Former Premier League side back in EFL after scoring twice in two minutes in dramatic National League play-off final
An extraordinary extra time escape act sent Micky Mellon's men back to League Two in front of chief executive Darren Royle - son of legendary ex-manager Joe.
8
8
Four years after coffins were carried outside Boundary Park to mark the death of the club and three years since owner Frank Rothwell stepped in as the saviour, they are alive and kicking again.
All thanks to two goals in two staggering extra-time minutes.
The Latics were behind five minutes after kick-off, then behind again 39 seconds into extra time.
But a Premier League quality finish from James Norwood and Kian Harratt's bizarre winner helped down Southend.
Oldham finished five points clear of Southend in the table and had sailed through the play-offs without conceding a single goal.
Their opponents, however, had scraped into the play-off places and needed extra time and then penalties to reach this final.
But it was Mellon's side who made a frantic start under the arch.
Having been so water-tight in the two games to reach Wembley, it was a surprise to see Oldham so ragged inside five minutes.
Southend's Charley Kendall raced onto a clipped ball over the top, unsettling Monthe to the extent he swung a leg and lifted the ball over his own goalkeeper.
Oldham responded well to the nightmare start and should have been level just over 10 minutes later, when Vimal Yoganathan headed inexplicably wide from two yards at the far post.
Former Premier League club closing in on return to EFL despite finishing 23 POINTS behind play-off opponents
8
8
Striker Mike Fondop erupted at his teammate for taking the chance away from him and wasting it, but was just as guilty later in the half.
Fondop, who should have been awarded a penalty earlier in the half, raced through one-on-one and decided to dink over the keeper but placed the ball just wide.
Oldham had scored seven goals in two play-off games before the final, but were so wasteful across a frustrating first half.
That was swiftly corrected after the break.
8
8
Monthe, making amends for his own-goal, was hauled to the ground by Ben Goodliffe inside the six-yard box within a minute of the restart.
Referee Elliot Bell immediately pointed to the spot and veteran Garner slotted home from the spot to make it three goals in three play-off games.
Having endured nine minutes of stoppage time at the end of the second half, Southend struck just 39 seconds into extra time.
Keeper Mathew Hudson flapped at a deflected cross from Gus Scott-Morriss, palming it straight to substitute Parillon to nod home.
8
8
That looked to have started a Southend party, though they wasted chances to extend their lead before the Latics struck.
Substitute Norwood collected a hopeful punt before showing off some staggering footwork, lifting the ball over advancing keeper Hayes and finishing into an empty net.
The winner was even more surprising as Harratt cut in on the right and swung in a low cross which evaded everyone in red and rolled in.
A galling way for Southend's own redemption story to hit the buffers, but the most ridiculous route back to League Two for Oldham.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
5 minutes ago
- BBC News
Wawickshire residents urged to support national cycle race
Warwickshire residents are being urged to take to the streets to support a national cycling race returning to the county after a five-year four of the Lloyds Tour of Britain Men will visit the area for a third time on 5 will set off from Atherstone in north Warwickshire and wind their way south, finishing with a 700m (2,296ft) climb to the top of Burton Dassett Hills Country race begins in East Suffolk on Tuesday 2 September. A detailed route map will be published later this month. The race last came to Warwickshire in 2019, with Dutch cyclist Mathieu van der Poel crowned the local stage county council is running a competition for primary school children to design a flag that will start the local leg, and a trophy to be presented to the stage leader George Finch said the race's return was a "fantastic boost" for the county, taking in North Warwickshire, Nuneaton and Bedworth, Rugby, Warwick and Stratford-on-Avon districts."I hope the people of Warwickshire will take to the streets and the hills, as they always have, to give the Tour the support it deserves," he added. Jonathan Day, managing director of British Cycling Events, said Warwickshire had a "long and proud history" of hosting the Tour of has also welcomed the women's race five times in the last decade, and the men's and women's Commonwealth Games road races in August 2022."We are delighted to be returning, especially with such a challenging finale at Burton Dassett Hills Country Park, that will draw spectators from right across the heart of England," Mr Day opening leg of the Tour runs between Woodbridge and Southwold, followed by a second stage at Keynes and Central Bedfordshire will host the third stage on 4 announcements about the host venues of remaining stages between 5-7 will be made in the coming weeks. Follow BBC Coventry & Warwickshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Why so many penalties are being missed at Euro 2025
