
Russia could soon get up to 30,000 more North Korean troops, reports say
If confirmed, this would almost triple the total number of North Korean soldiers directly supporting Russia after an estimated 14,000 were sent last year to repel Ukraine's incursion into Russia's Kursk region.
The move would also mark an intensification of the more than 3-year-old conflict that is now stretching across Europe and Asia, highlighting the speed at which Pyongyang's military ties with Moscow have deepened since the two signed a mutual defense treaty just over a year ago.
'There is a great possibility' the additional North Korean troops will be engaged in combat in parts of Russian-occupied Ukraine 'to strengthen the Russian contingent, including during the large-scale offensive operations,' CNN cited an Ukrainian intelligence assessment as saying .
It also noted that the Defense Ministry in Moscow would be capable of providing 'needed equipment, weapons and ammunition' to these soldiers with the aim of 'further integration to Russian combat units.'
CNN also pointed to satellite imagery provided by the Open Source Centre showing what appear to be Ilyushin-76 transport planes taxiing at North Korea's Sunan Airport in Pyongyang on June 4.
This is the same aircraft type that was used in last year's deployment. Other signs of preparations include the arrival of a ship linked to last year's deployments at a Russian port, as well as indications that other Russian military aircraft are being refitted to carry personnel.
The Ukrainian intelligence assessment, also reported by NHK , comes after Russian Security Council Secretary Sergei Shoigu announced in mid-June that Pyongyang would send 1,000 combat engineers and 5,000 military builders to help rebuild Russia's Kursk region.
His remarks followed talks with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in Pyongyang, with Shoigu saying that the meeting was meant to carry out "special instructions" from Russian President Vladimir Putin.
A few weeks later, in late June, North Korean state-run media broadcast images showing Kim honoring the flag-draped coffins of soldiers killed fighting Ukraine. Pyongyang only confirmed in April that it had deployed troops to Russia while admitting that soldiers had been killed in combat. It also declared that combat operations had concluded. Around 4,000 North Korean soldiers are estimated to have been killed or injured while helping Russia in Kursk.
But Pyongyang's support for Russia so far has not only included troops, but also some tens of thousands of shipping containers suspected of carrying artillery rounds, mobile anti-air missiles and anti-tank missiles, among other weapons.
Kim and Russian President Vladimir Putin attend a state reception in Pyongyang on June 19, 2024. |
Sputnik / via REUTERS
Defense experts, however, argue that an even greater concern for countries in both Europe and Asia should be the extent to which the allies are exchanging military technology, and how this cooperation could revitalize and ultimately help modernize Pyongyang's defense-industrial base.
For instance, the head of Ukrainian military intelligence Lt. Gen. Kyrylo Budanov was recently quoted by The Kyiv Independent news website as saying that North Korea is already using the Pantsir-S1 air-defense system provided by Russia to defend its capital, adding that Pyongyang is "currently significantly increasing its military power" through direct cooperation with Moscow.
Russia has reportedly helped improve its KN-23 ballistic missiles, and according to U.S. officials also provided advanced electronic warfare systems to Pyongyang.
'The military cooperation between Russia and North Korea is developing at an astonishing speed," former Ukrainian Ambassador to Tokyo Sergiy Korsunsky told the Japan Times.
This increasingly close security relationship is a matter of 'serious concern' for U.S. Indo-Pacific allies and partners, particularly Japan and South Korea, he said, noting that while North Korea has been building additional weapon production facilities the Russians have been making roads and bridges to facilitate the two-way flow of military systems and supplies.
The former diplomat also said he has 'no doubt' that Russian drone and hypersonic missile technologies have been made available to Pyongyang in exchange for troops, munitions and ballistic missiles.
Korsunsky also expressed concern about the impact the anticipated North Korean troop surge could have should these forces be deployed on the battlefield. 'Such an increase in manpower would be a dangerous development and could pose a clear and present danger to Ukraine,' he said.
'This conflict is already increasing the chances of major conflict in Europe, all the while affecting the balance of power in East Asia,' he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Japan Times
3 hours ago
- Japan Times
Japan's top trade negotiator holds two phone meetings with Lutnick
Japan's top tariff negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, held "in-depth exchanges" over the phone with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Thursday and Saturday, the Japanese government said. A pause on a 24% reciprocal tariff on imports from Japan expires on July 9, although U.S. President Donald Trump has suggested the rate could be even higher. The Japanese government also said in a statement that it intends to continue actively coordinating with the U.S. side on the matter, as it worked to avert higher tariffs. The White House declined to comment on the report, referring only to Trump's recent comments on Japan. Trump last week hammered Japan over what he said was Tokyo's reluctance to import U.S.-grown rice, and accusing Japan of engaging in "unfair" autos trade. Japan has in fact imported historically high volumes of U.S. rice in recent months as domestically grown rice has skyrocketed in price since last year. It was unclear if Trump would make good his pledge to skip further trade negotiations with Japan and send it a letter with a specific tariff rate, on top of the 10% already in effect on most trading partners. On Friday he said he had signed letters to 12 countries and they would be going out on Monday, but did not identify them. He expressed doubt that a deal could be reached with Japan on Tuesday, and suggested he could impose a tariff of 30% or 35% on imports from Japan — well above the 24% tariff rate he announced on April 2. Prime Minster Shigeru Ishiba on Wednesday said he was determined to protect his country's national interests as trade negotiations with the U.S. struggled, noting that his country was the largest investor in the United States. Tokyo has yet to secure a trade deal after nearly three months of negotiations as it scrambles to find ways to get Washington to exempt Japan's automakers from 25% automobile industry-specific tariffs, which are hurting the country's manufacturing sector.


