
US President Trump threatens BRICS with 10% tariffs again, says ‘dollar is king'
'And that's OK if they want to play that game, but I can play that game too. So, anybody that's in BRICS is getting a 10 per cent charge… If they are a member of BRICS, they are going to have to pay 10 per cent tariff, just for that one thing. And they won't be a member (for) long,' Trump said, adding that the collective had 'largely' broken up after his warning last year and was not a 'serious threat'.
'…if we lost the world standard dollar, that would be like losing a war, a major world war. We would not be the same country any longer. We are not going to let that happen… The dollar is king. We are going to keep it that way. If people want to challenge it, they can. But they are going to have to pay a big price. And I don't think any of them are willing to pay that price,' he added on Tuesday.
The American President's latest threat comes as the BRICS – which started with Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa but has grown to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, and Indonesia – concluded its 17th summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. BRICS now accounts for 45 per cent of the global population and contributes over 35 per cent to the world's GDP.
In June 2022, Russia proposed the creation of a new international reserve currency based on a basket of currencies from BRICS countries. However, according to a BRICS report, member nations said they 'do not seek to replace the US dollar as a medium of exchange'. Instead, BRICS aims to 'offer a viable alternative that will aid the market in its perpetual mission for efficiency' and foster greater prosperity, promoting universally beneficial and inclusive economic globalisation.
BRICS point-of-view
Trump's threats coincide with the US dollar hitting a three-year low this year, after declining by over 10 per cent against a basket of currencies such as the euro and yen, due to expected disruptions in the US economy stemming from proposed tariffs.
In October 2024, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar clarified that while US policies often complicate trade with certain countries, and India sought 'workarounds' in pursuit of its trade interests, it did not 'target' the dollar or seek to move away from it. Later, in December 2024, then Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Shaktikanta Das had said India was not pursuing 'de-dollarisation' and that steps such as entering into local currency trade agreements were intended to only 'de-risk' Indian trade.
A key reason why India is not backing de-dollarisation is the rise of the Chinese yuan as a challenger to the US dollar. India has resisted using the yuan for Russian oil imports, even as the currency's acceptance grows in Russia. Following Western sanctions on Russia, including the freezing of $300 billion in Russian foreign holdings, the yuan has become Russia's most traded currency. According to the Russian government, more than 90 per cent of trade settlement between the two countries is now conducted in roubles.
Ajay Sahai, Director General & CEO of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO), the country's top trade promotion body, told The Indian Express earlier that while supporting local currency initiatives, India should ensure the framework does not disproportionately favour China, given the asymmetry in economic power among BRICS nations.
August 1 tariff deadline
Separately in a post on Truth Social, Trump said on Tuesday that the August 1 tariff deadline decided in the letters sent by the US to its trade partners was final.
'As per letters sent to various countries yesterday, in addition to letters that will be sent today, tomorrow, and for the next short period of time, TARIFFS WILL START BEING PAID ON AUGUST 1, 2025. There has been no change to this date, and there will be no change. In other words, all money will be due and payable starting AUGUST 1, 2025 – No extensions will be granted. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Trump posted.
Earlier, on Monday, when asked if the deadline was absolute, the US President had told reporters that it was 'firm but not 100 per cent firm' and was dependent on the offers made by various countries.
On Monday, Trump said the US would impose 25 per cent tariffs on imports from Japan and South Korea starting August 1, followed by a sweeping round of tariffs on 12 other countries on Tuesday.
Siddharth Upasani is a Deputy Associate Editor with The Indian Express. He reports primarily on data and the economy, looking for trends and changes in the former which paint a picture of the latter. Before The Indian Express, he worked at Moneycontrol and financial newswire Informist (previously called Cogencis). Outside of work, sports, fantasy football, and graphic novels keep him busy.
... Read More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
30 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
What is blood money and can it save Nimisha Priya from execution in Yemen?
