How Spain's wealth tax became an unexpected boon for Britain
The 89-year-old's €110bn (£95bn) family office, Pontegadea Inversiones, last week snapped up a 49pc stake in PD Ports, paying an undisclosed sum to Canadian investment giant Brookfield for the shares. PD operates major ports at Tees and Hartlepool.
The Spaniard already has a property portfolio in Britain worth £2.5bn, but until now he has mostly stuck to hotels, shops and offices. The PD Ports deal is his first major British foray into infrastructure and logistics.
Ortega's family office insists the investment is simply about good business. But observers note that the push into ports could have an advantageous side effect: lowering the billionaire's wealth tax bill.
Spain's notorious wealth tax was first introduced in 1977 as an 'emergency' measure, and was reintroduced in 2011 after a three-year hiatus as a 'temporary' measure. It takes an annual slice of between 0.2pc and 3.5pc of the value of every Spanish resident's worldwide assets.
The rules say that a Spaniard's combined tax bill on wealth and income should not exceed 60pc of their taxable income. That shifts the tax net away from the asset-rich-cash-poor, old-money crowd and more towards the high-earning end of the wealth spectrum – where Ortega stands out.
Ortega's personal fortune, which Forbes estimates at almost $115bn (£86bn), largely derives from his 59pc shareholding in his company Inditex, which owns the Zara brand he founded 50 years ago.
After leaving school at 14, he began working for a clothes shop in Galicia and started his first rag-trade business in the early 1960s.
However, it is not just a paper fortune: he also regularly receives billions in dividends, a form of income, from his empire.
This year, his dividend bonanza will top €3bn for the first time thanks to his stake in Inditex, which is held via two of Pontegadea's three subsidiary companies. He tends to reinvest almost all of this in buying properties and companies.
Most of Ortega's British investments are in scope of Spain's wealth tax. However, the rules say that if a rich Spaniard has a stake worth more than 5pc in a productive or trading business (which does not include real estate), that won't count towards his or her taxable wealth.
PD Ports is exactly this kind of investment.
Sources close to Pontegadea say most of the family office's assets would still get caught in the wealth tax net. They say it is standard practice to redeploy the dividends and other income into economically productive assets.
Still, Pontegadea has been visibly broadening its portfolio away from purely property in recent years, taking the kind of 5pc-plus stakes in energy and infrastructure companies that, if structured in certain ways, could qualify for that wealth tax exemption.
Sources said some of these investments might qualify the exemption and lower the wealth tax liability. But they said this was not the motivation for the choice of assets, nor the timing of deals.
Ortega's strategic shift has mostly been aimed at energy. In 2023, the year after a reform that tightened the wealth tax net, Pontegadea pumped a reported €693m into energy projects, more than twice the amount of the year before.
In the past five years his family office has acquired 5pc stakes in both electricity major Redeia and gas grid operator Enagas. Among its dozen-plus energy investments, it also owns 12pc of Portuguese electricity and gas system operator Ren, and has stakes in several solar and wind farms in Spain and France.
Beyond energy, in 2022 Pontegadea bought a one-third stake in telecoms provider Telxius, and last December it took a 20pc chunk of Dutch parking operator Q-Park.
The 49pc stake in PD Ports looks to be one of Ortega's largest ownership positions, putting Britain at the centre of Pontegadea's diversification strategy.
The investment highlights how Britain is benefiting from a deal-making spree overseen by Spain's richest man. It could also be read as a sign of the distorting effects of a wealth tax, which critics say can often do more harm than good.
'I don't think this tax collects a lot of revenue,' says Christopher McCann, a Spain-based senior partner at financial advisers Blevins Franks.
Calls for UK wealth tax
It comes as Rachel Reeves comes under pressure to consider just such a wealth tax for Britain to help fill a multibillion-pound hole in the budget.
Lord Kinnock, the former Labour leader, has called for a 2pc tax on assets over £10m and the party's union backers have also spoken out in favour of the idea.
Anneliese Dodds, a former shadow chancellor, last week also urged Sir Keir Starmer and Reeves to look at 'how it would be possible' to impose a levy on the assets of the richest Britons.
