UK workers' rights bill ‘undermines devolution', Senedd
But the Plaid Cymru politician expressed serious concerns about powers in the bill for UK ministers to override decisions made by the Welsh Government.
He told the Senedd: 'We are seeing provisions that encroach on the ability of this [Welsh] Government and this place to legislate on behalf of the people of Wales.'
Mr Fletcher said: 'In the same way the Welsh Government would've opposed such a power grab in the days of a Tory government, I would hope they would do exactly the same now.'
Peter Fox, who chairs the health committee, expressed similar concerns, saying: 'The Welsh Government has a long-standing commitment to promote fair pay in the social care workforce, yet has not brought forward its own bill.
'The effect of this choice is to severely limit the opportunities for stakeholders in Wales to be involved in the legislative process and for the Senedd to examine the policy in detail.'
Warning of a £5bn cost to businesses, his Conservative colleague Altaf Hussain said his party would vote against providing consent to the employment rights bill.
He told the Senedd: 'Although the intentions behind this legislation appear commendable, I am concerned about the significant burden it will impose on businesses across the UK.'
Jack Sargeant, who is minister for fair work in the Welsh Government, said the bill will be the single biggest upgrade to workers' rights in a generation.
Mr Sargeant told Senedd members: 'It enhances employment rights, it strengthens enforcement and it removes unnecessary restrictions on trade unions.'
He agreed with Ms Blythyn, one of his predecessors as minister: 'I do note some of the concerns from some members in the contributions today but we do believe it's very much in the best interest of the social care sector and social care workers in Wales.'
Senedd members voted 27-13 in favour of the LCM on July 15, with Plaid Cymru abstaining.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
43 minutes ago
- BBC News
Syria: Bedouins tell BBC they could return to fighting Druze
Bedouin fighters positioned outside the southern Syrian city of Suweida have told the BBC they will observe a ceasefire with the Druze community there, but have not ruled out resuming hostilities. The Bedouin fighters have retreated from the city to surrounding villages in the province after a week of deadly sectarian clashes between Druze fighters, Bedouins and government forces, with Israel carrying out air strikes in support of the Sunday a UK-based monitoring group said there was a "cautious calm" in the region - but later said tribal fighters had attacked the town of al-Mazara'a - a Druze town until last week when it was taken over by the Bedouin and now under Syrian government control - smoke could be seen across the fields rising from Suweida a nearby checkpoint a mound of dirt cut across the road. Dozens of government security personnel were standing along it, all heavily armed and blocking the Bedouin from re-entering the of Bedouin fighters, many firing guns into the air, crowded the want the release of injured Bedouin people still in the city of Suweida, who they refer to as hostages. Otherwise, they say, they will force their way past the checkpoint and head back into the city."We did what the government have ordered us and we are committed to the agreement, and the government words and we came back, Suweida is 35km far from here," a tribal elder told the BBC."Currently our hostages and wounded are there, they are refusing to give us anyone... If they don't commit to the agreement we are going to enter again, even if Suweida will become our cemetery." Long-running tensions between Druze and Bedouin tribes erupted into deadly sectarian clashes a week ago, after the abduction of a Druze merchant on the road to the capital President Ahmed al-Sharaa's government responded by deploying forces to the city. Druze residents of Suweida told the BBC they had witnessed "barbaric acts" as gunmen - government forces and foreign fighters - attacked people. Israel targeted these forces, saying they were acting to protect the forces withdrew and Druze and Bedouin fighters subsequently clashed. Both Druze and Bedouin fighters have been accused of atrocities over the past seven days, as well as members of the security forces and individuals affiliated with the interim Saturday, al-Sharaa announced a ceasefire and sent security forces to Suweida to end the Druze fighters are once again in control of the city. But more than 1,120 people have been killed, the UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) dead included 427 Druze fighters and 298 Druze civilians, 194 of whom were "summarily executed by defence and interior ministry personnel", the monitor 354 government security personnel and 21 Sunni Bedouin were also killed, three of them civilians who it said were "summarily executed by Druze fighters". Another 15 government troops were killed in Israeli strikes, it said. At least 128,000 people have been displaced by the violence, the UN migration agency said on Sunday. Suweida city has a severe medical supply shortage, the SOHR said.A first humanitarian convoy from the Syrian Red Crescent has reportedly reached the city. Israel's public broadcaster reported that Israel had sent medical aid to the Secretary of State Marco Rubio meanwhile has demanded that the government "hold accountable and bring to justice anyone guilty of atrocities including those