Should I Brave The Gen Z Skirt This Summer? It's Selling Out Everywhere
I was on holiday recently and started to notice that every woman under the age of, I'm going to say 26, was wearing a very specific outfit formula: a halter-neck top, a pair of trainers and, crucially, a tennis skirt. As someone who's quite far north of their mid-twenties, this stopped me in my tracks. These people definitely weren't headed for a court or sunny patch of grass. They weren't carrying rackets or smuggling tennis balls in the side pockets of these skirts. They were just wearing them...because.
Maybe you're thinking, this is the final straw! After the tidal wave of track pants (bearable), capri pants (questionable) and now tennis skirts (seriously?), are we really still advocating the sporting of sports kit IRL? Yup (keep up).
Coco Gauff at the Berlin Tennis Open ©Imago
Coco Gauff has a lot to answer for, too. The French Open-champion raised the game of the humble tennis skirt to a stratospheric high before she raised that silverware on the clay at Roland-Garros. Because watching her serve in that signature green-and-white uniform from Miu Miu x New Balance, you couldn't help but realise why the tennis skirt could be a style ace.
In fact, after the mild shock had subsided on holiday, I had already started to clock why the garment is a good idea (in soaring temperatures especially). As a functional piece of sportswear, most come with an in-built pair of shorts that has a pocket for your phone and/or bank card, and tend to be made of a technical material that wicks sweat away from the body to stay breathable and keep you dry on the move. After last week's heatwave and a cancelled train on my way home, I can more than see the appeal.
I possibly wouldn't pair my tennis skirt with a sporty top half or a halter-top, although they're also trending so watch the space. I would still play up its preppy side, however, with a knitted V-neck, white ribbed socks and a pair of loafers. (You can also cheat slightly by seeking out a longer style that's white, pleated and still looks ripe for a game or two.) A cute and comfortable uniform that guarantees against guests of wind and will mean you look 'down with the kids' yet grown-up? That I can get on board with. 1.
Lululemon, Align™ High-Rise Skirt 2.
Sweaty Betty Racket Power Skort 3.
Vuori Clementine Pleated Skirt 15" 4.
The Upside Laver Cadiz Pleated Tennis Skirt
Price: £130 5.
On Court Skirt 6.
Wilson Midtown Tennis Skirt 7.
Alo Yoga Glam Slam Tennis Skirt
Price: £98 8.
Uniqlo Ultra Stretch Active Skort
Natalie Hammond is senior fashion news editor at Grazia. She loves winter, hates summer and can often be found writing about the weather (and what on earth to wear).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
3 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
For the sake of tennis, one player in particular must rise to the top
You can have all the quality in the world spread across the field but if there's no rivalries, there's no hook. Which, in turn, means no interest or, at least, much diminished interest from the public. One particularly intense, beautiful and hugely competitive rivalry is exactly why men's tennis thrived to the extent it did for a decade-and-a-half from the mid-2000s. That rivalry was the Roger Federer - Rafa Nadal match-up. Across all of sport, there have been few rivalries which have produced quite as much interest, tension, joy, heartbreak and world-class sport as the Federer-Nadal version. It's why there was such a visceral feeling of devastation when first Federer, then Nadal retired. How would men's tennis ever recover, it was asked? Inevitably, though things move on and already, there's a new rivalry that has seamlessly replaced Federer and Nadal as the most compelling head-to-head in tennis. Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz have filled the vacuum created by the departure of Federer and Nadal and they are, indisputably, the new stars of men's tennis. Of the last eight grand slam tournaments, the pair have won seven between them, with only Novak Djokovic breaking up the monopoly. Sinner and Alcaraz are the biggest names in the sport and, by some margin, the two best players. Their French Open final earlier this month was one of the greatest matches the sport has ever seen. Some have suggested it's the very best ever, although I wouldn't go that far. Alcaraz prevailed in Paris a few weeks ago, and it's the Spaniard who leads the head-to-head 5-2, but it's Sinner who is number one in the world. Whatever the statistics, though, what is clear is that, providing serious injury does not derail the career of either man, it's Alcaraz and Sinner who will dominate men's tennis over the coming years, perhaps even for the next decade. (Image: Andy Cheung/ Getty Images) A rivalry of this quality is, objectively, a good thing for the sport. But for the good of tennis, one man in particular from this duo must prevail. That man is Carlos Alcaraz. There's a number of reasons why it's so important that Alcaraz and not Sinner becomes the next real tennis great. The first reason is down to the style of their tennis. Alcaraz is, to my eye anyway, a far more flashy, skilful and compelling player to watch. The Spaniard has considerably more flair and variety in comparison to Sinner. The Italian is, it cannot be denied, a phenomenon on the tennis court. So consistently outstanding are his ground strokes, he's almost robotic-like. The sparsity of his unforced errors is remarkable. And the quality of his hitting is perhaps the best the sport has ever seen. But, for me, watching that style of tennis for a prolonged length of time, no matter how high quality it is, just isn't all that interesting. Give me variety, flair, imagination and creativity any day of the week, even if it results in quite a few more unforced errors. Alcaraz is the defending champion at Wimbledon (Image: Getty Images) The second reason is personality. Alcaraz is a far more compelling character than Sinner. The Italian is, on the face of it, a nice guy. It's almost impossible to find anyone who has a bad word to say about him, and he certainly comes across in the press as an amicable, friendly and genuinely decent guy. He also, though, is quite boring. Alcaraz in contrast, has a personality that shines through. He seems like a young guy who can't quite believe his luck that he's living this life. There's something very endearing about his youthful exuberance, with the way he celebrated his French Open victory with the Roland Garros ball kids the perfect example of just what's so likeable about the Spaniard. The final reason is perhaps the most pertinent for me. Earlier this year, Sinner served a doping ban. The details of his case are somewhat convoluted but, to simplify it, Sinner claimed that his trainer had a banned substance on his hands and when treating the Italian, the substance transferred to Sinner and caused his positive test. The Italian was banned from tennis for three months but there was considerable outcry over the alleged preferential treatment he was given and the leniency in allowing him back on tour after such a short suspension. His return was, conveniently, just in time for the French Open meaning the world number one didn't miss a major tournament during his time on the sidelines, nor did he lose his number one ranking. While Sinner wasn't unjustly 'let off' with anything, he was, it seems, treated very favourably as a result of his lofty standing within the sport. The outcry over the unfairness of his treatment was entirely justified because when you compare how fast his infringement was dealt with, as well as his lenient punishment, it's hard to argue that his doping case was handled in a comparable way to the cases of his lower-ranked peers following doping allegations. I don't believe Sinner is a prolific doper, not even close. I actually think his explanation for his positive test is entirely plausible. But I do think it's not a good look for any sport to have a doping conviction on the record of the top player. It's hard to see any way in which this new era of men's tennis isn't the Sinner and Alcaraz era. Tennis will benefit from this pair dominating; they're both outstanding tennis players and will, in all likelihood, move the game on even from the remarkable standard that Federer and Nadal set during their time of dominance. With Wimbledon beginning tomorrow, only a fool would bet against the prediction that we're heading for yet another Sinner-Alcaraz final. Objectively, this would be positive for the sport, particularly if the Wimbledon final is another classic in the way the French Open final was but in this head-to-head, I'll always be willing the Spaniard on. So while having this duo at the top of the game is a good thing for tennis, what will be really good for tennis, for so many reasons, will be if Alcaraz prevails, and emerges as the top dog.
