I Know Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale Is Going To Be Emotional, But The First Footage Had A Surprise Moment I Didn't Expect
There are some sequels fans just want to dive into as soon as possible, but I don't think Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale is one of them. At least, that's my subjective opinion about this upcoming 2025 movie schedule entry, because it's going to bring creator Julian Fellowes' iconic British drama to a resounding close.
Now the first footage has finally released to the public, I'm doubling down on my feelings, as it features an emotional scene with a typically stoic member of the Crawley family that feels sure to bring the house down.
So what is the scene in Focus Features' upcoming drama? It's one where Robert Crawley (Hugh Bonneville) plants a kiss on one of those very recognizable front walls. After all of the ups, downs, and everything in-between experienced in that stately manor, the teaser continues to sum it all up in a phrase we've seen since Downton Abbey 3's title reveal: 'It's time to say goodbye.'
I just don't want to, despite knowing better going into this trailer. I let myself get caught up in beautiful little glimpses of Lady Mary (Michelle Dockery) showing up to an event dressed in her finest, the return of Julian Levinson (Paul Giamatti) being marked by his trademark ebullience, and a bunch of the family showing up to a horse racing event. But then came that moment where the Paddington franchise star bid farewell to his familial home. A scene that may have been in the works for longer than we thought.
Before doing the required deep dive to revisit Downton Abbey's previous adventures through my Peacock subscription, the vague recollection that the Crawley's beautiful home has always been on the verge of bankruptcy has always been on my mind. And for a while, one year in particular on the calendar has stuck out as a potential stumbling block to the family fortune - 1929.
Seeing as that's when the American financial system suffered its first major crisis, and part of the money that's kept Downton afloat is from Cora's side of the family. Elizabeth McGovern's Cora, the American fixture in the ITV hit, has been the connection to various lifelines, for better or worse. With this movie being announced as taking place in 1930, the moment has passed, and consequences will start to take shape - with plenty of Downton Abbey 3 cast members still waiting to take their places.
Which now introduces the possibility that Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale may see her brother Julius coming to collect in some manner or another. Let's not forget Paul Giamatti's cryptic Downton 3 tease where he said he does 'something of real significance.'
Peacock TV: from $7.99 a month/$79.99 a yearFor a little as $7.99 a month, Peacock TV is your streaming gateway to almost all of the Downton Abbey legacy. All six seasons, plus the previous sequel film A New Era, are snuggly housed in its library - waiting for you to enjoy! Of course, if you want to watch like the Crawley's modern descendants would, you can sign up for the ad-free Peacock Premium tier, and skip the commercials! View Deal
Though now that I think about it, could the return of Guy Dexter (Dominic West) be an indication that he may want to secure the location as his own? You have to admit, that possibility would not only keep Thomas Barrow (Rob James-Collier) in the house he rose through the ranks serving, it'd also be a way to keep the household staff on board after the transition.
I think even Barrows' former foe Mr. Carson (Jim Carter) would begrudgingly admit that this is making the best of a sad situation. In either of these scenarios, the Crawley era of Downton Abbey looks to be at its end.
The real questions left to answer are where will its inhabitants go, who will be the new owner, and is it really for the best that Matthew Goode won't be appearing in The Grand Finale? Save your energy, and your tears, as we've got until September 12th to think of what to say about the end of this pop culture favorite.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Country Star Says He's 'Blessed' As He Shares Engagement News
Congratulations are in order for Zac Brown and Kendra Scott, country music's newest engaged couple! On Thursday, July 24, PEOPLE revealed that the Zac Brown Band frontman popped the question to the jewelry designer with a jaw-dropping pink diamond ring at sunset. "We are so happy and grateful that we found each other," the couple told PEOPLE, and continue to swoon to anyone and everyone who asks. Just this morning, the 'Chicken Fried' singer echoed the sentiment on TODAY while performing for their 2025 Citi Concert Series. 'What are you gonna get somebody that designs jewelry?' Zac joked on stage when asked about how he popped the question. "But it's incredible, incredible. So happy... We're so happy we found each other and we're blessed. It just adds so much energy to everything else. More to give to music, more to give to our families and everything, so we're blessed." All the while, the camera panned to Kendra, who was nodding along during her fiancé's speech and cheering throughout his performances. Zac and Kendra debuted their relationship to the public back in May while walking the 2025 American Music Awards red carpet. Fans were thrilled for the lovebirds back then and even more so now. 'This is wonderful news to wake up to. Congratulations,' one fan exclaimed on the TODAY show's Instagram post. 'Happy for y'all,' someone else commented. 'Such a lovely couple, sending many blessings for you both,' another fan chimed in. As happy as some fans are for Zac and Kendra, many others are dismayed by how quickly he's moved on, as his legal battle with second wife Kelly Yadzi continues. One can only imagine what it must be like to go through a divorce, let alone one in the public eye. Here's hoping it works out for everyone involved. You Might Also Like 70 Impressive Tiny Houses That Maximize Function and Style 30+ Paint Colors That Will Instantly Transform Your Kitchen Solve the daily Crossword