The clock is ticking for Indian-origin nurse Nimishi Priya, who has been sentenced to death in Yemen for allegedly killing a Yemeni national. Nimisha Priya has been lodged in a jail in Yemen's capital city of Sana'a since 2017, when she was convicted of the Yemeni national's murder. (File Photo) Priya was sentenced to death in 2018 for the alleged murder of her business partner, Talal Abdo Mahdi. Yemen's President Rashad al-Alimi had given the nod for her execution in January this year. As Priya's family and the Indian government looked for options to save the Kerala native, the Islamic Sharia law presents one option that could get her death sentence cancelled - 'blood money' also known as 'diya'. What is blood money? Can it save Nimisha Priya? Under the Islamic Sharia law, blood money or 'diya' means that the accused provides financial compensation to the family of the victim in serious crimes such as murder. The law notes that murder is of two types: by intent, and the other is by mistake. The Sharia law states that the punishment for murder by intent is death or any other punishment proportionate to the nature of the crime. "But if it is not a willful murder but a murder by mistake, the punishment according to verse (4:92) is ransom money (blood money). But if a remission is made by the heirs of the slain out of their own goodwill, they are allowed to do so. In such a case, it is incumbent on the murderer to abide by what has been settled and pay it in a commendable manner," it reads. The option of blood money in this case gains significance as Yemen is a country that follows the Islamic Sharia law. The system of blood money leaves the fate of the offender in the hands of the victim's family. The Sharia law does not state a fixed amount for 'diya'. However, it can be negotiated by the victim's family. In the Quran, Islam's central religious text, Surah Al-Baqarah (2:178) says on 'diya': "O believers! The law of retaliation is set for you in cases of murder—a free man for a free man, a slave for a slave, and a female for a female. But if the offender is pardoned by the victim's guardian, then blood-money should be decided fairly and payment should be made courteously. This is a concession and a mercy from your Lord. But whoever transgresses after that will suffer a painful punishment." The payment of the blood money or 'diya' might prevent the execution of Nimisha Priya. Nimisha Priya's family The family of the nurse from Kerala's Palakkad have been struggling to save her, and had earlier also agreed to pay the blood money. They have been trying to negotiate with the victim, Talal Abdo Mahdi's family, to save Nimisha Priya from the death sentence. Her husband, Tomy Thomas, a daily wage labourer and driver, has reportedly been forced to send their daughter, a Class 7 student, to a hostel due to financial limitations. The family is carrying the weight of a ₹60 lakh debt, which it took in 2015 to help Priya set up a clinic in Yemen, which was shut down in 2017. Priya's mother, Premakumari, had also travelled to Yemen last year as part of the efforts to secure her release from the Yemeni prison. The 38-year-old nurse is currently lodged in a jail in Yemen's capital city of Sana'a, a region controlled by the Iran-backed Houthis. ALSO READ | Indian nurse Nimisha Priya faces execution on July 16: How Yemen civil war impacts her chances Earlier this week, news agency PTI reported, citing people familiar with the matter, that India is engaged in efforts to halt the execution of Nimish Priya. A government source reportedly told PTI, "We have been closely following the matter since then. We have been in regular touch with local authorities and her family members and rendered all possible assistance. We continue to closely follow the matter." New Delhi is reportedly undertaking efforts to prevent Priya's execution. However, it is encountering certain complications as the Indian side does not have any formal contacts with the Houthi rebels. SC to hear plea to save Nimisha Priya The Supreme Court on Thursday will hear a plea seeking a direction to the central government to engage diplomatic channels to save Nimisha Priya, who is set to be executed in Yemen on July 16. ALSO READ | Hectic efforts on to prevent execution of Indian nurse Nimisha Priya in Yemen on July 16 A top court bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Joymalya Bagchi listed the matter for hearing on July 10 after advocate Subhash Chandran KR said diplomatic channels needed to be explored as soon as possible. He also submitted before the SC that payment of blood money to Mahdi's family, according to the Sharia law, can also be explored. "Save Nimisha Priya - International Action Council", an organisation which extends legal support to assist the Indian-origin nurse, has filed the plea in the apex court.