Daily Mirror
4 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Novak Djokovic perplexed wife with Wimbledon decision after tough family chat
Seven-time Wimbledon champion Novak Djokovic left his wife confused last year when deciding to play at Wimbledon, having just recovered from a torn meniscus, but his gamble paid off Novak Djokovic puzzled his wife when deciding to take to the grass of Wimbledon in 2024. The iconic Serbian has been triumphant seven times before in SW19 but heads there this year ranked as world No. 6. The then-37-year-old's year took a disappointing turn as Wimbledon approached 12 months ago. He was forced to retire from his French Open quarter-final four weeks prior due to a torn meniscus, which required significant surgery. Djokovic had contested the last five Wimbledon finals before the decision came on whether he'd make an appearance in 2024. Despite his consistent and remarkable successes on Centre Court, the Serbian star couldn't stay away, much to the bafflement of his other half, Jelena. Ahead of the 2024 championships, Djokovic revealed his wife didn't understand why he was playing and couldn't give her a proper answer. When asked by FOX News why he opted not to sit out the historic competition, Djokovic quipped: "My wife also kind of asked the same question, right? Which is normal. "[You are] 37 years old, you want to maybe have less risk and prepare yourself for the Olympic Games? So from that perspective, I don't have an answer to that. "But, I do have something that is described as a feeling of not missing out at a Grand Slam while I can still play and while I'm still active and at this level. "I wouldn't call it a fear of missing out. I would just say it's this incredible desire to play, just to compete, particularly because it is Wimbledon, the tournament that always has been a dream tournament for me when I was a kid. Just the thought of me missing Wimbledon was just not correct. I didn't want to deal with that." Djokovic will be present in west London for 2025, bringing his streak of consecutive appearances to 20. The 38-year-old had a stranglehold over SW19 from 2018 until 2022, winning four tournaments in a row to add to his trio of titles. His streak was ended by an up-and-coming Carlos Alcaraz in a five-set thriller two years ago. One year after his defeat in Wimbledon's showpiece, Djokovic ignored his wife's questioning and began his 2024 campaign with a dominant straight-sets win over Czech qualifier Vit Kopriva. British wildcard Jacob Fearnley was up next, and he put up a valiant fight, taking a set off the Serbian before falling to a score of 6-3, 6-4, 5-7, 7-5. Former top-25 Australian star Alexei Popyrin met Djokovic in the third round, and while he too stripped a set off the 24-time Grand Slam champion, he was swept aside. Fifteen-seed Holger Rune was Djokovic's fourth-round foe, but he was no match and lost in straight sets. Djokovic received a bye at the quarter-final stage after scheduled opponent Alex De Minaur was forced to withdraw from the event due to a hip injury. The Serbian faced Lorenzo Musetti in the final four and bravely batted him to one side 6-4, 7-6 (7-2), 6-4 to set up a date with his adversary from 2023's final, Alcaraz. While many expected the contest to be tight, the young Spaniard was simply too scintillating for Djokovic and beat him 6-2, 6-2, 7-6 (7-4) to lift back-to-back titles. The Serbian's run to the final - which saw him pocket a cool £1.4million - perhaps justified his decision to compete at Wimbledon after his wife's fears. His run at SW19 also didn't hinder his Paris 2024 bid, as he claimed gold to finally achieve his career goal. This year, there have been no such questions around his presence at Wimbledon, which could be his last with Djokovic continuing to flirt with retirement.
