logo
The tech woes of America's tech cops

The tech woes of America's tech cops

Politico2 days ago
With help from Alfred Ng and Aaron Mak
Frustration is brewing around the government office whose job is to track the most exquisite, cutting-edge American technology as it moves around the world.
Though a wonky agency known mostly to trade and tech insiders, the Bureau of Industry and Security at the Commerce Department operates at the cutting edge of the $600 billion global semiconductor industry. It polices American export controls by approving or rejecting export licenses and pursuing enforcement actions.
You might think the BIS would have sophisticated tools to deploy — but in fact, America's global tech cop is hobbled by software that in some cases hasn't been updated in two decades.
In a series of hearings and interviews, insiders have described an agency struggling to cope with creaking software even as its workload has ballooned in recent years. Last year, then-undersecretary of Commerce Alan Estevez, who led BIS, told Congress licensing applications had doubled to 40,000 since 2012 while some of its 'antiquated' software dated back to 2006.
The state of affairs has shocked tech policy experts.
'The IT infrastructure at the Bureau of Industry and Security is a legitimate national security threat to the U.S.,' said a senior Republican aide on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, which oversees BIS. (The aide requested anonymity to speak about ongoing discussions in Congress.)
A Democratic House staffer said BIS under the Biden administration responded at a glacial pace to requests for information, including important questions on applications for export licenses to Chinese tech companies. 'It took them over a year to get back to Congress with licensing data about SMIC and Huawei,' said the aide, who was not authorized to speak to the press.
The BIS did not respond to DFD's questions on its software. Its current leader, Commerce Department undersecretary Jeffrey Kessler, told lawmakers in June that the president's budget requested $303 million for the agency, 'the single largest investment in BIS history, and one that will significantly bolster our ability to protect national security.'
The House and Senate are also making efforts to shore up the agency. The House has suggested appropriating $303 million for BIS, while the Senate has suggested $211 million. Either would be an increase from the current $191 million. But it's not clear if that would cover the full software overhaul insiders say is needed — and Congress might not manage to pass appropriations bills before an Oct. 1 shutdown, which could mean flat funding for the near term.
The BIS has become increasingly important in American policy over its four decades of existence, as the U.S. has expanded its use of export controls for foreign policy.
During President Donald Trump's first term, he placed Huawei and SMIC on the 'Entity List' of blacklisted companies. His administration used the Foreign Direct Product Rule to extend U.S. export controls to goods made with U.S. components, even if the products were manufactured outside the U.S. Both of those are policed by the BIS.
Biden built on those controls, both by enacting new restrictions on the export of advanced AI chips, and by adding Russian companies to the 'Entity List' over Moscow's invasion of Ukraine.
As BIS was handling a bigger slice of the global tech trade, its systems struggled to keep up. Speaking to HFAC last year, Estevez said his agency was using 'manual pulls' of data for Congress.
The Democratic House aide said BIS brought staffers in for a demonstration. 'It was very distressing,' the aide said. 'Mostly I felt really really bad for the people who work at Commerce.'
The staffer pointed to frustrations at all levels, from disconnected systems handling major BIS responsibilities to character limits that made it hard to search accurately for company names. 'The search functions are alarmingly inadequate,' the staffer said.
In an effort to modernize, the agency awarded Palantir $3.5 million in 2024 for data center services. However, that was far from the scale of overhaul a database would require.
Even if lawmakers increase BIS's budget, the ancient tech is only one part of its problem. The agency staff has been in turmoil since Trump took office, with top leaders on chip export controls departing. David Feith, who handled technology at the National Security Council, was dismissed in April.
