Man accused of killing ex at luxury hotel ‘waved ambulance goodbye', jury told
Samantha Mickleburgh, from Axminster, Devon, was found dead at the Pennyhill Park Hotel in Bagshot, Surrey, on the morning of April 14 last year.
The mother of two, 54, had arranged to stay in a twin room with her ex-fiance, James Cartwright, the night before, because she 'didn't want him to feel lonely' on his birthday, a trial at Guildford Crown Court previously heard.
Cartwright called 999 at about 8.30am on April 14 claiming he had discovered the lifeless body of Ms Mickleburgh lying next to him in bed.
James Pettitt, guest relations manager at Pennyhill Park Hotel, told jurors on Monday he and the ambulance crew found Cartwright 'completely naked' and screaming in a 'loud and exaggerated' way when they entered the room.
Ms Mickleburgh was lying on the bed face up, and had dry blood around her nose, Mr Pettitt told the court.
He watched as the ambulance crew moved her from the bed to the floor, but decided not to begin CPR because it was apparent Ms Mickleburgh 'had been dead a long time', the court heard.
Her body was then put in a mortuary bag and carried to the ambulance van, Mr Pettitt said.
He told the court he saw Cartwright walk behind the bag, making 'noises' as though he was crying, but said he did not see any tears.
'There was lots of heavy breathing and panting. It was just very loud, very focused on himself,' Mr Pettitt told the court.
'He (Cartwright) followed us around the hotel, behind Samantha. He was just sniffling.
'It didn't appear sincere.'
Cartwright then approached the back of the ambulance where Ms Mickleburgh had been placed and started 'feeling the bag', Mr Pettitt said.
'I believe he assumed where the head was,' he told jurors.
'He bent over, kissed the bag, kissed his fingers and went 'bye-bye'.'
At that point, Mr Pettitt made a waving gesture to the court, prompting the prosecutor Louise Oakley to ask: 'He physically waved the ambulance goodbye?'
To which Mr Pettitt replied: 'Yes – until the vehicle had left the premises.'
After Ms Mickleburgh's body was taken away, Cartwright returned to the room and went through her handbag, from which he retrieved a car key and a piece of jewellery which Mr Pettit described as 'a diamond bracelet or necklace', he told jurors.
On seizing the jewellery, Cartwright reportedly told Mr Pettitt: 'I'll take care of that,' the court was told.
Asked whether Cartwright had offered an explanation about what happened to Ms Mickleburgh, Mr Pettitt said: 'He had mentioned that during the night, Samantha had rolled out of bed.
'She had hit her head, supposedly, on the bedside table and in turn had a nose bleed.
'He supposedly woke up to the sound of Samantha rolling out of bed and he helped her back on to the bed.
'I was informed that he pinched her nose to stop the bleeding and that no first aid was required.'
Cartwright, 61, of no fixed address, is on trial accused of raping and murdering Ms Mickleburgh between April 12 and April 14 last year.
He also denies one count of controlling and coercive behaviour between May 1 2022 and April 14 2024.
The trial continues.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
40 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Former senior coroner's officer says Lucy Letby has suffered miscarriage of justice
A senior coroner's officer who first reviewed the deaths of babies at the Countess of Chester hospital for Cheshire police in 2017 now believes Lucy Letby has suffered a miscarriage of justice. Stephanie Davies, who was given three hours to carry out her review, was told it was key to detectives deciding to commence an investigation into the former neonatal nurse. In her first interview, with the Guardian and Channel 4 News, Davies said she had become increasingly alarmed since December, when she learned that the hospital doctors had not reported a key medical procedure on one of the babies to the coroner at the time. She has since found the explanations of new medical experts, who have publicly contested the prosecution arguments, compelling. Last month, Davies wrote to Cheshire's senior coroner explaining her original involvement. 'I am now extremely concerned that the convictions of Ms Letby are wholly unsafe,' she wrote. Letby, who was a nurse in the hospital's neonatal unit, was convicted of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven more, and sentenced to a whole life in prison for each offence. The court of appeal twice last year refused her permission to appeal. Letby's lawyer, Mark McDonald, has applied to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), arguing that the convictions are unsafe and should be referred back to the court of appeal. A panel of international experts led by the world renowned neonatologist Dr Shoo Lee, who were instructed by McDonald, have publicly argued that Letby has been wrongly convicted, that there were no murders, and the babies died from natural causes and instances of poor care in the hospital. Lawyers representing the babies' families have been adamant that the convictions are safe and rejected the new experts' opinions. Two specialist consultant neonatologists, Dr Neil Aiton and Dr Svilena Dimitrova, produced a report for McDonald on a triplet who died at the hospital, anonymised at Letby's trial as Baby O. Davies said she was taken aback at the account of their report given at a press conference in December, that in trying to relieve swelling in the abdomen, a doctor had mistakenly inserted a needle with a cannula into the liver, and that this was a cause of the baby's death. Lee's panel has also said the needle may have penetrated the baby's liver. That medical procedure was considered at the trial, where the doctor who inserted the needle, the neonatal unit's clinical lead, Dr Stephen Brearey, said it was 'nowhere near' the liver. Prosecution medical experts argued that the procedure was not significant to the harm the baby suffered. Letby was found guilty of inflicting the liver damage, and injecting air into the baby's stomach and veins. In December, Davies noted from her original review that the hospital doctors had not reported the procedure involving the needle to the coroner's office. That meant it was not mentioned in the summary of circumstances surrounding the baby's death, sent by the coroner's office to the pathologist carrying out the post-mortem. In his postmortem report, the pathologist did identify bleeding from a rupture around the liver as the cause of Baby O's death, and said it had been caused by 'prematurity'. Davies said: 'I don't know why the hospital doctors didn't include the detail regarding the needle. 