
Two Edmonton teens found guilty in fatal group attack outside school
Court of King's Bench Justice Peter Michalyshyn handed down his decision Monday for a pair of young men referred to in court as D.P. and S.G.
They're among a group of seven young people charged after a fatal attack on April 8, 2022. At the time, their ages ranged from 14 to 17.
None of them can be named under the Youth Criminal Justice Act. Additional publication bans are also in place for the name of the victim and the school he attended.
The two teens found guilty on Monday were 14 and 16 on the day of the assault.
There isn't evidence that either of them stabbed the victim, but Michalyshyn said they were nonetheless part of a five-on-one assault that involved weapons.
"The wounds were inflicted at some point in the swarming attack, in which both [teenagers] were active participants," Michalyshyn said.
"It is unnecessary to determine who delivered the fatal blow. All members of the group are equally morally blameworthy."
The judge determined the teens' involvement was in a random attack, and there wasn't evidence of planning from either of them.
One of the teens, D.P., was captured on surveillance video armed with a field hockey stick during the attack.
Michalyshyn said he didn't believe the young man's explanation for his actions when he took the stand in his own defence.
"I do not believe him that his actions were just intended to impress the girls or people he was with," Michalyshyn said.
While the teenager denied hitting the victim with the hockey stick, Michalyshyn said he believed eyewitness testimony that it happened at least once.
"There is no evidence the striking contributed to the victim's death … but it clearly contributed to the atmosphere of fear and intimidation [he] was a part of."
With the conclusion of this trial, only one remains — a teen whose manslaughter trial was adjourned last year, and is set to resume in March.
A sentencing date will be set later this year for the two young men in this case.
Four people have been sentenced to date after pleading guilty:
A woman who was 17 at the time of the attack admitted that she drove a car away from the scene. She pleaded guilty to accessory after the fact to an assault with a weapon, and was sentenced to 12 months probation.
A young man who was 15 at the time admitted to driving a different car from the scene. He pleaded guilty to the same charge and received the same sentence as the driver of the other vehicle.
A teen who was 15 at the time admitted to being part of a group assault on the victim, but did not stab or punch him. The teen pleaded guilty to manslaughter and received four months in jail.
A teen who was 14 at the time admitted to stabbing the victim once and pleaded guilty to manslaughter. He was sentenced to 18 months in jail followed by 18 months of probation.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Sun
5 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
Immigration to Canada not a right, Saskatchewan court rules
Decision stems from applicant's ties to India-based travel broker allegedly offering bogus degrees and job offer letters Immigrating to Canada is not a right, a Saskatchewan court has ruled. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY The case, as reported by Blacklock's Reporter, stems from a lab technician from India whose decision to use a sketchy immigration broker resulted in her work permit being revoked. Try refreshing your browser, or Immigration to Canada not a right, Saskatchewan court rules Try refreshing your browser, or Article content 'Foreign nationals do not have a right to immigrate to Canada,' wrote Justice Andrew Davis, of the province's Court of King's Bench. 'Neither is there any right to a privileged immigration process.' The technician was granted a work permit under the 'occupation in demand' category of Saskatchewan's Immigrant Nominee Program, which was revoked due to her decision to employ Travel Jockey Immigration & Holidays of Surat, India — located about 300 km north of Mumbai. Evidence entered during the hearing included allegations that Travel Jockey offered fake job offer letters and fake college degrees for $1,000 a piece, and the would-be technician's permit was revoked despite her denials and explanations of irregularities in her application. 'Program integrity is essential to a workable immigration system,' Davis wrote in his decision, adding the province was broad powers in accepting or denying immigrants. 'It is essential to maintaining public confidence in and support for a government's immigration policies.'


Winnipeg Free Press
2 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Nova Scotia contractor sues Manitoba government, claims breach of whistleblower legislation
A Nova Scotia man is suing the province over claims his consulting contract with the Manitoba government wasn't renewed because he filed a whistleblower complaint about its handling of a software project. In a statement of claim filed in Court of King's Bench earlier this month, David Morash claims the government breached the provincial Whistleblower Protection Act and its contract with his company. Morash was contracted in 2023 by a computing consultant, working for the province, to manage an information technology project updating and integrating data processing and software programs into a single system for the provincial government, according to Morash's lawsuit. The court papers claim the contract wasn't renewed because he disclosed information to the Manitoba ombudsman related to 'gross mismanagement of a public fund or asset.' The contract was extended in January 2024, but in August that same year, Morash provided information to the ombudsman, alleging wrongdoing in the province's consumer protection and government services department. Specifically, Morash alleged, the project was 'being grossly mismanaged by the defendant, resulting in resource and financial mismanagement.' Before he disclosed information to the ombudsman's office, he tried to raise his concerns with government representatives, but an unnamed 'executive representative,' who was a lead on the project, told him to make a formal disclosure to the ombudsman instead, the court papers claim. Morash was told in November last year that the ombudsman would look into the matter. The court papers claim the government benefited from his complaint, with personnel on the project restructured. His contract then wasn't renewed in January and a new project manager was brought on, Morash alleges, claiming the province not renewing the contract constitutes misfeasance in public office. Morash claims he also made a complaint to the ombudsman about the expired contract, but the ombudsman's office told him in March it wouldn't investigate because it does not have the authority to probe reprisal complaints from contractors, only public employees. He claims to have suffered loss of income and out-of-pocket expenses, as well as psychological and emotional harm. He's seeking unspecified monetary damages. The provincial government has yet to respond to the claim with a statement of defence and the matter hasn't been heard in court. Erik Pindera Reporter Erik Pindera is a reporter for the Free Press, mostly focusing on crime and justice. The born-and-bred Winnipegger attended Red River College Polytechnic, wrote for the community newspaper in Kenora, Ont. and reported on television and radio in Winnipeg before joining the Free Press in 2020. Read more about Erik. Every piece of reporting Erik produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.


Global News
2 days ago
- Global News
3rd teen convicted of manslaughter in Halifax mall parking garage stabbing
A teenaged boy has been found guilty of manslaughter in the 2024 death of a Syrian teenager who was stabbed in a Halifax parking garage. Ahmad Al Marrach, 16, was a Grade 10 student at Citadel High School who had come to Canada with his family from Syria in 2016. In April 2024, he was attacked by a group of teenagers in a parking garage next to the Halifax Shopping Centre and later died in hospital. On Tuesday, a teen — who was 16 at the time of the crime — found guilty of manslaughter by a judge after a youth court trial that began in January. Police responded to a report of an injured person in the Halifax Shopping Centre parking lot on April 22, 2024. The injured male youth, who was later identified as 16-year-old Ahmad Al Marrach, was taken to hospital where he later died. Provided/Al Marrach family He and three other teens charged in connection with Al Marrach's death — a girl and two boys — were all initially charged with second-degree murder. Story continues below advertisement Their names and any details that could be used to identify them are protected from publication under the Youth Criminal Justice Act. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy One of the boys, who was 14 at the time, pleaded guilty in January to second-degree murder, admitting that he was the one who stabbed the Grade 10 student with a stolen kitchen knife. Another boy, who was 17 at the time, pleaded guilty in October to manslaughter. The girl was sentenced this past April to three more months in custody, followed by 24 months of rehabilitation in the community, as part of the Intensive Rehabilitative Custody and Supervision program. Court has previously heard the deadly brawl was prompted by a disagreement over a girl involved with Al Marrach and one of the accused. 2:15 Stabbing victim Ahmad Al Marrach's mother says court process has been disappointing — with a file from The Canadian Press