A bipartisan bill HFAC lawmakers introduced last week would require the bureau to nearly double the ranks of BIS export control officers around the world to 20, from 11 today.
Kessler told lawmakers last month that extra BIS money would enable the agency to hire nearly 200 special agents across the U.S. as well as 30 officers overseas. Michael Sobolik, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute who previously worked as an aide to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), said ramping up BIS staff could come at the expense of a tech reboot.
'If that money is going to have to go to cover new hires, and if the tech is really as old as it seems like it is, that may not be enough,' said Sobolik.
Jessie Blaeser contributed to this report.
AI pricing argument hits the airlines
Some lawmakers want to know how Delta Airlines is using artificial intelligence to set 'individualized fares' for customers — an emerging industry practice that critics fear abuses people's privacy and creates higher costs.
The letter, sent by Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) and joined by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Mark Warner (D-Va.) on Monday and exclusively provided to POLITICO, asks Delta CEO Ed Bastian to disclose what data the company uses to train its algorithm for setting prices, how many customers are paying for prices determined by AI and what steps the company is taking to evaluate the potential impact of AI on its pricing.
Unlike discounts for broad groups such as teachers, veterans and senior citizens, individualized pricing sets specific prices for different people, with critics saying the goal is to set the highest price that people are willing to pay.
It also uses more personal information, such as a person's web browsing behavior, social media activity, financial status and location, the Federal Trade Commission said in a January report.
Delta did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Delta told investors on a July 10 earnings call that it plans to use AI to set pricing for 20 percent of its domestic flights by the end of 2025. The company expects to eventually personalize all flight prices.
The practice of using people's data to set individualized prices, which the FTC calls 'surveillance pricing,' has been a concern among state lawmakers who worry it will lead to higher prices. Business lobbyists have pushed back against regulations, arguing that individual pricing can bring discounts to consumers.
Delta has until Aug. 4 to respond to the senators' letter.
Incoming: Trump's AI Action Plan
Trump is set to release his long-awaited AI Action Plan on Wednesday — and POLITICO's Mohar Chatterjee reports that it will center on cutting regulation, competing with China and suppressing 'woke AI.'
The president called on his AI and crypto czar, David Sacks, and other White House tech advisers to develop the action plan in a January executive order. The order rolled back AI safety guardrails that President Joe Biden put into place through his own EO.
Mohar obtained an overview of the action plan on Friday, and reports that it will include provisions for streamlining permitting for data center construction, ensuring that federal AI systems are not ideologically biased, promoting AI exports and withholding funds from states with restrictive AI laws.
Many of these aims align with the administration's light-touch approach to AI — for example, it backed a state AI law moratorium in the spending bill. That provision was cut, and members of Congress are now trying to get bipartisan support for AI regulations in statehouses. Yet, as POLITICO's Morning Tech team points out, using this action plan to push for state AI deregulation could be a potential workaround to Congress' rejection of the moratorium.
post of the day
THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS
Stay in touch with the whole team: Aaron Mak (amak@politico.com); Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@politico.com); Steve Heuser (sheuser@politico.com); Nate Robson (nrobson@politico.com); and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@politico.com).
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Congress slashes aid to Colombia over drug use allegations in Petro's government
Congress slashes aid to Colombia over drug use allegations in Petro's government