'I believe it could have made a difference to the post-mortem if it was highlighted. An inquest may well have been held, there may have been a finding that the baby died due to a medical procedure, and there may never have been a police investigation.' In her statement to the public inquiry chaired by Lady Justice Thirlwall, Davies explained that in early May 2017 she was asked to attend a 'Gold Group' meeting of senior Cheshire police officers, when they were considering whether to investigate the concerns raised by hospital doctors about Letby. The assistant chief constable, Darren Martland, asked Davies to review the post-mortems and records for the babies who had died, and provide an opinion the next morning. Senior coroner's officers lead teams investigating and collating evidence about deaths on behalf of coroners. Davies, who had undertaken specialist investigative training, had been promoted to senior coroner's officer in March 2017. In her review, Davies reported there were gaps in the explanations of how some babies had died. This was because some causes of death were quite general, including prematurity given for the rupture around Baby O's liver. 'I reported that there were missing jigsaw pieces, that the deaths of the babies hadn't been fully explained,' Davies says. 'I said if the police went ahead with an investigation, they may find those missing pieces. But I did not say, or see any evidence, that any of the babies had been deliberately harmed.' Davies says her manager, then Det Insp Paul Hughes, who became the senior investigating officer, told her when passing her office one day that her review was one of the main reasons they decided to launch a criminal investigation. The case of Baby O became key to hardening the investigation into Letby. Cheshire police appointed Dr Dewi Evans, a retired paediatrician, as their medical expert. Evans has said the police showed him Baby O's medical notes at his first meeting, and within 10 minutes, he saw the liver damage and said it must have been inflicted deliberately. Davies says she was surprised when Letby was convicted, but she assumed the trial must have established the truth. In her Thirlwall statement, she cautioned that it had been a 'near miss', because the police were not going to investigate before her review. However, during the last six months, she has become increasingly concerned. 'The new experts' medical explanations make sense to me,' she says. 'They have filled the gaps I saw when I did my review – much more than the police and prosecution case against Lucy Letby. 'I stand by the review I did, because I reported that there were gaps. But I feel almost guilty that it contributed to a police investigation being started, which led to convictions that I now believe are unsafe and a miscarriage of justice.' Davies lost her job at Cheshire police in 2023 after a different review she conducted, which challenged the outcomes of two murder investigations. She consulted a small number of experts to further her research, and her report was leaked to the Sunday Times – not by her – then widely reported in the media, including by the Guardian. Cheshire police pursued Davies for gross misconduct, alleging that she breached duties of confidentiality when she sent details to the experts. She resigned from the force before her disciplinary hearing. Responding to Davies' concerns about the Lucy Letby case, a Cheshire police spokesperson described Davies's former position as 'an administrative role within the Cheshire coroner's office' and said she was 'neither formally medically, nor legally trained'. 'A disciplinary hearing in February 2023 found allegations of gross misconduct by Stephanie Davies unrelated to the Lucy Letby case to be proved and had she not already resigned, she would have been dismissed without notice,' the spokesperson said. 'Cheshire constabulary strongly refute the credibility of these claims.' Davies said the senior coroner's officer role was investigative, and rejected any suggestion that she was not well qualified for the work she did. Dewi Evans said he stood by the opinions he gave about Baby O. The hospital and Brearey declined to comment. The Guardian approached the solicitor representing the parents of the triplets, Babies O and P. He said that they did not wish to comment. The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know. If you have something to share on this subject you can contact us confidentially using the following methods. Secure Messaging in the Guardian app The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said. If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select 'Secure Messaging'. SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post See our guide at for alternative methods and the pros and cons of each.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Schoolgirl, 15, hit & killed by ‘show off' driver months after she had life-saving kidney transplant