An incredible nine penalties were missed in England's quarter-final shoot-out with Sweden. Some were saved, while some missed the target completely. That game was not an outlier. Missing penalties has been a theme of Euro 2025. Of the 41 spot-kicks taken at the tournament so far, only 24 have been scored, a conversion rate of only 58.5 per cent – and before Saturday night's shoot-out between France and Germany, it was as low as 48 per cent. Spain missed two against Switzerland, with Mariona Caldentey firing wide before Alèxia Putellas's effort was saved. Ada Hegerberg, meanwhile, put two penalties wide in separate fixtures for Norway. Germany's Sjoeke Nüsken also had her spot-kick saved against France in normal time on Saturday before finding the net in the shoot-out. A golden chance missed for Norway 🇳🇴 Ada Hegerberg misses her second penalty of the tournament. #WEuro2025 — Match of the Day (@BBCMOTD) July 16, 2025 The low conversion rate is intriguing given players have had considerably greater success in previous tournaments. In Euro 2022, eight of the 10 penalties taken during 90 minutes were scored, a conversion rate of 80 per cent. There were no shoot-outs at that tournament. The average was slightly lower at the 2023 World Cup. Of the 70 penalties taken during both 90 minutes and shoot-outs, 48 were scored, a conversion rate of 68.6 per cent. The 2015 World Cup has the highest conversion rate of the past eight tournaments, with 84.4 per cent of penalties scored in both matches and shoot-outs, while Euro 2025 so far has the lowest percentage. So what are some of the possible explanations for the significant drop this year? Pressure takes toll in latter stages Statistics show that conversion rates decrease after the quarter-final stage. At Euro 2017, seven of eight penalties taken during 90 minutes were scored while eight from nine during shoot-outs were converted. But once the two semi-final games and final were taken into account, the overall conversion rate for the tournament dropped to 73.1 per cent. In fact, that is the case for every tournament since 2011, which does not bode well for this Euros as it heads to the semi-final stage. It is perhaps not surprising, given that the stakes increase further into the tournament. There is also the impact of the increased attention on and exposure of women's football. Geir Jordet, a professor in football and psychology, and the author of Pressure – Lessons from the Psychology of the Penalty Shootout, tells Telegraph Sport: 'Our research on penalties with men show that with increased pressure comes reduced shot performance. 'With the explosive interest in the women's game these past four to five years, these players are now asked to perform on behalf of their countries with a level of expectation and outside investment in the outcome that they may not have experienced at this level before. 'While Premier League players on the men's side are used to this type of interest every weekend, the women players are not, and it is possible that this makes it harder and that some of these players underperform as a result.' Putellas, Caldentey and Hegerberg have all taken high-pressure penalties before. But it is interesting that all three missed against the host nation, Switzerland, who had the majority of fans in the stadium. Hegerberg also missed in Norway's quarter-final with Italy. Goalkeepers improving Poor penalties are often linked to good goalkeeping and Jordet believes the increased professionalism in the women's game has given goalkeepers an analytical edge. Sweden's Jennifer Falk had information about England's penalty-takers on her water bottle, a technique Jordan Pickford has used in numerous shoot-outs for England's men's team. Ann-Katrin Berger had similar on her bottle for Germany's shoot-out against France. Those notes said dive left for the decisive last penalty; she did and she saved, having pulled off another spectacular stop in extra-time. England goalkeeper Hannah Hampton also referenced the importance of data, joking that she did not have any on Falk when the Sweden goalkeeper surprisingly stepped up – and missed – in the shoot-out. There are undoubtedly greater resources available to female goalkeepers now than in 2011 and the standard of players in that position has increased significantly. There is also much more data and research available. 'In the England v Sweden shoot-out, the goalkeepers moved to the correct side more than 70 per cent of the time, indicating that they had successfully figured out the penalty-takers,' Jordet says. 