administration. "The people of Idaho have been clear – we do NOT support the sale of our public lands to the highest bidder. I am proud to help lead the effort to remove this provision from the One Big Beautiful Bill," Idaho Republican Sen. Jim Risch posted to X after Lee said he would pull the provision. Lawmakers are on a tight 4th of July deadline to get the legislation, which will advance Trump's agenda on taxes, immigration, energy, defense and the national debt, to the president's desk. Senate Republicans successfully carried the legislation over a procedural hurdle late on Saturday after hours of negotiations.
Washington Post
33 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Senate rushes to pass Trump's tax bill, as cost tops $3 trillion
The Senate was plowing ahead on President Donald Trump's massive tax and immigration agenda Sunday as Republicans tried to swat away Democratic policy challenges and contend with its rising impact on the ballooning national debt. Trump's budget bill would extend tax cuts passed in 2017, enact campaign promises such as no tax on tips, spend hundreds of billions of dollars on immigration and defense and slash social benefit programs. The multitrillion-dollar legislation survived a brief GOP revolt Saturday night to allow the chamber to move forward with debate on the measure. Senators will likely work overnight to get the bill moving through the chamber. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) said he hopes to pass the legislation as soon as Monday so it can be sent back to the House for final approval in time to beat Trump's self-imposed Independence Day deadline. The House passed a version of Trump's agenda in May. But the Congressional Budget Office, lawmakers' nonpartisan bookkeeper, reported Sunday that the measure would raise the national debt by $3.3 trillion over 10 years. That estimate does not include increased borrowing costs, which would be substantial because the measure, even with spending cuts, is largely deficit-financed. The legislation has also grown increasingly unpopular among voters. A Washington Post-Ipsos poll conducted this month found Americans oppose the bill by an almost 2-to-1 margin, and 63 percent said the measure's debt impact was 'unacceptable.' The bill would extend expiring tax cuts from Trump's first term and include new deductions the White House hopes will spur economic growth. It includes a trio of Trump's populist campaign promises — no taxes on tips, overtime wages or auto loan interest — and adds $6,000 to the standard deduction for seniors. During the 2024 campaign, Trump pitched ending taxes on Social Security benefits, but the idea was not included in the bill. For the private sector, the legislation would give corporations larger deductions for research and development, depreciating assets and interest on large purchases. To offset the cost, Republicans have proposed steep cuts to Medicaid, the state and federal health insurance program for low-income individuals and disabled people, as well as SNAP, the anti-hunger Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program formerly known as food stamps. 'We don't pay people in this country to be lazy,' Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Oklahoma) said Sunday on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' 'We want to give them an opportunity, and when they're going through a hard time, we want to give them a helping hand. That's what Medicaid was designed for, and it's, unfortunately, it's been abused.' The largest budget cuts would come from provider taxes, which are duties that states charge medical providers as a roundabout way of collecting more federal Medicaid dollars. Some in the GOP wish to use that policy to force states to jettison some immigrants from benefits rolls, leaving other lawmakers concerned about the finances of rural hospitals, which rely heavily on Medicaid patients. That's become a sticking point among Republicans, both within the Senate and between senators and House members. The House's version of the bill was far less expensive and far less punitive on Medicaid. The Senate overhauled that legislation in ways that some House members now find unrecognizable, and the measure could have trouble securing support when it returns to the lower chamber. In the Senate, though, lawmakers who represent states that use provider taxes or have a large number of rural health care facilities have warned the provision is fatal to the success of the bill. 'Let's watch and be careful that we don't cut into bone, don't hurt our rural hospitals,' Sen. Jim Justice (R-West Virginia) said late last week. 'If we do that, it's going to be a bad day.' Sen. Thom Tillis (R-North Carolina) voted with Democrats on Saturday night to block moving forward on the measure. Tillis announced Sunday that he would not seek reelection next year. Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) have expressed similar concerns, though they voted to clear the bill's procedural hurdle. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) is steadfastly opposed to the bill over deficit concerns, meaning the GOP can lose only two more votes to keep the measure afloat. If that happens, Vice President JD Vance would be forced to break the Senate's tie.
