To boost surveillance, Govt taps global firms for high-resolution satellite imagery
The initiation of talks with these satellite imagery providers comes in the wake of Operation Sindoor in May, where it has been inferred that China provided live inputs through satellite support to Pakistan. Senior Army officials have since said that when the DGMO-level talks were on, Pakistan flagged information about 'specific vectors' on the Indian side that were being primed and readied for action, likely from satellite inputs facilities by China.
'We are in talks with commercial satellite imagery providers. We have to deepen our surveillance measures,' an official told The Indian Express.
The objective of these discussions is to extend the surveillance envelope and be able to do real-time surveillance at the time of conflicts for more efficient military actions, officials said.
The move likely includes Maxar Technologies, which operates some of the world's most advanced Earth observation satellites that can capture images with 30-centimetre resolution, detailed enough to discern targets such as infrastructure, buildings, artillery gun systems and even vehicles.
When contacted by The Indian Express, Maxar's spokesperson said they 'don't comment on contract negotiations'.
While India's satellites, including the Cartosat and RISAT, have played a big role in helping defence forces to strategise, track enemy mobilisation and confirm strike impact, while maintaining real-time situational awareness which prevented any major damage to the country's military assets, these domestic satellites face some limitations in their capabilities.
The Cartosat-3 satellite was designed to offer resolution of up to 30-centimetre, but is claimed to provide good quality imagery at about 50 centimetres. Also, Cartosat-3 operates alone, which limits how frequently it can scan the same area, something that is crucial during fast-paced military engagements where the battlefield is limited to a specific sector. Visibility is crucial, which the Pakistanis are believed to have with Chinese inputs.
India's satellites, including the Cartosat and RISAT, have played a big role in helping defence forces to strategise and maintain real-time situational awareness, but there are some limitations in their capabilities. The move to rope in global players is aimed at plugging these gaps.
India is already working on upgrading its satellite capabilities and has fast-tracked deployment of 52 surveillance satellites under the SBS (Space Based Surveillance)-III programme after Operation Sindoor, to enable efficient and enhanced monitoring of land and sea borders, with stronger imaging and all-weather functionalities. 'They will start launching the satellites from next year onwards and the deployment of all satellites will be completed by 2029,' the official said.
In October last year, the Union Cabinet approved $3.2 billion for the SBS-III programme to develop next-generation satellites over the next decade. Under the programme, ISRO will manufacture and launch the first 21 satellites, while private companies will handle the remaining 31. The Defence Space Agency will oversee the operation of the newly launched satellite system.
Aanchal Magazine is Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express and reports on the macro economy and fiscal policy, with a special focus on economic science, labour trends, taxation and revenue metrics. With over 13 years of newsroom experience, she has also reported in detail on macroeconomic data such as trends and policy actions related to inflation, GDP growth and fiscal arithmetic. Interested in the history of her homeland, Kashmir, she likes to read about its culture and tradition in her spare time, along with trying to map the journeys of displacement from there.
... Read More
Anil Sasi is National Business Editor with the Indian Express and writes on business and finance issues. He has worked with The Hindu Business Line and Business Standard and is an alumnus of Delhi University. ... Read More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
10 minutes ago
- India.com
India celebrates its 26th Kargil Victory Day
videoDetails India celebrates its 26th Kargil Victory Day Yashwant Bhaskar | Updated: Jul 26, 2025, 11:00 AM IST The country is celebrating the 26th anniversary of Kargil Vijay Diwas today. Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi will hoist the tricolor in honor of the martyrs at the Kargil War Memorial and pay tribute to the heroes of Kargil.
India.com
40 minutes ago
- India.com
Pakistan FM Endorses Trumps Ceasefire Claim During Meeting With Rubio In US
New Delhi: Pakistan's Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar has endorsed former US President Donald Trump's claim of playing a key role in de-escalating tensions between India and Pakistan earlier this year. During a visit to Washington, Dar 'appreciated' both Trump and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio for their efforts in facilitating a ceasefire following heightened military activity between the two nuclear-armed neighbours. According to an official statement released by Pakistan's Foreign Office following Dar's meeting with Rubio on Friday, the minister 'appreciated the pivotal role' of Trump and Rubio in de-escalating tensions between Pakistan and India by facilitating a ceasefire. The statement aligns with Trump's repeated public assertions that he helped prevent war between India and Pakistan after conflict erupted in May following India's launch of Operation Sindoor. However, India has firmly denied these claims. The US State Department also issued a statement following the Dar–Rubio meeting, though it notably did not mention India or the ceasefire. Trump had claimed credit for brokering the ceasefire in a May 10 social media post, saying that his administration engaged in talks with both sides to prevent further escalation. India, however, disputes that US intervention led to the ceasefire. According to Indian government sources, the ceasefire understanding followed a request from the Pakistani Director General of Military Operations (DGMO), who contacted his Indian counterpart on May 10 to propose a halt to hostilities. India maintains that all issues between New Delhi and Islamabad must be resolved bilaterally, rejecting any third-party involvement. Operation Sindoor, launched by India on May 7, was a retaliatory strike following the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which left 26 people, mostly tourists, dead. India targeted nine terror facilities in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) and across the border, after The Resistance Front (TRF), a Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) front, claimed responsibility for the attack. TRF has since been declared a designated terror group by the US. Hostilities between India and Pakistan escalated into missile and drone strikes across three days starting May 7. A ceasefire was eventually announced on May 10.