in their own ranks" to preserve the possibility of a united and peaceful Mia'rbah, south-west of Suweida, Bedouin refugees gathered at what used to be a school. The village still bore the scars from years of civil war, with buildings lying in ruins and strewn with bullet holes. At the aid distribution centres elderly Bedouin women collected water from a tank on the back of the truck. Most of the people there were women and children. Asked whether she thought Bedouin and Druze could live together, one woman displaced from Suweida city said it would depend on the government in Damascus. "They can live together if the government will take over and rule, and if the government will provide peace and security," she the absence of government authority, she said she believed that Bedouin could not trust the Druze."They are traitors, without peace and security we can't live with them," she reporting by Jack Burgess
Rhyl Journal
2 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Water bills to see ‘small, steady' rise despite reform plans, says Reed
Steve Reed is expected to set out plans for 'root and branch reform' of the water sector on Monday, following the publication of a landmark review of the industry. Those plans are thought to include action to tackle sewage spills, invest in water infrastructure and the abolition of the industry's beleaguered regulator Ofwat as ministers seek to avoid a repeat of this year's 26% increase in bills. But while Mr Reed has promised that families will never again see 'huge shock hikes' to their bills, he was unable on Sunday to rule out further above-inflation increases. Although he told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips that bills should be 'as low as possible', he added that there needed to be 'appropriate bill rises' to secure 'appropriate levels of investment'. He said: 'A small, steady increase in bills is what people expect.' Government sources have argued that the recent large rise in bills was necessary to pay for investment in long-neglected infrastructure, but expect Mr Reed's promised reforms to make further rises unnecessary. Asked about the possibility of expanding social tariffs to help households struggling with bills – a move that could see wealthier families pay more – Mr Reed said he had 'not been convinced yet' that this was necessary. Earlier on Sunday, Mr Reed had pledged to halve sewage pollution in England by 2030, after the Environment Agency said serious pollution incidents had risen by 60% in 2024. Mr Reed said the measures the Government was taking would enable it to significantly reduce pollution, with the aim of completely eliminating it by 2035 should it be re-elected. He also suggested to the BBC that he would resign if the 2030 target was not achieved, provided he was still in the same job by then. His comments come before a major report by former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, which is expected to recommend sweeping reform to water regulation on Monday. Sir Jon has been widely reported to be preparing to recommend the abolition of Ofwat, which has faced criticism over its handling of sewage spills and allowing water companies to pay large dividends while taking on significant debt and missing targets for investing in infrastructure. On Sunday, Mr Reed would not say whether he would scrap Ofwat, but also declined to say he had confidence in the regulator. He told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg: 'The regulator is clearly failing.' Sir Jon's interim report criticised regulation of the water sector, which is split between economic regulator Ofwat, the Environment Agency and the Drinking Water Inspectorate. But on Sunday, Conservative shadow communities secretary Kevin Hollinrake said he would be concerned any changes 'might just be shuffling the deckchairs on the Titanic'. He told the BBC: 'It's really important the regulator's effective, and we put in a lot of measures to give Ofwat more powers to regulate the water industry and a lot of those things were very effective.' Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said he backed scrapping Ofwat, calling for a new Clean Water Authority to 'hold these water companies to account'. Sir Ed has also called for the Government to go further and aim to eliminate sewage pollution entirely by 2030, saying voters were 'fed up with empty promises from ministers while Britain's waterways continue to be ruined by sewage'. He added: 'For years water companies have paid out millions in dividends and bonuses. It would be deeply unfair if customers are now made to pick up the tab for this scandal through higher bills.' Although sweeping regulatory reform is likely to be on the table, full nationalisation of the industry will not be after the Government excluded it from Sir Jon's terms of reference. Smaller parties such as the Greens have called for nationalisation, while on Sunday Reform UK's Nigel Farage said he would look to strike a deal with the private sector to bring 50% of the water industry under public ownership. But Mr Farage was unable to say how much this would cost, leading Labour to accuse him of having 'nothing to offer apart from bluster', and shadow Treasury minister Gareth Davies to say he was 'flogging billion-pound promises with no plans to deliver them'. Mr Reed argued nationalisation would cost 'upwards of £100 billion', diverting resources from the NHS and taking years during which pollution would get worse.
