Summer intern fired from New York City law firm for ‘biting colleagues'
The woman, who interned at Sidley Austin in Manhattan, New York City, allegedly bit five of her colleagues and roared at them before she was given the boot.
The biting, according to Above Law, was 'not in an aggressive, we're beefing way, but more of a faux-quirky manic pixie dream girl crossed with the Donner party vibe'.
One social media account claimed other employees started wearing long sleeve shirts in order to protect themselves, New York Post reported.
Social media users have collectively lost their minds after news of the alleged sacking hit the internet.
'Brings a whole new meaning to 'She ate during her internship',' one social media user said.
Another added: 'They let anyone in as an intern? Might do some bite screening for next summer.'
'Dam [sic] going to have to make a new policy now,' one said.
Another added: 'Once bitten, twice shy.'
'I have been bitten by a colleague at a work event, my arm was bruised as hell. He begged me not to mention anything as it wasn't his first time,' another said.
But, one Reddit user defended the young woman and said people were 'outright making things up'.
'I just want to ask people to please remember that there's a human being on the other end of this story — someone whose mental health is a genuine concern, and who is probably feeling like her life is ruined right now,' the social media user said.
'She made a really stupid mistake and has paid the price for it.'
But, are instances like this something we are set to see more of?
HR expert Karen Gately, from Corporate Dojo, told news.com.au, 'I have to say it's up there on the extreme end of behaviour like that.'
She said she had seen 'plenty of' instances of people having poor judgement, such as excessive alcohol consumption at Christmas parties.
'Regardless of your beliefs or what your identity is, choosing to bite colleagues is really taking it to a new level.'
Ms Gately said more is needed to know about the individual and the reasoning behind it to determine what the best course of action in this instance would be.
'Based on the article, they're saying there wasn't any malice — that the person wasn't trying to hurt people they were just trying to be 'cute',' Ms Gately said.
'I'd be inclined, depending on how hard people have been bitten, there would be a conversation of 'this is not on at all'.'
Then, if it happened again, there would be a turning point where it would be deemed as misconduct. She said it was certainly an invasion and crossed the line, and could see why the law firm decided on the ultimate disciplinary action — letting the intern go.
Ms Gately said, although not as extreme, there was a possibility of similar situations here in Australia, as a generation who spent much of their high school and university years in isolation finally enters the workforce.
'It makes sense, in terms of there is room to argue interpersonal engagement skills and how to be part of a team are less well developed because of how hard it is to do remotely,' she explained.
For those who are concerned, Ms Gately said valuing relationships and spending enough time connecting with people goes a long way to increase interpersonal skills with colleagues.
She said there is also training to help tackle difficult conversations in the workplace, which includes social scenarios, and tapping into mentors.
'Self reflection is a good starting point,' she said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
US House panel subpoenas Clintons in Epstein probe
The US House Oversight Committee on Tuesday subpoenaed former president Bill Clinton and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton for testimony on sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, according to letters posted on its website. The Clintons were among multiple former Democratic and Republican government officials -- as well as the Justice Department -- targeted by investigators in a major escalation of the controversy surrounding the investigation into the disgraced financier, who died in 2019 awaiting trial for sex trafficking. The White House has been facing increasingly intense demands to be more transparent after the Justice Department angered Trump supporters -- many of whom believe Epstein was murdered in a cover-up -- when it confirmed last month that he had died by suicide and that his case was effectively closed. The department also said Epstein had no secret "client list" -- rebuffing conspiracy theories held by Trump's far-right supporters about supposedly high-level Democratic complicity. Trump has urged his supporters to drop demands for the Epstein files, but Democrats in the Republican-led Congress -- with some support from majority lawmakers -- have also been seeking a floor vote to force their release. "By your own admission, you flew on Jeffrey Epstein's private plane four separate times in 2002 and 2003," Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer wrote to former president Clinton. "During one of these trips, you were even pictured receiving a 'massage' from one of Mr. Epstein's victims. The White House has been seeking to redirect public attention from uproar over its handling of the affair with a series of headline-grabbing announcements including baselsss claims that former president Barack Obama headed a "treasonous conspiracy" against Trump. Epstein was a financier and friend to numerous high-profile people -- for years, including Trump -- who was convicted of sex crimes and then imprisoned pending trial for allegedly trafficking underage girls. His 2019 prison cell death supercharged a conspiracy theory long promoted by many Trump supporters that Epstein had run an international pedophile ring and that elites wanted to make sure he never revealed their secrets. After Trump returned to power in January, his administration promised to release Epstein case files. - Past relationship - Several of Trump's most effective promoters over the years -- including new FBI Director Kash Patel and his deputy Dan Bongino -- made careers of fanning the rumors about Epstein. But when Attorney General Pam Bondi announced on July 7 that she had nothing to release, Republicans were