Bilawal terms July 5 'darkest day'
In a message on July 5 - the day when the government of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto was toppled by military dictator — the ppp chairman said it was the day when the democratic journey was derailed through tyranny. He said Quaid-e-Awam Zulfikar Ali Bhutto became the voice of voiceless people and gave the poor dignity.
The purpose of July 5 tragedy was to stifle the voice of the people and usurped the powers. Despite the tragedy and persecution, the dream of the Quaid-e-Awan remained alive. The dictatorship, which was imposed after July 5, started a series of terrorism and destruction of democratic institutions, highlighted Bilawal.
The PPP chairman reiterated to continue the struggle for realization of Benazir Bhutto and Zulfikar Ali Bhutto's dream.
The vision envisages the people of Pakistan powerful and the Constitution supreme.
He said the PPP never compromised on principles despite its leaders and workers languished in jails.
He expressed his resolve to continue the struggle until Pakistan becomes democratic, peaceful and prosperous country.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
US professors take Trump's immigration policies to court over pro-Palestinian activities
Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil speaks at a rally to welcome him home after being released from immigration custody, outside the Cathedral of St. John the Divine in New York City, US , June 22, REUTERS Listen to article Groups representing US university professors seeking to protect international students and faculty who engage in pro-Palestinian advocacy from being deported are set to do what no other litigants challenging the Trump administration's hardline immigration agenda have done so far: Take it to trial. A two-week non-jury trial in the professors' case scheduled to kick off on Monday in Boston marks a rarity in the hundreds of lawsuits that have been filed nationally challenging Republican President Donald Trump's efforts to carry out mass deportations, slash spending and reshape the federal government. In many of those cases, judges have issued quick rulings early on in the proceedings without any witnesses being called to testify. But US District Judge William Young in keeping with his long-standing practice instead ordered a trial in the professors' case, saying it was the "best way to get at truth." The lawsuit was filed in March after immigration authorities arrested recent Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil, the first target of Trump's effort to deport non-citizen students with pro-Palestinian or anti-Israel views. Read More: Pro-Palestine group loses bid to pause ban Since then, the administration has canceled the visas of hundreds of other students and scholars and ordered the arrest of some, including Rumeysa Ozturk, a Tufts University student who was taken into custody by masked and plainclothes agents after co-writing an opinion piece criticizing her school's response to Israel's war in Gaza. In their cases and others, judges have ordered the release of students detained by immigration authorities after they argued the administration retaliated against them for their pro-Palestinian advocacy in violation of the free speech guarantees of the US Constitution's First Amendment. Their arrests form the basis of the case before Young, which was filed by the American Association of University Professors and its chapters at Harvard, Rutgers and New York University, and the Middle East Studies Association. They allege the State Department and Department of Homeland Security adopted a policy of revoking visas for non-citizen students and faculty who engaged in pro-Palestinian advocacy and arresting, detaining and deporting them as well. That policy, they say, was adopted after Trump signed executive orders in January directing the agencies to protect Americans from non-citizens who 'espouse hateful ideology' and to "vigorously" combat anti-Semitism. Secretary of State Marco Rubio in late March said he had revoked more than 300 visas and warned that the Trump administration was looking every day for "these lunatics." The goal, the plaintiffs say, has been to suppress the types of protests that have roiled college campuses after Israel launched its war in Gaza following the Hamas-led attack of October 7, 2023. Trump administration officials have frequently spoken about the efforts to target student protesters for visa revocations. Yet in court, the administration has defended itself by arguing the plaintiffs are challenging a deportation policy that does not exist and cannot point to any statute, rule, regulation or directive codifying it. Also Read: At least 24 Palestinians killed in Israeli attacks across Gaza "We don't deport people based on ideology," Homeland Security Department spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem "has made it clear that anyone who thinks they can come to America and hide behind the First Amendment to advocate for anti-American and anti-Semitic violence and terrorism - think again. You are not welcome here," McLaughlin said. The trial will determine whether the administration has violated the plaintiffs' First Amendment free speech rights. If Young concludes it has, he will determine a remedy in a second phase of the case. Young has described the lawsuit as "an important free speech case" and said that as alleged in the plaintiffs' complaint, "it is hard to imagine a policy more focused on intimidating its targets from practicing protected political speech." The case is the second Trump-era legal challenge so far that has gone to trial before Young, an 84-year-old appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan. While other Trump-era cases have been resolved through motions and arguments in court, the veteran jurist has long espoused the value of trials and in a recent order lamented the "virtual abandonment by the federal judiciary of any sense that its fact-finding processes are exceptional. Young last month after another non-jury trial delivered civil rights advocates and Democratic-led states a win by ordering the reinstatement of hundreds of National Institutes of Health research grants that were unlawfully terminated because of their perceived promotion of diversity, equity and inclusion.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Punjab speaker emphasises Parliament's role for legislation, not protest