On Friday, Dame Diana Johnson, the policing minister, said on Friday it was important 'all these issues are looked at and discussed and we look at the evidence about what will work and what won't work'.
Despite the growing calls, senior ministers have downplayed talks of a wealth tax amid concerns it would hasten the stampede of wealthy leaving Britain after the abolition of non-dom status. Depending on the structure of any regime, it could also put off investors like Ortega.
The businessman is a little-known but significant presence in the British property sector. His flagship is the imposing neoclassical Adelphi building on Victoria Embankment in central London, which he bought for a reported €680m.
Pontegadea's other London assets include the 1920s commercial edifice Devonshire House, opposite the Ritz on Piccadilly; the roof-gardened Post Building in Bloomsbury; and a former BBC office near Oxford Circus.
In Companies House filings, Pontegadea valued its British portfolio at £2.4bn in March 2024, yielding rental income of £98m.
His worldwide real estate empire, worth a reported €20bn, spans Spain, Portugal, Italy, Germany, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Ireland, Britain, Canada and the United States. Ortega is a landlord to the likes of Amazon, Walmart and Primark.
Although Pontegadea denies the wealth tax has played the driving role in Ortega's shift from pure property into energy and infrastructure, advisers say the tax figures are large in the financial planning of even moderately wealthy Spanish residents.
'If you have investment income, then by using the right structures you can squeeze down your taxable income, and you can reduce your wealth tax liability,' McCann says.
'It is possible to live here and pay a more reasonable level of tax just by good planning.'
Whatever the motivation behind Ortega's PD Ports play, you can be sure he has plenty of good financial planning.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mag 7 Plans to 'FOMO' Into $650B Tech Investment Despite Trump's U.S. Manufacturing Push
While President Donald Trump's tariff war aims to spark a manufacturing boom at home, corporate America's spending focus remains firmly on "bits" rather than "bricks and mortar." This contrast is evident in the spending patterns of the Magnificent 7 (Mag 7) stocks – a group comprising large-cap tech companies, including Alphabet (parent company of Google), Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms (parent company of Facebook and Instagram), Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla. These firms are expected to cumulatively spend an astonishing $650 billion this year on capital expenditure (capex) and research and development (R&D), according to data tracked by Lloyds Bank. That amount is larger than what the U.K. government spends on public investments in a year, the bank noted in a Thursday note. If that number alone doesn't impress you, consider this: the total economy-wide investment spending on IT equipment and software has continued to surge this year, accounting for 6.1% of GDP, while both private fixed and fixed non-residential investment, excluding IT, have shrunk for consecutive quarters. FOMO and AI According to Lloyds' FX Strategist Nicholas Kennedy, the decline in investments across other sectors of the economy could be due to several reasons, including the fear of missing out (FOMO) on the artificial intelligence (AI) boom. "There might be some explanations other than a crowding out by IT spending and political/trade uncertainties that you could call on; the building boom that was triggered by Biden's CHIPS act, which boosted structures, has faded, for instance. There is also a FOMO effect at work, firms encouraged to divert investment resources from what they traditionally do towards fashionable AI-related projects. So they're just spending elsewhere," Kennedy said in a note to clients. The chart indicates that U.S. corporate spending on IT equipment and software has increased to $1.45 trillion, representing a 13.6% year-over-year rise. The tally makes up over 40% of the total U.S. private fixed investment. The U.S. second-quarter GDP estimate, released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis early this week, showed that private fixed investment in IT increased by 12.4% quarter-on-quarter. Meanwhile, investment in non-IT sectors or the broader economy fell by 4.9%, extending the three-quarter declining trend. From 'bricks' to 'bits' This continued