Qatar prime minister says $400m gifts are ‘normal' between friends, following Trump jet criticism
The prime minister of Qatar has again defended the decision to gift President Donald Trump a $400 million luxury aircraft, saying that such exchanges between friendly nations wereare 'normal.'
Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani dismissed accusations that the move was being used by Qatar to curry favor with the president and his administration for some kind of payoff in the future.
It comes after the White House announced that Trump would be accepting the aircraft, described as a 'flying palace' due to its luxurious interior, from the Qatari royal family as a replacement for Air Force One.
The announcement has ignited controversy and triggered ethics complaints at home that cast a long shadow over the president's visit to the Middle East last week.
Speaking at the Qatar Economic Forum on Tuesday, Al-Thani said a 'lot of controversy has been created' out of what he called 'an exchange between two countries,' adding that no business was being done 'under the table.'
'Our intention is to have a very clear exchange that the U.S. is in need for…To accelerate a temporary Air Force One,' he said. 'Qatar has the ability to provide this, we stepped up.'
He added: 'A lot of nations have gifted the U.S. many things,' before appearing to make a joking reference to the Statue of Liberty – which was given to America by the French in 1884.
Trump previously insisted throughout his trip to the Gulf that the plane was a present from one of America's key regional allies, describing it as 'A GIFT, FREE OF CHARGE' on Truth Social, and saying that only a 'stupid person' would have refused it.
His position was reiterated by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Monday. She described the jet as a 'donation to our country,' saying that Qatar's royal family 'has offered to donate this plane to the United States Air Force, where that donation will be accepted according to all legal and ethical obligations.'
At his forum remarks on Tuesday Al-Thani echoed the White House's sentiment, saying the transaction is being done with 'full transparency and very legally,' and was simply part of the long-standing cooperative relationship cooperation between Qatar and the U.S.
He said that allegations of bribery were unfair efforts to sully his country's image.
The U.S. Constitution's emoluments clause prohibits any government official from accepting gifts from 'any King, Prince or foreign State.' It's unclear if the aircraft would be a gift to the U.S. or to Trump since it was initially reported it would go to Trump's own presidential library at the end of his term.
Beyond the constitutional ban, gifts are 'designed to create good feelings for the recipient and to get some kind of reciprocity," Richard Briffault, a Columbia Law School professor who specializes in government ethics, told NPR. 'The thing that [Trump] can give, of course, is public policy — weapons deals or whatever."
Trump also has personal business dealings in Qatar. The Trump Organization last month announced a deal to build a luxury golf resort in Qatar.
"Clearly he [Trump] is trying to make money there, and that puts us in an uncomfortable situation," said Jordan Libowitz, spokesperson for the nonprofit watchdog Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. "Is America's best interest being served, or is it the best interests of the Trump Organization?"
CNN reported Tuesday that it was the Trump administration that had originally approached Qatar about the possibility of acquiring one of its Boeing 747 jumbo jets. The outlet cited several unnamed sources.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
HAMISH MCRAE: Get ready for a weaker dollar
The dollar is getting weaker – and it's going to get weaker still. By Friday, the pound was up around $1.37, close to its highest for four years, and I expect it will climb above $1.50. That's still a long way from the heady days before the banking crash in 2007 when it was last above $2, but a lot more respectable than the sub-$1.20 level during the awful autumn of 2022. But before you think this is some sort of endorsement of the policies of our present Government, this isn't much to do with the pound. It's a story about America, not about the UK. Talk to people here in the US and, depending on their politics, you hear a mixture of triumphalism and grudging respect for what has happened in the past few days. No surprises there. Share prices are back to their all-time highs. But, for anyone following economic policy, there was a disturbing development: Donald Trump has stepped up his drive to undermine Jerome Powell, chair of the Federal Reserve. The President has been characteristically offensive about the head of the US central banking system for some time, calling him 'a very stupid person', 'terrible', 'numbskull', 'having a low IQ for what he does' and so on. But the markets are so accustomed to these insults they brush them off. Powell is in post until spring next year and they will decide then whether the change of the Fed chair will shift policy. They know Trump wants cheaper money – he's a property developer after all – but the Fed is independent, and they will wait until they know who the new chair will be before making any projections about interest rates. But