The National
5 hours ago
- The National
For the sake of tennis, one player in particular must rise to the top
You can have all the quality in the world spread across the field but if there's no rivalries, there's no hook. Which, in turn, means no interest or, at least, much diminished interest from the public. One particularly intense, beautiful and hugely competitive rivalry is exactly why men's tennis thrived to the extent it did for a decade-and-a-half from the mid-2000s. That rivalry was the Roger Federer - Rafa Nadal match-up. Across all of sport, there have been few rivalries which have produced quite as much interest, tension, joy, heartbreak and world-class sport as the Federer-Nadal version. It's why there was such a visceral feeling of devastation when first Federer, then Nadal retired. How would men's tennis ever recover, it was asked? Inevitably, though things move on and already, there's a new rivalry that has seamlessly replaced Federer and Nadal as the most compelling head-to-head in tennis. Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz have filled the vacuum created by the departure of Federer and Nadal and they are, indisputably, the new stars of men's tennis. Of the last eight grand slam tournaments, the pair have won seven between them, with only Novak Djokovic breaking up the monopoly. Sinner and Alcaraz are the biggest names in the sport and, by some margin, the two best players. Their French Open final earlier this month was one of the greatest matches the sport has ever seen. Some have suggested it's the very best ever, although I wouldn't go that far. Alcaraz prevailed in Paris a few weeks ago, and it's the Spaniard who leads the head-to-head 5-2, but it's Sinner who is number one in the world. Whatever the statistics, though, what is clear is that, providing serious injury does not derail the career of either man, it's Alcaraz and Sinner who will dominate men's tennis over the coming years, perhaps even for the next decade. (Image: Andy Cheung/ Getty Images) A rivalry of this quality is, objectively, a good thing for the sport. But for the good of tennis, one man in particular from this duo must prevail. That man is Carlos Alcaraz. There's a number of reasons why it's so important that Alcaraz and not Sinner becomes the next real tennis great. The first reason is down to the style of their tennis. Alcaraz is, to my eye anyway, a far more flashy, skilful and compelling player to watch. The Spaniard has considerably more flair and variety in comparison to Sinner. The Italian is, it cannot be denied, a phenomenon on the tennis court. So consistently outstanding are his ground strokes, he's almost robotic-like. The sparsity of his unforced errors is remarkable. And the quality of his hitting is perhaps the best the sport has ever seen. But, for me, watching that style of tennis for a prolonged length of time, no matter how high quality it is, just isn't all that interesting. Give me variety, flair, imagination and creativity any day of the week, even if it results in quite a few more unforced errors. Alcaraz is the defending champion at Wimbledon (Image: Getty Images) The second reason is personality. Alcaraz is a far more compelling character than Sinner. The Italian is, on the face of it, a nice guy. It's almost impossible to find anyone who has a bad word to say about him, and he certainly comes across in the press as an amicable, friendly and genuinely decent guy. He also, though, is quite boring. Alcaraz in contrast, has a personality that shines through. He seems like a young guy who can't quite believe his luck that he's living this life. There's something very endearing about his youthful exuberance, with the way he celebrated his French Open victory with the Roland Garros ball kids the perfect example of just what's so likeable about the Spaniard. The final reason is perhaps the most pertinent for me. Earlier this year, Sinner served a doping ban. The details of his case are somewhat convoluted but, to simplify it, Sinner claimed that his trainer had a banned substance on his hands and when treating the Italian, the substance transferred to Sinner and caused his positive test. The Italian was banned from tennis for three months but there was considerable outcry over the alleged preferential treatment he was given and the leniency in allowing him back on tour after such a short suspension. His return was, conveniently, just in time for the French Open meaning the world number one didn't miss a major tournament during his time on the sidelines, nor did he lose his number one ranking. While Sinner wasn't unjustly 'let off' with anything, he was, it seems, treated very favourably as a result of his lofty standing within the sport. The outcry over the unfairness of his treatment was entirely justified because when you compare how fast his infringement was dealt with, as well as his lenient punishment, it's hard to argue that his doping case was handled in a comparable way to the cases of his lower-ranked peers following doping allegations. I don't believe Sinner is a prolific doper, not even close. I actually think his explanation for his positive test is entirely plausible. But I do think it's not a good look for any sport to have a doping conviction on the record of the top player. It's hard to see any way in which this new era of men's tennis isn't the Sinner and Alcaraz era. Tennis will benefit from this pair dominating; they're both outstanding tennis players and will, in all likelihood, move the game on even from the remarkable standard that Federer and Nadal set during their time of dominance. With Wimbledon beginning tomorrow, only a fool would bet against the prediction that we're heading for yet another Sinner-Alcaraz final. Objectively, this would be positive for the sport, particularly if the Wimbledon final is another classic in the way the French Open final was but in this head-to-head, I'll always be willing the Spaniard on. So while having this duo at the top of the game is a good thing for tennis, what will be really good for tennis, for so many reasons, will be if Alcaraz prevails, and emerges as the top dog.
