‘Objectionable' names of 40 schools changed
According to an order issued Friday by Sita Ram Jat, director of elementary education, Bikaner, the decision follows recommendations from district education officers and local school management committees. The initiative aims to align school names with constitutional values of equality, secularism, and inclusivity.
Examples include Govt Primary School Kanjar Basti (Ajmer), now renamed Govt Primary School, Ramganj Ward 27, and Govt Primary School Bhil Basti (Patan) in Beawar, now Govt Primary School, Patan.
Many schools previously had names referencing marginalised communities, such as "Bheelon ka Guda" or "Harijan Basti," which officials said could reinforce social stigmas.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Brits Over 50 are Raving About These Pain-Relieving Barefoot Shoes - Here's Why
Foot Insider
Learn More
Undo
"The goal is to prevent any student or community from feeling singled out or disrespected due to a school's name," a senior department official said, adding that names should reflect neutral or culturally inclusive identities.
All affected schools have been instructed to immediately update signboards, official records, and online data. District authorities will oversee the process and are required to confirm compliance by the end of the month.
Jaipur: The school education department has ordered to rename 40 govt schools whose names were deemed "objectionable" or inappropriate due to caste, community, or locality-based identifiers.
According to an order issued Friday by Sita Ram Jat, director of elementary education, Bikaner, the decision follows recommendations from district education officers and local school management committees. The initiative aims to align school names with constitutional values of equality, secularism, and inclusivity.
Examples include Govt Primary School Kanjar Basti (Ajmer), now renamed Govt Primary School, Ramganj Ward 27, and Govt Primary School Bhil Basti (Patan) in Beawar, now Govt Primary School, Patan.
Many schools previously had names referencing marginalised communities, such as "Bheelon ka Guda" or "Harijan Basti," which officials said could reinforce social stigmas.
"The goal is to prevent any student or community from feeling singled out or disrespected due to a school's name," a senior department official said, adding that names should reflect neutral or culturally inclusive identities.
All affected schools have been instructed to immediately update signboards, official records, and online data. District authorities will oversee the process and are required to confirm compliance by the end of the month.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
10 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Why 'Hamas-run hospital' but never ‘US-backed IDF'?': Zohran Mamdani calls out double standards on Israel-Gaza coverage; slams BBC
Zohran Mamdani (AP image) Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani criticized public broadcaster BBC for biased reporting on the ongoing Middle East conflict. He condemned the use of selective language in its coverage of the Israel-Gaza war, questioning why the outlet uses terms like 'Iran-backed Houthis' or 'Hamas-run hospital,' but avoids labels such as 'US-backed IDF' or referring to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as an 'indicted war criminal.' Mamdani questioned the broadcaster's choice of language, calling out its failure to apply similar labels to Israeli leaders and military forces as it does to other groups in the region. 'Why does the BBC always include context like 'Iran-backed Houthis' and 'Hamas-run hospital' but never 'US-backed IDF' or 'indicted-war-criminal Benjamin Netanyahu'?' Mamdani questioned in a post on X. Mamdani, a New York Assembly member and a vocal advocate for Palestinian rights, has long drawn attention for his positions on Israel and Palestine. A supporter of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, he has referred to Israel's military operations in Gaza as 'genocide' and has introduced proposals to cut ties with firms operating in Israeli settlements in the West Bank. In a past interview on Fox5's 'Good Day New York,' Mamdani courted controversy when he said he did not support Israel's existence as a Jewish state, arguing that no state should have a religious hierarchy. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like AirSense 11 – Smart tech for deep sleep ResMed Buy Now Undo by Taboola by Taboola 'Because I'm not comfortable supporting any state that has a hierarchy of citizenship on the basis of religion or anything else,' Mamdani said. "In the way we have in this country, equality should be enshrined in every country in the world.' Mamdani's remarks and political stance have not gone unnoticed. US President Donald Trump has frequently targeted him, most recently after Mamdani won the Democratic primary in New York City. In a post on Truth Social, Trump called Mamdani a '100% Communist Lunatic' and mocked him for looking "terrible." He further claimed that he would be bad for New York City. Speaking on a Fox News interview, Trump said Mamdani is a communist and he openly admits it. "He's a communist and I think it's very bad for New York. I don't know if he's going to get in but he's a pure communist and I think he admits it," he said. Mamdani's viral post criticizing the BBC has sparked online debate, with some social media users defending his stance and others accusing him of selective outrage. One netizen questioned, "Why does Zohran Mamdani never address the Russian genocide in Ukraine and war criminal Putin?" Another user agreeing with Mamdani wrote,"You are asking hard questions."
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Government convenes all-party meet ahead of Monsoon session
An all-party meeting convened by the government ahead of the Monsoon session of Parliament is underway here on Sunday where the opposition is likely to rake up various issues, including special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar as well as the Pahalgam terror attack . The government is likely to seek cooperation from opposition parties for the smooth conduct of the House. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category Technology PGDM MCA Digital Marketing Product Management Others Data Science healthcare Public Policy others Artificial Intelligence Data Analytics Degree Healthcare CXO Management Leadership MBA Cybersecurity Design Thinking Finance Project Management Operations Management Data Science Skills you'll gain: Duration: 12 Weeks MIT xPRO CERT-MIT XPRO Building AI Prod India Starts on undefined Get Details Leaders of various political parties are attending the meeting where the government is being represented by Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju and his junior minister Arjun Ram Meghwal. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas Prices In Dubai Might Be More Affordable Than You Think Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Quote Undo Gaurav Gogoi and Jairam Ramesh of the Congress, Supriya Sule of NCP-Sharad Pawar, DMK's T R Baalu and RPI (A) leader and Union minister Ramdas Athawale were amongst those who are attending the meeting. INDIA bloc parties have resolved to raise during the Parliament's Monsoon session the issues of Pahalgam attack terrorists not being brought to justice, US President Donald Trump's repeated claims of brokering a 'ceasefire' during India-Pakistan hostilities and the special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar that the opposition alleges "threatens people's voting rights".
