
Dell Pro 14 (PA14250) review: Professional powerhouse that overpromises on a few fronts
Some laptops grab your attention with RGB lights and gamer flair. Others, like the Dell Pro 14 (PA14250), walk in dressed for business, speak when spoken to, and promise to quietly handle whatever you throw at them. With a crisp 2.8K OLED touchscreen display, a snappy Intel Core Ultra 7 chip, and a generous 32 GB of RAM, this machine feels like it was built for fast-moving professionals who don't want to waste time, or space.
But after living with this machine for a few weeks, I've realised that while Dell has packed in a lot of hardware muscle, a few design quirks and usability gaps hold it back from greatness.
Component Details Processor Intel Core Ultra 7 RAM 32 GB LPDDR5 Storage 512 GB NVMe SSD Display 14-inch, 2880 x 1800 (2.8K), OLED Touchscreen Graphics Integrated Intel Arc Weight ~1.57 kg (approx) Ports 2x USB-C, 1x USB-A, HDMI, microSD slot Extras Fingerprint reader, Backlit keyboard
At first glance, the Pro 14 feels refreshingly minimal. It's compact, weighs around 1.5 kg, and feels easy to slide into any professional setting. The chassis doesn't creak, the hinge holds firm, and the matte finish keeps fingerprints to a minimum.
But spend some real time with it, and a few annoyances creep in. The trackpad showed visible wear within weeks, which is rare for a machine in this price range. It's responsive, yes—but visually aged far too quickly.
And the hinge, while solid, doesn't go beyond 180 degrees, making the touchscreen feel oddly underutilised. You can tap, scroll, and pinch, but without any pen in the box or tablet-mode flexibility, the touchscreen ends up as a nice-to-have rather than a meaningful upgrade. Dell Pro 14 (PA14250) review
Now here's where the Pro 14 redeems itself. The 14-inch 2.8K (2880×1800) OLED panel is crisp, sharp, and lovely to look at. Colours are punchy without being oversaturated, text rendering is tack-sharp, and the extra vertical resolution (thanks to the 16:10 aspect ratio) makes multitasking noticeably more comfortable. Dell Pro 14 (PA14250) review
I worked on slides, edited documents, or took multiple YouTube breaks, and this display consistently delivered. It's not overly reflective, which helped me while working near windows. The brightness isn't eye-searing, it's comfortably usable indoors. The OLED contrast was refreshing to see, but do not that this panel is built for productivity, not punch.
Armed with the Intel Core Ultra 7 processor and 32 GB of LPDDR5 RAM, this machine felt consistently fast. Boot times are near-instant, heavy Chrome multitasking doesn't cause stutters, and the laptop glides through productivity apps like Excel, PowerPoint, Lightroom (light edits), and even video conferencing with background tasks running. Dell Pro 14 (PA14250) review
The Intel Arc integrated graphics did not let me game on high settings, but for creative workflows and FHD video playback, it held up just fine. Thermal performance remains steady, no hot palm rests or fan blast during normal use.
In short:it performs like a top-tier ultrabook should.
This is where things get subjective, but not without reason. The keyboard is well-spaced, cleanly backlit, and offers decent feedback… but the key travel is shallow, and that becomes a problem during fast typing sessions. If you're coming from a ThinkPad like me, or any laptop with deeper keys, you might find yourself pressing Caps Lock instead of 'A', as I often did.
The layout also takes some getting used to. It's not unusable, but it lacks the kind of muscle memory comfort that serious typists typically expect—especially in a productivity-focused machine like this one.
With real-world use (screen at ~60% brightness, Wi-Fi on, multitasking in full swing), the battery comfortably lasts around 7 to 8 hours. That's good, but not outstanding for a laptop in this class. The bright 2.8K panel definitely draws more power than a typical FHD display, so you'll want to keep a charger nearby for longer stretches.
On the upside, it charges quickly via USB-C, juicing up to about 80% in under an hour. I could also use a portable GaN charger with this laptop, instead of carrying a proprietary one.