Miami Herald

time26 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Congress slashes aid to Colombia over drug use allegations in Petro's government

A powerful congressional panel led by Florida Republican Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart is moving to sharply cut non-military U.S. aid to Colombia, citing a combination of rising instability, weakening rule of law and growing concerns about drug use within the highest levels of President Gustavo Petro's government. In a report released this week alongside the 2026 National Security, Department of State and Related Programs Appropriations Bill, the House Appropriations Committee criticized Petro's government for what it called 'detrimental policies, erratic behavior and malign relationships.' The report also flagged concerns about increased drug use in Colombia, including among top government officials, and what it described as a deteriorating security situation. As a result, the committee is proposing a 50% reduction in non-military assistance to Colombia compared to 2025 levels. The move, driven by Díaz-Balart — chair of the subcommittee that oversees foreign aid — signals a shift in what has long been a bipartisan consensus supporting Colombia as a close strategic ally in the U.S.-led fight against narcotrafficking. The bill still requires approval by the full House and reconciliation with Senate legislation before becoming law. Still, the proposed cuts point to a significant cooling in relations between Washington and Bogotá, adding pressure on Petro's government amid growing domestic and international scrutiny. The committee report referenced the June 7 assassination attempt against opposition senator and 2026 presidential candidate Miguel Uribe Turbay as emblematic of Colombia's mounting political instability. It also cited the resurgence of armed groups in regions previously reclaimed under Plan Colombia, the multi-billion-dollar U.S. security initiative launched in the early 2000s. 'The security environment is deteriorating, and political volatility is on the rise,' the report states, warning of escalating violence in several parts of the country. Among the more unusual elements of the report is its focus on domestic drug consumption in Colombia—traditionally seen as a drug-producing nation rather than a consumer one. The congressional committee directs the secretary of state to consult with Congress within 90 days on launching drug demand-reduction programs in Colombia. The report's reference to alleged substance abuse among government officials comes amid renewed political turmoil in Bogotá. Earlier this year, a leaked audio recording surfaced in which former Foreign Minister Álvaro Leyva — once a key Petro ally — appeared to call for Petro's removal from office, reportedly citing health concerns. According to the Madrid newspaper El País, Leyva traveled to Washington in April and attempted to meet with Republican leaders, including Díaz-Balart and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. It remains unclear whether any of those meetings actually took place or whether U.S. officials seriously entertained Leyva's claims. The committee also raised alarms over judicial proceedings against former President Álvaro Uribe Vélez, a staunch U.S. ally. The report cites alleged due process violations, unauthorized surveillance and judicial politicization as cause for concern, framing the case as part of a broader trend of democratic erosion worldwide. 'These challenges reflect a troubling pattern of threats to due process and judicial independence,' the report reads. Despite the proposed cuts to development and civilian law enforcement aid, military support remains largely unchanged. The bill allocates $38.5 million in Foreign Military Financing and $67.3 million for National Security Investment Programs. The International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement account would receive $103 million, underscoring the continued importance of counternarcotics efforts in the bilateral relationship. If adopted, the bill would mark a rare and dramatic recalibration of U.S.-Colombia ties, long rooted in security cooperation but now increasingly strained under Petro's leftist government.

From tech podcasts to policy: Trump's new AI plan leans heavily on Silicon Valley industry ideas
From tech podcasts to policy: Trump's new AI plan leans heavily on Silicon Valley industry ideas

The Hill

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hill

From tech podcasts to policy: Trump's new AI plan leans heavily on Silicon Valley industry ideas

