Pine Cliff Energy Ltd. Declares Monthly Dividend for July 31, 2025
About Pine Cliff
Pine Cliff is a natural gas and crude oil company with a long-term view of creating shareholder value. Further information relating to Pine Cliff may be found on sedarplus.ca as well as on Pine Cliff's website at www.pinecliffenergy.com.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
16 minutes ago
- CTV News
Canadian businesses seeing sales boost
As the Canada-U.S. trade war drags on, many Canadian businesses are seeing a boost to their bottom line. CTV's Kimberely Johnson reports.
CTV News
41 minutes ago
- CTV News
B.C. lawyer gets suspension for misconduct in retail cannabis application
A New Westminster lawyer has been suspended two months for professional misconduct that included failing 'to guard against becoming the tool of an unscrupulous client.' Robert L. Dick's suspension began Thursday, according to a news release from the Law Society of B.C. The lawyer proposed a consent agreement to the society, in which he admitted to a variety of misconduct that took place from mid-2018 to November 2021, all of it related to the same client. That client, identified in the document only as 'DC,' was someone Dick had known for roughly two decades. DC was an existing criminal law client of Dick's, and someone who – along with his associate 'GS' – was 'understood by the lawyer to be involved in the illicit cannabis industry.' DC approached Dick about a plan to apply for a retail cannabis licence, and in early summer 2018, the lawyer, DC and GS all met with a consultant to discuss the provincial licensing process, according to the consent agreement. The consultant expressed concern about the would-be applicants' history of involvement – and reported ongoing involvement – in the illegal cannabis market, and explained that such situations are often dealt with using a 'white knight' applicant. 'The lawyer understood that the 'white knight' applicant process involved using a purported applicant to cloak the identity of the true applicant,' the consent agreement reads. DC brought his acquaintance – referred to as 'SB' – into the process to serve as the 'white knight.' SB was the sole director and shareholder of a company called NRC Ltd., which made the application for a licence to operate a non-medical cannabis retail store. The consent agreement indicates Dick believed DC was the 'driving force' behind the venture, providing funding to SB and NRC as a 'silent partner.' 'The lawyer was aware that there would have to be dishonesty involved in preparing and submitting the licensing application to the province in order for the 'white knight' application to succeed,' the document reads. 'The lawyer made no inquiries to determine whether the true sources of funding for the business were being disclosed to the province in the licensing application." Dick represented NRC in negotiating a letter of intent to lease a property in New Westminster and in submitting a business plan to the city. While he took direction from DC when creating those documents, DC's name was not included in either one, according to the consent agreement. Dick also appeared on behalf of NRC at a New Westminster public hearing on rezoning the location where the proposed cannabis store would be located. The document indicates he made no mention of DC in either his oral or written submissions. Ultimately, both the provincial licensing application and the municipal rezoning process were successful. NRC never opened its cannabis store, however, because of a dispute over unpaid rent. When the landlord told Dick he would not be renting to SB and NRC, he asked if the lawyer knew of anyone else who might be interested in leasing the premises. According to the consent agreement, Dick referred the landlord to GS, who by that time was the owner and director of a different company that ran a cannabis store in Vancouver. By making this referral, Dick was acting against the interests of his client NRC. This conflict of interest was one of the instances of misconduct Dick admitted in the consent agreement. He also admitted that he 'failed to be on guard against becoming the tool or dupe of an unscrupulous client or other persons,' failed to 'make reasonable inquiries about the circumstances,' and failed to 'decline to act or continue to act in the matter until there was a reasonable basis for believing that the nature and purpose of the business venture were legitimate.' The law society's discipline committee accepted the consent agreement proposal, noting that Dick had no prior record of professional misconduct, was remorseful and did not gain any personal benefit, including legal fees, through his misconduct.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
B.C. judge says concerns ‘overblown' in court challenge to Squamish townhouse project
Apartments, condos and houses are seen in downtown Squamish, B.C., on Thursday, June 26, 2025. (Darryl Dyck / The Canadian Press) VANCOUVER — The B.C. Supreme Court says concerns raised by Squamish, B.C., residents in a legal challenge to a townhouse development project are 'overblown,' paving the way for high-density housing in one of the country's fastest-growing communities. A ruling issued Thursday says Dennis and Andrea Smith wanted to stop a four-unit townhouse project from being built on a neighbouring property, claiming a 'building scheme' from 1959 only allows for single family homes to be built on the lot. The court ruling says the developer behind the project, Clearwater Park GP Inc., sought to cancel or modify the scheme to allow the project to go ahead. It says the homeowners opposed the townhouse project because it will 'change the character of the neighbourhood,' impacting their privacy, increasing traffic and reducing pedestrian safety. The judge's decision says 'circumstances have changed' since the creation of the 1959 building scheme, and it has been 'widely ignored' for years, allowing residents to conduct renovations and build secondary suites. Judge Frits Verhoeven's ruling says the building scheme is therefore 'obsolete' and the company has a development permit from the District of Squamish, rejecting the Smiths' bid to halt the project and agreeing to cancel the building scheme at the heart of the court challenge. 'I am not without sympathy for the desire of the Smiths and other property owners and residents of the area to preserve their neighbourhood as it is, including in particular its single family, low-density nature,' Judge Verhoeven wrote. " However, in relation to the exercise of the court's residual discretion, the need of the community for additional housing is also relevant." The ruling says Squamish is among Canada's 10 fastest-growing communities, with its population growing more than 22 per cent between 2016 and 2021. The ruling says its population was just under 24,000 people in 2021, and is forecasted to grow past 40,000 by 2040. 'Consideration of the public interest does not favour the position of the Smiths that the court should refuse to cancel the building scheme,' the court ruled. This report by Darryl Greer of The Canadian Press was first published July 5, 2025.