A SCHOOLGIRL has been killed by a "show off" driver just months after receiving a life-saving kidney transplant. Keely Morgan, 15, was pronounced dead at the scene in Caerau, Cardiff after being fatally struck on a pedestrian crossing. 7 7 7 Christopher West, 42, was driving his two daughters and their friend when he hit the schoolgirl at about 9:30pm on 1 May 2023. Now, over two years later, Keely's parents have revealed their "incredible" daughter had received a life-saving kidney transplant just months before she was tragically killed. West admitted to killing the teenager at Cardiff Magistrates' Court in May, where it was also heard that the dad had been driving between 32 and 42mph on a road with a 30mph limit. After hitting the girl, West was arrested and questioned by police who also performed a drugs and alcohol test on the driver. Both test results came out negative. Judge Murphy granted the dad conditional bail and told him not to make any contact - direct or indirect - with Keely's family or to enter certain areas in Caerau. He has also been banned from driving until his sentencing. A sentencing hearing at Cardiff Crown Court on Friday heard that West had been driving a "little fast" and had been "snaking" his Vauxhall Astra. The court also heard the dad turned to his daughters and said: "Shall I remove the black box?" before driving from Barry Island to Ely. His daughter said her dad had been "showing off" on the drive. Billionaire airline CEO's wife 'runs down and kills babysitter, 24, crossing road before FLEEING holiday island' Kevin Seal, representing West, said his client had shown genuine remorse for causing the teenager's death, adding that he would have to live with the grief and regret for the rest of his life. The court also heard a number of emotional statements read by Keely's family including from her mum, Sian Morgan. Sian said her daughter had been given a "second chance of life" aged 13 and had fought "so hard" to live a normal life. The tragedy of her "preventable" death will haunt her forever, she continued. 7 7 In a victim statement, she said: "She fought so hard to have the opportunity to live a normal life and have the joys of being a teenager. "She remained brave, courageous, and positive, but those dreams have been cruelly taken from her in an instant. "She'll never be able to finish school, go to university, follow her dreams, experience the joys and the milestones of life. "She had so much love to give. She was truly an incredible person with promise and a future ahead of her." The young girl's devastated parents described the tragedy as "beyond repair" and a loss they will carry for the rest of their lives. Sian said: "Every day I wake up and relive a nightmare. Her loss ripples through every part of our lives. Her life mattered. Her death must mean something. No sentence will ever bring her back. Sian Morgan "My heart aches every day for my daughter who I can no longer hug or see the incredible person she could have been. "The world is a darker place without her. The trauma of losing her in a sudden, violent, but preventable way haunts us." She added: "This was totally avoidable. That one decision, that one moment, took everything from us. "A pedestrian crossing is meant to protect people like Keely who was using the crossing appropriately as she had a right to do so but she was struck and killed. "Her life was taken by the drastic failure of you and you alone. You had a duty to uphold fundamental safety laws of being safe while driving and you chose not to do so. "She was an irreplaceable part of my life and her family loved her more than words can say. "Her life mattered. Her death must mean something. No sentence will ever bring her back." Sentencing has been adjourned until July 17 at Cardiff Crown Court. 7 7
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
I'm fuming after spotting my neighbour's camera – it looks directly into my garden and records everything my kids do
A WOMAN was left fuming after claiming her neighbour has installed a camera in their window which looks directly into her garden. The mum said she was especially concerned as her kids play in the garden in full view of the alleged recording device. 1 The woman claimed: 'He's now recording me. 'I can't cope. 'He's watching my kids, this is enough.' She didn't share whether or not she had already confronted her neighbour, but people were quick to chime in with their views on the video. Many people urged her to report the neighbour to the police, with some calling it a privacy violation. However, another said: '2 sides to every story.' The person replied: 'I don't do anything that untoward, I get anxious with confrontation. 'Next door go to sleep at 10, I respect that and make sure my house is in bed too cos not to make any noises! They scare my [sic] I'm alone with 3 small kids!' WHAT ARE YOUR RIGHTS? It's typically not illegal for a neighbour's security camera to capture images beyond their property boundary, but it can be intrusive and raise privacy concerns. If your CCTV footage captures images beyond your property boundary then you are subject to the data protection laws. Your kids are breaking law if they kick their ball over neighbour's fence, High Court rules after couple sued next door Legal experts say you will be regulated under the General Data Protection Regulation and the Data Protection Act. You may be familiar with this when it comes to websites storing your data or companies sending you emails. Joanne Ellis, a partner at Warrington-based solicitor Stephensons, said if CCTV being captured falls outside of a homeowner's property boundaries, the person capturing the CCTV becomes a data controller. This creates a set of responsibilities for the CCTV owner. The person captured has a right to be told a CCTV system is being used and what information is being recorded. Ellis said a subject access request can be made if a neighbour refuses to do this. She said: "You can ask for the footage captured of you to be deleted - but it can be refused if there is a legitimate reason to keep it such as it captures a burglar. "Any third parties that the CCTV is disclosed to, such as police and insurers, are also obliged to process the footage in accordance with the rules." CAN YOU REFUSE TO BE FILMED? Ellis said that a neighbour can request they are not captured on CCTV, but this might not be granted if the filming complies with regulations. The CCTV owner must also process data in a lawful and transparent manner and only for specified and legitimate purposes. Ellis said: "In a domestic context, this is usually to deter or record burglaries or theft. "If the CCTV footage for example covers a potential entrance or exit and is not too intrusive for the neighbour the use is likely to be considered legitimate." As always with disputes, Ellis said, the best course of action is to speak with the neighbour, voice your concerns and try to reach agreement. If that fails it may be worth taking legal advice, but this can be pricey.