Pembrokeshire Herald
3 hours ago
- Pembrokeshire Herald
NHS in Wales to offer protection for premature babies against respiratory virus
A 'KANGAROO COURT' on the Covid-19 pandemic will be formally disbanded after members quit, but another Senedd committee will take over rather than a judge-led Wales-specific inquiry. At least 13,000 people died in Wales during the pandemic but, more than five years later, Senedd scrutiny of the decisions made in Cardiff Bay has stalled – if it ever got going. Elin Jones, the Senedd's speaker or Llywydd, announced the end of the 'Wales Covid-19 inquiry special purpose committee', which was set up to look at gaps in the UK inquiry. In March, Tom Giffard, its co-chair, and his Conservative colleague Sam Rowlands quit the committee after Labour blocked calls for witnesses to swear an oath. He said he had no confidence in the committee, saying he would no longer associate himself with a process 'seemingly designed to protect those it is supposed to hold to account'. The Welsh Government refused to set up a judge-led Wales-specific inquiry in the wake of the pandemic like in Scotland, where a public inquiry was established to learn lessons. Ms Jones announced the committee would be dissolved in the autumn after months of wrangling behind closed doors, with the Senedd's public accounts committee picking up the baton. Llywydd Elin Jones In a statement on July 16, she said: 'Due to the breakdown of the co-chair model that was adopted, it hasn't been possible for the committee to proceed with its work. 'It's been evident through discussions… that a different model will be required to move forward with the committee's scrutiny of this vital work.' Mark Isherwood chairs the public accounts committee which will now lead scrutiny of gaps identified by the Covid committee in its report on module one. The Conservative expressed concerns about the committee's capacity and the limited time left in this Senedd term, with an election on the horizon in May 2026. Conservative MS Mark Isherwood But he said: 'We have agreed to take on the task that has been asked of us to ensure that some scrutiny of these important matters is done within this Senedd – rather than none. 'While there is scope within the committee's work plan to accommodate some work on module one during the autumn term, this work will be limited and the scope of our work will need to be sharp and focused. 'Our work on module two will depend on when the report is published and will naturally be limited in any event, with issues potentially arising for our legacy report.' He stressed: 'We may not be best placed to pursue this work. And we cannot be sure any outcome will be sufficiently comprehensive to satisfactorily address the issues arising from the module one report, rather than through a Wales-specific public inquiry…. However, we will do our best to conduct work as effectively as we can within these constraints.' Mr Isherwood said the committee will want to take evidence from First Minister Eluned Morgan, given her responsibility for civil contingencies in Wales. Mabon ap Gwynfor said: 'Unfortunately, the main lesson that we've learned over the past few years is that the Welsh Government has an ongoing hatred of accountability.' Plaid Cymru's shadow health secretary paid tribute to the Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice Cymru group for their tireless campaigning on the issue. Mr ap Gwynfor expressed concerns about the 'shambolic' handling of the Covid committee, with months 'wasted debating the actual purpose of the special purposes committee'. He criticised the Tories for 'pulling the plug' on a committee they had a hand in setting up, saying: 'They're now proposing to belatedly re-enter the conversation by chairing a separate committee that also doesn't have any authority to compel oathtaking.' James Evans, the Conservatives' shadow health secretary, reiterated his party's position that a specific Covid inquiry is the only way Wales will get the focus and answers it needs. His colleague Mr Giffard said resigning from the committee he co-chaired was never his preferred outcome but it was better than the alternative: 'Presiding over a kangaroo court that would never have got to the bottom of the issues that the families deserve.' Conservative MS Tom Giffard Julie James, for the Welsh Government, urged Mr Giffard, a public accounts committee member, to reflect on his 'disgraceful' depiction of the Covid committee as a kangaroo court. At the outset, families led by Anna-Louise Marsh-Rees feared the 'not-fit-for-any-purpose' committee would be whitewashed by politicians marking their own homework. Following the latest debate, she said: 'It's clear to everyone there must be a Welsh inquiry into the handling of the pandemic in Wales and the continued failure to hold one is because the current government does not want its actions to be scrutinised.'
