30 Jun 2025 13:45 PM Britain, France and Germany condemn 'threats' against head of IAEA watchdog
Britain, France and Germany condemned on Monday what they described as threats against the head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog, after a hardline Iranian newspaper said IAEA boss Rafael Grossi should be tried and executed as an Israeli agent.
"France, Germany and the United Kingdom condemn threats against the Director General of the IAEA Rafael Grossi and reiterate our full support to the Agency and the DG in carrying out their mandate," said a joint statement issued by the foreign affairs ministries of those three countries.
"We call on Iranian authorities to refrain from any steps to cease cooperation with the IAEA. We urge Iran to immediately resume full cooperation in line with its legally binding obligations, and to take all necessary steps to ensure the safety and security of IAEA personnel," they added.
The three European countries are parties to a 2015 nuclear agreement with Iran.
Their joint statement did not specify what threats had been made against Grossi, but it follows an article in Iran's Kayhan newspaper, known for hardline views and closely associated with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, which accused Grossi of having ties to Israel's Mossad intelligence agency.
The newspaper said that, should Grossi enter Iran, he should be tried and sentenced to death.
Iranian officials have not publicly endorsed the newspaper article. Iran's ambassador to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, said there was no threat against Grossi.
Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said Grossi was not currently welcome in Iran, accusing him of having carried out "malign action" and playing a "regrettable role" that had led to Iran's parliament voting to suspend cooperation with the IAEA.
Iranian officials have long blamed the IAEA for providing justification used by Israel for its 12-day campaign of airstrikes against Iran, which began on June 13, a day after the IAEA's board declared Iran in violation of treaty obligations.
"Misleading narratives have dire consequences, Mr Grossi, and demand accountability," Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said on June 19.
On Monday, Iran said it could not be expected to guarantee the safety of IAEA inspectors so swiftly after its nuclear sites were hit by Israeli and U.S. strikes in war, which ended with a ceasefire last week.
"How can they expect us to ensure the safety and security of the agency's inspectors when Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities were attacked a few days ago?" Baghaei told a news conference.
Baghaei said the parliamentary bill calling for the government to withdraw cooperation with the IAEA had been approved by the Guardian Council, a security body controlled by appointees of the supreme leader, and carrying it out was now mandatory.
"Iran shouldn't be expected to accept its obligations under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) when the UN nuclear watchdog has stopped short of condemning the attacks on Iran's nuclear sites," Baghaei said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
MTV Lebanon
an hour ago
- MTV Lebanon
30 Jun 2025 19:22 PM UN: More than 250,000 Afghans left Iran in June
More than 256,000 Afghans left Iran in June alone, marking a surge in returns to Afghanistan since Tehran set a hard deadline for repatriations, the UN's migration agency said. The International Organization for Migration (IOM) recorded as many as 28,000 Afghans leaving Iran in a single day in June, after the Iranian regime ordered all undocumented Afghans to leave the country by 6 July. The number of Afghan refugees in neighbouring Iran has swelled since the Taliban regained control of Afghanistan in 2021, many of whom live without legal status. This has contributed to growing anti-Afghan sentiment in Iran, with refugees facing systemic discrimination. The IOM said more than 700,000 Afghans had left Iran since January, with spokesperson Avand Azeez Agha telling news agency AFP that 70% had been "forcibly sent back". The surge in repatriations - and the deadline - have come since Iran and Israel engaged in direct conflict with one another, beginning with Israel attacking nuclear and military sites in mid-June. A ceasefire has since been brokered. As the two exchanged daily strikes, the Iranian regime arrested several Afghan migrants it suspected of spying for Israel, state media reported. Following these claims, a new wave of deportations began. The semi-official Iranian Mehr news agency reported that police had been directed to accelerate deportations, though the police later denied this. "We're scared to go anywhere because there's always the fear they might accuse us of being spies," one Afghan migrant in Iran, who we are not naming to protect their identity, told BBC Persian. "At the checkpoints, they do body searches and check people's phones. If they find any messages or videos from foreign media on social networks, it could literally put someone's life in danger. "Many Iranians insult us, saying things like: 'you Afghans are spies' or 'you work for Israel'." Numerous reports in Iranian media indicate that even Afghans with valid visas and documentation have been forcibly deported. Some Afghans who were detained and later freed said they were accused by officials of betraying the country. Arafat Jamal, the UN's refugee co-ordinator for Afghanistan, said that while there was now a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, "the consequences of that war continue". "This movement pre-dates the war, but it has been exacerbated by it," he told BBC Pashto. "And what we hear from the returnees is a series of actions that have caused them to come back, some of them quite coercive, others not as much." Afghan refugees are not eligible for Iranian citizenship, even if they are born in the country, while many are unable to open bank accounts, buy SIM cards or live in certain areas. Employment opportunities are also heavily restricted, and are often limited to hard labour with low wages. In this latest push to remove them, Iranian authorities have also urged the public to report undocumented Afghans. "There are oppressors here, and there are oppressors there," a second Afghan in Iran said. "We migrants have never been free, never lived a free life." Another said "the future for Afghans living in Iran looks really bleak", adding: "The police are violent and humiliating, and now even the Basij [volunteer militia] have been tasked with arresting Afghans." The surge in repatriations comes after Pakistan accelerated its own drive to expel undocumented Afghans, saying it could no longer manage hosting them. Mr Jamal said the number of refugees returning to Afghanistan from both Iran and Pakistan this year was in excess of one million. While he thanked both nations for taking in millions of Afghans over the past few decades of instability, he urged them to seek a joint solution to the crisis. The UN director said humanitarian provisions at the border had been "overwhelmed", adding: "There is simply too many people coming back." Maulvi Abdul Salam Hanafi, deputy prime minister in the Taliban government, said on Saturday that talks with Iranian officials were under way over the issue. The Taliban's transport minister also said it was accelerating efforts to transport refugees from the border to their homes.