Punjab Assembly Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan emphasised on Monday that the parliament's primary function is to legislate, not protest, defending his move to file disqualification references against 26 opposition lawmakers. Addressing a press conference on Monday, he referred to recent disruptions in Assembly, stating that the opposition had turned the house into a platform for protests rather than constructive debate. He said that while he is not in favour of expelling any member, it is within the constitutional right of petitioners to have their applications decided within 30 days, as per Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution of Pakistan. Read: Punjab speaker moves to disqualify 26 MPAs Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution refer to required qualifications for members of assembly as well as grounds for disqualification. Earlier, Khan had filed disqualification references with the ECP against 26 opposition MPAs from the Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC) for "disparaging the sanctity of the house". Speaking to the media, Khan confirmed the development, stating that those who violate the house's sanctity would face action. He condemned the use of abusive language and violence in the assembly, describing it as an anti-democratic attitude. He also referenced Article 63 of the Constitution, which outlines disqualification criteria, and emphasised that MPs take an oath to protect the Constitution. Khan vowed to continue fighting for the Constitution's protection, stating that maintaining order in the House is his duty. He added that he had shown patience for over a year and needed to justify his role as speaker. Khan stressed that if these applications are not resolved within the stipulated period, they will automatically be forwarded to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP). "Parliament is meant for legislation, not protest," he said, criticising opposition members for continuous disruptions in the house. He added that if there is disorder during the order of the day, proceedings will continue under the law. The Speaker further addressed claims from the Leader of the Opposition asserting that the Speaker lacks the authority to send a reference. Khan referred to the Panama Papers case judgment by Justice Asif Saeed Khosa, which establishes that if members violate their oath, the Speaker is bound to either make a decision or refer the matter to the ECP. Khan reiterated that "if a reference is received under Article 63(2) of the Constitution, it must be decided accordingly". He expressed hope for future dialogue between the government and opposition to improve the atmosphere in the Assembly. He reaffirmed his commitment to upholding the sanctity of the house and ensuring that legislative processes are respected.
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Nawaz-Imran meeting pure fiction: Dar
Listen to article Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar on Saturday dismissed reports of a meeting between PML-N leader Nawaz Sharif and PTI founder Imran Khan, terming them baseless and part of a 'sponsored narrative' aimed at sowing political confusion. Speaking at the annual 982nd ceremonial bathing (ghusl) of the shrine of Hazrat Ali Hujwiri (Data Darbar) in Lahore, the DPM said such sponsored reports are propagated deliberately. 'These are all speculations. It must be someone's wish list as we don't want to meet anyone.' The foreign minister said the current government was initially formed with the critical support from the PPP. 'When we started, our numbers were incomplete without them. Now that we have a simple majority, there's no difficulty, but we will continue cooperating with the PPP even more than before,' he said. He also ruled out any rift within the ruling coalition, asserting that the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) had made no demands and remained a committed ally. 'The PPP did not demand any portfolio. They are our coalition partners and they supported us at hard time and companions are not left after the passage of trials and tribulations,' 'In difficult times, you don't abandon your partners,' he said, stressing that all coalition parties are working together on a shared economic agenda. Dar said the law will take its course and the government wants to work in synergy with all parties. He said the government had no war ambitions or hostility-driven agendas. 'We desire peace and stability in the region,' he said, adding that Iran had acknowledged Pakistan as a 'true friend', with chants of 'Shukria Pakistan' also echoing in their parliament. Highlighting the country's string of recent achievements, Dar noted that the country had been elected as a member of the UN Security Council and had signed a $2 billion agreement with Azerbaijan. 'Inflation has eased, interest rates have dropped from 22% to 11%, and per capita income will now rise,' he claimed. Dar accused Israel of engaging in terrorism and recalled how even at the funeral of Iran's military chief, slogans were raised in support of Pakistan. 'Iran has acknowledged Pakistan as a sincere friend. We do not seek war; our agenda is peace and regional security.' The deputy PM praised Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's relentless efforts, saying they had brought 'immense respect' to Pakistan on the global stage. He reminisced about the original inauguration of Data Darbar's development by Nawaz Sharif on May 31, 1999, and noted that the shrine's expansion was now near completion. On Pakistan-India ties, Dar said that the country responded firmly when provoked. 'During the India-Pakistan conflict, all political parties stood united. India started the war, but we brought down six of their aircraft and responded to 80 drone attacks within 36 hours. The ceasefire along the LoC is still intact,' he said. Commenting on the PDM's formation, Dar noted that Pakistan was on the brink of default at the time. 'If there had been no change, Pakistan would have defaulted. We took bold risks to steer the country back. Our foreign reserves have now reached $14 billion,' he revealed. Dar also warned of ongoing threats: 'Risk is always present; we must remain alert. Thirty militants were sent to hell. On the diplomatic front, talks with Saudi Arabia began seven to eight months ago and will resume on June 24. The general visa process has improved, and we request that Blue Passports be extended to include diplomats, MNAs, MPAs and senior bureaucrats.' Speaking on local developments, Dar said renovation work at Data Darbar had already begun. 'The dome has been elevated, and umbrellas like those in Masjid-e-Nabawi will be installed in the mosque. We hope all work will be completed before the next ceremonial bathing.' The ghusl ceremony was attended by Provincial Auqaf Minister Shafi Hussain and a large number of devotees.