President Donald Trump has unveiled a sweeping new plan for America's 'global dominance' in artificial intelligence, proposing to cut back environmental regulations to speed up the construction of AI supercomputers while promoting the sale of U.S.-made AI technologies at home and abroad. The 'AI Action Plan' introduced Wednesday embraces many of the ideas voiced by tech industry lobbyists and the Silicon Valley investors who backed Trump's election campaign last year. The White House on Wednesday revealed the 'AI Action Plan' Trump ordered after returning to the White House in January. Trump gave his tech advisers six months to come up with new AI policies after revoking President Joe Biden's signature AI guardrails on his first day in office. The unveiling is co-hosted by the bipartisan Hill and Valley Forum and the 'All-In' podcast, a business and technology show hosted by four tech investors and entrepreneurs, which includes Trump's AI czar, David Sacks. The plan includes some familiar tech lobby pitches. That includes accelerating the sale of AI technology abroad and making it easier to construct the energy-hungry data center buildings that are needed to form and run AI products. It also includes some of the AI culture war preoccupations of the circle of venture capitalists who endorsed Trump last year. Trump's AI plan: global dominance, cutting regulations The plan prioritizes AI innovation and adoption, urging the removal of any 'red tape' that could be slowing down adoption across industries and government. But it also seeks to guide the industry's growth to address a longtime rallying point for the tech industry's loudest Trump backers: countering the liberal bias they see in AI chatbots such as ChatGPT or Google's Gemini. Trump's plan seeks to block the government from contracting with tech companies unless they 'ensure that their systems are objective and free from top-down ideological bias.' A Biden-era framework for evaluating the riskiest AI applications should also be stripped of any references to 'misinformation, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and climate change,' the plan said. The plan also says the nation's leading AI models should protect free speech and be 'founded on American values,' though it doesn't define which values those should include. Sacks, a former PayPal executive and now Trump's top AI adviser, has been criticizing 'woke AI' for more than a year, fueled by Google's February 2024 rollout of an AI image generator that, when asked to show an American Founding Father, created pictures of Black, Asian and Native American men. Google quickly fixed its tool, but the 'Black George Washington' moment remained a parable for the problem of AI's perceived political bias, taken up by X owner Elon Musk, venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, Vice President JD Vance and Republican lawmakers. Streamlining AI data center permits to speed up supercomputer construction The plan aims to speed up permitting and loosen environmental regulation to accelerate construction on new data centers and factories and the power sources to fuel them. It condemns 'radical climate dogma' and recommends lifting a number of environmental restrictions, including clean air and water laws. Trump has previously paired AI's need for huge amounts of electricity with his own push to tap into U.S. energy sources, including gas, coal and nuclear. Many tech giants are already well on their way toward building new data centers in the U.S. and around the world. OpenAI announced this week that it has switched on the first phase of a massive data center complex in Abilene, Texas, part of an Oracle-backed project known as Stargate that Trump promoted earlier this year. Amazon, Microsoft, Meta and xAI also have major projects underway. The tech industry has pushed for easier permitting rules to get its computing facilities connected to power, but the AI building boom has also contributed to spiking demand for fossil fuel production, which will contribute to global warming. United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Tuesday called on the world's major tech firms to power data centers completely with renewables by 2030. 'A typical AI data center eats up as much electricity as 100,000 homes,' Guterres said. 'By 2030, data centers could consume as much electricity as all of Japan does today.' The plan includes a strategy to disincentivize states from aggressively regulating AI technology. It recommends that federal agencies 'consider a state's AI regulatory climate when making funding decisions and limit funding if the state's AI regulatory regimes may hinder the effectiveness of that funding or award.' Trump's Republican administration had supported a different proposal in Congress to block states from passing any AI laws for 10 years, but the Senate defeated it earlier this month. Who benefits from Trump's AI action plan? There are sharp debates on how to regulate AI, even among the influential venture capitalists who have been debating it on their favorite medium: the podcast. While some Trump backers, particularly Andreessen, have advocated an 'accelerationist' approach that aims to speed up AI advancement with minimal regulation, Sacks has described himself as taking a middle road of techno-realism. 'Technology is going to happen. Trying to stop it is like ordering the tides to stop. If we don't do it, somebody else will,' Sacks said on the 'All-In' podcast. On Tuesday, more than 100 groups, including labor unions, parent groups, environmental justice organizations and privacy advocates, signed a resolution opposing Trump's embrace of industry-driven AI policy and calling for a 'People's AI Action Plan' that would 'deliver first and foremost for the American people.' Amba Kak, co-executive director of the AI Now Institute, which helped lead the effort, said the coalition expects Trump's plan to come 'straight from Big Tech's mouth.' 'Every time we say, 'What about our jobs, our air, water, our children?' they're going to say, 'But what about China?'' she said in a call with reporters Tuesday. She said Americans should reject the White House's argument that the industry is overregulated and fight to preserve 'baseline protections for the public' as AI technology advances.