NHK
4 hours ago
- NHK
India notifies WTO of proposed retaliatory duties against US tariffs on autos
India's government has notified the World Trade Organization of its proposal to impose retaliatory duties on imports from the United States. The move is a response to an additional 25 percent tariff that the administration of US President Donald Trump has imposed on automobiles and major auto parts imported into the country. The Indian notification sent to the WTO on Friday says that the US would collect 723.75 million dollars by imposing the additional tariff. It also says that India's retaliatory tariffs would result in an equivalent amount of duties collected from products imported from the US. India has not disclosed details of the measure, including US products targeted by the retaliatory tariffs. India says it reserves the right to withdraw or modify the notification, suggesting that the proposed retaliatory duties may be called off depending on how Washington reacts to the proposal. India's government is stepping up its efforts to negotiate a new trade pact with the US as the pause in what Trump calls reciprocal tariffs is due to expire on Wednesday.

Japan Times
15 hours ago
- Japan Times
Under pressure, Hezbollah weighs scaling back its arsenal
Hezbollah has begun a major strategic review in the wake of its devastating war with Israel, including considering scaling back its role as an armed movement without disarming completely, three sources familiar with the deliberations say. The internal discussions, which aren't yet finalized, reflect the formidable pressures the Iran-backed Lebanese militant group has faced since a truce was reached in late November. Israeli forces continue to strike areas where the group holds sway, accusing Hezbollah of ceasefire violations, which it denies. It is also grappling with acute financial strains, U.S. demands for its disarmament and diminished political clout since a new Cabinet took office in February with U.S. support. The group's difficulties have been compounded by seismic shifts in the regional power balance since Israel decimated its command, killed thousands of its fighters and destroyed much of its arsenal last year. Hezbollah's Syrian ally, Bashar Assad, was toppled in December, severing a key arms supply line from Iran. Tehran is now emerging from its own bruising war with Israel, raising doubts over how much aid it can offer, a regional security source and a senior Lebanese official said. Another senior official, who is familiar with Hezbollah's internal deliberations, said the group had been holding clandestine discussions on its next steps. Small committees have been meeting in person or remotely to discuss issues including its leadership structure, political role, social and development work, and weapons, the official said on condition of anonymity. The official and two other sources familiar with the discussions indicated Hezbollah has concluded that the arsenal it had amassed to deter Israel from attacking Lebanon had become a liability. Hezbollah "had an excess of power," the official said. "All that strength turned into a weak point." Under the leadership of Hassan Nasrallah, who was killed last year, Hezbollah grew into a regional military player with tens of thousands of fighters, rockets and drones poised to strike Israel. It also provided support to allies in Syria, Iraq and Yemen. Israel came to regard Hezbollah as a significant threat. When the group opened fire in solidarity with its Palestinian ally Hamas at the start of the Gaza war in 2023, Israel responded with airstrikes in Lebanon that escalated into a ground offensive. People gather next to a vehicle carrying the coffins of former Hezbollah leaders Hassan Nasrallah and Hashem Safieddine, who were killed in Israeli airstrikes last year, in February. | Reuters Hezbollah has since relinquished a number of weapons depots in southern Lebanon to the Lebanese armed forces as stipulated in last year's truce, though Israel says it has struck military infrastructure there still linked to the group. Hezbollah is now considering turning over some weapons it has elsewhere in the country — notably missiles and drones seen as the biggest threat to Israel — on condition Israel withdraws from the south and halts its attacks, the sources said. But the group won't surrender its entire arsenal, the sources said. For example, it intends to keep lighter arms and anti-tank missiles, they said, describing them as a means to resist any future attacks. Hezbollah's media office did not respond to questions for this article. Israel's military said it would continue operating along its northern border in accordance with the understandings between Israel and Lebanon, in order eliminate any threat and protect Israeli citizens. The U.S. State Department declined to comment on private diplomatic conversations, referring questions to Lebanon's government. Lebanon's presidency did not respond to questions. For Hezbollah to preserve any military capabilities would fall short of Israeli and U.S. ambitions. Under the terms of the ceasefire brokered by the U.S. and France, Lebanon's armed forces were to confiscate "all unauthorized arms," beginning in the area south of the Litani River — the zone closest to Israel. Lebanon's government also wants Hezbollah to surrender the rest of its weapons as it works to establish a state monopoly on arms. Failure to do so could stir tensions with the group's Lebanese rivals, which accuse Hezbollah of leveraging its military might to impose its will in state