logo
Former superintendent indicted in AI child porn case involving teacher: Records

Former superintendent indicted in AI child porn case involving teacher: Records

Yahoo06-06-2025
MEMPHIS, Tenn. — Former Corinth School District superintendent Edward Childress has been indicted in connection with an investigation into an ex-middle school teacher accused of creating AI porn using students' images.
The arrest of former Corinth teacher Wilson Frederick Jones led to the termination of Childress' contract as superintendent of Corinth schools. He has now been indicted on state and federal charges in connection with the investigation.
WREG has followed this story since Jones' arrest.
Jones is accused of using Artificial Intelligence to morph pictures of several students in his class, turning them into explicit material.
Parent concerned over ex-MS teacher accused of AI porn videos of students
According to reports, the content was created on his school-issued computer in November 2024. Jones's activity triggered a program with the school system that scans for illicit content being downloaded or shared.
Court documents show that Childress knew about the explicit material in November, but did not notify the Mississippi Department of Education until January. The evidence was seized on Mar. 3, and Jones was arrested on Mar. 12.
The indictment states that Childress concealed the acts by permitting Jones to resign his position as a teacher at the Corinth School District and misrepresented the reason behind Jones's resignation to the school board.
None of the students involved, between the ages of 14 and 16, were aware of what Jones was allegedly doing. Parents expressed their concerns following the arrest, knowing that Superintendent Childress was aware of the illicit content, but did not report it until months later.
Parent concerned over ex-MS teacher accused of AI porn videos of students
'We need to know. We need to know what's going on at our schools and with our children, and not only our own but anybody else's children,' said Jasmica Wade.
Childress was subsequently fired.
Jones and Childress have each been indicted on three counts.
Jones is also facing charges of production and possession of a morphed image of child pornography at the state level.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ex-NBA star Gilbert Arenas Mocks Arrest for Alleged Illegal Poker Games
Ex-NBA star Gilbert Arenas Mocks Arrest for Alleged Illegal Poker Games

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Ex-NBA star Gilbert Arenas Mocks Arrest for Alleged Illegal Poker Games

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Ex-NBA star Gilbert Arenas has mocked his arrest over allegedly running an illegal, high-stakes poker ring out of his home. Arenas, 43, has been charged with three federal crimes, including operating an illegal gambling business and making false statements to investigators. He denies the charges. Posting on social media, the former Washington Wizards player poked fun at the charges in a jokey video after he and five others were arrested at his Los Angeles mansion on Wednesday. Newsweek contacted his legal representative by email to comment on this story. The Context According to a statement from the U.S. Attorney's Office, Arenas, nicknamed in his sporting days as "Agent Zero", and the five other defendants were charged with one count of conspiracy to operate an illegal gambling business and one count of operating an illegal gambling business. Former Washington Wizards player Gilbert Arenas takes part in a ceremony during the half-time of an NBA basketball game between the Wizards and the Miami Heat, Friday, Nov. 18, 2022, in Washington. Former Washington Wizards player Gilbert Arenas takes part in a ceremony during the half-time of an NBA basketball game between the Wizards and the Miami Heat, Friday, Nov. 18, 2022, in Washington. AP Photo/Nick Wass, File The indictment said that the defendants used the house for illegal gabling activities from September 2021 to July 2022. Arenas, who made the NBA All-Star team three times and played for four NBA teams over an 11-year career, was also charged with making false statements to federal investigators, said the statement. Arenas pleaded not guilty to all charges and was released on a $50,000 bond after appearing in court on Wednesday afternoon. What To Know In one video posted on X and Instagram, Arenas was seen leaving a police department, dancing down the stairs and saying "they can't hold me" while a woman behind the camera shouted: "Free!" The caption read: "Im Back on the Streets. This aint got shyt to do with me ' just rented the house' Wasnt apart". Im Back on the Streets 🗣️This aint got shyt to do with me ' just rented the house' Wasnt apart — Gilbert Arenas (@NoChillGilZero) July 31, 2025 The gambling incident is not the first time Arenas has been embroiled in controversy. In 2010, he was charged with carrying a pistol without a license after he argued with teammate Javaris Crittenton in a locker room where both men had guns. He was sentenced to two years on probation and 30 days in a halfway house. What People Are Saying Speaking outside the courthouse, Arenas' attorney, Jerome Friedberg, said: "At this point in the case, he is presumed innocent, right. He has the same right as any other citizen to that presumption and that's how he should be treated." Kwame Brown, a former teammate of Arenas, posted a video of himself on social media celebrating the arrest: "I told people one thing. I said, 'this ****** is a stupid mother f*****. He gonna self-sabotage. He's a dummy.' And look at this stupid mother f*****." What Happens Next Arenas' trial is scheduled for September 23. Prosecutors said that if convicted, the defendants would face a statutory maximum sentence of five years in federal prison for each count.