Vox
42 minutes ago
- Vox
How to make the hardest choices of your life
is a senior reporter for Vox's Future Perfect and co-host of the Future Perfect podcast. She writes primarily about the future of consciousness, tracking advances in artificial intelligence and neuroscience and their staggering ethical implications. Before joining Vox, Sigal was the religion editor at the Atlantic. Your Mileage May Vary is an advice column offering you a unique framework for thinking through your moral dilemmas. It's based on value pluralism — the idea that each of us has multiple values that are equally valid but that often conflict with each other. To submit a question, fill out this anonymous form. Here's this week's question from a reader, condensed and edited for clarity: I'm soon to be a part of the legal profession. I went to law school to advocate for marginalized populations who seldom have their voices heard — people who are steamrolled by unethical landlords, employers, corporations, etc. I will clerk after law school, and then I'll encounter my first major fork in the road: whether I pursue employment in a corporate firm or nonprofit/government. Corporate firms, ultimately, serve profitable clients, sometimes to the detriment of marginalized populations. Corporate firms also pay significantly better. Nonprofit or government work serves the populations I want to work for and alongside, but often pays under the area median income. I'll be 32 by the time I reach this fork, and I don't know what to do. I'm extremely fortunate in that I won't have law school debt — I was on a full ride. Still, I'm not 'flush.' I want to buy a house one day, have some kids with my partner, feel financially secure enough to do so. I also want to have a morally congruent career and not enable (what I consider) systems of oppression. What do I do? Dear Fork in the Road, Your question reminds me of another would-be lawyer: a very bright American woman named Ruth Chang. When she was graduating from college, she felt torn between two careers: Should she become a philosopher or should she become a lawyer? She loved the learning that life in a philosophy department would provide. But she'd grown up in an immigrant family, and she worried about ending up unemployed. Lawyering seemed like the financially safe bet. She got out some notepaper, drew a line down the middle, and tried to make a pro/con list that would reveal which was the better option. But the pro/con list was powerless to help her, because there was no better option. Each option was better in some ways and worse in others, but neither was better overall. Have a question you want me to answer in the next Your Mileage May Vary column? Feel free to email me at or fill out this anonymous form! Newsletter subscribers will get my column before anyone else does and their questions will be prioritized for future editions. Sign up here! So Chang did what many of us do when facing a hard choice: She chose the safe bet. She became a lawyer. Soon enough, she realized that lawyering was a poor fit for her personality, so she made a U-turn and became — surprise, surprise — a philosopher. And guess what she ended up devoting several years to studying? Hard choices! Choices like hers. Choices like yours. The kind where the pro/con list doesn't really help, because neither option is better on balance than the other. Here's what Chang came to understand about hard choices: It's a misconception to think they're hard because of our own ignorance. We shouldn't think, 'There is a superior option, I just can't know what it is, so the best move is always to go with the safer option.' Instead, Chang says, hard choices are genuinely hard because no best option exists. But that doesn't mean they're both equally good options. If two options are equally good, then you could decide by just flipping a coin, because it really doesn't matter which you choose. But can you imagine ever choosing your career based on a coin toss? Or flipping a coin to choose whether to live in the city or the country, or whether to marry your current partner or that ex you've been pining for? Of course not! We intuitively sense that that would be absurd, because we're not simply choosing between equivalent options. So what's really going on? In a hard choice, Chang argues, we're choosing between options that are 'on a par' with each other. She explains: When alternatives are on a par, it may matter very much which you choose. But one alternative isn't better than the other. Rather, the alternatives are in the same neighborhood of value, in the same league of value, while at the same time being very different in kind of value. That's why the choice is hard. To concretize this, think of the difference between lemon sorbet and apple pie. Both taste extremely delicious — they're in the same league of deliciousness. The kind of deliciousness they deliver, however, is different. It matters which one you choose, because each will give you a very different experience: The lemon sorbet is delicious in a tart and refreshing way, the apple pie in a sweet and comforting way. Now let's consider your dilemma, which isn't really about whether to do nonprofit work or to become a corporate lawyer, but about the values underneath: advocating for marginalized populations on the one hand, and feeling financially secure enough to raise a family on the other. Both of these values are in the same league as each other, because each delivers something of fundamental value to a human life: living in line with moral commitments or feeling a sense of safety and belonging. That means that no matter how long you spend on a pro/con list, the