Mystery behind cold blob in the Atlantic Ocean finally solved
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Researchers have finally answered a longstanding question about a giant patch of cold water in the Atlantic Ocean, blaming a change in ocean currents for the unexpected cooling.
The anomaly, located just south of Greenland, is — perhaps counterintuitively — called the North Atlantic Warming Hole, and it has been stumping scientists for years. Despite the steady warming of ocean waters around the world, this one area got colder by up to 0.5 degrees Fahrenheit (0.3 degrees Celsius) over the past century.
By analyzing ocean temperatures and salinity patterns, scientists linked this mysterious cooling to the slowing of a system of ocean currents called the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC).
The changing AMOC is "a weakening of a major part of the climate system," David Thornalley, a paleoceanographer at University College London who was not involved in the new research, told Live Science in an email.
The cold blob has long been a point of disagreement among oceanographers. Some believed that ocean dynamics were responsible, while others suggested atmospheric influences like aerosol pollution were the cause, according to a statement from the University of California, Riverside.
These findings, published May 28 in the journal Communications Earth and Environment, could help settle the disagreement, providing evidence that ocean dynamics are responsible.
Related story: Key Atlantic current is weakening much faster than scientists had predicted
There are only about 20 years of direct AMOC observations, so the research team relied on other data to track older ocean movements. They used temperature and salinity data, which are correlated to current speed, to uncover the AMOC's patterns from the last century, and used 94 different ocean models to assess the changes.
With a clear timeline of the AMOC's behavior in hand, the researchers found that only the models that included slowed Atlantic currents matched the real-world cooling.
"It's a very robust correlation," study co-author Kai-Yuan Li, a climate scientist at the University of California, Riverside, said in the statement.
Better understanding of how the AMOC is slowing will not only explain the cold blob but will also contribute to climate forecasting, the statement noted. The AMOC and the anomaly it created both influence European weather patterns, including rainfall and wind.
Marine ecosystems may also be negatively affected by the changing currents, as water temperature and salinity can determine local habitability for some species.
RELATED STORIES
—Large patch of the Atlantic Ocean near the equator has been cooling at record speeds — and scientists can't figure out why
—'We don't really consider it low probability anymore': Collapse of key Atlantic current could have catastrophic impacts, says oceanographer Stefan Rahmstorf
—The Atlantic Ocean is widening. Here's why.
There's also concern that the AMOC will collapse. Scientists believe that it will weaken by at least 20% by 2100, but it's unclear whether a collapse is imminent, said Nicholas Foukal, an oceanographer at the University of Georgia's Skidaway Institute of Oceanography who was not involved in the new study.
"In some sense, the debate is over how bad the effects will be and whether we will have time to adapt to the changes, not whether it will happen," Foukal told Live Science in an email.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
A Mysterious Blob of Cold Water Defies Ocean Heat – Now We Know Why
Over the last decade, Earth's oceans have been warming at unprecedented rates, yet one mysterious blob of water, just south of Greenland, has defied this trend. It has stubbornly remained colder than its surrounding waters for over a century now. "People have been asking why this cold spot exists," says University of California Riverside climate scientist Wei Liu. To find out, Liu and oceanographer Kai-Yuan Li analyzed a century's worth of temperature and salinity data. They found this mysterious cool patch wasn't limited to the ocean surface, but extended 3,000 meters (around 9,840 feet) deep. And only one scenario they explored could explain both sets of data. It's the same scenario researchers have been warning the world about for years now: one of Earth's major ocean circulation systems, the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), is slowing down. Related: "If you look at the observations and compare them with all the simulations, only the weakened-AMOC scenario reproduces the cooling in this one region," explains Li. If the AMOC stalls, it will disrupt monsoon seasons in the tropics, and North America and Europe will experience even harsher winters. The knock-on effects will severely impact entire ecosystems and global food security. The AMOC is a large heat- and salt-driven system of ocean currents that sweeps warm salty water northward. This water cools on its wending journey north, which makes it denser. As the cooler water sinks, water from other oceans is pulled in to fill the surface, driving the cooler water back down south again. With increasing contributions of freshwater from climate change-driven glacier melt, concentrations of salt in the sea water drop, and the water becomes less dense, disrupting the sinking-with-cooling process and weakening the entire physical cycle. That's exactly what the sea surface salinity records showed. Li and Liu found the odd cold spot in the north, near the melting glaciers, had decreasing levels of salinity. Near the equator, however, salinity had increased as the weaker currents failed to stir things up as forcefully. All up, the researchers calculated AMOC has slowed from -1.01 to -2.97 million cubic meters of water per second between 1900 to 2005. "This work shows the AMOC has been weakening for more than a century, and that trend is likely to continue if greenhouse gases keep rising," Li concludes. This research was published in Communications Earth & Environment. Scientists Discover 'Goblin Prince' That Roamed With Dinosaurs Ancient Blueprint For Human Bodies Discovered in Sea Anemones Spider With No Venom Has a Deadly Trick to Poison Its Prey