Hindustan Times
30 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Jeffrey Epstein is still causing trouble for Donald Trump
ONE OF DONALD TRUMP'S superpowers is saying something one moment, contradicting it the next and convincing most of the MAGA faithful that he has never changed his position. Other members of his administration do not possess this power, which is why they are struggling to deal with a right-wing furore surrounding the late Jeffrey Epstein . Before joining the government, a number of high-ranking officials claimed that the deep state was withholding explosive information about Epstein, a convicted paedophile, and his links to important people. Now that they are the state, they have had to admit it is all nonsense. On July 7th the Department of Justice (DoJ) said there was no secret information to release. But nothing convinces a conspiracy theorist of a cover-up like saying 'nothing to see here'. The Epstein affair had the hallmarks of a conspiracy theory. He was a rich financier with a Jewish surname and powerful acquaintances, including Bill Clinton, a former president, and Prince Andrew, a British royal. He was also a paedophile whom the state treated leniently. In 2008 he pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution and soliciting a minor for prostitution. He was sentenced to 18 months in prison but served less than 13, during which he was outside the prison walls six days a week to work. Allegations that he brought children to his private island using a jet known to the press as the 'Lolita Express' kept the grim gossip mill turning. The chatter among conspiracy theorists reached a new level when, in 2019, Epstein hanged himself in prison. He had been awaiting a new trial on federal sex-trafficking charges. The conspiracies mainly focused on two things: whether Epstein had actually been murdered and whether he had a 'client list'—a 'Who's Who' of paedophiles at the top of society. Information about both, claimed conspiracists, was being suppressed by the state. Future members of the Trump administration encouraged and even engaged in these speculations. In 2021 J.D. Vance, now the vice-president, implied that the government was protecting Epstein's 'clients'. Kash Patel, now head of the FBI, told Congress in 2023 to 'put on your big-boy pants' and release the list. Mr Trump himself implied that Mr Clinton was tangled up in the Epstein affair. Some of this talk continued even after Mr Trump was elected for the second time. In February Pam Bondi, the attorney-general, claimed to have Epstein's client list 'sitting on my desk right now'. She made a big show of inviting MAGA social-media influencers to the White House to receive 'The Epstein Files: Phase 1'. Little in the documents was new. The administration and the influencers were roundly mocked by other conspiracy theorists. Ms Bondi blamed the FBI for withholding documents. She continued to advertise grand revelations. In May she spoke of a previously unheard of stash of 'tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn'. As a result, when the DoJ announced that, actually, there was no 'client list' and that Mr Epstein killed himself, much of the internet's ire was directed at Ms Bondi. A number of faithful Trump supporters have called for her to be fired, including Laura Loomer, a far-right media personality with the president's ear. And the government's denials have only fuelled more Epstein conspiracy theories. A few people—including Elon Musk, the president's former adviser and 'first buddy'—have claimed that the government is not releasing more documents on Epstein because Mr Trump's name is in them. Mr Trump's ties to Epstein are well known: they first met in the 1980s and have been neighbours, friends and rivals. The president's superpower has come in handy amid the saga. In 2002 Mr Trump thought Epstein was a 'terrific guy'; in 2019, after Epstein was arrested, the president said he 'was not a fan'. Mr Trump might still worry that, if attention is drawn to his relationship with Epstein, it will damage his reputation with his base. The president seems eager to put it all in the past. 'Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?' he asked on July 8th, in response to a reporter's question directed at Ms Bondi. 'Are people still talking about this guy, this creep? That is unbelievable.' Perhaps if members of his own administration had not already spread so much nonsense about Epstein, the din wouldn't be so loud.


NDTV
30 minutes ago
- NDTV
US Woman Gets Hundreds Of Amazon Parcels From China. She Never Ordered Them
A California woman's home turned into a dumping ground for Amazon packages after a Chinese seller listed her home as a return address. Despite never ordering any packages, she received hundreds of return parcels. The woman, Kay (name changed), was receiving massive cardboard boxes, most of them unopened, in such high volume that she had no choice but to stack them in her driveway, leaving no room to park her car, The New York Post reported. She said the situation created a nuisance, making it hard for her to help her 88-year-old mother enter the house. According to Amazon's policy, international vendors are required to either give a US address for the return, offer a "returnless refund" in which the buyer does not need to ship the item back, or provide a prepaid international shipping label within two days of the consumer requesting a return. Kay told ABC7 that the packages she received had a set of faux-leather seat covers sold by Liusandedian and listed on Amazon under the brand name Etkin. They claim their seat covers fit almost all types of cars, including SUVs and Sedans, but the majority of buyers say they didn't fit their vehicles. California woman has been receiving hundreds of Amazon packages that she never ordered for over a year now, says she is living through hell. The Bay Area woman says an Amazon Chinese seat cover seller listed her home as their return address. To make matters worse, the seat… — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) July 9, 2025 When they tried to return, they had to pay for shipping themselves, which was too expensive, sometimes more than half the product's price. Some even complained that they never received the refund, according to the same report. Kay contacted Amazon several times over the past year to fix the issue. She filed six complaints, but Amazon always procrastinated, saying the issue would be fixed soon. "Amazon promised that she won't get more packages and would hear back from them in 24 to 48 hours, but nothing changed," she said. Amazon gave her a $100 gift card, but the packages kept coming, Kay said. She claimed that Amazon asked her to return those packages via USPS or FedEx, but the e-commerce giant denied the claim, reported ABC7. The company said, "We'd like to thank [ABC 7] for bringing this to our attention. We've apologised to the customer and are working directly with her to pick up any packages while taking steps to permanently resolve this issue." The company has now removed all the packages from Kay's house, ABC7 reported.