Apparent AI mistakes force two judges to retract separate rulings
Apparent AI mistakes force two judges to retract separate rulings

Fox News

time3 hours ago

  • Fox News

Apparent AI mistakes force two judges to retract separate rulings

Two U.S. judges in separate federal courts scrapped their rulings last week after lawyers alerted them to filings that contained inaccurate case details or seemingly "hallucinated" quotes that misquoted cited cases — the latest in a string of errors that suggest the growing use of artificial intelligence in legal research and submissions. In New Jersey, U.S. District Judge Julien Neals withdrew his denial of a motion to dismiss a securities fraud case after lawyers revealed the decision relied on filings with "pervasive and material inaccuracies." The filing pointed to "numerous instances" of made-up quotes submitted by attorneys, as well as three separate instances when the outcome of lawsuits appeared to have been mistaken, prompting Neals to withdraw his decision. In Mississippi, U.S. District Judge Henry Wingate replaced his original July 20 temporary restraining order that paused enforcement of a state law blocking diversity, equity and inclusion programs in public schools after lawyers notified the judge of serious errors submitted by the attorney. They informed the court that the decision "relie[d] upon the purported declaration testimony of four individuals whose declarations do not appear in the record for this case." Wingate subsequently issued a new ruling, though lawyers for the state have asked his original order to be placed back on the docket. "All parties are entitled to a complete and accurate record of all papers filed and orders entered in this action, for the benefit of the Fifth Circuit's appellate review," the state attorney general said in a filing. A person familiar with Wingate's temporary order in Mississippi confirmed to Fox News Digital that the erroneous filing submitted to the court had used AI, adding that they had "never seen anything like this" in court before. Neither the judges' office nor the lawyers in question immediately responded to Fox News Digital's requests for comment on the retracted New Jersey order, first reported by Reuters. It was not immediately clear if AI was the reason for that erroneous court submission in that case. However, the errors in both cases — which were quickly flagged by attorneys, and prompted the judges to take action to revise or redact their orders — come as the use of generative AI continues to skyrocket in almost every profession, especially among younger workers. In at least one of the cases, the errors bear similarities to AI-style inaccuracies, which include the use of "ghost" or "hallucinated" quotes being used in filings, citing incorrect or even nonexistent cases. For bar-admitted attorneys, these erroneous court submissions are not taken lightly. Lawyers are responsible for the veracity of all information included in court filings, including if it includes AI-generated materials, according to guidance from the American Bar Association. In May, a federal judge in California slapped law firms with $31,000 in sanctions for using AI in court filings, saying at the time that "no reasonably competent attorney should out-source research and writing to this technology — particularly without any attempt to verify the accuracy of that material." Last week, a federal judge in Alabama sanctioned three attorneys for submitting erroneous court filings that were later revealed to have been generated by ChatGPT. Among other things, the filings in question included the use of the AI-generated quote "hallucinations," U.S. District Judge Anna Manasco said in her order, which also referred the lawyers in question to the state bar for further disciplinary proceedings. "Fabricating legal authority is serious misconduct that demands a serious sanction," she said in the filing. New data from the Pew Research Center underscores the rise of AI tools among younger users. According to a June survey, roughly 34% of U.S. adults say they have used ChatGPT, the artificial intelligence chatbot — roughly double the percentage of users who said the same at the same point two years ago, in 2023. The share of employed adults who use ChatGPT for work has spiked by a whopping 20 percentage points since June 2023; and among adults under 30, adoption is even more widespread, with a 58% majority saying they have used the chatbot.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store