The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Heat dome passes, but climate-fueled waves aren't going anywhere
Climate change is making heat waves like the one that lingered over much of the U.S. this week more frequent and intense. The Eastern U.S. sweltered under a heat dome in recent days, with some cities surpassing 100 degrees Fahrenheit. Roads in Delaware, Wisconsin and Missouri buckled, while a Virginia bridge malfunctioned and dozens of people in places including Washington D.C. and North Carolina were reportedly hospitalized. In New Jersey, some 100 people were treated after attending outdoor graduation ceremonies in the extreme heat. And while summer is always hot, man-made climate change is worsening the problem. Temperatures in parts of the country are set to soar again this coming week. Megan Kirchmeier-Young, a research scientist at Environment and Climate Change Canada, told The Hill that as the planet warms up in a broader sense, extreme heat events become more likely. 'Warming, from human-caused climate change, means more days when we exceed particular temperature thresholds. Across most of the globe, hot extremes are becoming hotter and occurring more often. And we expect these trends to continue with continued global warming,' Kirchmeier-Young said in an email. 'While we do not yet have results for this week's event, Environment and Climate Change Canada's rapid event attribution system analyzed many heat waves from last summer and found that all were more likely to occur because of human-caused climate change,' she added. And not only is the entire planet warming, the Arctic is warming even faster. Because of this, said Jonathan Overpeck, dean of the School for Environment and Sustainability at the University of Michigan, the jet stream slows down and becomes curvier. 'This is where you start to get these high-pressure domes that just sit in one place longer,' he said, adding that 'these very hot events are becoming more frequent because of that; they concentrate the heat in one large region.' Michael Mann, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania's earth and environmental science department, said in an email that the heat domes being experienced by the U.S and Europe 'show that this was part of a very large-scale pattern, associated with a very 'wiggly' jet stream where the 'wiggles' stay in place for days on end.' 'It's really a double whammy, the basic effect of warming the planet, plus how the pattern of warming is changing the jet stream, giving us those stuck, weather extremes, like the heat domes,' Mann said. He's one of the authors of a paper published earlier this year that found that there has been a 'threefold increase' in such events over the last 70 years, which has been 'closely tied to amplified Arctic warming.' 'You're potentially looking at that trend simply continuing on toward quadrupling, etc., as long as we continue to warm the planet with carbon emissions,' Mann told The Hill. Kirchmeier-Young provided a different perspective, saying there's some uncertainty in how weather patterns are changing. 'The main factor for increases in the intensity and frequency of hot extremes is increasing temperatures. While specific weather patterns are important for the occurrence of any particular heat wave event, if/how these weather patterns might be changing is much more uncertain,' she said. But it's not just the heat that causes misery during a heat wave, it can also be the humidity — something that Overpeck also said is being exacerbated by climate change. 'The atmosphere, because it's warmer, it holds more moisture. And it's that combination of the higher humidity, the water in the atmosphere and the heat that really makes it bad,' he said. The world's average global temperature has already risen 1.36 degrees Celsius, or about 2.4 degrees Fahrenheit, when compared to preindustrial times, primarily due to manmade activity such as the burning of fossil fuels. But this is just a global average, and what people experience may be significantly hotter than just a few degrees. 'We still have warmer days and cooler days, but we are shifting the baseline, so the warmer days are even hotter than they used to be,' said Kirchmeier-Young. 'It will not take much warming in the global temperature to see notable changes in extremes at the regional scale.' 'The average temperature of the planet is hard to feel, but for comparison, if we cooled the planet by four to five degrees C, we'd have an ice age, and that would be a totally different planet,' said Overpeck. The heat wave came as the Trump administration is rolling back regulations meant to mitigate climate change — and as Congress prepares to repeal climate-friendly policies and incentives as part of Republicans' 'big, beautiful bill.' 'This heat wave that we're just coming out of is a great example of we're going to see more of getting even hotter and longer if we don't slow down our use and stop our use of fossil fuels and replace fossil fuels with … clean, low-carbon energy,' Overpeck said.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
I Heard Jurassic World Dominion Was Bad, But I Would Watch It Over Any Other Jurassic Sequel