These 11 Republicans are backing the Khana-Massie Epstein measure
These 11 Republicans are backing the Khana-Massie Epstein measure

The Hill

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hill

These 11 Republicans are backing the Khana-Massie Epstein measure

A bipartisan effort to force a binding House vote on releasing the 'Epstein files' has picked up Republican support, though just how many in the GOP ultimately support the measure won't be seen at least until the lower chamber returns from its August recess. The bipartisan bill from Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) is one of two measures related to the Epstein files, which have effectively stymied the entire chamber and prompted Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) to send members home early. It has the 11 Republican and nine Democratic co-sponsors as of Wednesday. Massie and Khanna have vowed to file a discharge petition to bypass House leadership and force their bill to the floor with 218 signatures. Discharge petitions are rarely successful, and seldom used by members of the majority. But Massie and Khanna's could be successful if all 11 GOP co-sponsors sign on with all Democrats. It would not be ready for a vote until September due to procedural rules. The measure would require Attorney General Pam Bondi to make public 'in a searchable and downloadable format' all 'unclassified records, documents, communications and investigative materials in the possession' of the Justice Department (DOJ) related to the late sex offender and disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Massie has led the charge from the GOP side and taken heat from Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who on Tuesday said he was baffled about Massie's motivations. The House will now leave town Thursday, a day earlier than scheduled, for its recess. Democrats have hammered Johnson for avoiding any summer votes on the Epstein bills. Here are the Republicans who are backing the measure. Lauren Boebert Rep. Lauren Boebert (Colo.), a fierce ally of President Trump, was one of the first lawmakers to call for a special counsel to investigate the government's handling of the files. 'People are frustrated. We want to know if there's more information,' the Colorado lawmaker said on NewsNation last week. Boebert was among the lawmakers who celebrated the Trump administration's move in February to reveal what it claimed were the Epstein files — a move that ended up disappointing many observers who hoped for new revelations. In 2020, while Boebert was running for her first term in Congress, she appeared to indulge a conspiracy theory that Epstein did not die by suicide. 'Is 2020 a set up so we all forget Epstein didn't kill himself?' she wrote then on X, adding a chin-scratching emoji. The medical examiner ruled that Epstein, who was in New York City jail awaiting trial, died by suicide in 2019. The DOJ and the FBI reaffirmed the cause of his death in an unnamed memo earlier this month, where officials also said that the disgraced financier did not keep the so-called 'client list.' Jeff Van Drew Rep. Jeff Van Drew (N.J.) switched from the Democratic Party to the GOP in 2020 over Trump's first impeachment. The New Jersey Republican, who represents a South Jersey district that includes Atlantic City, has not commented extensively on the Epstein files. 'The American people deserve full transparency,' Van Drew said in a post on X announcing his support. Marjorie Taylor Greene Epstein is one of the rare issues on which Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.), one of the most prominent MAGA Republicans in Congress, has not been in lock-step with the president. The Georgia lawmaker has warned that voters could turn on Trump over the controversy. 'If you tell the base of people, who support you, of deep state treasonous crimes, election interference, blackmail, and rich powerful elite evil cabals, then you must take down every enemy of The People,' she wrote on X Monday. If not, 'The base will turn and there's no going back.' Greene celebrated Trump's move to ask to unseal grand jury transcripts related to Epstein last week, and derided Democratic outrage on the issue as 'fake.' Eric Burlison Rep. Eric Burlison (Mo.), a two-term congressman, has blamed both the DOJ and the 'deep state' for hiding files related to Epstein. He expressed skepticism early on about the DOJ-FBI memo, as well as their release of hours of surveillance footage from outside Epstein's cell. The footage is missing about one minute around midnight, which Bondi has said was due to standard resetting of the prison's security cameras every night. 'What is a reasonable person supposed to conclude when they're first told the footage doesn't exist, only to see it later released, showing a different cell and missing a full minute?' Burlison wrote on X the day the footage was released. Tim Burchett Rep. Tim Burchett (Tenn.) successfully pushed Tuesday for a subcommittee of the House Oversight Committee to subpoena Maxwell, Epstein's longtime associate who is serving a lengthy prison sentence. 