dominance of "bits" spending in corporate America should calm the nerves of those worried that the administration's focus on manufacturing may suck capital away from technology markets, including emerging avenues like cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin and NVDA, the bellwether for all things AI, both bottomed out in late November 2022 with the launch of ChatGPT and have since enjoyed incredible bull runs, demonstrating a powerful correlation between technology's rise and the crypto market. "Whether that [AI spending boom] generates a return is another matter, but it does reshape plans towards bits from bricks," Kennedy said. Moreover, the crypto market has also found a significant tailwind in the form of a favourable regulatory policy under Trump. The administration has demonstrated its pro-crypto bias through the signing of several key pieces of legislation aimed at clarifying regulatory oversight for digital assets and stablecoins, including measures that have garnered bipartisan support. Additionally, the administration has made strategic appointments to financial regulatory bodies. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2025 Women's British Open prize money payouts include a record $1,462,500 to Miyu Yamashita
The 2025 AIG Women's British Open had a record purse and a record first-place prize. It also featured a first-time major champion. Miyu Yamashita held off a charging Charley Hull on Sunday at Royal Porthcawl in Wales in the UK, her final-round 70, one day after her 24th birthday, was enough to win the fifth and final major of 2025. Yamashita finished at 11 under, and beat Hull and Minami Katsu each by two shots. Yamashita was the lone golfer to reach double-digits under par. Yamashita also earned nearly $1.5 million for her win, the biggest of her young career. Since AIG took over as title sponsor in 2019, prize money has tripled. The total purse in 2025 was $9.75 million. 2025 AIG Women's British Open prize money payouts Pos. Golfer Score Earnings 1 Miyu Yamashita -11 $1,462,500 T2 Minami Katsu -9 $829,742 T2 Charley Hull -9 $829,742 T4 A Lim Kim -7 $485,403 T4 Rio Takeda -7 $485,403 T6 Megan Khang -6 $324,018 T6 Wei Ling Hsu -6 $324,018 T8 Steph Kyriacou -4 $244,650 T8 Lottie Woad -4 $244,650 T8 Paula Martin Sampedro -4 $244,650 T11 Andrea Lee -3 $187,760 T11 Mao Saigo -3 $187,760 T13 Chiara Tamburlini -2 $146,578 T13 Hyojoo Kim -2 $146,578 T13 Minjee Lee -2 $146,578 T13 Sei Young Kim -2 $146,578 T13 Lauren Coughlin -2 $146,578 T13 Pajaree Anannarukarn -2 $146,578 T19 Georgia Hall -1 115,538 T19 Mimi Rhodes -1 115,538 T19 Yan Liu -1 115,538 T19 Linn Grant -1 115,538 T23 Jenny Shin E $93,390 T23 Ariya Jutanugarn E $93,390 T23 Morgane Metraux E $93,390 T23 Esther Henseleit E $93,390 T23 Celine Boutier E $93,390 T23 Haeran Ryu E $93,390 T23 Jinhee Im E $93,390 T30 Anna Nordqvist 1 $75,581 T30 Jeeno Thitikul 1 $75,581 T30 Narin An 1 $75,581 T33 Ayaka Furue 2 $66,502 T33 Nasa Hataoka 2 $66,502 T33 Alexa Pano 2 $66,502 T36 Sarah Schmelzel 3 $58,391 T36 Lydia Ko 3 $58,391 T36 Nelly Korda 3 $58,391 39 In Gee Chun 4 $53,095 T40 Darcey Harry 5 $45,779 T40 Madelene Sagstrom 5 $45,779 T40 Casandra Alexander 5 $45,779 T40 Angel Yin 5 $45,779 T40 Akie Iwai 5 $45,779 T40 Shannon Tan 5 $45,779 T46 Ilhee Lee 6 $36,958 T46 Diksha Dagar 6 $36,958 T46 Lindy Duncan 6 $36,958 T46 Brooke Matthews 6 $36,958 T50 Bronte Law 7 $30,875 T50 Ashleigh Buhai 7 $30,875 T50 Amy Yang 7 $30,875 T50 Mi Hyang Lee 7 $30,875 T50 Stacy Lewis 7 $30,875 T55 Kristen Gillman 8 $26,641 T55 Emma Spitz 8 $26,641 T55 Manon De Roey 8 $26,641 T58 Chisato Iwai 9 $22,727 T58 Yuri Yoshida 9 $22,727 T58 Arpichaya Yubol 9 $22,727 T58 Carla Bernat 9 $22,727 T58 Mary Liu 9 $22,727 T63 Perrine Delacour 11 $20,028 T63 Leona Maguire 11 $20,028 T63 Patty Tavatanakit 11 $20,028 T63 Yani Tseng 11 $20,028 T67 Laura Fuenfstueck 12 $18,440 T67 Grace Kim 12 $18,440 T69 Dasom Ma 15 $17,383 T69 Pauline Roussin-Bouchard 15 $17,383 71 Jeneath Wong 17 $12,777 This article originally appeared on Golfweek: Women's British Open: Winner Miyu Yamashita earns $1.4625 million
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Martin Lewis explains how to claim car finance mis-selling compensation as FCA predicts payouts worth up to £950