'A correct guess will increase the chance of a save by 30 to 40 per cent. 'Under pressure, people – and penalty-takers – tend to fall back to what is known and many will then lean on the shots they are most comfortable with, making them predictable for goalkeepers.' Players should consider flexible approach While goalkeepers do their homework, a way for penalty-takers to combat this is to employ a more flexible goalkeeper-dependent technique. This is where they look at the goalkeeper moving to one side before the shot, and then roll the ball to the other side. 'Very few female penalty-takers actually use this technique,' Jordet says. 'None of the players in the England v Sweden shoot-out did so, and those goalkeepers were successful because they moved very early to a side, and hence could quite easily make their saves because the penalty-takers rigidly stuck to their pre-decided corner. 'However, Spain's Mariona Caldentey actually used the goalkeeper-dependent technique against Switzerland, looking at the goalkeeper as she moved towards the ball. 'The Swiss goalkeeper had definitely studied Caldentey because she came equipped with the antidote against this type of strategy by standing still for an extremely long time, forcing the forward to just go for a side – and the shot was not particularly strong.' Not one, but two missed penalties 😬 It didn't matter in the end, but a couple of moments to forget for Spain! — ITV Football (@itvfootball) July 18, 2025 It is interesting that the conversion rate at the men's Euro 2024 tournament was up by nearly 10 per cent from the 2022 World Cup and 17 per cent from Euro 2020. That perhaps has to do with the increased use of the goalkeeper-independent technique. 'In the men's game, the best penalty- takers are now fully flexible and unpredictable,' says Jordet. 'Specialist penalty-takers such as Harry Kane and Robert Lewandowski alternate technique, sometimes goalkeeper-independent – pre-decided corner – and sometimes goalkeeper-dependent – react to goalkeeper. I expect we will see this also in the women's game going forward.'
The Guardian
5 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Rental deposit scheme ‘puts millions in the pockets of landlords'
The official deposit scheme for renters is 'putting millions in unscrupulous landlords' pockets', campaigners have said. Almost half (46%) of renters said they did not know they could challenge deposit deductions they deemed to be unfair. Only 4% have used the formal dispute resolution process to try to reclaim the money. Dan Wilson Craw of Generation Rent, the campaign group which conducted the research, said the system was 'failing renters who are put off from challenging unfair deductions by unclear rules, and threats and delaying tactics from landlords'. He added: 'Ultimately, that puts millions more in unscrupulous landlords' pockets. The uncertain timescales and unclear rules of the deposit system, as well as obstructiveness and threats from some landlords, mean that accepting unfair deductions to get some cash back quickly can feel like the better option.' The research, based on a nationally representative survey of 2,000 private renters, found that a quarter of tenants who did not challenge unfair deductions said their landlord either threatened to make a larger claim if they raised a dispute, refused to take part in the adjudication process or had not protected the deposit in the first place. Data from one deposit protection scheme, TDS, showed that 77% of tenants got some of their disputed deposit back and 32% got all of it back. Generation Rent analysis found tenants who disputed deductions won 79% of the disputed money back on average. 'Because challenging deposit deductions is usually worth it, renters put off from doing so are losing hundreds of pounds of their own money,' said Wilson Craw. 'The government's review of deposit protection is an opportunity to build trust in the system so tenants have the confidence to challenge unfair landlord claims.' Landlords must legally put a tenant's deposit in a government-approved tenancy deposit scheme. There is a free dispute resolution service for tenants who disagree with their landlord on how much deposit should be returned. Ministers have said they were reviewing the system and 'identifying areas for improvement'. Generation Rent said it wanted to see a 14-day deadline for deposits to be returned at the end of a tenancy and landlords to be legally compelled to take part in a dispute resolution if a tenant pursued it, with disputes resolved within 10 days. It also said landlords and agents who broke the rules, or made repeated excessive deductions, should face 'meaningful penalties'. The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has been contacted for comment.