'It's about to get real. I just did this,' he wrote on X after moving to issue the subpoena. Burchett has also criticized the Democrats, who celebrated the subpoena, for not caring about Epstein until Trump had been encircled in the controversy. 'If Democrats were serious about this issue, they wouldn't have waited four years to bring it up,' he said on CNN last week. Cory Mills Rep. Cory Mills (Fla.) has not yet publicly commented on his decision to co-sponsor the resolution. He garnered headlines for a different reason last week after news broke of court filings alleging that he owed $85,000 in back rent at his D.C. apartment. Mills blamed an online processing error and has since said the debt is settled. Mills was previously a Trump appointee on the Defense Business Board. He represents a coastal district in north-central Florida, centered on the town of New Smyrna Beach. Max Miller Rep. Max Miller (R-Ohio) said last week he signed on the petition because he believes in 'transparency and delivering the truth' to the American people. Miller previously was Trump's senior advisor during his first White House term and was in the Marine Corps Reserves for six years. Also in recent but unrelated news, Miller said last month he was run off the road by a 'deranged man' who was waving a Palestinian flag and hurled death threats before driving off. Eli Crane Rep. Eli Crane (R-Ariz.), a staunch Trump defender and member of the conservative Freedom Caucus, announced he would co-sign Massie's measure last week, writing 'Add me. Transparency matters.' The former Navy SEAL, who sits on the subcommittee on border security enforcement, told Axios 'that's been something that I've supported from day one … I think there needs to be transparency, and I'm glad to see that this is bipartisan because it should be.' Nancy Mace Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) has linked her support for Epstein transparency to her own alleged experience with sexual violence. In February, she accused four men, including her former fiancé, of a range of sex crimes. All four men have denied accusations. 'I've always been an advocate for women and children. The Jeffrey Epstein case is no different. I want to see arrests. I want to see any one who raped underage girls in handcuffs and behind bars,' Mace, who is mulling a run for South Carolina governor, said in a X post last week. 'No more passes for predators,' she added. 'May God bless President Trump – he's never let us down before!' Mace said in an interview that she was in favor of appointing a special counsel to probe who might be involved in trafficking girls and young women, along with investigating if anyone destroyed evidence. 'If the Justice Department can be more transparent on this, it would be best for the country. People don't trust the government, and we haven't given them much reason to over the past few years,' Mace told The New York Times last week. Keith Self Rep. Keith Self (R-Texas), a military veteran, said during an interview on Wednesday that the bipartisan Massie-Khanna measure will 'easily pass' the lower chamber if it comes to a full vote. 'We want to expose the criminals, we want to protect the victims. Recent reports said there were 1000 victims, we need to figure out who perpetrated the crimes against those victims and this seems to be the only way that we're going to get to do it,' Self told Newsmax. Self noted that the release of the Epstein files has widespread support among the American public and predicted that the petition will secure 218 votes in the House. 'But again, this is an issue of justice. It's an issue of transparency and frankly, accountability of the government. The American people want to see a government that is accountable to our employers, who are the citizens, the voters of the United States,' the Texas Republican said. 'It is as simple as that.' Tom Barrett Rep. Tom Barrett (R-Mich.) said last week there are too many 'questions and not enough answers' about the Epstein files. 'I agree that it's time to release them, which is why I put my name on a resolution to force their release and give the American people the transparency they deserve,' Barrett wrote on X. Democrats At least nine Democrats have signed onto the measure, as the party looks to fuel GOP angst over the Epstein files and force tough votes on the issue. The co-sponsors are: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.), Rashida Tlaib (Mich.), Jim McGovern (Mass.), Hank Johnson (Ga.), Jamie Raskin (Md.), Ryan Patrick (N.Y.), Debbie Dingell (Mich.), Joe Neguse (Colo.), Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) and Nydia Velazquez (N.Y.).

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store