India.com
40 minutes ago
- India.com
How much did the Kargil war cost India and Pakistan? Find out who suffered greater losses both financially and militarily
How much did the Kargil war cost India and Pakistan? Find out who suffered greater losses both financially and militarily The Kargil War was not just a military fight, but it was a test of India's strength, smart planning, and the incredible courage of our soldiers. In May 1999, Pakistani soldiers and militants secretly occupied high mountain peaks in the Kargil region, which is part of India which led to a war. To drive them out, India launched Operation Vijay, which went on for more than two months. On 26 July 1999, India won the battle and proudly raised the national flag on every peak. But this victory came at a heavy cost. Hundreds of Indian soldiers lost their lives, the country spent billions of rupees, and a lot of military equipment was used up. On Kargil Vijay Diwas, let's take a closer look at which country, India or Pakistan, suffered the most losses during the war, and who had to bear the higher cost of the conflict. India faced huge expenses, yet the economy stayed strong The Kargil War was not just a military challenge for India, it also tested the country's economy. According to estimates, India spent around Rs. 5,000 to Rs. 10,000 crore on the war. The Indian Air Force alone carried out over 300 airstrikes, costing nearly Rs. 2,000 crore. On the ground, the Army's daily operations cost about Rs. 10 to Rs. 15 crore per day. Some reports suggest that during the peak days of the war, India was spending nearly Rs. 1,460 crore each day. Even with such massive expenses, India's economy didn't break down. At the time, the country had a strong financial base, with USD 33.5 billion in foreign exchange reserves and a USD 10 billion defence budget. This solid economic support helped India manage the war costs without letting its economy fall under pressure. The biggest loss: The sacrifice of our brave soldiers More than the financial cost, India paid the highest price by losing 527 brave soldiers during the Kargil War. Over 1,363 soldiers were injured in the fierce battles. This sacrifice is something that can never be measured in money. In the final phase of the war, Indian Army units fought for every inch of land on the steep mountain peaks, putting their lives on the line to protect the country. Pakistan suffered more losses but kept denying the truth If we compare, Pakistan faced much heavier military losses than India in the Kargil War. According to some reports, nearly 3,000 Pakistani soldiers were killed. But officially, Pakistan only admitted to 357 deaths. After Indian forces recaptured the high-altitude positions, they found hundreds of bodies of Pakistani soldiers. Shockingly, Pakistan even refused to take back many of those bodies. Not only did Pakistan suffer on the battlefield, but the war also damaged its reputation worldwide. Just a few months after signing the Lahore Declaration (a peace agreement with India), the Kargil intrusion was seen globally as a betrayal and a planned act of war. This badly hurt Pakistan's image in the international community. Weak military planning and economic pressure forced Pakistan to back down While India had a strong economy during the Kargil War, with USD 33.5 billion in foreign exchange reserves and a USD 10 billion defence budget, Pakistan was not in a position to continue the war for long. Reports suggest that Pakistan's daily war expense was around Rs. 370 crore, which was less than India's. But the impact on Pakistan's economy was much greater. India's solid financial base and stable political leadership gave it the strength to handle a long and intense conflict. On the other hand, Pakistan struggled under international pressure, weaker military resources, and growing economic problems, which eventually forced it to step back from the war. Lessons learned from the war The Kargil War also exposed several weaknesses in India's military systems. One major issue was the lack of weapon-locating radars, which led to the loss of many soldiers. Realizing this gap, India later introduced the Swathi Radar System, which can accurately detect enemy artillery positions. There were also shortages of bulletproof jackets, night vision devices, and even basic supplies — all of which were addressed after the war.