furious -- and Trump has attempted to control the scandal ever since. Yet it has dominated headlines through the summer, showing just how hard it is for 79-year-old Trump to maintain his usual mastery of driving news agendas -- even within his fervently loyal "MAGA" base. Things got even more complicated for him after a Wall Street Journal report that Trump had written a lewd birthday letter to Epstein in 2003. Trump denies this and has sued the Journal. The Journal then dropped a separate story, saying Bondi had informed Trump in May that his name appeared several times in the Epstein files, even if there was no indication of wrongdoing. The president recently raised further questions about his past relationship with Epstein when he told reporters he fell out with his former friend after Epstein "stole" female employees from the spa at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. Other officials targeted by the panel include former FBI director James Comey, former special counsel Robert Mueller and ex-attorney generals Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Merrick Garland, Bill Barr, Jeff Sessions, and Alberto Gonzales. Their depositions will take place between mid-August and mid-October. Comer also issued a subpoena to the Justice Department for records related to Epstein -- including its communications with Trump's predecessor Joe Biden and his officials. Lawmakers have also been seeking testimony from Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving 20 years in prison for her role in his alleged crimes -- although her cooperation is considered unlikely. ft/mlm

ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
US DOJ to open grand jury investigation into political opponents over Trump-Russia probe
US Attorney General Pam Bondi has ordered prosecutors to launch a grand jury investigation into whether former President Barack Obama's administration manufactured intelligence on Russia's interference in the 2016 elections. The Justice Department said late last month it was forming a strike force to assess claims made by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard about "alleged weaponisation of the US intelligence community". US President Donald Trump has leapt on comments from Ms Gabbard in which she threatened to refer Obama administration officials to the Justice Department for prosecution over an intelligence assessment of Russian interference. Fox News first reported that the attorney general ordered an unnamed federal prosecutor to initiate legal proceedings. The prosecutor is expected to present department evidence to a grand jury, which could consider an indictment if the Justice Department pursued a criminal case. The report cited a letter from Ms Bondi and a source. A DOJ spokesperson declined to comment. Referring to the probe in a post on Truth Social, Mr Trump said: "The TRUTH always wins out. This is great news." Last month, Mr Trump accused Mr Obama of treason, alleging, without providing evidence, that the Democrat led an effort to falsely tie him to Russia and undermine his 2016 presidential campaign. Mr Trump won the 2016 election against Democrat Hillary Clinton. A spokesperson for Obama had denounced Mr Trump's claims, saying "these bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction." Ms Gabbard had declassified documents and said the information she released showed a "treasonous conspiracy" in 2016 by top Obama officials to undermine Mr Trump, claims that Democrats called false and politically motivated. An assessment by the US intelligence community published in January 2017 concluded that Russia, using social media disinformation, hacking, and Russian bot farms, sought to damage Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign and bolster Mr Trump, who won that election. The assessment determined the actual impact was likely limited and showed no evidence that Moscow's efforts actually changed voting outcomes. Russia has denied it attempted to interfere in US elections. Reuters

News.com.au
9 hours ago
- News.com.au
Cops called after Denise Richards shows up at ex Aaron Phypers' home despite restraining order
Denise Richards was photographed talking to police officers after she unexpectedly showed up at her estranged husband Aaron Phypers' house, despite having a restraining order against him. The former Real Housewives of Beverly Hills star arrived at the Calabasas, California, home, where Phypers is living with his parents and brother, on Sunday afternoon to pick up her dog, TMZ reported on Tuesday. An insider claimed to the outlet that Richards was banging on the back door before Phypers' parents let her inside. She then allegedly started screaming at them to leave the house. The source claimed Richards, 54, put her finger in the faces of Phypers' parents and attempted to hit Phypers' brother. The reality star also allegedly threw mail at her brother-in-law. Phypers, 52, reportedly left the property once she arrived out of fear of violating the restraining order. Phypers' elderly mother appeared shaken up, as she was seen hugging her son in the driveway in photos obtained by TMZ. According to the outlet, no arrests were made as authorities concluded no crime had been committed. Richards' lawyer, Brett Berman, denied any wrongdoing on the reality star's part, claiming to People that Richards did not violate the restraining order because she confirmed beforehand that Phypers 'was not present in her home.' 'Ms. Richards entered the home to retrieve her dogs after learning that Mr. Phypers had put down one of her other dogs without her knowledge or permission,' Berman claimed. A source close to Phypers, meanwhile, called the allegation '100 per cent, absolutely false.' Reps for Richards weren't immediately available to Page Six for comment. The Denise Richards & Her Wild Things star was granted a temporary restraining order last month against Phypers shortly after he filed to end their six-year marriage. In her restraining order filing, Richards accused Phypers of abuse, claiming he slapped, choked and threatened to kill her throughout their relationship. Phypers denied the allegations, telling People that he 'never physically or emotionally abused Denise.'