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. SPOILER WARNING: The following article gives away, just about, the entire plot of Jurassic World Dominion. If you have not yet seen the 2022 Jurassic Park movie, act like Owen Grady holding up his hand to magically neutralize a dinosaur, and proceed with caution as you read on. With Jurassic World Rebirth hitting theaters soon, I figured it was about time that I do something I had been reluctant to do: catch up with the full franchise and watch Jurassic World Dominion. Considering the beastly reviews from critics and audiences, I was braving the worst, but, to my surprise, I thought it was far from it. To be clear, I would not call Colin Trevorrow's sequel a good movie. I think it suffers from a pitifully lazy script, sleepy acting, and throwing out the previous film's setup for a dinosaur-ridden dystopia in favor of, echoing Eric Eisenberg's Jurassic World Dominion review, two bland, disparate plotlines that have little to do with, ya know, dinosaurs. However, I do not at all regret watching it and would choose to watch it again over most sequels to Steven Spielberg's 1993 classic, which I realize may come as a shock to many Jurassic fans. Well, allow me to explain… In previous articles of mine, such as my reaction to the recent sci-fi thriller Companion, I have made it clear that I am a staunch technophobe who fears how dangerously technology's advancement could, or already has, affected our society. However, there is one fear of mine that I have been a bit less vocal about in my writing until now: bugs, especially ones of unusual size. So, you might be able to imagine how I felt when the genetically engineered locusts appeared on the screen. Now, I will agree with the widely shared opinion that a Jurassic Park movie focusing its plot on a non-reptilian prehistoric creature is a mistake, but said creatures did manage to get my adrenaline going faster than any of the dinosaurs that appear in Jurassic World Dominion. That being said… Whenever a dinosaur would appear on screen in Dominion, I found it nothing short of impressive. The special effects, boasting the classic blend of practical animatronics with some of the best CGI Hollywood has to offer, were so convincing, I am surprised there was not more praise about that aspect, at least. Aside from their visual effects, I felt that the action sequences involving dinosaurs are genuinely some of the best that the franchise has ever seen. I recall, in particular, being thoroughly riveted by a scene taking place in Malta, when Owen Grady (Chris Pratt) is chased on a motorcycle through the city by Atrociraptors. I had to stop and think to myself, Wow, I am actually having fun with this movie, and it did not stop there. Some have said the extended edition of Jurassic World Dominion is better than the theatrical version, but you can get both on a Blu-ray and 4K UHD set from Amazon for nearly half off the regular price!View Deal The one reason I had to be somewhat optimistic about finally watching Dominion was the one aspect that I had heard positive rumblings about: DeWanda Wise as Kayla Watts. I could not agree more with my colleague Sarah El-Mahmoud that the daredevil pilot is the best character from the Jurassic World trilogy for her bravery and quick wit, and for just being a badass. If there are any downsides to Kayla, I would say that she makes most of the other newer characters (including Mamoudou Athie's Ramsay Cole and even Pratt's Grady) look weaker than I already believed they were, and that she should have been introduced to the franchise earlier. With all due respect to Scarlett Johansson and Mahershala Ali, a part of me wishes that she were the focus of the upcoming 2025 movie, Jurassic World Rebirth, instead. Despite my harsh words about the newer Jurassic characters, I have to admit that I really enjoyed seeing them finally interact with Dr. Alan Grant (Sam Neill), Dr. Ellie Sattler (Laura Dern), and Dr. Ian Malcolm (Jeff Goldblum). In fact, I don't think I was ever amused by the OG heroes' return until that moment, as the parameters of their reunion and the moments the trio shared never felt particularly natural. And don't get me started about the random callbacks to the first film, like Lewis Dodgson (Campbell Scott) somehow possessing the fake Barbasol canister and displaying it in his office. What?! Anyway, I can't say that 'natural' is a word I would use to describe Grant, Sattler, and Malcolm's meeting with Grady, Claire Dearing (Bryce Dallas Howard), and others in the final act either. The events that lead them to each other are far too convenient (like many other aspects of the plot), and much of their dialogue feels egregiously forced. Yet, there was something about seeing them all gathered together and relying on one another to survive against the prehistoric wildlife that left me wishing the movie had dedicated more time to bringing them together. Of course, any Jurassic Park fan knows that the real draw of this franchise is not the meat, but the meat-eaters, and the one who rules them all is the Tyrannosaurus Rex. Any return by that big behemoth in these movies, no matter how convoluted the reasoning may be, is warmly welcomed by me, and its appearance in Dominion was no exception, especially since it was not alone. I actually really dug how the T-Rex was treated as a hero, Godzilla style, in the film's final act, when it teams up with a Therizinosaurus to bring down the Giganotosaurus. Watching the T-Rex throw the Giganotosaurus onto the Therizinosaurus' claws, fatally impaling it, made for a more satisfying final battle than the Indominus Rex showdown in 2015's Jurassic World, if you ask me. I don't see a future in which I ever boot up my Peacock subscription to watch Jurassic World Dominion again, unless I get curious and decide to check out the extended edition, which I hear is an improvement. Yet, I can't say I feel that I wasted my morning watching it the other day, which is something I can't say about most of the follow-ups to the original '90s movie classic, and that calls for a modest roar of applause in my book.