Financial expert Martin Lewis has advised on the next steps for drivers who were mis-sold car loans, after a financial regulator said the industry could pay out up to £18bn in compensation. The Financial Conduct Authority is launching a compensation consultation which will determine how much is paid out to millions of people who paid more interest than they knew about. A Supreme Court ruling on Friday (1 August) found that lenders are not liable for hidden commission payments in car finance schemes, a decision which means most of the claims will not go ahead, but only the most serious claims will be eligible for compensation. But many cases in a separate strand of the car finance mis-selling case, which was not part of the Supreme Court ruling, are still likely to receive payouts, Mr Lewis explained. Am I eligible for the compensation scheme? Mr Lewis explains that there are 'two strands' of the car finance mis-selling case. Discretionary Commission Arrangements (DCAs), which Mr Lewis says will be the main form of compensation to come out of the consultation, were not involved in the Supreme Court case, he said. 'The one most people have complained about wasn't involved in the Supreme Court decision, although it was on hold just in case anything in that decision caused a wobbler for DCAs,' Mr Lewis added. DCAs were banned in January 2021, so anyone with a personal contract purchase (PCP) or Hire Purchase (HP) deals before then, is likely to have unknowingly agreed to one. 'It is when you went to a car broker or dealer and it increased the amount of interest that you were charged to increase the amount of commission without telling you,' Mr Lewis explained. Those who had PCP or HP deals are 'likely to get compensation under this scheme'. But Mr Lewis notes that those who had 0 per cent interest, or whose commission was very small, are unlikely to receive compensation. But he says that for most people, the compensation will be in the hundreds of pounds. The other strand of the mis-selling case is the one element of the Supreme Court case which was upheld by the court - with the other two being dismissed. This refers to commissions which were 'manifestly unfair', Mr Lewis explained, adding that it is harder to define because it was done on a case-by-case basis. Factors in the payout may even include how vulnerable you are - and whether it is therefore seen as more unfair for the commission to have been so high. As this is done case-by-case and it is not a blanket issue like the DCA cases, it is unclear how the compensation scheme will work for these, Mr Lewis said. What should I do next? For those that are unsure whether they are eligible, Mr Lewis advises putting in a complaint to see whether you had a DCA. 'If you're one of those people who have already had a letter saying that your car finance firm, after you complained, won't deal with it until December this year, that will almost certainly be delayed until next year,' he said. The FCA is advising consumers who believe they may have paid too much should complain now, and advise against using Claims Management Firms (CMC) or law firms, which could cost up to 30 per cent of any compensation fees received. Lenders will have to contact customers, and either automatically pay out consumers or consumers will have to opt into a scheme for compensation, meaning receiving compensation will be 'very simple to do', Mr Lewis explained. Therefore, CMCs and law firms could take 30 per cent of the compensation without doing any work. Mr Lewis' money advice website MoneySavingExpert offers a free tool which will do a template complaint for you for DCAs. How much could I be compensated? The FCA estimates that most individuals making claims will receive 'less than £950 in compensation per agreement'. The final cost of a compensation scheme will depend on the final design which it takes, the FCA added in its statement earlier today. The first payments are forecast to be made in 2026. For DCA cases, the maximum you could receive is all of the commission you paid, Mr Lewis said. It is more likely you will be paid the higher interest rate you were charged minus the standard interest rate. A simple interest - meaning the interest is calculated on the original amount of the loan - of roughly 3 per cent per year will be added on top of the payout, Mr Lewis added. 'The very high likelihood is that many people who had a discretionary commission arrangement where they were charged more interest than they should have been will get back a chunk of that in the hundreds of pounds at some point in 2026,' he said. But the expert warned that the industry could 'fight this hard', before he urged industry members to accept the 'fair compromise'.