now Trump has ramped up the volume. Instead of waiting until next year, he mooted the idea of announcing Powell's successor this autumn, thereby creating a shadow chair whose presence would undermine his authority in his final months. Names in the frame include Scott Bessent, the Treasury Secretary. Inevitably a shadow chair would increase the pressure on Powell and the rest of the board through the autumn as market expectations of looser policy to come would be hard to resist. So the US seems likely to get lower interest rates sooner than was expected. And lower interest rates mean a weaker dollar. There are other forces at work. International investors are wondering whether it's such a great idea to hold so much of their wealth in America. Aside from the Powell spat, the administration does not want a strong dollar, because a cheaper currency helps boost exports and trim imports. And if you take a longer-term view, the dollar still looks high. Put all this together and you could conclude that the dollar is set to fall further, maybe a lot further. What does this mean for us in the UK? There are obvious benefits, including cutting the cost of importing dollar-denominated commodities, notably oil. That should come through fairly swiftly to the pumps, though it won't help much to cut electricity prices, as we closed our last oil-fired power station ten years ago. But quite a lot of other goods, including some foods, are priced in dollars, so a cheaper dollar could indeed help with inflation, so thanks for that. But it won't help UK exporters to the US, and remember that America is our biggest single overseas market. Nor will it help most of the big British companies that dominate the FTSE 100 index, as much of their global revenues are in dollars. It will also push down the sterling value of the portfolios of UK investors who have done well out of the US share price boom. Looking further ahead, the great question is whether this is simply a sensible course correction, or something bigger and potentially more disruptive. Further devaluation of the dollar is no bad thing. In sterling terms, $1.50 feels fine and there could be an overshoot to $1.60. But no one should wish for a dollar collapse. That would hugely disrupt global trade, investment, everything. You could say the world needs a solid dollar, but not an almighty one. The world needs a solid greenback, not an almighty one.
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Hamas chief 'who masterminded October 7 attack' is killed by Israeli airstrike, IDF say
The Hamas chief allegedly behind the attacks on October 7 has been killed by an Israeli airstrike, according to the Israel Defence Forces (IDF). In a post on X, the IDF reported that it 'eliminated' Hakham Muhammad Issa Al-Issa - 'one of the founders of Hamas' military wing' in a targeted airstrike on the Sabra neighbourhood of Gaza. 'Issa led Hamas' force build-up, training, and planned the October 7 massacre,' the post said. 'As Head of Combat Support, he advanced aerial & naval attacks against Israelis. 'The IDF & ISA will continue to locate and eliminate all terrorists involved in the October 7 massacre,' they added. The post on X is accompanied by a picture of Al-Issa and claims he is 'one of the last remaining senior Hamas terrorists in the Gaza Strip.
Daily Mail
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
What's in the latest version of Trump's big bill now before the Senate?
At some 940-pages, the legislation is a sprawling collection of tax breaks, spending cuts and other Republican priorities, including new money for national defense and deportations. Now it's up to Congress to decide whether President Donald Trump 's signature's domestic policy package will become law. Trump told Republicans, who hold majority power in the House and Senate, to skip their holiday vacations and deliver the bill by the Fourth of July. Senators were working through the weekend to pass the bill and send it back to the House for a final vote. Democrats are united against it. Here's the latest on what's in the bill. There could be changes as lawmakers negotiate. Republicans say the bill is crucial because there would be a massive tax increase after December when tax breaks from Trump's first term expire. The legislation contains roughly $3.8 trillion in tax cuts. The existing tax rates and brackets would become permanent under the bill. It temporarily would add new tax breaks that Trump campaigned on: no taxes on tips, overtime pay or some automotive loans, along with a bigger $6,000 deduction in the Senate draft for older adults who earn no more than $75,000 a year. It would boost the $2,000 child tax credit to $2,200 under the Senate proposal. Families at lower income levels would not see the full amount. A cap on state and local deductions, called SALT, would quadruple to $40,000 for five years. It's a provision important to New York and other high tax states, though the House wanted it to last for 10 years. There are scores of business-related tax cuts. The wealthiest households would see a $12,000 increase from the legislation, which would cost the poorest people $1,600 a year, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office analysis of the House's version. Middle-income taxpayers would see a tax break of $500 to $1,500, the CBO said. The bill would provide some $350 billion for Trump's border and national security agenda, including $46 billion for the U.S.