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Obama, Russia, and a coup? DNI Tulsi Gabbard claims plot to derail Donald Trump's 2016 win
Tulsi Gabbard , the current US Director of National Intelligence , has ignited a political firestorm by accusing former President Barack Obama and senior members of his administration of orchestrating a "treasonous conspiracy" during the 2016 election aftermath. Speaking on Friday, Gabbard said her office had uncovered "overwhelming evidence" that high-ranking officials manipulated intelligence to justify the Trump–Russia investigation. These claims were laid out in newly declassified documents, which she says will be handed to the Department of Justice for criminal referral. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category Cybersecurity Technology Artificial Intelligence Data Science CXO MCA Healthcare Degree others Design Thinking Product Management PGDM Management Others healthcare Digital Marketing Leadership Data Analytics Project Management Public Policy Finance Data Science Operations Management MBA Skills you'll gain: Duration: 10 Months MIT xPRO CERT-MIT xPRO PGC in Cybersecurity Starts on undefined Get Details 'No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, to ensure nothing like this ever happens again,' Gabbard said in an official statement. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 20 Most Expensive Cars In The World Undo A high-level meeting and a shift in narrative According to the documents released by Gabbard, the turning point came during a National Security Council meeting at the White House on 9 December 2016. Present at that meeting were former CIA Director John Brennan, DNI James Clapper, National Security Adviser Susan Rice, Secretary of State John Kerry, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. She contends that the meeting led to a new intelligence directive—ordered by Obama—to reassess Russia's role in the 2016 election. Following the meeting, Clapper's assistant reportedly instructed the CIA, FBI, NSA and DHS to prepare a revised Intelligence Community (IC) assessment "per the President's request". Live Events This assessment, released on 6 January 2017, suggested Russia interfered in the election to aid Donald Trump. But Gabbard says earlier internal findings did not support that conclusion. 'Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome,' reads a 7 December 2016 internal memo cited in the report. She claims the revised report ignored previous intelligence and relied instead on 'manufactured' sources, including the now-discredited Steele Dossier. 'Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people,' Gabbard said on social media. False leaks and media influence Gabbard further alleged that Obama-era officials leaked misleading claims to major news outlets to shape public opinion. She cited examples where statements were fed to publications such as The Washington Post, claiming Russia had attempted to interfere with or even influence the election outcome. 'Russia has attempted through cyber means to interfere in, if not actively influence, the outcome of an election,' she said, quoting one such claim. Trump applauds, Democrats push back Donald Trump quickly responded to Gabbard's claims, voicing his support through a post on Truth Social. "Great job by young and talented Harrison Fields on FoxNews. The Panel was fantastic on prosecuting Obama and the 'thugs' who have just been unequivocally exposed on highest level Election Fraud. Congratulations to Tulsi Gabbard. Keep it coming!!!" Meanwhile, Democratic lawmakers issued swift and sharp rebuttals. Senator Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said, 'The Senate Intelligence Committee conducted a bipartisan investigation reviewing hundreds of thousands of documents and interviewing witnesses over several years. The unanimous, bipartisan conclusion was that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump. This is just another example of the DNI trying to cook the books, rewrite history, and erode trust in the intelligence agencies she's supposed to be leading.' Representative Jim Himes of Connecticut also weighed in, 'Baseless accusations of treason are unfortunately par for the course for this Director of National Intelligence, but that doesn't make them any less damaging and unacceptable. The IC leaders in 2016 understood that they took an oath to the Constitution, not President Trump. I wish Director Gabbard could say the same.' Layers of investigation and conflicting reports Gabbard's claims arrive years after a slew of investigations into the Trump–Russia saga. The Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Republicans during Trump's presidency, conducted a three-year investigation concluding that Russia did mount an aggressive effort to sway the 2016 election. It found numerous contacts between Trump campaign aides and Russian officials but stopped short of confirming coordination. Former CIA Director John Ratcliffe also ordered a separate review. While that review criticised how the 2016 IC assessment was put together, it did not overturn its conclusions. Additionally, the Department of Justice's internal watchdog and Special Counsel John Durham investigated the origins of the FBI's Russia probe. Durham's inquiry led to three indictments, including one FBI lawyer who admitted to falsifying details in a surveillance warrant. But overall, the probe found no systemic wrongdoing. A deepening divide Gabbard insists this issue cuts across party lines. 'The issue I am raising is not a partisan issue. It is one that concerns every American,' she said. 'The American people's faith and trust in our democratic republic and therefore the future of our nation depends on it.' The Justice Department has not yet confirmed whether it will pursue the referrals. Clapper and Brennan did not respond to comment requests. James Comey declined to comment. With both political camps entrenched, the release of these documents may reopen old wounds—but whether it leads to prosecutions remains uncertain.