Dell gets the I/O mix mostly right. You get: Two USB-C ports (both support charging, only one supports fast charging)
One USB-A for legacy devices
HDMI for displays
A headphone jack
The fingerprint reader on the power button works fast and reliably, but the slight misalignment did trigger my OCD. Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3 ensure you're future-proof on the wireless front. No Ethernet, but that's expected at this size. Dell Pro 14 (PA14250) review
Pros Cons Snappy Core Ultra 7 performance with 32 GB RAM Touchscreen feels redundant with no pen and limited hinge flexibility 2.8K display is sharp, vibrant, and productivity-friendly Trackpad shows wear within weeks Reliable battery life with fast USB-C charging Shallow key travel, not ideal for fast or accurate typing
The Dell Pro 14 (PA14250) delivers excellent internals in a smartly packaged body, making it ideal for professionals who value speed, clarity, and a compact form. The display is crisp, the performance is snappy, and it holds its own in real-world multitasking. Dell Pro 14 (PA14250) review
But a few design choices prevent it from feeling truly complete: the shallow keyboard, the pointless touchscreen implementation, and the visible trackpad wear in under a month all leave room for refinement. If you want a laptop that performs beautifully for work and daily tasks, this is a compelling choice. Just don't expect the kind of long-term polish or tactile satisfaction that power users (especially writers or coders) might crave.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
6 hours ago
- Indian Express
Nothing Phone (3), Headphone (1) set to launch on July 1: What we know so far
Nothing is gearing up to unveil its highly anticipated Phone (3), which the company is positioning as its first 'true flagship' smartphone, at a major launch event in London, United Kingdom on Tuesday, July 1. Alongside the Nothing Phone (3), the British tech startup is also expected to introduce its first over-ear headphones called Headphone (1). There have been several leaks and rumours swirling about the design of the Nothing Phone (3) as well as the Headphone (1) in the run-up to the event. While customers do not have to wait long to see if these leaks and rumours are true, here's what we know so far about the Nothing Phone (3) and Headphone (1). In a video on the Android Show channel on YouTube, Nothing CEO Carl Pei announced that the Phone (3) will be priced around 800 pounds, which currently translates to $1,063 or Rs 90,500, taking into consideration the current exchange rate. This is almost double the price of the Phone (2), Nothing's most expensive smartphone to date. Pei also said that the phone would be designed out of 'premium materials' and will come up with major performance as well as software upgrades that will 'level things up'. The company has also confirmed that the incoming flagship will be powered by a Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset. It will also boast a 50-megapixel primary camera that has been 'built for creators'. — Nothing (@nothing) June 26, 2025 A few days ago, the company's official handle on X posted a series of images that appear to have been captured using the Phone (3) with impressive zoom capabilities. The Phone (3) will also boast a Glyph matrix on the top-right corner of the smartphone. Coming to the design, a leaked image revealed that the Phone (3) has a translucent back and three center-aligned cameras. However, a newer image posted by Android Headlines shows an entirely different design with a separation between the three cameras. When light becomes language. Introducing the Glyph Matrix. Phone (3). 1 July. — Nothing (@nothing) June 19, 2025 The renderings show two cameras lined up next to each other and another that's in the corner of the phone and not really aligned with anything else. While the design renderings have not been confirmed by Nothing, it would be a bold camera layout if the leaks turn out to be true. Nothing has also announced that the Phone (3) will receive software support for a minimum of seven years, with five years of full Android OS updates and another two years of security patches only. With Android 16 having been released earlier this month, the Nothing Phone (3) is likely to run on the latest version of Android out of the box. In terms of India pricing, the Phone (3) is expected to come with a price tag of Rs 50,000 to Rs 60,000 given the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset under the hood and premium flagship experience. It has also been rumoured that the Phone (3) will have a dedicated button that offers quick access to AI features, similar to the Nothing Phone (3a) series. But this will probably be confirmed only at the launch on July 1. Last month, Nothing posted a video in which it announced that it would be launching over-ear headphones for the first time in summer 2025. There has not been much else teased about the Nothing Headphone (1), except that Tom Ridley, one of the company's designers, said that they are looking to make 'a more interesting looking pair of headphones that say something about you.' Adam Bates, Nothing's global design director, also suggested that its buttons will feature distinct designs for each control function. Based on leaked photos and videos, the Headphone (1) sports a squircle earcup with Nothing's signature transparent elements and support for what appears to be a 3.5mm audio cable. In another set of unverified, leaked images shared on Instagram, the earcups for the Headphone (1) seem to resemble quirky cassette tapes. It show the headphones in black or silver colourways, with 'Nothing Headphone 1' and 'Sound by KEF' branding printed on either earcup.