affairs and repeatedly dragging Lebanon into conflicts. All sides have said they remain committed to the ceasefire, even as they traded accusations of violations. Arms have been central to Hezbollah's doctrine since it was founded by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to fight Israeli forces who invaded Lebanon in 1982, at the height of the 1975-1990 Lebanese civil war. Tensions over the Shiite Muslim group's arsenal sparked another, brief civil conflict in 2008. The United States and Israel deem Hezbollah a terrorist group. Nicholas Blanford, who wrote a history of Hezbollah, said that in order to reconstitute itself, the group would have to justify its retention of weapons in an increasingly hostile political landscape, while addressing damaging intelligence breaches and ensuring its long-term finances. "They've faced challenges before, but not this number simultaneously," said Blanford, a fellow with the Atlantic Council, a U.S. think tank. A European official familiar with intelligence assessments said there was a lot of brainstorming underway within Hezbollah about its future but no clear outcomes. The official described Hezbollah's status as an armed group as part of its DNA, saying it would be difficult for it to become a purely political party. Nearly a dozen sources familiar with Hezbollah's thinking said the group wants to keep some arms, not only in case of future threats from Israel, but also because it is worried that Sunni Muslim jihadis in neighboring Syria might exploit lax security to attack eastern Lebanon, a Shiite-majority region. Despite the catastrophic results of the latest war with Israel — tens of thousands of people were left homeless and swathes of the south and Beirut's southern suburbs were destroyed — many of Hezbollah's core supporters want it to remain armed. A man carries a picture of the late Hezbollah leaders Hassan Nasrallah and Hashem Safieddine in Beirut in April. | Reuters Um Hussein, whose son died fighting for Hezbollah, cited the threat still posed by Israel and a history of conflict with Lebanese rivals as reasons to do so. "Hezbollah is the backbone of the Shiites, even if it is weak now," she said, asking to be identified by a traditional nickname because members of her family still belong to Hezbollah. "We were a weak, poor group. Nobody spoke up for us." Hezbollah's immediate priority is tending to the needs of constituents who bore the brunt of the war, the sources familiar with its deliberations said. In December, Secretary-General Naim Qassem said Hezbollah had paid more than $50 million to affected families with more than $25 million still to hand out. But there are signs that its funds are running short. One Beirut resident said he had paid for repairs to his apartment in the Hezbollah-controlled southern suburbs after it was damaged in the war only to see the entire block destroyed by an Israeli airstrike in June. "Everyone is scattered and homeless. No one has promised to pay for our shelter," said the man, who declined to be identified for fear his complaints might jeopardize his chances of receiving compensation. He said he had received checks from Hezbollah but was told by the group's financial institution, Al-Qard Al-Hassan, that it did not have funds available to cash them. The institution could not be immediately reached for comment. Other indications of financial strain have included cutbacks to free medications offered by Hezbollah-run pharmacies, three people familiar with the operations said. Hezbollah has put the onus on Lebanon's government to secure reconstruction funding. But Foreign Minister Youssef Raji, a Hezbollah critic, has said there will be no aid from foreign donors until the state establishes a monopoly on arms. A State Department spokesperson said in May that, while Washington was engaged in supporting sustainable reconstruction in Lebanon, "this cannot happen without Hezbollah laying down their arms." Israel has also been squeezing Hezbollah's finances. The Israeli military said on June 25 that it had killed an Iranian official who oversaw hundreds of millions of dollars in transfers annually to armed groups in the region, as well as a man in southern Lebanon who ran a currency exchange business that helped get some of these funds to Hezbollah. Iran did not comment at the time, and its U.N. mission did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Since February, Lebanon has barred commercial flights between Beirut and Tehran, after Israel's military accused Hezbollah of using civilian aircraft to bring in money from Iran and threatened to take action to stop this. Lebanese authorities have also tightened security at Beirut airport, where Hezbollah had free rein for years, making it harder for the group to smuggle in funds that way, according to an official and a security source familiar with airport operations. Such moves have fueled anger among Hezbollah's supporters toward the administration led by President Joseph Aoun and Nawaf Salam, who was made prime minister against Hezbollah's wishes. Alongside its Shiite ally, the Amal Movement, Hezbollah swept local elections in May, with many seats uncontested. The group will be seeking to preserve its dominance in legislative elections next year. Nabil Boumonsef, deputy editor-in-chief of Lebanon's Annahar newspaper, said next year's poll was part of an "existential battle" for Hezbollah. "It will use all the means it can, firstly to play for time so it doesn't have to disarm, and secondly to make political and popular gains," he said.