MDMK chief Vaiko's once trusted lieutenant breaks silence: "I prefer poison to be called traitor"
No other loyal worker should be humiliated with such "unfounded accusations" and it does not befit Vaiko's stature in public life, he claimed.
"I have been working for the MDMK with a sense of commitment to its ideology. I am not the reason for the unusual developments in the party," Sathya said, accusing Vaiko of deliberately attempting to finish his political career.
In a strongly worded statement on Monday, titled "Breaking my silence," he said the party leader could have cited some other reason. "But to sacrifice my honest political life for the sake of your son and call it 'betrayal' - that word from you wounds me deeply," he said.
"He could have told me something else or could have asked me to take a bottle of poison and die. I would have died. Instead, he made a remark that has left a deep scar in me," he said.
On July 10, Vaiko accused the party's Deputy General Secretary, Mallai C E Sathya, of indulging in anti-party activities for two years. 'He has close ties with those who left the party and criticise me. There are four people posting against me on social media, and they are living abroad. Mallai Sathya provides them the content," Vaiko told reporters at the airport here.
Sathya, who was with Vaiko for three decades, said he was anguished over being said he betrayed Vaiko like LTTE leader Prabhakaran was backstabbed by Mathaiya. It was unfair to equate his political differences with an act of treachery, he added.
Vaiko ensured a truce between his son Durai Vaiko, who is the party's principal secretary, and Sathya following differences over Durai's elevation in the party in April. But trouble arose in the MDMK when Sathya's name and photo did not figure in the banners of the party's meeting at Poonamallee here on July 10.
Breaking down in a televised interview to a Tamil news channel - Puthiya Thalaimurai on July 14, Sathya said "it has been five days since I slept. I am worried about society's perception. But I will come through all of this. Vaiko has raised me like a warrior. I will prove my genuineness to the public."
He further said, "I will come out of the fire ring. As a leader, he might have made a mistake but as a father he has done the right thing for his son, which I understand. I wish him success in politics. …I will march forward with my goals and aspirations."
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Madras High Court directs Centre to reconsider Indian passport application of ‘Stateless' person, born to Sri Lankan Tamil refugees
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has directed the Centre to reconsider the application for an Indian passport made by a 'Stateless person', born in India to Sri Lankan Tamil refugees. The court was hearing a petition filed in 2024 by Harinaa who sought a direction to the Centre to issue a passport considering her application in terms of Section 20 of The Passports Act, 1967, which empowers the Central government to issue passport or travel document to persons who are not citizens of India. She was born in a government hospital in Karur district in 2002. Her parents were housed in a refugee camp / rehabilitation camp. She had completed her school and graduation in India and wanted to go abroad for her higher education. The petitioner said she earlier approached the court in 2022 after her application for issuance of a passport was rejected. In 2023, the court had directed the Centre to consider her application for an Indian passport. Following the court direction, she applied for a fresh travel document in 2023. However, her request was not acceded to. The Ministry of External Affairs neither issued passport nor travel document. The Centre submitted she was neither a citizen of India nor entitled to a travel document under Section 20 of the Passport Act. The matter was referred to local police for verification. The report filed by the Karur Superintendent of Police stated she was not an Indian citizen and was born in Sri Lanka. The Ministry decided that the issuance of a Certificate of Identity to the petitioner may not be in the interest of the nation. It was further submitted that it would be advisable for the petitioner to approach the Sri Lankan Deputy High Commission in Chennai in order to obtain a one-way passport. The counsel for the petitioner I. Romeo Roy Alfred submitted the petitioner was born in India and was not registered as a Sri Lankan citizen or as a national of Sri Lanka. There was no question of obtaining a one-way passport to return to Sri Lanka and the petitioner has also been declared a Stateless person, it was submitted. Justice C. Saravanan observed there were overwhelming records available to indicate that the petitioner was born in India and was issued a birth certificate by the Executive Officer, Thanthoni Town Panchayat, Karur district. She graduated in 2022. The records indicate she was born in India and has been residing in India. She has also been issued an Aadhaar Card. There are no records to indicate she travelled from Sri Lanka or that she illegally entered India after she was purportedly born in Sri Lanka, the court observed. The order passed by the authorities, which was apparently based on internal discussions within the Department, has not taken into consideration all these aspects, the court observed and quashed the order passed by the Ministry of External Affairs. The court remitted the matter to the Ministry to reconsider the same after obtaining fresh report from the police and in case the petitioner's application is proposed to be rejected again, all materials and information relied upon by the authorities to reject the application should be furnished to the petitioner, so as to enable her to make out her case, the court said and directed the entire exercise be completed in three months.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Goa mulls law to legalise traditional bullfight, CM says it's a taming sport
Panaji: Goa chief minister Pramod Sawant said the government will consider a law to legalise the traditional buffalo fight (Dhirio or Guerra) as 'it does not involve a fight between two bulls, but is rather a taming sport.' NGO People for Animals, filed a petition in 1996 against the government's failure to act against bullfights. (Representative photo) Speaking during a calling attention motion raised by Maharashtrawadi Gomantak Party (MGP) legislator Jit Arolkar, Sawant said, 'Jallikattu is a traditional Tamil sport often described as a bull taming event held during the Pongal festival held usually in January. It involves releasing a bull into the crowd and participants attempt to grab its hump and hold on for as long as possible. It is not a fight between two bulls.' The Government of India in 1960 enacted the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, which said inciting 'any animal to fight… solely with a view to providing entertainment' would amount to 'treating animals cruelly.' A year later, Goa became part of the Indian Union, and the law came into force in the region. Also Read: Clash of cultures and rights in Goa's underground bullfighting pits As bullfights reportedly continued in Goa, NGO People for Animals, filed a petition in 1996 against the government's failure to act against bullfights. The Bombay High Court at Goa reiterated, '…inciting any animal to fight any other animal with a view to providing entertainment or organising, using or acting in the management of any place for animal fighting… is clearly prohibited by Section 11 of the said Act.' Arolkar argued that Dhirio has been a part of Goa's cultural and traditional fabric for decades, often associated with village feasts and community gatherings. 'The practice dates back to the Harappan civilisation with evidence uncovered suggesting that such fights were held for sport and entertainment,' Arolkar said. Also Read: Assam revives traditional bull fights nine years after SC ban Sawant said, 'I understand the sentiments of the members of this House that it is a traditional event along the coastal belt. Animal lovers went to court and it got banned. Keeping in mind the sentiments, and examining the issue legally, we will see what can be possible.' He added that there were six cases of illegal bullfighting registered so far in the state. Meanwhile, Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MLA Venzy Viegas had moved a private members' bill in 2023 to legalise the practice, a bill that has been pending for vetting with the law department since then.
NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
3-Time Tamil Nadu Chief Minister OPS Quits BJP Alliance. Why It Matters
Chennai: The BJP's Tamil Nadu election plans took a hit after three-time ex-Chief Minister O Panneerselvam - from the influential Thevar community - led his AIADMK loyalists out of the national party-led alliance. OPS was reportedly miffed at being excluded from meeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi during his visit earlier this week. He was also excluded from the guest list when Home Minister Amit Shah visited. OPS loyalist Panruti Ramachandran confirmed the withdrawal; pressed on the reason for the break-up Mr Ramachandran, flanked by his boss, told reporters "the reason is widely known". The ex-Chief Minister's future plans will be announced shortly, Mr Ramachandran said. "... a right alliance to lead the people in the right direction will materialise in the future". For now, he also said, OPS will travel the state ahead of the 2026 Assembly election. But OPS' options are limited. He could ally with the ruling DMK. There was plenty of buzz after OPS met DMK boss and Chief Minister MK Stalin this morning, but the meeting was played down as a chance encounter during a morning constitutional. #WATCH | Former Tamil Nadu CM O Panneerselvam calls on CM M.K. Stalin, in Chennai. Deputy CM Udhayanidhi Stalin also present. (Video: DMK) — ANI (@ANI) July 31, 2025 However, hours later OPS met Mr Stalin at his residence. Udhayanidhi Stalin, the latter's son and Deputy Chief Minister, was also present. A video shared by the DMK showed them chatting amiably. Sources told NDTV that OPS had asked after the Chief Minister's health; Mr Stalin was released from a city hospital earlier this week after undergoing a "therapeutic procedure" for "variations in heart rate". O Panneerselvam with J Jayalalithaa (File). But an alliance with the DMK could be problematic given OPS is seen as the 'true heir' of AIADMK icon and ex-Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa. Joining hands with her arch-rivals will anger his supporters. He could contest next year's election solo. He will almost certainly not win enough seats to form the government, but could win enough, backed by the Thevar voters from the south, to become a 'kingmaker' and secure his own political future. Or he could patch up with the Bharatiya Janata Party and return to the NDA fold. The BJP and he were allies for the 2024 Lok Sabha poll; this was when the AIADMK itself had split from the national party. Tamil actor-politician Vijay and his TVK are seen as dark horses for the 2026 election. Another possibility, and an intriguing one, is that OPS could join actor-politician VIjay and his fledgling Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam. Vijay's fiery electoral debut has seen him castigate the DMK and AIADMK - the Dravidian parties that control the Tamil political landscape - and the BJP, ruling out any alliances. Either way, why is OPS so significant? Because, despite being sidelined in state politics over the past few years - the result of a leadership struggle with Edapaddi K Palaniswami that led to his expulsion in July 2022 - Mr Panneerselvam still has a large support base and the trust of a section of the AIADMK's on-ground workers. A three-time MLA from Bodinayakkanur in Theni district, OPS is a big name among the Thevar, or Mukkulathor, community that accounts for 10-12 per cent of the state's population. In the 2021 election a majority of the Thevar vote - around 55 per cent - went to the AIADMK. But it was still beaten; the party won only 75 seats (136 in 2016) to the DMK's 159 (up from 98). AIADMK leaders O Panneerselvam (right) and E Palaniswami (File). A chunk of those - 44 - came from western Tamil Nadu; the shift in the Gounder community vote was critical to these victories. But a sizeable number - 15 - came from the south. Losing, potentially, OPS' support could dent chances for the BJP (and its on-again allies, the AIADMK) to finally do what it has traditionally struggled to - crack the Tamil voter conundrum. OPS going it alone will certainly split the Thevar community vote in the south and, possibly, those from other communities that usually vote for the AIADMK. Ideally the BJP - which has insisted it will stay out of its ally's internal leadership problems - would like to retain the support of the AIADMK as a whole, i.e., OPS and EPS. That, however, may not work out.
