
"Six Hour Notice, No Safety Assurance": Inside America's New Deportation Plan
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is reportedly planning to deport migrants with as little as six hours of advance notice to countries that are not their own-- even without any guarantees of safety from the receiving nations. ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons told the ICE workforce in a recent memo that the Supreme Court's last month ruling has cleared the way for "immediately" deporting immigrants to "alternative" countries, without "diplomatic assurances" of protection against torture or persecution, according to a report by The Washington Post.
In case of deportation to countries with no "diplomatic assurance", deportees will ideally receive a notice 24 hours in advance. However, in "exigent circumstances," removal can be carried out within only six hours, the report said.
Those being flown to places offering those assurances, deportation can be carried out with no advance notice.
The new US policy marks a significant departure from previous deportation practice, when migrants were rarely sent to third countries. Among those affected would be thousands of immigrants who might face danger in their own countries, or people from nations like China or Cuba that do not always cooperate with deportations due to frosty relationships with the US.
Lawyers' Warning
Immigration lawyers have warned that the new policy could endanger thousands of longtime immigrants with work permits and families in the US. These people can be uprooted and sent to places where they lack family ties or even a common language.
"It puts thousands of lives at risk of persecution and torture," said Trina Realmuto, executive director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, which is challenging the ruling in court.
Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, lead counsel in another immigration case, said the move is "definitely" going to affect "thousands upon thousands of people". "This is a category of people who understood themselves to be out of the woods,' he said.
Realmuto's agency sued the Trump administration in March for violating federal law by sending migrants to countries where they could be harmed. The lawsuit included the case of a Guatemalan man who was deported to Mexico, where he had been kidnapped and raped.
US District Judge Brian Murphy has temporarily barred the Trump administration from sending immigrants to third countries without first providing them written notice at least 10 days before for a "meaningful opportunity" to challenge the deportation. On June 23, the US Supreme Court's conservative majority paused the district court's order in a brief, unsigned statement that did not explain its reasoning, making way for the removals to resume.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented against the Supreme Court's judgment, and along with Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, she warned that the court's decision would put people at risk. "In matters of life and death, it is best to proceed with caution," she wrote. "In this case, the Government took the opposite approach.
What ICE Memo Said
ICE chief's memo, which is based on guidance Homeland Security Secretary Kristi L Noem issued in March, permits removal based on assurances accepted by the US State Department. It says ICE can deport an individual to a third country within 24 hours of notifying them where they are being sent. Officials also don't need to ask deportees if they fear going to a third country.
In case any immigrant does express a fear of being deported in the 24-hour period, Lyons' memo said they will be screened for possible humanitarian protection under federal law and the Convention Against Torture-- which was ratified by Congress in 1994 to stop governments from sending immigrants to a country where they might face torture.
The screenings will "generally" happen within a 24-hour window to determine if the deportee merits immigration court proceedings or humanitarian protection.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
13 minutes ago
- The Hindu
India welcomes U.S. listing of The Resistance Front as global terrorist outfit
India on Friday (July 18, 2025) welcomed the U.S. designating Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) proxy The Resistance Front (TRF), which claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam terror attack, as a global terrorist outfit. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar described Washington's decision on The Resistance Force (TRF) as a "strong affirmation" of India-U.S. counter-terrorism cooperation. In a social media post, he specially complimented U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio for designating the proxy of Pakistan-based LeT. A strong affirmation of India-US counter-terrorism cooperation. Appreciate @SecRubio and @StateDept for designating TRF—a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT) proxy—as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT). It claimed responsibility for the… — Dr. S. Jaishankar (@DrSJaishankar) July 18, 2025 "Appreciate @SecRubio and @StateDept for designating TRF — a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT) proxy — as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT). It claimed responsibility for the April 22 Pahalgam attack," the external affairs minister said. Earlier, the U.S. State Department said it is adding TRF as a designated Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT). The U.S. State Department also noted that the TRF claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam attack which killed 26 civilians. "This was the deadliest attack on civilians in India since the 2008 Mumbai attacks conducted by LeT," it said. "TRF has also claimed responsibility for several attacks against Indian security forces, including most recently in 2024," The State Department said its actions demonstrates the Trump Administration's commitment to "protecting our national security interests, countering terrorism, and enforcing President Trump's call for justice for the Pahalgam attack".


New Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Trump mired in Epstein controversy as Wall Street Journal reports on 2003 letter
WASHINGTON: The controversy over President Donald Trump 's handling of records from the Jeffrey Epstein investigation entered a new dimension Thursday as his administration struggles to make good on its promises to release details on the sex trafficking case involving a one-time friend of the now-president. Trump promised a lawsuit after The Wall Street Journal described a sexually suggestive letter that the newspaper says bore Trump's name and was included in a 2003 album for Epstein's 50th birthday. Trump denied writing the letter, calling it 'false, malicious, and defamatory.' It came after Trump in recent days has berated as 'weaklings' supporters vying for more records from the Epstein probe, after years of courting political support from those who have stoked claims of a coverup in the case to protect wealthy friends of Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 awaiting trial on federal charges of trafficking of underage girls. Trump has also shielded his attorney general from being questioned about the case after she walked back claims of the existence of a 'client list' of elites who participated in Epstein's crimes, and has even taken to claiming without evidence that files were doctored by Democrats. In an administration that prides itself on changing the narrative on negative storylines, the Epstein saga has had remarkable staying power, thanks in part to infighting at high levels of government, Trump's blistering criticism of his own base and the head-scratching mystery of why documents his own administration promised to unlock will remain buried — seemingly for good. Thursday's disclosure — coupled with frustration from Trump-allied lawmakers on Capitol Hill — pushed Trump to abruptly reverse course and direct Attorney General Pam Bondi to try to make some of the documents in the case public. Bondi said she would seek court permission Friday to release grand jury information, but it would require a judge's approval, and she and Trump were silent on the additional evidence collected by federal law enforcement in the sprawling investigation that Bondi last week announced she would not release.


Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Epstein scandal: Trump orders release of ‘any and all' case files; Pam Bondi vows ‘ready to move the court'
Amid mounting pressure from both Democrats and Republicans, US President Donald Trump has ordered Attorney General Pam Bondi to release 'any and all' grand jury testimony related to Jeffrey Epstein . The new Epstein files could refer to more secret witness statements, evidence, and court proceedings from past criminal investigations into Epstein's sex trafficking network, reigniting public attention on the long-running scandal involving powerful and wealthy figures. 'Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval,' Trump posted on his Truth Social platform. 'This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!' Bondi, a close ally and legal adviser to Trump, confirmed her readiness to act. Reposting Trump's Truth Social message on X, she wrote, 'President Trump — we are ready to move the court tomorrow to unseal the grand jury transcripts.' This development comes as Trump strongly denies a Wall Street Journal report that claims his signature appears in a letter found in Epstein's 2003 birthday album. The Journal says the leather-bound book, compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell for Epstein's 50th birthday, contains messages from influential associates and includes a typed letter signed 'Donald' inside the outline of a naked woman. Trump rejected the letter as a forgery and has threatened legal action against the Wall Street Journal, NewsCorp, and Rupert Murdoch. 'This is not me. This is a fake thing. It's a fake Wall Street Journal story,' Trump told the WSJ. 'I never wrote a picture in my life. I don't draw pictures of women. It's not my language. It's not my words.' Trump also said he warned the Journal not to publish the story, stating, 'I'm gonna sue The Wall Street Journal just like I sued everyone else.' In another Truth Social post, he criticised editor Emma Tucker, writing, 'The Editor of The Wall Street Journal, Emma Tucker, was told directly by Karoline Leavitt, and by President Trump, that the letter was a FAKE, but Emma Tucker didn't want to hear that.' Leavitt, who is also White House press secretary, doubled down, saying, 'The WSJ refused to show us the letter and conceded they don't even have it in their possession when we asked them to verify the alleged document they're basing their ENTIRE fake story on.' WSJ described the letter as a third-person note written in Trump's voice and ending with the line: 'A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.' US vice presient JD Vance slammed the article as false. 'Forgive my language but this story is complete and utter bulls—,' he wrote on X. 'The WSJ should be ashamed for publishing it.' Trump claims the allegations are part of a broader political plot. He accused the Democrats, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and former FBI director James Comey of being behind a 'Jeffrey Epstein hoax,' and suggested they should be investigated by the FBI. The article was published shortly after prosecutor Maurene Comey — daughter of James Comey and part of the Epstein-Maxwell investigations — was reportedly dismissed from her role. Trump has repeatedly denied any improper links to Epstein and claims he cut ties with the disgraced financier long before Epstein's 2008 conviction. Epstein died by suicide in a Manhattan jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Maxwell is currently serving a 20-year sentence for her role in recruiting underage girls.