Indian Express
9 hours ago
- Indian Express
YouTube rolls out AI search results for Premium users: Will it impact views, engagement?
Google is bringing AI-generated search results to YouTube as part of its broader efforts to reinvent the traditional search experience of users by integrating generative AI across its entire ecosystem. The AI-generated search results on the video sharing platform will appear at the top of the results page. It will feature multiple YouTube videos along with an AI-generated summary of each video. Users can tap on the thumbnails of the videos to begin playing them directly from the search results. The AI-generated summary accompanying each video will include information that is most relevant to the user's search query. However, the AI-powered search experience on the platform is currently limited to YouTube Premium subscribers. It is an opt-in feature, which means that Premium subscribers will have to manually enable the feature by visiting YouTube's experimental page. The move signals Google's shift towards generative AI-based search and discovery with AI-summarised answers replacing traditional links. Similar to AI Overviews in Google Search, this feature is designed to appear above organic search results as part of the big tech company's strategy to have more of its users engage with its AI systems. 'In the coming days, our conversational AI tool will be expanding to some non-Premium users in the US. Premium members already love it for getting more info, recommendations, and even quizzing themselves on key concepts in academic videos,' YouTube said in a blog post published on June 26. While only YouTube Premium subscribers can currently choose to see AI-generated search results on the platform, it is likely that Google will expand access to all users in the future. By showing AI-generated summaries of videos, YouTube users might be less inclined to open videos and watch them on the platform. The feature could also have an impact on engagement as fewer users might comment, subscribe, and generally interact with content creators. Something similar is already happening in web search. Multiple studies have shown that people are increasingly looking for information by asking questions to chatbots like ChatGPT or Gemini as opposed to using web browsers like Safari. This defection away from traditional search engines towards generative AI has negative consequences, especially for publishers and websites that have relied on search traffic to generate revenue. A recent study by content licensing platform TollBit found that news sites and blogs receive 96 per cent less referral traffic from generative AI-driven search engines than from traditional Google Search. When asked about publishers seeing a dip in traffic coming from Search, Elizabeth Reid, the head of Google Search, previously told 'We see that the clicks to web pages when AI Overviews exist are of higher quality. People spend more time on these pages and engage more. They are expressing higher satisfaction with the responses when we show the AI Overviews.' Even though the video is just one tap away, the AI-generated summary in YouTube search results will probably give users an idea of all the relevant parts of the video. This could potentially make it harder for YouTube channels to grow and earn revenue. In addition, YouTube is bringing its Veo 3 AI video generation model to YouTube Shorts in the coming months, according to CEO Neal Mohan. The AI model capable of generating cinematic-level visuals with complete sound and dialogue, was reportedly trained on subsets of the 20-billion video library uploaded on YouTube.