Nahar Net
3 hours ago
- Nahar Net
Iran decries 'destructive' conduct by IAEA chief
by Naharnet Newsdesk 30 June 2025, 16:59 Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian told his French counterpart Emmanuel Macron that Tehran halted cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog due to what he called the agency chief's "destructive" behavior towards the Islamic republic, his office said Monday. "The action taken by parliament members... is a natural response to the unjustified, unconstructive, and destructive conduct of the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency," Pezeshkian told Macron in a phone call late Sunday, according to a presidency statement. On Wednesday, Iranian lawmakers voted in favor of a bill to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, citing Israel's June 13 attack on the Islamic republic and later strikes by the United States on nuclear facilities. A ceasefire between Iran and Israel took hold on June 24. Since the start of the war with Israel, Iranian officials have sharply criticized the agency for failing to condemn the strikes. Iran has also criticized the watchdog for passing a resolution on June 12 accusing it of non-compliance with its nuclear obligations. In a Sunday post on X, Macron said he called for "respect for the ceasefire" and a return to negotiations to address "ballistic and nuclear issues." He further called for "the swift resumption of the IAEA's work in Iran to ensure full transparency." On Monday, France, Germany, and Britain condemned what they called "threats" against the IAEA chief Rafael Grossi after Iran rejected its request to visit nuclear facilities bombed during the war. None specified which threats they were referring to, but Iran's ultra-conservative Kayhan newspaper recently claimed documents showed Grossi was an Israeli spy and should be executed. Iran has said Grossi's request to visit bombed sites signaled "malign intent" but insisted that no threats were posed against Grossi or the agency's inspectors. On Monday, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said the Iranian parliament's decision to halt cooperation with the IAEA reflected the "concern and anger of the Iranian public opinion." He further criticized the United States and European powers for maintaining what he described as a "political approach" toward Iran's nuclear program during his weekly press conference. Baqaei also questioned how the safety of IAEA inspectors could be ensured while the extent of the damage to Iran's nuclear facilities -- targeted by Israel and the United States during the 12-day war -- remains unknown. "One aspect of this issue is how to ensure the safety and security of the agency's inspectors, in a situation where there is still no accurate assessment of the severity of the damage," he said.
Nahar Net
3 hours ago
- Nahar Net
Hezbollah's Qmati says deadline must be set for Israel not for Hezbollah
by Naharnet Newsdesk 3 hours Hezbollah political bureau member Mahmoud Qmati has said that a deadline must be set for Israel and not for Hezbollah, calling again for Israel's halt of attacks and withdrawal from south Lebanon before demanding Hezbollah to disarm. Qmati said Sunday that liberating the five occupied hills in south Lebanon, freeing the Lebanese prisoners, halting the "Israeli aggression and violations", and the "unconditional reconstruction" of war-hit regions have always been a national priority to the President, the Prime Minister and the Lebanese government. "These are not just Hezbollah's demands but an official Lebanese stance," Qmati said, adding that the U.S., although leading the ceasefire committee, is encouraging Israel to keep its attacks on Lebanon in order to put political and military pressure on the country. Qmati said that the conditions for reconstruction are humiliating, and that the priorities -- liberating the five occupied hills, freeing the Lebanese prisoners, halting the Israeli violations, and the unconditional reconstruction -- must be implemented before any domestic dialogue about Hezbollah's arms or any discussion about a defense strategy. "How can we have such a dialogue while our land is still occupied, prisoners are still in (Israeli) jails, and daily aggressions continue?" They want to change the priorities, they want the Lebanese to focus on one demand: the disarmament of the resistance, Qmati said. "We have cooperated and participated in all national junctures. The (Israeli) enemy is the side that must respect its deadlines, not the resistance." Israel has repeatedly bombed Lebanon despite the November ceasefire aimed at ending over a year of hostilities with Hezbollah. Under the ceasefire deal, Hezbollah was to pull its fighters back north of the Litani river and Israel was required to fully withdraw its troops from the country, but has kept them in five locations in south Lebanon that it deems strategic. But whether Hezbollah must first disarm or Israel must first withdraw remains a chicken and egg situation, and Israel, despite the ceasefire, has struck regions north of the Litani, and deep inside Lebanon, including Beirut's southern suburbs.