external world isn't going to supply reasons that tip the scales. Chang continues: When alternatives are on a par, the reasons given to us — the ones that determine whether we're making a mistake — are silent as to what to do. It's here in the space of hard choices that we get to exercise our normative power: the power to create reasons for yourself. By that, Chang means that you have to put your own agency into the choice. You have to say, 'This is what I stand for. I'm the kind of person who's for X, even if that means I can't fulfill Y!' And then, through making that hard choice, you become that person. So ask yourself: Who do you want to be? Do you want to be the kind of person who serves profitable clients, possibly to the detriment of marginalized people, in order to be able to provide generously for a family? Or do you want to advocate for those who most need an advocate, even if it means you can't afford to own property or send your kids to the best schools? What is more important to you? Or, to ask this question in a different way: What kind of person would you want your future children to see you as? What legacy do you want to leave? Only you can make this choice and, by making it, choose who you are to be. I know this sounds hard — and it is! But it's good-hard. In fact, it's one of the most awesome things about the human condition. Because if there was always a best alternative to be found in every choice you faced, you would be rationally compelled to choose that alternative. You would be like a marionette on the fingers of the universe, forced to move this way, not that. But instead, you're free — we're free — and that is a beautiful thing. Because we get the precious opportunity to make hard choices, Chang writes, 'It is not facts beyond our agency that determine whether we should lead this kind of life rather than that, but us.' Bonus: What I'm reading Chang's paper ' Hard Choices ' is a pleasure to read — but if you want an easier entry-point into her philosophy, check out her TED talk or the two cartoons that she says summarize her research interests. I cannot stop thinking about the cartoon showing a person pulling their own marionette strings. In the AI world, when researchers think about how to teach an AI model to be good, they've too often resorted to the idea of inculcating a single ethical theory into the model. So I'm relieved to see that some researchers in the field are finally taking value pluralism seriously. This new paper acknowledges that it's important to adopt an approach that 'does not impose any singular vision of human flourishing but rather seeks to prevent sociotechnical systems from collapsing the diversity of human values into oversimplified metrics.' It even cites our friend Ruth Chang! We love to see it. Nobel-winning Polish poet Wisława Szymborska has a witty poem, ' A Word on Statistics ,' that asks how many of us, out of every hundred people, exhibit certain qualities. For example: 'those who always know better: fifty-two. Unsure of every step: almost all the rest.' It's a clever meditation on all the different kinds of people we could choose to become.
New York Post
43 minutes ago
- New York Post
King Charles' godson Hugh Grosvenor and wife welcome first child, reveal unique name
Oh, baby! Prince William's longtime friend, Hugh Grosvenor, has welcomed his first child with wife Olivia Henson. The Duke and Duchess of Westminster confirmed they had welcomed a baby girl a year after their lavish nuptials at which William served as an usher. 4 Prince William's longtime friend, Hugh Grosvenor, has welcomed his first child with wife Olivia Henson. Grosvenor2023/PA The pair also revealed their newborn daughter's unique name, Cosima Florence Grosvenor. 'The Duke and Duchess of Westminster are thrilled to announce the birth of their baby daughter,' a spokesperson for the couple said in a statement. 'Both the duchess and Cosima are doing well. The duke and duchess now look forward to spending this special time together as a family.' The duke, 34, is a close friend of princes William and Harry, and serves as the godfather to both Prince George and Prince Archie. Despite his close friendship with the Duke of Sussex, Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle, declined the invitation to attend the nuptials, which took place in June 2024. 4 The Duke and Duchess of Westminster confirmed they had welcomed a baby girl a year after their lavish nuptials. Getty Images 4 Prince William served as an usher at Grosvenor's June 2024 wedding. Getty Images The wedding proved to be a who's who among the British elite, with the Sunday Times describing it as 'the most royal non-royal wedding of the year, with members of Britain's oldest and wealthiest aristocratic families heading north.' The couple said their 'I Do's' at Chester Cathedral, before inviting around 400 special guests — including the future king and Princess Eugenie — to go to a lavish reception at Eaton Hall. Grosvenor, whose inherited fortune is reportedly worth an estimated $12.6 billion, was introduced to Henson by mutual friends in 2021. Follow The Post's royal family live blog for the latest pics, news, exclusive details and more He became an instant billionaire at age 25 following his father's unexpected death in 2016 when he inherited his title and control of the historic Grosvenor Estate. Grosvenor and his wife announced they were expecting a new addition to their family. 4 The duke, 34, is a close friend of princes William and Harry, and serves as the godfather to both Prince George and Prince Archie. AFP via Getty Images 'The Duchess is expecting a baby in the summer. The couple are delighted with the news and are very much looking forward to starting a family together,' a spokesperson for the duo said in March. The pair, who kickstarted their relationship in 2021, announced their engagement in April 2023.