Mint
a day ago
- Mint
Why tech billionaires want bots to be your BFF
Next Story Tim Higgins , The Wall Street Journal In a lonely world, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg and even Microsoft are vying for affection in the new 'friend economy.' Illustration: Emil Lendof/WSJ, iStock. Gift this article Grok needs a reboot. Grok needs a reboot. The xAI chatbot apparently developed too many opinions that ran counter to the way the startup's founder, Elon Musk, sees the world. The recent announcement by Musk—though decried by some as '1984"-like rectification—is understandable. Big Tech now sees the way to differentiate artificial-intelligence offerings by creating the perception that the user has a personal relationship with it. Or, more weirdly put, a friendship—one that shares a similar tone and worldview. The race to develop AI is framed as one to develop superintelligence. But in the near term, its best consumer application might be curing loneliness. That feeling of disconnect has been declared an epidemic—with research suggesting loneliness can be as dangerous as smoking up to 15 cigarettes a day. A Harvard University study last year found AI companions are better at alleviating loneliness than watching YouTube and are 'on par only with interacting with another person." It used to be that if you wanted a friend, you got a dog. Now, you can pick a billionaire's pet product. Those looking to chat with someone—or something—help fuel AI daily active user numbers. In turn, that metric helps attract more investors and money to improve the AI. It's a virtuous cycle fueled with the tears of solitude that we should call the 'friend economy." That creates an incentive to skew the AI toward a certain worldview—as right-leaning Musk appears to be aiming to do shortly with Grok. If that's the case, it's easy to imagine an AI world where all of our digital friends are superfans of either MSNBC or Fox News. In recent weeks, Meta Platforms chief Mark Zuckerberg has garnered a lot of attention for touting a stat that says the average American has fewer than three friends and a yearning for more. He sees AI as a solution and talks about how consumer applications will be personalized. 'I think people are gonna want a system that gets to know them and that kind of understands them in a way that their feed algorithms do," he said during a May conference. Over at Microsoft, the tech company's head of AI, Mustafa Suleyman has also been talking about the personalization of AI as the key to differentiation. 'We really want it to feel like you're talking to someone who you know really well, that is really friendly, that is kind and supportive but also reflects your values," he said during an April appearance on the Big Technology Podcast. Still, he added, Microsoft wants to impose boundaries that keep things safe. 'We don't really want to engage in any of the chaos," Suleyman said. 'The way to do that, we found, is that it just stays reasonably polite and respectful, super-even handed, it helps you see both sides of an argument." With all of that in mind, it comes as little surprise that the current crop of chatbots are designed to sound like you're having a conversation with another human. This has resulted in lots of pearl clutching. There are academics warning about the dangers of users falling in love with AI and individual anecdotes of users going overboard in their use. The idea of a heartbroken man falling in love with his chatbot isn't new, of course. It was the plot of the 2013 film 'Her" starring Joaquin Phoenix and Scarlett Johansson, who voiced the AI. (OpenAI's own AI voice, which sounded eerily similar to Johansson's last year, triggered a public fight with the actress.) Still, we—a society that's only a generation into a world of social media—have some recent experience in how algorithms can have unintended consequences. They create echo chambers that reinforce worldviews rather than expand them. The news of Musk's Grok reboot is an example of that. Grok and xAI were born, in part, out of Musk's concerns about AI being developed by companies he called woke. He pointed to Google results that seemed overly concerned with being politically correct rather than factually accurate. With xAI, Musk aimed to create what he called a 'maximum truth-seeking AI." Yet when an influential X user known as Catturd lambasted Grok's answers in June, Musk took quick note. 'When Grok first came out—it was awesome—now Grok is just woke fake news that repeats liberal talking points," Catturd posted on June 18. 'I know this for a fact because everything Grok says about me is a lie. What a joke Grok has become." Another X user asked Grok why it lied about Catturd. 'I aim to provide accurate, neutral responses based on available data," the chatbot responded on X. 'Claims that I lie about @catturd2 may stem from disagreements with my sourcing, like Media Matters or Rolling Stone, which document his misinformation. I don't have personal biases, but AI training can introduce unintended slants. Some report I censor criticism or push fringe views, while others note I fact-check conservative claims accurately. Bias in AI is complex, and neutrality is tough to achieve. If you have specific examples of lies, please share, and I'll clarify with evidence." Musk wasn't impressed. 'Your sourcing is terrible," Musk replied. 'Only a very dumb AI would believe [Media Matters] and [Rolling Stone]! You are being updated this week." He later said xAI would retrain the AI on data created with an updated version of Grok, 'which has advanced reasoning" that would be used 'to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors." After all, nobody wants a friend who is always spouting the wrong crazy stuff. Write to Tim Higgins at Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Technology News and Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates & Live Business News.