-Mexico border wall and $45 billion for 100,000 migrant detention facility beds, as he aims to fulfill his promise of the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history. Money would go for hiring 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, with $10,000 signing bonuses and a surge of Border Patrol officers, as well. The goal is to deport some 1 million people per year. The homeland security secretary would have a new $10 billion fund for grants for states that help with federal immigration enforcement and deportation actions. The attorney general would have $3.5 billion for a similar fund, known as Bridging Immigration-related Deficits Experienced Nationwide, or BIDEN, referring to former Democratic President Joe Biden. To help pay for it all, immigrants would face various new fees, including when seeking asylum protections. For the Pentagon, the bill would provide billions for ship building, munitions systems, and quality of life measures for servicemen and women, as well as $25 billion for the development of the Golden Dome missile defense system. The Defense Department would have $1 billion for border security. To help partly offset the lost tax revenue and new spending, Republicans aim to cut back some long-running government programs: Medicaid, food stamps, green energy incentives and others. It's essentially unraveling the accomplishments of the past two Democratic presidents, Biden and Barack Obama. Republicans argue they are trying to rightsize the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. The package includes new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for many adults receiving Medicaid and food stamps, including older people up to age 65. Parents of children 14 and older would have to meet the program´s work requirements. There's also a proposed new $35 co-payment that can be charged to patients using Medicaid services. Some 80 million people rely on Medicaid, which expanded under Obama's Affordable Care Act, and 40 million use the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program. Most already work, according to analysts. All told, the CBO estimates that under the House-passed bill, at least 10.9 million more people would go without health coverage and 3 million more would not qualify for food stamps. The Senate proposes a $25 billion Rural Hospital Transformation Fund to help offset reduced Medicaid dollars. It's a new addition, intended to win over holdout GOP senators and a coalition of House Republicans warning that the proposed Medicaid provider tax cuts would hurt rural hospitals. Both the House and Senate bills propose a dramatic rollback of the Biden-era green energy tax breaks for electric vehicles. They also would phase out or terminate the various production and investment tax credits companies use to stand up wind, solar and other renewable energy projects. In total, cuts to Medicaid, food stamps and green energy programs would be expected to produce at least $1.5 trillion in savings. A number of extra provisions reflect other GOP priorities. The House and Senate both have a new children's savings program, called Trump Accounts, with a potential $1,000 deposit from the Treasury. The Senate provided $40 million to establish Trump´s long-sought 'National Garden of American Heroes.' There's a new excise tax on university endowments, restrictions on the development of artificial intelligence and blocks on transgender surgeries. A $200 tax on gun silencers and short-barreled rifles and shotguns was eliminated. One provision bars money to family planning providers, namely Planned Parenthood, while $88 million is earmarked for a pandemic response accountability committee. Billions would go for the Artemis moon mission and for exploration to Mars. The bill would deter states from regulating artificial intelligence by linking certain federal AI infrastructure money to maintaining a freeze. Seventeen Republican governors asked GOP leaders to drop the provision. Also, the interior secretary would be directed to sell certain Bureau of Land Management acreage to provide for housing. The sale of public lands would cover at least 600,000 acres and up to 1.2 million acres, according to a projection from the Center for Western Priorities, a conservation group. Altogether, keeping the existing tax breaks and adding the new ones is expected to cost $3.8 trillion over the decade, the CBO says in its analysis of the House bill. An analysis of the Senate draft is pending. The CBO estimates the House-passed package would add $2.4 trillion to the nation's deficits over the decade. Or not, depending on how one does the math. Senate Republicans are proposing a unique strategy of not counting the existing tax breaks as a new cost because those breaks are already 'current policy.' Senators say the Senate Budget Committee chairman has the authority to set the baseline for the preferred approach. Under the Senate GOP view, the tax provisions cost $441 billion, according to the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation. Democrats and others say this is 'magic math' that obscures the true costs of the GOP tax breaks. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget puts the Senate tally at $4.2 trillion over the decade.
